HMRC warning to check codes on letters as workers are owed £700 each – check if you're affected
It comes as the May 31 deadline has passed for employers to issue P60 forms – a crucial document that confirms how much tax you've paid in the last financial year.
1
But tax experts are warning that many workers could be on the wrong tax code without even knowing it, potentially costing them hundreds of pounds.
One in three Brits has been on the wrong tax code at some point, with average overpayments hitting a hefty £689, according to research by Canada Life.
The blunder means HMRC could be sitting on billions in overpaid tax and the only way to get it back is to check your details and flag it.
Taxpayers should double check the 'final tax code' on their P60 that's the string of letters and numbers near the top of the form.
Codes like "BR", "D0", or "D1" should raise a red flag.
These mean you may have been taxed at a flat rate with no tax-free allowance.
Anyone who stayed with the same employer up to April 5 should have already received their P60, either in the post or digitally.
And while it may be tempting to toss it aside, it's an important piece of paperwork.
Not only is it used to claim tax rebates, it's also essential for applying for tax credits, benefits, loans, or even a mortgage.
If you think your code is wrong, or if something doesn't look right on your payslip, it's time to act.
How to check your tax code
You can check your current tax code by logging into your personal tax account online, using the HMRC app, or digging out your latest payslip.
You may also have received a Tax Code Notice from HMRC in the post, so it's worth checking any recent letters too.
If the numbers don't add up, contact HMRC directly.
You can call them on 0300 200 3300 or write to: Pay As You Earn and Self Assessment, HMRC, BX9 1AS.
Those who've overpaid could see a refund land in their bank within five days once their claim is processed or receive a cheque in the post within two weeks.
But it's not always good news, some may find they underpaid tax and owe HMRC money.
If that's the case, most will be asked to repay it gradually over 12 months.
If you're owed money, you may also receive a P800 letter or a simple assessment telling you how much you're due and how to claim it.
There's a four-year limit on claiming back overpaid tax, so if you think you've been overcharged, don't delay.
Whether you're a full-time employee, working multiple jobs, or have just switched roles, it's worth double checking your code because a five-minute check could leave you hundreds better off.
The Sun has approached HMRC for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers face fresh challenge to welfare reforms in Wednesday votes
Ministers face a fresh challenge to their welfare reforms from Labour backbenchers, who have warned that the Government is being 'stubborn and obstinate' in its efforts. The Department for Work and Pensions will try to steer the Universal Credit Bill through its final Commons stages, including clause-by-clause scrutiny, on Wednesday. The Bill, if agreed to, would roll out two different rates of benefit for claimants who cannot currently work. It would also freeze the limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCW and LCWRA) elements of the benefit until 2030. The PA news agency understands that a 'substantial number' of Labour rebels have agreed to vote to gut the Bill of these reforms, if they can trigger a division. When MPs debated the reforms last week, Government frontbenchers rolled back on their plan to reform the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit, vowing to revisit any proposed changes only after a review by social security minister Sir Stephen Timms. 'The Government for all the goodwill of pulling clause five on Pip, they've lost it over being so stubborn and obstinate over clauses two and three,' Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell said. Clause two of the Bill includes a framework for two rates of LCWRA, with claimants who are eligible for the benefit before April 2026 able to claim a higher rate than later applicants. Claimants who are terminally ill or who have severe symptoms of an illness which 'constantly' apply would also be eligible for the higher rate, regardless of when they become eligible. Ms Maskell has proposed a change to the reforms, so that someone who has slipped out of and then back into the LCWRA eligibility criteria either side of April 2026 would still be able to claim the higher rate. Approving this change would be like 'gathering up the crumbs rather than getting the full course meal', she said. Asked what the Government should do to tackle welfare costs, Ms Maskell told the PA news agency: 'We've got to put the early interventions in to take people off this path of ill health. 'We've got quite a sick society at the moment for all the reasons that we know, a broken NHS, you know, social care not being where it should be, and of course long-term Covid. 'All of that is having its impact, and the endemic mental health challenges that people are facing. 'But to then have the confidence that your programme is so good that it's going to get loads of these people into work and employers are going to have to fulfil their obligations in the future hopefully after the Charlie Mayfield report (the Keep Britain Working review) will make those recommendations – all of that, great, as far as it goes. 'But what we can't do is leave those people that can't work in poverty, because they would love to work and earn money, but they can't, so we have to pay for it. 'And therefore the people who've got the good fortune of earning money, whether it's through income or assets, they're the people that are going to have to support a wider society.' Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan proposed gutting the Bill through a series of draft amendments, to strike clause two and cancel the freeze in clause three. He and Ms Maskell were two of 49 MPs who unsuccessfully tried to block the Bill at second reading, when it cleared its first Commons hurdle by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Amid fears the Bill had been rushed through Parliament, and referring to the Liberal reformer William Beveridge who published a post-war blueprint for the welfare state in 1942, Mr Duncan-Jordan asked: 'Beveridge didn't design the welfare state on the back of a postage stamp, did he?' Beyond changes to parts of the benefit specifically for people who cannot currently work, the Bill would demand an above-inflation rise to the universal credit standard allowance each year until 2030.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's retreat on welfare reforms leaves Britain vulnerable to bond traders, warns ALEX BRUMMER
Never has Mark Carney's 2017 assertion that Britain is dependent on the 'kindness of strangers' felt so real. The former Bank of England governor, now Canadian Prime Minister, made his remarks in the context of Brexit. It is not divorce from the European Union, however, but the failure of successive governments to get to grips with the size of the state which has so empowered the bond markets. Pledges to reduce levels of UK government debt as a percentage of output have featured in eight of the last ten fiscal plans unveiled by Chancellors of the Exchequer, says the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) in its latest fiscal risks report. Yet despite the declared targets, underlying debt has jumped by 24 per cent of national output over the past 15 years and by 60 per cent over two decades. The consequence is that the yield on government long-term bonds, gilt-edged stock, is higher now in Britain than at any time since the start of the 21st Century. A failure to get a grip, symbolised by retreat on welfare reforms, increasingly leaves Britain vulnerable to bond traders. That was seen most clearly during Liz Truss's brief period as Prime Minister in 2022. It has also reared its head when Labour took the helm a year ago despite an eye-popping £40billion tax raising budget last October. It notoriously failed to steady the ship. Bond yields spiked last week when it was feared that Chancellor Rachel Reeves might leave the Government after the retreat from welfare cuts. Amid the chaos, the hope is that despite tears in the Commons, the Chancellor would stick with her 'iron clad' fiscal commitments. Investment bank Goldman Sachs notes that 'the UK bond market sell-off largely stems from concerns about fiscal discipline'. Reneging on the welfare reform cuts is serious enough. But the 'UK now faces a structural deficit worsened by growth and employment forecasts'. The Labour narrative is that the problem can be fixed by tax rises in the Autumn with wealth in the line of sight. The OBR fiscal report suggests that this would only be a palliative unless fundamental changes to pensions and welfare can be delivered. Britain lacks the US anchor of a 'reserve' currency and Silicon Valley propelled growth to see off the pressure from the bond vigilantes. Vulnerability to the type of foreign speculator that Harold Wilson famously described as 'gnomes of Zurich' is profound. The switch in the UK from defined benefit (gold-plated) pension schemes to defined contribution pension plans, more likely to invest in equities than bonds, mean cornerstone buying of gilts will trend down. The OBR estimates that pension fund holdings of gilts will plunge from 29.5 per cent of gross domestic product in 2024-25 to 10.9 per cent by the 2070s. Foreigners, the Carney 'strangers', presently hold around 30 per cent of the debt stock. Overseas holders cannot but be aware that the UK has the third highest borrowing costs of any advanced economy but for tiny Iceland and New Zealand. Ideally, Britain would grow its way out of debt. It has the research universities, tech, science, creativity and financial innovation to do so with the right tax breaks for digital and cyber investment. It cannot do so while the albatross of rocketing pension, welfare and NHS spending hovers. The 'triple lock', costing the Exchequer three times more than projected at £15.5billion, needs to be revised. The unfunded public sector pension fund liability is ballooning along with public sector pay. An unreformed welfare system will need to be tackled. The number of working-age people classed as inactive since the pandemic has climbed to 780,000, above pre-Covid levels. It is driven by 660,000 citing long-term sickness as a cause of not working. The OBR estimates the extra welfare cost at £6.8billion a year and forgone tax revenues at £8.9billion. It is more attractive to go on the sick than claim unemployment benefit which is meaner and requires recipients to look for a job. Such changes dare not speak their name on the Left. If they don't happen, it will be mercurial gilt markets, rather than our elected politicians, that will have the biggest say.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How Labour is coming for YOUR money: Reeves is targeting wealth, pensions and Isas, warns JEFF PRESTRIDGE
Brace yourself for a summer of doom and gloom as Chancellor Rachel Reeves works out how to fill a gaping £40billion hole in the public finances left by Labour's U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments and disability benefits. Whatever she decides, and there will be twists and turns along the way, the Autumn Budget will make last year's seem like a walk in the park.
