Browns owners close on $25 million home after Ohio gives them $600 million for new stadium
The oceanfront home is 5,906 square feet on 1.1 acres of land. It was purchased through Dee Haslam's Knox-Main Trust.
Advertisement
The home, which was built in 1971, was purchased in an off-market sale. It was previously sold in 1990 for $3.2 million. It's inside the gated Lost Tree Village neighborhood.
In a situation that's been controversial, the optics of such a move cannot be considered ideal.
The Haslam Sports Group received a gift from the state in the recently passed budget bill.
And, yes, it's basically a gift that won't have to be repaid, contrary to reports that said that tax revenues from the proposed entertainment district with a domed stadium as its centerpiece, would replace monies taken from the state's unclaimed funds account.
Advertisement
In the budget the Republican-dominated state legislature established a Sports and Cultural Facility Fund with monies from holdings in the unclaimed funds account.
Cleveland Browns owner Jimmy Haslam watches his team during practice at NFL minicamp, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Berea, Ohio.
Cleveland.com reported that the $600 million will not have to be repaid. The Haslam Sports Group was only required to put $100 million in escrow to cover potential stadium shortfalls. If there are no shortfalls, that money will be returned.
That gift could face obstacles as two former Democratic members of the legislature have filed a class-action suit on behalf of three individuals to halt the transfer of funds in Franklin County Court.
Advertisement
No one should tell anyone how or when to spend their money, but...
George M. Thomas covers a myriad of things including sports and pop culture, but mostly sports, he thinks, for the Beacon Journal.
This article originally appeared on Akron Beacon Journal: Browns owners Jimmy, Dee Haslam close on $25 million Florida mansion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
Bengals' Shemar Stewart has ‘no regrets' about holdout: ‘All football now'
CINCINNATI — The last time Shemar Stewart sat in front of his locker answering questions from the media, he was taking shots at the Bengals organization amid a dispute over his rookie contract. He stated the team was more interested in winning arguments than games. With his rookie deal finally signed, 94 days after he was selected No. 17 in the 2025 NFL Draft, Stewart expressed a 'deep sense of joy.' He recognized the impetus in the deal getting done was that he needed to get on the field as soon as possible. Advertisement 'It's time for all football now,' Stewart said. 'I don't got to worry about anything else but football.' However, in terms of how the deal went down, what he said and how contentious the process got, he said he wouldn't change anything in hindsight. 'Nope,' Stewart said. 'I try to live my life with no regrets.' Last week, Bengals de facto general manager Duke Tobin took aim at Stewart's agent, Zac Hiller of LAA Sports, stating 'I don't understand or believe or agree with the advice' Stewart is paying for. Stewart openly defended Hiller's approach in the negotiations, which ended with Stewart accepting the default language in exchange for the Bengals paying him $500,000 of his signing bonus up front instead of in December. 'In my opinion, I feel like I want an agent that's more of a pit bull,' he said. 'You feel me? I don't want an agent that can easily be pushed over. I want someone that's going to war (for) me. So I don't have to do any of the hard work behind the scenes. In terms of that regard, I think Zac is a great agent. He handles business very well, that's my dog for life.' Stewart was working out at Texas A&M during his time away, spawning rumors he might return to the Aggies, but Stewart put that talk to bed. 'The Internet makes up some crazy things sometimes,' Stewart said. 'I've just got to sit back and laugh at it sometimes 'cause I don't know where they get it from. I mean, I can't go back and work at my old college scene? I mean, stupid.' Shemar Stewart going through the early paces here. — Paul Dehner Jr. (@pauldehnerjr) July 27, 2025 Stewart admitted the heat and getting acclimated to practice took some time, but the Bengals eased him in. He participated in about 10 reps of team drills, according to head coach Zac Taylor. The coach said the immediate focus is merely getting him acclimated. Stewart came in before anyone else at 6:30 a.m. for an early meeting about his ramp-up process. Advertisement There are expectations for gradual growth in how much he participates. Stewart expects to enjoy a fresh start after the nasty back and forth it took to arrive at this moment. 'End of the day, I'm happy to be a Bengal,' he said. 'I'm happy I got drafted here. We have a long relationship ahead of us. There is no bad blood. It's just how things go sometimes.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Lux's RBI groundout
Matt McLain scores on Gavin Lux's groundout in the bottom of the 1st to give the Reds a 2-0 lead
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Vought won't rule out more rescissions funding cuts before September
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said his office is considering more options to claw back funding approved by Congress and isn't ruling out sending more bills to lawmakers with further cuts before September. Vought confirmed on CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday that "we are looking to do [a] rescissions package" to take back some funding from the Education Department. A rescissions bill is the president's request to rescind funding already appropriated by Congress. Last week, President Trump signed a bill clawing back foreign aid, NPR and PBS funding, becoming the first president in decades to receive approval for such a measure. "We're thrilled that we had the first rescissions package in decades, and we've got the process moving again," Vought said of the $10 billion clawback. Asked to confirm there'd be no rescissions package before September, as Congress attempts to fund the government and head off a shutdown, Vought responded, "Not here to say that. We're looking at all of our options, we will look at it and assess where the Hill is, what are the particular funding opportunities that we have?" Asked about National Institutes of Health funding for research into heart disease and cancer that has yet to be released, Vought replied, "We're going through the same process with the NIH that we did with the education." He alleged NIH had wasted funds, claiming "$2 million for injecting dogs with cocaine that the NIH spent money on, $75,000 for Harvard to study blowing lizards off of trees with leaf blowers." He vowed to go "line by line to make sure the NIH is funded properly" and said funding would be released "when we are done with that review." Vought's use of rescissions measures to amend government spending is seen by Democrats and some Republicans as a backdoor method of infringing on Congress' constitutional power of the purse. "Rescissions is just a Washington name for double cross," Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, also on "Face the Nation," said after Vought's interview on the program. "They support one thing one day — the president even signs off — and then they come back and say they change their mind." But the OMB director argued, "We have the ability and the executive tools to fund less than what Congress appropriated" under the Impoundment Control Act, which enables the president to delay spending funds appropriated by Congress, and he didn't rule out a legal battle over the executive branch's authority to revise lawmakers' spending downward, if it "could find waste" by an agency. Vought has also caused GOP Senate Majority Leader John Thune some headaches with a comment he made Thursday suggesting the appropriations process must be "less bipartisan." But this put Thune in a bind as he oversees negotiations to avoid a government shutdown in October, since Republicans hold a slim majority of 53 - 47 in the Senate, and most legislation must reach a 60-vote threshold. "It's going to take 60 to fund the government," Thune said in response to Vought's remark, and he added, "we plan to move [appropriations] bills that will have cooperation from the Democrats." Van Hollen said it was ironic that Vought is "calling for these deep cuts to education, NIH, when he has asked for an increase for his OMB budget." And referring to reduction-in-force — or RIF — staff cuts the administration wants across the government, Van Hollen added, "He asked for a 13% increase for his OMB budget. He's asked for more people to join the OMB staff while he's talking about RIF-ing people at other departments." The Maryland senator said that Democratic senators, as they negotiate funding government operations, are "asking for four Republican senators just to publicly declare that when they say they're gonna fund the Veterans Affairs Department, that they actually mean it."
