Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes to stand down as MSP in 2026
She is one of the SNP's most significant politicians, having finished second in the 2023 leadership election, which saw Humza Yousaf succeed Nicola Sturgeon as party leader.
When John Swinney became First Minister last year, he appointed Ms Forbes to his cabinet as his deputy, also taking charge of the Government's economy portfolio.
John Swinney appointed Ms Forbes to his cabinet (Jane Barlow/PA)
In a statement shared on Monday, Ms Forbes said she had reflected over recess and decided not to run again in 2026.
She said she had been 'privileged' to serve her various roles in government.
Ms Forbes said: 'I remain wholly supportive of the First Minister just as when I backed him to be leader of the SNP and I look forward to campaigning for the SNP at the next election – to lead Scotland to independence.
'I was first elected in my mid-20s, dedicating my most formative adult years to public service. In that time, I presented multiple budgets, supported thousands of businesses and workers during Covid-19 and launched Scotland's most ambitious business start up network TechScaler.
'I now wish to step back from my public duties and focus on new opportunities to serve people.
'I have grown up in the public eye, getting married, having a baby and raising a young family.
'I have consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's during that time. I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure.
'Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life – which can never be rewound.'
The First Minister wrote back to Ms Forbes, saying he understood her decision and thanking her for her contributions.
Mr Swinney said: ''You have made a huge contribution to public life in Scotland and have been instrumental in making progress on economic issues for my Government.
'You have much to be proud of in all of the work you have undertaken but I am especially heartened by the effect of your leadership on advancing support for the Gaelic language.
'We all wrestle with the inevitable conflicts between family and public life and I sympathise with the dilemmas you have faced.
'I wish you, Ali and your family well and much happiness in the years ahead.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning made over UK pensions
An industry expert has warned that the UK state pension age may need to rise to 80 without significant reforms, as the current system is becoming unaffordable. The state pension age is already scheduled to increase from 66 to 67 by 2028, with a further rise to 68 expected to be brought forward from 2046. The Office for Budget Responsibility projects the annual cost of the state pension could reach £200 billion by 2073, representing 7.7-8.4 per cent of GDP by the 2070s. Pensions expert Jack Carmichael suggests the cost could be even higher than official projections, potentially necessitating a state pension age of 80 to maintain affordability. To manage spiralling costs, the government may be compelled to either raise the state pension age more rapidly or reform the triple lock mechanism.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's time to come clean on what the Government actually owes
Today's fiscal climate is dominated by one overriding and impossible to escape fact: the Government owes so much money it may be impossible to borrow much more at affordable interest rates. The last time we got close to this position was in 1976, when in October of that year, at the worst point of the funding crisis, the Government was forced to issue what was then a 'jumbo' gilt issue (£600m) with a maturity date of 1998 at an interest rate of 15.5pc. Imagine that interest rate today! As you may recall, this was the same year the UK applied to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the largest loan requested at that time (although only half was actually drawn). In return, the Government agreed to IMF-imposed austerity. Clearly, this is consequential stuff. Gilts are UK government bonds, which pay a fixed annual interest at the rate stated until they mature, at which point they are repaid in full. They are unconditionally guaranteed by the UK government – which has never defaulted on its debt promises – so have lent their name in a colloquial sense to their 'gold-plated' nature as high grade assets. The name itself, however, comes from the original debt certificates issued by the Bank of England being literally 'gilt-edged'. The Government mostly covers its annual fiscal deficit by issuing gilts.
ITV News
35 minutes ago
- ITV News
What do this year's exam results mean for the future of the Scottish education system?
Around the time that Scottish school pupils were sitting their preliminary exams in February, people in the SNP were whispering in my ear that the Education Secretary, Jenny Gilruth, was vulnerable to being moved from her post in a Scottish Government reshuffle. Today, alongside many young people north of the border, the education secretary will be relieved at this year's exam results. She will see them both as a vindication of how she is doing her job – and the fact that she kept it. Overall attainment is up, with 30.8 per cent of pupils who sat a Higher exam receiving an A grade and 75.9 per cent passing their tests. That is a slight increase on last year and – in the case of top grades – a decent bump on the 2019 results, which were the last set of exams sat before the Covid-19 pandemic. The awards handed out during the various lockdowns were higher than usual as pupils had high-stakes exams removed. In 2020, they were based on heavily moderated teacher estimates before a series of smaller assessments were then used to determine grades the following year. These latest set of results were a key test after a series of controversies last year: from falling pass rates, to blank emails being sent to thousands of pupils instead of exam results, to controversy over how some exams were marked. Chaos, in other words. It had to go smoothly this year and, so far, it has for Gilruth. So, that's the good news. The downside is that the SNP is still being judged on a pledge made a decade ago by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. 'My aim - to put it bluntly - is to close the attainment gap completely,' she said in a 2015 speech. 'It will not be done overnight - I accept that. But it must be done.' The following year, the Scottish Government's programme for government said ministers were aiming to 'substantially eliminate the gap over the course of the next decade'. Well, we're 12 months out from that deadline, and while the gap has narrowed a little year on year, it is largely stuck at the same level as it was pre-pandemic. Indeed, it has widened for advanced highers. Gilruth, a former modern studies teacher, who was appointed to her cabinet post in 2023, believes that the key to progress is by focusing on what goes on in classrooms and listening to those leading them. Her family and friends still work in the profession, meaning she is left in no doubt about concerns from those on the frontline. She is determined to work with teachers and that has informed her approach to the new body, Qualifications Scotland, which will run next year's exams. Donna Stewart, Scotland's chief examining officer, is a former deputy headteacher, and others are being moved straight from classrooms into senior positions. Teachers at the sharp end say this is filtering down to them with a 'very positive' Curriculum Improvement Cycle, which was set up in 2021 to help develop how subjects are taught, listening to those in classrooms and being unafraid to criticise the outgoing Scottish Qualifications Authority. The SQA is being scrapped – and replaced by Qualifications Scotland – because of a series of exam controversies. The biggest of these was the decision to use an algorithm to use schools' past performances to change some pupils' grades when exams were first scrapped during the 2020 lockdown. After public protests from pupils and teachers – and a vote of no confidence being tabled in the education secretary of the day – 124,000 exam results were reinstated. So who was that education secretary, who survived that vote on his future only after U-turning on the original policy? It was the current First Minister, John Swinney. If these exam results are signs that a mess is being cleared up, his successor could argue that much of the untidiness is of her boss's making.
