logo
Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told by Jeremy Atherton Lin – How bigotry was moved off the statute books

Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told by Jeremy Atherton Lin – How bigotry was moved off the statute books

Irish Times2 days ago
Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told
Author
:
Jeremy Atherton Lin
ISBN-13
:
9780241629789
Publisher
:
Allen Lane
Guideline Price
:
£25
Ten years ago, the Marriage Equality Act, giving same-sex couples the right to marry, was approved by a majority of Irish voters. The relative ease with which the referendum passed lies in stark contrast to Jeremy Atherton Lin's experience in the US during the mid 1990s, when president Bill Clinton signed the Defence of Marriage Act under cover of night, banning federal recognition of same-sex marriage. (It was repealed by Joe Biden in 2022.)
The evolution of gay rights in the US is interspersed with the story of his own early love affair. As a young man visiting London, he encounters a local boy and, despite having planned on spending his twenties 'f**king his way around Europe', he's smitten. Geography, however, gets in the way, when he returns home and visa issues keep his boyfriend in England.
Atherton Lin won the National Book Critics Circle award for Gay Bar: Why We Went Out and there's more than enough here to show his skill as a writer. Describing a transatlantic phone call with his lover, he recalls the line being 'somehow damp and dark, as if you were phoning from a Mike Leigh film', and he draws cautious parallels between the rights of same-sex couples to marry in America with the struggle for interracial marriage in the landmark case of Loving v. Virginia (1967), saying that 'it's worth noting that marriage has never been something available to everybody except gays'. Closer to home, there are interesting political references too, such as an account of Margaret Thatcher's 1987 Conservative Party Conference speech, where she stated that children who were being taught that it was all right to be gay were being 'cheated of a sound start in life'.
What makes Deep House
so engaging, however, is how its author avoids outrage while recounting past injustices. Instead, knowing that the argument has already been won, both morally and legally, he seems baffled that anyone ever cared who married whom in the first place. When future generations look back and wonder what all the fuss was about, books such as this will illuminate their understanding of a time when bigotry was not only encouraged, but on the statute books.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff deadline delayed
Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff deadline delayed

Irish Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff deadline delayed

The United States is close to finalising several trade pacts in coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9th, President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates set to take effect on August 1st. Since taking office, Mr Trump has set off a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies, through efforts such as deals with the United States and other countries. In April, Mr Trump unveiled a base tariff rate of 10 per cent on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50 per cent, although he later delayed the effective date for all but 10 per cent until July 9th. The new date offers countries a three-week reprieve. Mr Trump, whose remarks to reporters on Sunday came just before his return to Washington from a weekend golfing in New Jersey, had flagged the August 1st date earlier, but it was unclear if all tariffs would increase then. READ MORE Asked to clarify, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the higher tariffs would take effect on August 1st, but Mr Trump was 'setting the rates and the deals right now'. In a posting on his Truth Social website, Trump later said the US would start delivering tariff letters from noon US eastern time on Monday. In a separate post, he rolled out a new tariff policy, calling for countries 'aligning themselves with the anti-American policies' of the Brics developing nations to be charged an extra 10 per cent tariff, with no exceptions to be granted. Brics includes Brazil, China, India and Russia, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Mr Trump has close ties to leaders of some of those countries, such as Saudi Arabia and UAE, and has been touting the prospect of a trade deal with India for weeks. On Sunday, Brics leaders condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran, called for reforms to global institutions and warned that the rise in tariffs threatened global trade. It was not immediately clear if Mr Trump's latest tariff threat would derail trade talks with India, Indonesia and other Brics nations, however. Earlier on Sunday, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CNN's State of the Union that several big trade agreements would be announced in the next few days, adding that talks with the European Union had made good progress. Mr Trump would also send letters to 100 smaller countries with which the United States does not have much trade, notifying them of higher tariff rates, he added. 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1st you will boomerang back to your April 2nd tariff level,' Mr Bessent said. 'So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly.' Kevin Hassett, who heads the White House National Economic Council, told CBS's Face the Nation programme there might be wiggle room for countries engaged in earnest negotiations. 'There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, and so maybe things will push back past the deadline,' Mr Hassett said, adding that Mr Trump would decide. Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told ABC News' This Week programme that countries needed to make concessions to get lower tariff rates. 'I hear good things about the talks with Europe. I hear good things about the talks with India,' Mr Miran said. 'And so I would expect that a number of countries that are in the process of making those concessions ... might see their date rolled.' Mr Bessent told CNN the Trump administration was focused on 18 important trading partners that account for 95 per cent of the US trade deficit. But he said there had been 'a lot of foot-dragging' among countries in finalising trade deals. Thailand, keen to avert a 36 per cent tariff, is now offering greater market access for US farm and industrial goods and more purchases of US energy and Boeing jets, finance minister Pichai Chunhavajira told Bloomberg News on Sunday. India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini trade deal in the next 24 to 48 hours, local Indian news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on Sunday, with average tariffs of 10 per cent on Indian goods shipped to the US, it said. Mr Hassett told CBS News that framework agreements already reached with Britain and Vietnam offered guidelines for other countries. He said Mr Trump's pressure was prompting countries to move production to the United States. The Vietnam deal was 'fantastic', Mr Miran said. 'It's extremely one-sided. We get to apply a significant tariff to Vietnamese exports. They're opening their markets to ours, applying zero tariff to our exports.' – Reuters

Irish house prices continue to rise and pharma's tariff options
Irish house prices continue to rise and pharma's tariff options

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Irish house prices continue to rise and pharma's tariff options

Irish house prices continue rise despite the negative sentiment about Donald Trump's tariffs and what impact it might have on the Irish economy. owned by The Irish Times, said asking prices nationally rose by more than 7 per cent annually in the second quarter while the Dublin increase was above 5 per cent. Barry O'Halloran reports. Barry also has the details of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission's letter to the motor industry, warning it intends to crack down on attempts to stop drivers from using independent garages for repairs. Dealers could face fines of up to €50 million for breaches of competition law. It has long been conventional wisdom that a boss who is prepared to reveal fear, uncertainty or some other form of uselessness is in luck, writes Pilita Clark. It's thought they will be more trusted and respected, especially by younger staff who are said to yearn for 'authenticity', and are therefore more valuable to an organisation. There is a strong logic for US pharma companies to continue making drugs in Ireland for non-US markets, writes our columnist John FitzGerald, as he explores the potential impact of Donald Trump's threatened tariffs on the sector here. READ MORE In our Q&A, a reader wonders if Prize Bonds are a good investment. Dominic Coyle offers a view. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers. In Me & My Money, author Eimear McBride explains how her 'pension plan is to die before I'm no longer able to earn'. She spoke with Tony Clayton-Lea. The Changing Times Brewery, which was founded by the families behind some of Dublin's best-known pubs , is expanding the number of premises serving its beers and moving outside the capital for the first time. Colin Gleeson has the details. In a wide-ranging interview, EasyJet founder Stelios Haji-Ioannou talks to Mark Hennessy about his new North-South awards aimed at fostering cross-Border entrepreneurship, his Irish family members, and his relationship with Ryanair's Michael O'Leary. Tesco plans to add 400 new jobs here as part of a €40 million investment to expand its operations with the opening of 10 new stores over the next 12 months. Barry O'Halloran has the details. In our Opinion piece, Bank of Ireland executive Susan Russell says the EU could crack down on fake digital ads by forcing online platforms to ensure they are dealing with a reputable entity, especially as they earn income from these scam ads. BP's woes persist in spite of talk of a takeover by Shell , which the company has denied. Stocktake offers a view.

Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats
Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats

On July 4th, in a mockery of the best American democratic traditions, Donald Trump signed into law his signature piece of domestic legislation. His so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' offers massive tax cuts, mostly to the benefit of the very rich: today's American aristocrats. Yet, while it might be good news for the luxury yacht industry, it will leave an estimated 12 million without health insurance through cuts to the Medicaid programme. Trump's ability to pass such ugly legislation through a tightly divided Congress reflects his political power, and yet it could well lead to his undoing in the 2026 mid-term elections. The more the Republican Party changes, the more it stays the same. For all the talk about the party appealing to the working class, it remains fundamentally committed to a regressive agenda that puts the interests of the very rich above those of ordinary Americans and future generations. This legislation is ripped straight from the playbook of Ronald Reagan. Reagan reduced the tax rate on the highest earners from 70 per cent to 28 per cent, inaugurating a new era of massive upward redistribution of wealth. He did so by slashing programmes benefiting the poorest Americans: child nutrition, housing assistance and payments to single mothers. READ MORE Trump's Bill also resembles Reagan's agenda in another respect: it is as irresponsible as it is cruel. The most expensive social welfare programmes in the US – social security (old age pensions) and Medicare (health insurance for those over the age of 65) – are too popular to cut. Trump, like Reagan has also increased the budget for the major area of American spending: the military. Reagan justified his cuts with the fantasy of supply-side economics, claiming that slashing taxes would generate so much economic growth that it would actually result in increased government revenue. Republicans today justify their irresponsible spending with the accounting trick that, because they only extended tax cuts due to expire, they aren't really adding to the deficit. When Reagan left office, the federal debt had tripled. Trump's Bill is set to increase the federal deficit by more than $3 trillion. Trump's Bill was not much loved by many of the Republicans who voted for it. Deficit hawks worried about adding to the national debt; they like the tax cuts, but would have preferred more social spending cuts to finance them. Elon Musk's criticism of the Bill on these grounds led to his public falling out with Trump. Moderate Republicans, meanwhile, worried that cuts to Medicaid would hurt the party's chances in 2026. Thom Tillis, one of only three Republican Senators to vote against the bill , wondered how he could face his voters 'when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore'. Trump's ability to pass such legislation reflected his considerable political muscle. He could only afford to lose three out of 53 Republican votes in the Senate (he lost three, with vice-president Vance breaking a 50-50 tie) and, even more challenging, only three of 219 Republican votes in the House of Representatives (he lost only two). Trump held his party together by threatening Republicans who voted against the Bill that he would support primary challengers against them. For decades, the Republican Party has been distorted by the fact that most of its politicians are elected from heavily Republican districts or states. As a result, the threat to their re-election lies in primary challenges from the right rather than in winning the general election against a Democrat. Yet Trump was able to exploit this fact like no previous leader. His personal hold on the party means that his endorsement of a primary candidate all but ensures their success. Yet the thing about being at the pinnacle of your power is that everything is downhill from there. The passage of Trump's beautiful Bill may well lead to an ugly Republican defeat at the polls in 2026. Polling shows that only 29 per cent of Americans support it. It seems likely that Republicans will lose their slim majority in the House of Representatives. But it also seems possible that Democrats might re-take the Senate, even though they face a very challenging map there. Tillis, after voting against Trump's bill, announced that he would not seek re-election rather than face a primary challenge. The forced retirement of a popular incumbent increases the chances that Democrats can win his vacated seat in North Carolina. This bill is so extreme and irresponsible that it will enable Democrats to win back moderate voters in contested electoral districts. But perhaps more importantly it will enable them to make the case that Bernie Sanders and others have been pushing: that whatever they say, the Republicans are the party of the billionaires, and the Democrats can be the party of working Americans. Still, the massive federal deficit the Bill creates has planted a ticking time bomb for Democrats. If, and when, they do regain control of the federal government, they will be hampered in pursuing an ambitious agenda because they will be forced first to clean up the Republicans' mess. That, too, is part of a pattern in American politics evident since the Reagan era. How can Republicans retain popularity when their agenda so clearly favours the few at the expense of the many? As they have done since Reagan, they will double down on culture war politics to distract from their economic agenda. Expect to see ramped up assaults on trans rights and racialised attacks on migrants. Republicans will promote misinformation so that Americans don't realise what they're really doing. And, finally, if push comes to shove, Trump may employ authoritarian measures to retain his hold on power. Even so, the biggest legacy of Trump's big, beautiful Bill might be that it shatters Republicans' credibility as the party of working Americans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store