Harry and Charles' Peace Talks Quickly Descend Into a Fresh Round of Recriminations
Neither side would comment on the record to the Daily Beast but a source in Harry's camp forcefully denied that they had leaked details of the meeting to the paper, which photographed the encounter. They stopped short, however, of directly accusing the king's office of leaking the details.
Given that one of Prince Harry's main grievances about his family has been the claim that his father's aides have planted stories in the media about him, the publication of the photographs in the Mail is likely to infuriate him.
The Telegraph reported Sunday that all the details of the meeting were leaked to the Mail, resulting in attendees being photographed as they arrived at the London club. In a further breach, it appeared the group took a table on an external terrace, open to public view from Green Park, where more photos of them were taken.
There are signs that the peace meeting itself has now become a source of further discord: while Harry and Meghan's camp insist they did not leak the details, a story in the Mail Monday quoted royal author Phil Dampier suggesting the meeting was indeed leaked by Harry in an attempt to 'portray himself as the one who is trying to patch things up.'
The pictures of the group talking could be published without an issue in the U.K., as under British privacy laws, individuals cannot claim to have had a reasonable expectation of privacy if they can be clearly seen from a public space such as a park.
The meeting was hosted by the king's press secretary Tobyn Andreae, who, before taking his role as the king's chief press officer was a senior editorial executive at the Mail.
Andreae arrived carrying a bag from wine merchants Berry Bros, which the Mail said confidently was a gift.
The members-only club selected for the meeting was the Royal Over-Seas League, a club of which the king is the patron and a member and is a short walk from King Charles' residence and office, Clarence House. It has long been a favored spot for Charles' courtiers to conduct discreet meetings. As is the case with all London clubs, rooms and tables can only be booked by members.
Harry's reaction to the meeting being leaked to the media and his aides being photographed can be well imagined after he alleged his family members have a penchant for revealing secrets to the media in his book.
In Spare, Harry said Camilla 'sacrificed me on her personal PR altar,' and described her as 'dangerous.'
In remarks to Anderson Cooper on the show 60 Minutes to promote the book, which is estimated to have made Harry some $27 million, Harry said: 'With a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street.'
Harry also claimed that Camilla leaked details of her very first private conversation with Prince William to the press shortly after the meeting.
According to Harry, as late as 2019, William was left 'seething' after learning that Charles and Camilla's staff were caught planting negative stories about him, his wife, and their children to the tabloids.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government lifts ban on developing land reserved for bridge project axed in 2008
A ban on developing land reserved for a proposed bridge project cancelled 17 years ago has been withdrawn by the Government. Transport minister Simon Lightwood described the safeguarding direction in relation to the axed Thames Gateway Bridge scheme in east London as an 'obstacle to much-needed development'. The bridge would have connected Newham to Greenwich, but was scrapped by then-London mayor Boris Johnson in 2008, who said the capital should focus on 'projects that deliver real benefits for Londoners'. Safeguarding is used to stop land from being developed in a way that would conflict with future schemes. In a written statement to Parliament, Mr Lightwood wrote that the safeguarding direction for the Thames Gateway Bridge dated back to 1940, when 'the area's transport needs were very different'. He went on: 'Since then, London's transport priorities have evolved, and over the decades we have seen major investments in London's river crossings – most notably the Dartford Crossing, and recently, the Silvertown Tunnel. 'The safeguarding directions therefore no longer align with the direction of transport policy or the evolving needs of this part of London. 'The continued safeguarding of this land has been an obstacle to much-needed development, and I am therefore lifting these directions. 'The Government is keen to deliver new homes and unlock economic opportunity, and we are taking steps to remove unnecessary barriers to progress.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pupil numbers in schools expected to drop by nearly 400,000 over five years
The number of pupils in state schools in England is expected to decline by nearly 400,000 by 2030 amid falling birth rates, Government figures suggest. The population attending primary and nursery schools is expected to drop at a 'faster rate' than previously projected over the next five years, according to the Department for Education (DfE). It comes as primary schools in parts of England, including London, have been considering closing due to falling pupil numbers and funding pressures. The latest DfE projections, published on Thursday, suggest that 4,205,117 pupils will be in state nursery and primary schools by 2030 – a fall of 300,000 from the population in 2025. Meanwhile, 3,135,086 pupils are projected to be in state secondary schools in 2030 – which is 97,000 lower than the actual school population in 2025. A population bulge in England has been moving into secondary schools, but the DfE said it now expects these pupil numbers to peak in 2026/2027. Last month, a former education secretary called for school funding to no longer be judged on a per-pupil basis because of falling pupil numbers. Conservative MP Damian Hinds said the decline in the number of children in schools meant funding being measured on a per-pupil basis was no longer a good reflection of whether funding is increasing or decreasing. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Falling rolls can create a real headache for schools already struggling amid severe financial pressures because the majority of funding is calculated on a per-pupil basis. 'It will be vital that the Department for Education protects schools that are particularly affected by this as it has a disproportionate impact on budgets, particularly for small schools. 'There are always significant variations between different parts of the country, individual schools and even year groups and other recent data forecast the number of school places planned for 2026/27 will need to double to meet demand. 'Trends can also change over time. Rather than reducing funding, we would urge the Government to continue to invest in schools, allowing them to maintain existing staffing levels. 'This would help reduce the unsustainable levels of workload which are fuelling a recruitment and retention crisis, also enabling some schools to offer smaller classes and more targeted help for pupils who need it.' Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'The forecast that there will be almost 400,000 fewer pupils in schools by 2030 will understandably cause concern among parents and educators about implications for their schools. 'However, it is not a given that falling pupil numbers means widespread school closures.' He added: 'Using falling rolls to reduce class sizes would improve schools for pupils and staff, helping reduce workload and improve teacher retention, allowing more contact time with each pupil to improve educational outcomes and allowing for greater integration of pupils with Send into mainstream classrooms. 'Schools with 30 pupils per class cost the same amount to run as schools with fewer per class, but the current funding model allocates money to schools on a per-pupil basis, leaving those with smaller classes out of pocket. 'To take advantage of the slowing birthrate and improved outcomes, the Government must protect schools with falling rolls from funding shortfalls and avoid schools in this situation making cuts that harm educational provision.'
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Britain to lower voting age to 16 before next national election, government announces
London — Britain will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 by the next national election as part of measures to increase democratic participation, the government announced Thursday. The center-left Labour Party pledged before it was elected in July 2024 to lower the voting age for elections to Britain's Parliament. Scotland and Wales already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. Britain will join a short list of countries where the voting age is 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A handful of European Union countries, including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament, but not their national legislatures. The move comes alongside wider reforms that include tightening campaign finance rules to stop shell companies with unclear ownership from donating to political parties. Democracy Minister Rushanara Ali said the change would strengthen safeguards against foreign interference in British politics. There will also be tougher sentences for people convicted of intimidating political candidates. Additionally, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government said it will introduce automatic voter registration and allow voters to use bank cards as a form of identification at polling stations. The previous Conservative government introduced a requirement for voters to show photo identification in 2022, a measure it said would combat fraud. Critics argued it could disenfranchise millions of voters, particularly the young, the poor and members of ethnic minorities. The law ironically caught out the man who had helped to usher it onto the books, when former Prime Minister Boris Johnson was turned away from his local polling station last year after forgetting to bring his photo ID. Britain's elections watchdog agency, the Electoral Commission, estimates that about 750,000 people did not vote in last year's election because they lacked ID. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. Harry Quilter-Pinner, head of left-leaning think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the changes were "the biggest reform to our electoral system since 1969," when the voting age was lowered to 18 from 21. The changes must be approved by Parliament, but Starmer's Labour Party currently holds an overwhelming majority of the seats, so it is likely to pass easily. The next national election must be held by 2029, but it could, theoretically, be called before that by the government. "For too long, public trust in our democracy has been damaged and faith in our institutions has been allowed to decline," Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said. "We are taking action to break down barriers to participation that will ensure more people have the opportunity to engage in U.K. democracy." Stuart Fox, a politics lecturer at the University of Exeter who has studied youth voting, said it's "far from clear" whether lowering the voting age actually increases youth engagement. "It is right to help young people be heard," he said. "But there are other measures which are more effective at getting young people to vote - particularly those from the poorest backgrounds who are by far the least likely to vote - such as beefing up the citizenship curriculum or expanding the provision of volunteering programs in schools."
