Feds refuse judge's order to release activist facing deportation
Supporters of Mahmoud Khalil rally outside the federal courthouse in Newark on March 28, 2025. (Reena Rose Sibayan for New Jersey Monitor)
Federal authorities refused a judge's order Friday to release Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil, arguing that the order only barred them from detaining him on the basis of an obscure 1952 law that allows deportations for foreign policy reasons.
U.S. District Court Judge Michael Farbiarz had ruled Wednesday that federal authorities lacked grounds to hold Khalil, a permanent resident who's been detained since March for helping to organize pro-Palestinian protests. His detention was likely unconstitutional, the judge decreed, ordering authorities to free him or ask the 3d Circuit Court of Appeals by Friday morning to step in.
But in a letter to the court Friday, government attorneys argued they were no longer detaining Khalil based on the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 and instead held him based on a separate federal statute that allows authorities to keep immigrants in custody during removal proceedings.
'Detaining Khalil based on that other ground of removal is lawful,' the attorneys wrote. 'An alien like Khalil may be detained during the pendency of removal proceedings regardless of the charge of removability.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April released a memo justifying Khalil's deportation that argued his support of pro-Palestinian protests would have 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.'
Farbiarz on Wednesday had noted the government could argue Khalil, who has no criminal convictions or charges, could be detained because some information on his lawful permanent resident application was allegedly inaccurate. But he'd cautioned that argument would be ineffective here because green card holders are virtually never detained for that reason.
'That strongly suggests that it is the Secretary of State's determination that drives the Petitioner's ongoing detention — not the other charge against him,' the judge wrote Wednesday.
Attorney Ian Fernando Hinonangan, who represents Khalil, echoed the judge's own words and said federal authorities' reasoning for his continued detention was part of a campaign of retaliation for Khalil's First Amendment-protected speech.
While the judge's order allowed officials to continue efforts to remove Khalil that were not based on Rubio's memo, it did not explicitly permit them to continue detaining him for other reasons, Hinonangan wrote in a Friday declaration.
'The post-hoc charge is an undisputed continuation in the fabric of retaliatory motive and hence 'carries the taint of unconstitutional conduct,'' Hinonangan said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Moldovan Pro-European Party Leads Poll Before Key Election
Moldova's ruling pro-European party is leading in a new opinion poll three months ahead of a general election that's crucial for maintaining the country's course to join the European Union by the end of the decade. Prime Minister Dorin Recean's Action and Solidarity Party would take about 40% of the vote or 49 seats in parliament if elections were scheduled next Sunday, according to a survey by iData published by HotNews on Monday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Harvard's Jewish faculty have their own wish list for a deal with Trump
Jewish faculty, through Concerned Jewish Faculty & Staff, a group of Boston-area-based Jewish faculty, are calling on Harvard to protect free expression, academic freedom and resist the 'weaponization' of antisemitism as the institution is in talks with the federal government to create a deal after months of challenges. 'Those negotiations are framed by the Trump administration's groundless allegations of institutionalized antisemitism. The accusations have been used to suppress academic freedom and create a climate of fear at Harvard and throughout the US, particularly among Arab and Muslim community members and those who support Palestinian rights,' the faculty wrote in an open letter to Harvard on Monday. The group is made up of 150 Jewish faculty at Harvard and 24 other Boston-area universities. Read more: 'Devastating': 10 Harvard researchers detail 'essential' work set to be cut by Trump President Donald Trump boasted on Friday of a 'mindbogglingly HISTORIC' deal with Harvard University. In April, the Trump administration demanded an overhaul of Harvard's leadership structure, admissions and hiring. If the university didn't comply, it risked losing $9 billion in funding, the federal government said. The actions were taken in the name of antisemitism, as the Trump administration claimed Harvard failed to protect Jewish students, particularly in the wake of the war in Gaza. Harvard rejected the administration's demands and set the stage for a historic showdown, leading to two lawsuits — one of which centered on Harvard's ability to enroll international students. It also led to a series of other funding cuts and cuts to research funding. The university has so far largely prevailed in court in lawsuits against the Trump administration, with a federal judge granting a preliminary injunction on Friday, allowing Harvard University's international students to continue attending school until the legality of the case is decided. Read more: Alums urge Harvard to resist compromise with Trump as reports of deal emerge In its first lawsuit against the Trump administration, Harvard garnered the support of 12,000 alumni. Other individuals and groups also expressed their support through amicus briefs, including two dozen universities, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Council on Education, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression — also known as FIRE — and Columbia Alumni for Academic Freedom. In the open letter, faculty wrote that the two task force reports on Anti-Muslim, Anti-Arab and Anti-Palestinian Bias, and on Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias 'make clear that the actions of the Trump administration are not the only cause of the crisis in our academic community.' 'Harvard's own voluntary cooperation with the weaponization of antisemitism allegations has also taken a significant toll,' the faculty wrote. The group of Jewish faculty said that the university's report on Anti-Muslim, Anti-Arab and Anti-Palestinian Bias didn't offer 'meaningful corrective action' compared to the other report, which was more robust. In negotiating with the Trump administration, the group said the university should apply academic freedom evenly by protecting the right of freedom of expression to all students, regardless of their viewpoint on the war in Gaza. 'Without robust protections for freedom of expression and protest, these calls for 'viewpoint diversity' come across as an attempt to mandate inclusion of pro-Israel perspectives, and give false legitimacy to the Trump administration's attacks on higher education,' the group wrote. The group also pointed to the institution canceling programming on the war in Gaza and dismissing staff at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies; the Religion, Conflict and Peace Initiative as examples for sidelining pro-Palestinian voices. 'As the university now moves toward a negotiated settlement, its resistance to President Trump's assault on its core values must continue. However, such resistance will only be effective if Harvard applies its defense of academic freedom consistently, and opposes the cynical use of 'antisemitism' and 'viewpoint diversity' to control and police research and evidence-based discourse on Israel-Palestine,' the group said. These 16 states are supporting the Trump admin in lawsuit with Harvard Alums urge Harvard to resist compromise with Trump as reports of deal emerge 'Devastating': 10 Harvard researchers detail 'essential' work set to be cut by Trump Federal judge halts Trump's plans to keep Harvard from enrolling foreign students Harvard researcher's work gives 'hope' for Parkinson's. But the feds cut his funding Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Reuters counted the dead in the March killings of Syrian Alawites
LATAKIA, Syria -A Reuters investigation pieced together how the March 7-9 massacres of Syrian Alawites along the country's Mediterranean coast unfolded, identifying a chain of command leading from the attackers directly to men who serve alongside Syria's new leaders in Damascus. The investigation found 1,479 Syrian Alawites were killed and dozens were missing from 40 distinct sites of revenge killings, rampages and looting against the religious minority, long associated with the Assad government. Reuters spoke with over 200 families of victims during visits to massacre sites and by phone, 40 security officials, fighters and commanders, and government-appointed investigators and mediators. Journalists for the news agency also reviewed messages from a Telegram chat established by a Defense Ministry official to coordinate the government response. Journalists examined dozens of videos, obtained CCTV footage and compiled handwritten lists of victims' names. Reuters counted the dead by gathering local lists of names of victims, many of them handwritten, from community leaders and families of the victims. Villagers also gathered pictures and personal details about the victims. For each list, written in Arabic, Reuters cross-checked the names with activists who are either in the relevant village, run Facebook pages, or in the diaspora and have relatives in the places that came under attack. For each massacre site, Reuters also gathered pictures of victims, and photos and locations of mass graves. On March 11, the U.N. said it had counted 111 deaths but acknowledged it as an undercount. It hasn't updated its death tally since. The most recent count from the Syrian Network for Human Rights, an independent monitoring group, shows 1,334 people killed, including 60 children and 84 women. Of that total, 889 were killed by government forces while 446 were killed by pro-Assad fighters, it said. Of the 446, SNHR said that half were civilians and half were government forces. SNHR did not explain how it confirmed the identity of the perpetrators. Reuters could not confirm the SNHR toll for Alawites killed by Assad loyalists or that for the government forces. On March 17, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, another civil society organization, said it had tallied 1,557 civilian deaths but did not detail how it arrived at the figure. The group also counted 273 dead among government forces and 259 among Alawite gunmen affiliated with pro-Assad forces. President al-Sharaa has said 200 government forces died. The government has not released a tally of the dead among Alawite civilians.
