'Exploited' investors lose fortune, $280m fines mulled
Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020.
Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December.
The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets.
The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms.
EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday.
The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said.
"In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney.
The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct.
Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said.
EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment".
ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future.
EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place.
The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly.
Justice Wigney rejected those allegations.
EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found.
The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said.
"EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time.
The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products.
Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies.
The hearing continues.
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines.
Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020.
Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December.
The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets.
The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms.
EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday.
The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said.
"In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney.
The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct.
Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said.
EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment".
ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future.
EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place.
The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly.
Justice Wigney rejected those allegations.
EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found.
The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said.
"EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time.
The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products.
Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies.
The hearing continues.
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines.
Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020.
Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December.
The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets.
The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms.
EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday.
The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said.
"In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney.
The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct.
Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said.
EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment".
ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future.
EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place.
The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly.
Justice Wigney rejected those allegations.
EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found.
The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said.
"EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time.
The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products.
Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies.
The hearing continues.
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines.
Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020.
Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December.
The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets.
The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms.
EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday.
The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said.
"In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney.
The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct.
Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said.
EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment".
ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future.
EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place.
The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly.
Justice Wigney rejected those allegations.
EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found.
The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said.
"EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time.
The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products.
Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies.
The hearing continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
23 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Live updates in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' trial as jury deliberates
Jury members in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex-trafficking trial have been ordered to deliberate further after failing to reach a decision on one count. On day two of deliberations following the music mogul's six-week trial in New York, the 12-person panel had decided on four out of five counts but couldn't agree on the charge of racketeering conspiracy, resulting in a hung-jury. In a note sent to the judge at 4pm, local time, the judge was informed that members were deadlocked, with their opinions 'unpersuadable', per CNN. Members had reached a partial verdict, agreeing on the charges of sex trafficking of Cassie Ventura, transportation for prostitution of Ms Ventura and others, sex trafficking of 'Jane', and finally, transportation for prostitution of 'Jane' and others. Lawyers for the defence and prosecution pushed the judge to instruct jury members to continue deliberating on the racketeering conspiracy charge. A jury in a criminal trial in most U.S. jurisdictions, including New York, must be unanimous. There was a fair bit of back-and-forth between Judge Arun Subramanian and lawyers for both the defence and prosecution to determine next steps. Combs' lawyer Marc Agnifilo asked the judge to gently instruct the jury to continue deliberations, while the prosecution questioned if the judge would enforce the 'Allen' charge, also known as the 'dynamite' charge, which is used when jurors are unable to reach a verdict. The 'Allen' charge is a strategy to encourage jurors to re-evaluate their positions in order to reach a decision, though it's considered to be a controversial move, with some believing it pushes members to change their existing stances. The jury was soon brought into the courtroom where Judge Subramanian advised members to continue their deliberations. Shortly afterwards, the jury sent a note instructing they had finished deliberations for the day and would continue tomorrow from 9am, local time. Press in the courtroom have described the scenes as 'tense', reporting Combs sat surrounded by his lawyers who were comforting him. CNN reports Combs, at one point, whispered to his six adult children seated in the second row behind him. He was heard telling his mother, Janice, 'I'll be alright. Love you.'
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial jurors reach partial verdict but deadlocked on racketeering charge
The jury at Sean "Diddy" Combs's sex trafficking trial has reached a verdict on four of the five counts the music mogul faces, according to the New York judge overseeing the case. But the verdicts have not been revealed, and the jury is deadlocked on the most serious charge of racketeering conspiracy. US District Judge Arun Subramanian said he would instruct the jury to continue deliberating.
The Advertiser
12 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Mushroom jury finishes first full day of deliberations
The mushroom trial jury has been sent back to their accommodation after completing their first full day of deliberations on whether Erin Patterson is guilty of a triple murder. Twelve jurors retired to consider their verdict on Monday afternoon as the Victorian Supreme Court trial at Morwell, in regional Victoria, reached its 10th week. They returned to the court about 10.30am on Tuesday where they spent a full day deliberating before being sent home to their sequestered accommodation at 4.15pm. Black tarp has been placed across the front of Patterson's home, in Leongatha, since the jury retired to deliberate on Monday. After hearing more than two months of evidence, the jury must decide whether Patterson, 50, intentionally served her lunch guests beef Wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms. Her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather, all died after consuming the lunch at Patterson's regional Victorian home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson also ate the meal but survived after spending months in hospital. Patterson claims it was all an accident and has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one charge of attempted murder. The jury heard from more than 50 prosecution witnesses throughout the trial before Patterson entered the witness box for eight days. The prosecution and defence then spent a week delivering their closing arguments before Justice Christopher Beale provided his directions to the jury. He said the jurors needed to consider whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt Patterson deliberately served death caps with the intention to kill her guests. Justice Beale reminded the jurors if they held any doubts about Patterson's guilt, they must acquit her. "You cannot be satisfied that the accused is guilty of an offence if you have a reasonable doubt if she is guilty of the offence," he told the jury on Monday. The jury is being sequestered during the deliberations and will have to remain together until unanimous verdicts are reached on all charges. Justice Beale reiterated that every juror must agree on the verdict, although it did not matter how each person reached their conclusion. He reminded the jurors they cannot return home until their unanimous decision. The jury can deliver its verdicts any time from 10.30am to 4.15pm on Monday through to Saturday. They'll remain sequestered on Sunday if they have not reached a verdict but will not deliberate that day. The jury will return to the court to reconvene their deliberations on Wednesday morning. The mushroom trial jury has been sent back to their accommodation after completing their first full day of deliberations on whether Erin Patterson is guilty of a triple murder. Twelve jurors retired to consider their verdict on Monday afternoon as the Victorian Supreme Court trial at Morwell, in regional Victoria, reached its 10th week. They returned to the court about 10.30am on Tuesday where they spent a full day deliberating before being sent home to their sequestered accommodation at 4.15pm. Black tarp has been placed across the front of Patterson's home, in Leongatha, since the jury retired to deliberate on Monday. After hearing more than two months of evidence, the jury must decide whether Patterson, 50, intentionally served her lunch guests beef Wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms. Her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather, all died after consuming the lunch at Patterson's regional Victorian home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson also ate the meal but survived after spending months in hospital. Patterson claims it was all an accident and has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one charge of attempted murder. The jury heard from more than 50 prosecution witnesses throughout the trial before Patterson entered the witness box for eight days. The prosecution and defence then spent a week delivering their closing arguments before Justice Christopher Beale provided his directions to the jury. He said the jurors needed to consider whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt Patterson deliberately served death caps with the intention to kill her guests. Justice Beale reminded the jurors if they held any doubts about Patterson's guilt, they must acquit her. "You cannot be satisfied that the accused is guilty of an offence if you have a reasonable doubt if she is guilty of the offence," he told the jury on Monday. The jury is being sequestered during the deliberations and will have to remain together until unanimous verdicts are reached on all charges. Justice Beale reiterated that every juror must agree on the verdict, although it did not matter how each person reached their conclusion. He reminded the jurors they cannot return home until their unanimous decision. The jury can deliver its verdicts any time from 10.30am to 4.15pm on Monday through to Saturday. They'll remain sequestered on Sunday if they have not reached a verdict but will not deliberate that day. The jury will return to the court to reconvene their deliberations on Wednesday morning. The mushroom trial jury has been sent back to their accommodation after completing their first full day of deliberations on whether Erin Patterson is guilty of a triple murder. Twelve jurors retired to consider their verdict on Monday afternoon as the Victorian Supreme Court trial at Morwell, in regional Victoria, reached its 10th week. They returned to the court about 10.30am on Tuesday where they spent a full day deliberating before being sent home to their sequestered accommodation at 4.15pm. Black tarp has been placed across the front of Patterson's home, in Leongatha, since the jury retired to deliberate on Monday. After hearing more than two months of evidence, the jury must decide whether Patterson, 50, intentionally served her lunch guests beef Wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms. Her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather, all died after consuming the lunch at Patterson's regional Victorian home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson also ate the meal but survived after spending months in hospital. Patterson claims it was all an accident and has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one charge of attempted murder. The jury heard from more than 50 prosecution witnesses throughout the trial before Patterson entered the witness box for eight days. The prosecution and defence then spent a week delivering their closing arguments before Justice Christopher Beale provided his directions to the jury. He said the jurors needed to consider whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt Patterson deliberately served death caps with the intention to kill her guests. Justice Beale reminded the jurors if they held any doubts about Patterson's guilt, they must acquit her. "You cannot be satisfied that the accused is guilty of an offence if you have a reasonable doubt if she is guilty of the offence," he told the jury on Monday. The jury is being sequestered during the deliberations and will have to remain together until unanimous verdicts are reached on all charges. Justice Beale reiterated that every juror must agree on the verdict, although it did not matter how each person reached their conclusion. He reminded the jurors they cannot return home until their unanimous decision. The jury can deliver its verdicts any time from 10.30am to 4.15pm on Monday through to Saturday. They'll remain sequestered on Sunday if they have not reached a verdict but will not deliberate that day. The jury will return to the court to reconvene their deliberations on Wednesday morning. The mushroom trial jury has been sent back to their accommodation after completing their first full day of deliberations on whether Erin Patterson is guilty of a triple murder. Twelve jurors retired to consider their verdict on Monday afternoon as the Victorian Supreme Court trial at Morwell, in regional Victoria, reached its 10th week. They returned to the court about 10.30am on Tuesday where they spent a full day deliberating before being sent home to their sequestered accommodation at 4.15pm. Black tarp has been placed across the front of Patterson's home, in Leongatha, since the jury retired to deliberate on Monday. After hearing more than two months of evidence, the jury must decide whether Patterson, 50, intentionally served her lunch guests beef Wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms. Her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather, all died after consuming the lunch at Patterson's regional Victorian home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson also ate the meal but survived after spending months in hospital. Patterson claims it was all an accident and has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one charge of attempted murder. The jury heard from more than 50 prosecution witnesses throughout the trial before Patterson entered the witness box for eight days. The prosecution and defence then spent a week delivering their closing arguments before Justice Christopher Beale provided his directions to the jury. He said the jurors needed to consider whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt Patterson deliberately served death caps with the intention to kill her guests. Justice Beale reminded the jurors if they held any doubts about Patterson's guilt, they must acquit her. "You cannot be satisfied that the accused is guilty of an offence if you have a reasonable doubt if she is guilty of the offence," he told the jury on Monday. The jury is being sequestered during the deliberations and will have to remain together until unanimous verdicts are reached on all charges. Justice Beale reiterated that every juror must agree on the verdict, although it did not matter how each person reached their conclusion. He reminded the jurors they cannot return home until their unanimous decision. The jury can deliver its verdicts any time from 10.30am to 4.15pm on Monday through to Saturday. They'll remain sequestered on Sunday if they have not reached a verdict but will not deliberate that day. The jury will return to the court to reconvene their deliberations on Wednesday morning.
