Jack Lavin: MLB All-Star Game in 2027? Let's fly the ‘W' for Chicago's economy.
Last week's announcement about the All-Star Game is a big win for Chicago's residents and local businesses, and credit goes to our leaders in Chicago and Springfield, but above all, to the Cubs organization, which has spent the past decade reimagining and reinvesting in Wrigley Field and the surrounding neighborhood.
The results speak for themselves. Led by the Ricketts family, the Cubs organization took our treasured, century-old ballpark and transformed it into a modern, world-class economic driver without losing the character and charm that makes it one of baseball's most beloved landmarks. That vision, combined with strategic investments and strong community partnerships, laid the foundation for this moment.
Without question, this is a big deal, and it's about much more than baseball.
Events such as the All-Star Game are powerful moneymaking engines. When the All-Star Game comes to Chicago, it won't bring just the world's best ballplayers to Wrigley Field. It will bring jobs, visitors and investment to every corner of our city, providing critical revenue for neighborhood businesses large and small and generating the tax receipts needed to fund critical services. A sold-out Wrigley Field means more work for hotel staff, servers, ride-share drivers, retailers and many others who make up the backbone of our local economy.
The numbers are significant. Previous host cities have reported economic impacts ranging from $60 million to over $85 million, driven by increased hotel stays, restaurant visits, local transportation, retail purchases, tourism spending and more.
Our goal is to top that, and there's every reason we should given our unmatched hospitality infrastructure, vibrant neighborhoods, award-winning restaurants and leading cultural institutions.
The 2027 All-Star Game also means visibility. As we saw with last year's Democratic National Convention, events of this scale bring with them the platform of national media, international attention, and millions of TV and digital viewers that will bolster Chicago's reputation as the premier host for future global events, conventions and investment opportunities. It's an exciting opportunity for us to once again showcase Chicago as a dynamic, world-class city that welcomes visitors, fosters innovation and delivers memorable experiences.
But at the end of the day, this announcement is about momentum. It's about building on the progress Chicago has made to reenergize our tourism and event industries — which support thousands of jobs — following the devastation of the COVID-19 pandemic and catalyze long-term economic opportunity and growth in neighborhoods across the city. It's a testament to the collaborative effort between public officials, business leaders and civic partners who believe in Chicago's potential and are working every day to unlock it.
Chicago has a storied history when it comes to hosting large-scale events like this. From the 1893 World's Fair to the 2024 Democratic National Convention, we have proved we not only know how to do it and do it well, but also do it better than it's ever been done.
That legacy now extends into the future. That's because we know the connection between civic pride and economic progress. We know that when Chicago wins, we all win. And when the 2027 MLB All-Star Game comes to Wrigley Field, Chicago will fly the 'W' and set a new standard for what All-Star Week can be and reaffirm our status as an unparalleled international destination.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Cubs president Jed Hoyer admits Michael Soroka trade 'not looking like a good bet' after only 5 days
Occasionally, MLB executives will acknowledge a deal didn't go their way. Some moves just don't work out and they can admit that. What you never see, though, is an executive publicly regret a deal less than a week after making it. So Chicago Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer entered some new ground on Tuesday, five days after acquiring starting pitcher Michael Soroka from the Washington Nationals at the MLB trade deadline. In return, the Nationals received prospects Christian Franklin and Ronny Cruz, the Cubs' No. 13 and 14 prospects on MLB Pipeline. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Soroka made his Cubs debut on Monday and lasted only two innings, exiting due to what was described as right shoulder discomfort. The next day, he was placed on the 15-day injured list with a shoulder strain. Hoyer opted to speak to the media in the wake of the move, and admitted the deal already looked much less attractive than before: "We spent a lot of time on that. We knew the velocity was trending down. We obviously talked through that extensively. Given the market, given the asking price and given all those different things, we felt like it was a good bet to make. Ultimately, he came off the mound last night and right now, it's not looking like a good bet. "That's our job to make bets on these things. Doesn't mean he's not going to help us the rest of the year, we're still waiting on the medical stuff." As Hoyer pointed to, a major red flag was Soroka's velocity. After sitting around 94 mph for the first three months of the season, his average velocity on four-seamers nose-dived, going from 93.7 mph on July 10 to 91.7 mph on July 18, then 90.9 mph on July 23. He averaged 90.8 mph before exiting his start on Monday. A multi-tick velocity drop is a classic red flag for an underlying medical issue with a player, to say nothing of the basic drop in effectiveness. The Cubs still went through with the deal and parted with two real prospects to do it. Hoyer was candid in his explanation for why they did that, while also reflecting the dehumanizing nature of MLB roster moves: "Earlier, he was sitting a much higher velocity. It was coming down and we were trying to get to the bottom of what exactly that was. He had the MRI before that. That risk profile was known and we decided, given the asking price and given the fact we felt he was a notch above the other guys we were talking about in terms of talent and development opportunities, we felt it was the right risk. "We make bets on human beings and sometimes they work out ... We did a lot of due diligence, a ton of research, and if it doesn't work out, that's on me. That's the job." As far as how Soroka's pre-trade MRI looked, Hoyer acknowledged that "there are no clean MRIs" for veteran MLB pitchers, whose ligaments carry a lifetime of wear-and-tear and can give way without warning. Chicago was likely attracted to Soroka's peripherals much more than his surface stats, as his 4.87 ERA in D.C. hardly screamed a deadline upgrade. Baseball Savant had his xERA (which combines strikeout, walk and batted ball data to determine what a player's ERA should be) at 3.32 at the time of the trade, and it wasn't a big leap to think he would perform better in front of the Cubs defense, which is good, than the Nationals defense, which is bad. Soroka's way forward obviously now depends on how his new round of imaging looks. Even if it comes back fine, a move to the bullpen could be in his future between his performance on the mound and injury risk.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's pursuit of meeting with Chinese leader reveals the complex web of US-China relations
WASHINGTON (AP) — China, the adversary. China, the friend? These days, maybe a bit of both. From easing export controls to reportedly blocking the Taiwanese president's plans to travel through the United States, President Donald Trump is raising eyebrows in Washington that he might offer concessions that could hurt U.S. interests in his quest to meet, and reach a deal with, the Chinese leader. There is no firm plan for Trump to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. But it's widely believed that the men must meet in person, likely in the fall, for the two governments to ink a trade deal, and some are worried that Xi is leveraging Trump's desire for more giveaways. "The summit mismatch is real. There's a clear gap between Trump's eagerness for a face-to-face with Xi and Beijing's reluctance to engage," said Craig Singleton, senior director of the China program at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. There are concerns that Trump may throttle back on export controls or investment curbs to preserve summit prospects, Singleton said, warning the risk 'isn't just in giving away too much' but also "in letting Beijing set the tempo.' China-U.S. relations have pinballed often since Washington established relations with communist-led Beijing in 1979. They've hit highs and lows — the latter in the aftermath of the 1989 massacre of pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square, after a 2001 incident involving a U.S. spy plane, during the COVID pandemic and right now. Both countries have struggled to understand each other, which has sometimes gotten in the way of deeper partnerships. And this time around, there's a wild card: the anything-might-happen second presidency of Trump. Disputes often accompany potential US-China leader meetings Efforts by a U.S. president to meet the head of the authoritarian Chinese government have often met with partisan outcries — which happened when former President Joe Biden hosted Xi in California in 2023. But Trump's case is peculiar, partly because he is willing to break with conventional political restraints to make deals and partly because his own party has grown hawkish towards China over national security. 'With President Trump, everything seems to be open for negotiation, and there are few if any red lines,' said Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the global consultancy Teneo. 'The hawks worry that if Trump gets into a room with Xi, he will agree to extraordinary concessions, especially if he believes that a big, beautiful deal is within reach.' While most Republican lawmakers have not voiced their concerns openly, Democrats are vocal in their opposition. "President Trump is giving away the farm to Xi just so he can save face and reach a nonsensical trade deal with Beijing that will hurt American families economically," said Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. On Tuesday, Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said the Trump administration 'has not wavered — and will never waver — in safeguarding our national and economic security to put America first.' 'The administration continues to have productive conversations with China to address longstanding unfair trade practices,' Desai said, adding that export controls on cutting-edge technology and many tariffs remain in place. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, after his latest round of trade negotiations with the Chinese in July, told CNBC that the team was 'very careful to keep trade and national security separate.' And Secretary of State Marco Rubio, appearing on Fox News Radio, said the U.S. remains 'as committed as ever to our partners ... in places like Taiwan' but also spoke of the strategic need to keep trade ties with China steady. 'In the end, we have two big, the two largest economies in the world,' Rubio said. 'An all-out trade conflict between the U.S. and China, I think the U.S. would benefit from it in some ways, but the world would be hurt by it." There's worry over Taiwan Taiwan is concerned that the self-governing island could be 'trade-able' when Trump seeks a deal with Beijing, said Jason Hsu, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former legislator in Taiwan. 'Our concern is that, will any of the trade deals lead to concession on political support for Taiwan?" Hsu said, citing the case last month where the White House allegedly blocked a request for Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to transit through the United States. The U.S. maintains unofficial ties with Taiwan and has always allowed such transits in the past. Experts are worried that the Trump administration is setting a bad precedent, and Democrats have seized on it to criticize Trump. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China, called the move 'both a sharp break from precedent and another example of the Trump administration caving to China in hopes of reaching a trade deal." He said the policy decision 'sends a dangerous signal' that Taiwan's democracy is negotiable. Hsu said Taiwan fears that Trump could be coerced or compelled to support the one-China principle, as espoused by Beijing, that acknowledges Beijing's sovereignty claim over the island. There are also concerns that Trump might utter anything in support of 'unification." That was a request Beijing raised with the Biden administration, though it failed to get a positive response. Now, it's upon Taiwan to persuade Trump to think of the island as 'an economic partner rather than something that he can trade when he negotiates with China,' Hsu said, suggesting that Taiwan step up defense commitments, increase energy procurement, open its market to U.S. companies and invest more in the U.S. But Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, said Trump is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act, a domestic law that obligates the U.S. to maintain an unofficial relationship with the island and provides it with sufficient hardware to deter any invasion by China. 'He can dial the (U.S.-Taiwan) relationship up and down," Sun said, "but he can't remove the relationship.' Export controls have been instituted, to mixed results In April, the White House, citing national security, announced it would restrict sales of Nvidia's H20 computer chips to China. The ban was lifted about three months later, when the two governments had climbed down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. The decision upset both Republican and Democratic lawmakers. Rep. John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on China, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to stress that the U.S. cannot let the Chinese Communist Party 'use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation.' In Stockholm, Bessent pushed back at the concern that national security might be compromised. 'We are very diligent,' Bessent said, adding there's an interagency process that involves the National Security Council and the Defense Department for decisions. 'There's nothing that's being exchanged for anything,' Bessent said. Addressing H20 chips specifically, Bessent said they 'are well down" Nvidia's "technology chips stack.' U.S. companies are banned from selling their most advanced chips to China. That might not be persuasive enough. Teneo's Wildau said China hawks are most worried that the H20 decision could be the beginning of a series of moves to roll back export controls from the Biden era, which were once considered 'permanent and non-negotiable.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Edwin Diaz's historic Mets stretch has been a journey two years in the making
Access the Mets beat like never before Don't miss Mike Puma's text messages from Queens and beyond — he's giving Sports+ subscribers the inside buzz on the Mets. Sign up Now Edwin Díaz has enjoyed some dominant stretches before, but the Mets closer is currently riding an unrivaled heater both personally and across franchise history. Díaz's scoreless inning Monday night gave him 19 consecutive appearances over more than two months without allowing an earned run. He has only been charged with one over his past 34 relief outings since April 23, and his 0.26 ERA over that span represents both the best 34-game stretch of his career and the lowest ever by any Mets reliever. Before Tuesday's game against the Guardians, the three-time All-Star acknowledged this is 'the best I've felt' since missing the entire 2023 season with a knee injury suffered in the World Baseball Classic earlier that year. 'One hundred percent,' Díaz told The Post outside the dugout during batting practice. 'It's been a long time that I haven't given up [an earned] run. I always look at my stats and I know how I'm doing.
