Divya Deshmukh says Chess WC triumph was stressful, needed stamina
Divya, 19, overcame Humpy in the tie-breaker after two nerve-wracking classical games ended in draws to become the first Indian woman to win the prestigious title and become a Grandmaster.
"It was quite stressful. Quite difficult at least because also it's such a long event. You have to keep up your stamina. You have to be resistant and you have to show up on the board every single day to give your best. Thankfully, I was never in a situation where I had to be in a must-win (situation). So, I don't know how I would have coped with that," said Divya in an interaction posted by FIDE on social media.
The Nagpur player added that though she was nervous going into the final, she wanted to give it her best shot after coming this far.
"I think from an emotional perspective, maybe, but the finals was incredibly difficult. The pressure, the nerves the toll that the entire tournament was taking and the feeling like you've come so far and now you cannot go back down so I would say it was quite difficult.
"I think there was always some part of me that would never give up. So I always wanted to fight, but after I lost the second match I was quite disappointed or mainly because I got a good position at the opening..
Beating an opponent like GM Dronavalli Harika in a tough quarterfinals was a key motivations which helped Divya to go all the way to the final. The match went to a tiebreak after two classical games ended in draws. Divya won both tiebreak games to advance to the semifinals.
"Harika was definitely quite strong, but I think because I had gone through (some tough games) already... by the time I got to Harika, I was already quite sure.
Divya said she was taking it one game at a time and only started entertaining thoughts of winning the title after she had reached the final.
"At least, I never had the thoughts of winning the tournament until I was in the finals. I knew that of course there's some part of you that always, you know, wants (to be) the best, but I was just trying to survive.
Divya then beat Tan Zhongyi of China in the semifinals, one of the strongest players in the world.
"She was a very strong player. Very strong. That was a close match. (As for Humpy), I think she's definitely quite strong, but honestly in this tournament the nerves...you know you have to be calm throughout the entire tournament." On whether achieving the GM title was bigger than winning the tournament, she said, "I think Grandmaster title is something that would have eventually come definitely come. I don't know when but it would have. So can't choose. I think the fact that both of them happen at the same time makes it all the more special.
"I think maybe maybe it was destiny that I got my title in one shot and the fact that I did not even have even one (GM) norm before it and now I'm a Grandmaster. That's why I think that maybe it was meant to be.".
On what her mother told her following the emotional hug after winning the title, Divya said, "She told me to have confidence in myself and to manage my time. I think motivation is not a constant factor. I think sometimes there is, sometimes there isn't, but you just have to push through it.
"At least that's what I've been doing. And, what I believe in is that all I can do is give my best and I don't control the results. So, that's what I've been focusing on.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The age of Shubhman Gill is here
Just like Sachin Tendulkar securing his first Test hundred in Old Trafford 25 years ago to herald his arrival at the threshold of greatness; just like Sourav Ganguly furiously waving his shirt from the Lord's balcony in 2002 after a cliff-hanger of a final; or, more momentously, like Kapil Dev's 'devils' raising the World Cup trophy to change the destiny of Indian cricket 42 years ago, a new age in Indian cricket dawned under a brooding English sky. Even though it's a hollow claim to say that the result would taste as sweet as a triumph, the Test series that India drew could become a reference point, a metaphor of India's reemergence, a precursor to better moments, even a watershed event in the country's cricketing history. The team is not flawless, but it has forged an identity, shown spine and steel, a capacity to bite the bullet and an attitude to never surrender. Doubts lingered when India boarded the flight to Heathrow nearly 50 days ago. Gill's captaincy was untested; the batting was callow, the bowling group had injury concerns and ragged edges. Three stalwarts had recently retired and India had lost seven of its last eight games. But in the course of the English summer, the team cleared most of the doubts. Gill has the instincts, wisdom and poise to lead the side. The leadership responsibility elevated his batting too. Among Indian batsmen, only Sunil Gavaskar has scored more runs than Gill's 754 at an average of 75.4 in a single series. Contributions arrived from the two openers too, KL Rahul and Yashasvi Jaiswal, and the effervescent Rishabh Pant, who captured India's resilience by batting with a broken toe in Old Trafford, besides shellacking a pair of hundreds. Sai Sudharsan illustrated the virtues that could make him an ideal successor to Rahul Dravid and Cheteshwar Pujara at one drop. Ravindra Jadeja, at 36, has light left in him; Washington Sundar could fill the R Ashwin-shaped hole. Mohammed Siraj, with his unshakeable grit and unflinching energy, emphasised that there is life beyond Jasprit Bumrah in the seam-bowling department. There is a fiercely combative coach in Gautam Gambhir. In the end, it was a triumph of collective spirit and individual splendour, blending frictionlessly. The portrait, though, is both incomplete and imperfect. But it's how great teams are forged. It may take months or years. It won't be without fumbles and stumbles. India will have to keep its bowlers optimally fit for the big series, develop depth in the fast bowling department, polish some of the promising youngsters such as Sudharsan, Nitish Kumar Reddy and Anshul Kamboj, upskill some others. Gill, too, could be smarter with his bowling choices — which bowler to use, and when — as well as field placements. The journey will be fascinating, and at times frustrating. But there is boundless optimism as Indian cricket enters a new era. The age of Gill is upon us.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Najeeb Jung writes: Division is easy, outrage is cheap – sports teaches a different lesson
The recently concluded Test cricket series in England once again establishes how the religion of cricket, amid political polarisation, religious tensions and regional divides, has consistently demonstrated its extraordinary ability to bring the country together. What a sight to see Mohammed Siraj from one end and Prasidh Krishna from the other, bowling under the captaincy of Shubman Gill — need anyone say how sport binds our country. From the lanes of rural Bihar, Delhi or Lucknow to the elite clubs of Mumbai, cricket transcends India's many fault lines. It is not merely a sport; it is a collective passion, a secular celebration and a national obsession. More importantly, it is one of the few arenas where people of all faiths — Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Parsi, and others — not only participate but thrive, often becoming national icons whose achievements are cheered regardless of religion. India's cricket team, past and present, resembles a miniature version of the country itself. Over the decades, it has featured players from every region and many religions. From the early years of Indian cricket, when the likes of Ranjitsinhji and Duleepsinhji — both Hindu princes playing for England — laid the foundation for Indian excellence, the game already carried markers of inclusion. In pre-Partition days, when India was in the throes of communal violence, Nisar Ahmad, Fazal Mahmood, the Nawab of Pataudi Sr and Lala Amarnath formed the backbone of the Indian team. Post-Independence, players like Vinoo Mankad, Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, and Polly Umrigar represented India. In later years, Mohammad Azharuddin captained India for most of the 1990s. His religion was never a point of concern; his wristy elegance and calm demeanour won admiration across the country. Harbhajan Singh, from Punjab, became a fan favourite for his fiery competitiveness. Anil Kumble, Zaheer Khan, and Robin Uthappa, all wore the Indian jersey with distinction and pride. This was a statement of pure secularism in Indian cricket. This same theme is played out in other sports — in football, in hockey or any other sport that we participate in. Syed Rahim coached the Indian football team to glory as Syed Nayeemuddin captained India as did Yusuf Khan and Jarnail Singh. Sikh hockey players brought repeated glory even as Mary Kom and now Nikhat Zareen bring laurels in boxing. Sport is replete with these examples. And yet, at times even sport has not remained entirely untouched by India's religious sensitivities. There have been moments when Muslim or Sikh cricketers have been unfairly criticised or subjected to suspicion. The most prominent example in recent memory was Mohammed Shami's experience after the 2021 T20 World Cup match against Pakistan. India lost the match, and Shami — one of the few Muslim players in the team — was subjected to a torrent of abuse on social media. He was trolled viciously, with many insinuating that his religion had made him less loyal to the national cause. Much to everyone's disgust, Arshdeep Singh was trolled when he dropped a catch while playing against Pakistan. But what followed was equally revealing. Teammates, past legends, and the broader cricket community rallied around Shami and Arshdeep. Virat Kohli, then the Indian captain, issued a powerful statement condemning the abuse, calling out religious bigotry, and defending his teammates in unequivocal terms. His words resonated deeply with millions of Indians who were appalled at the targeting of national players based on religion. But these incidents, while serious and concerning, remain exceptions. The broader narrative is one of inclusion and unity, where sport has often acted as a balm, offering moments of national cohesion in an otherwise divided polity. Sport may unify, but it cannot entirely escape the undertow of communalism that affects all public life in India. However, each such incident also becomes an opportunity — where the public and sporting fraternity reassert the foundational values of secularism and merit on every such occasion. Sport provides moments of pure national joy that cut across caste, class and religious lines. The 1983 World Cup victory in cricket or the 2007 T20 triumph, and the 2011 World Cup win are etched into the consciousness of every Indian. The same feelings ran through the nation when our athletes performed well at the Olympics or the Asian and Commonwealth Games. In those moments, the nation was not Hindu or Muslim or Christian — it was simply Indian. People celebrated in mosques, temples, churches and gurdwaras alike. Flags waved in all neighbourhoods, urban or rural, rich or poor, majority or minority. In those nights of triumph, sport did something no policy or speech could: It made Indians feel like one people. India is at a delicate moment in its democratic journey. Religious polarisation has increased in some quarters, and public discourse is often fraught. But cricket, and sport in general, remains an oasis where pluralism thrives. That players of all faiths continue to be selected, cheered and honoured is a testament to the sport's unique place in the Indian psyche. How pleasing it is when a Neeraj Chopra embraces an Arshad Nadeem and touches the latter's mother's feet in respect. But this harmony cannot be taken for granted. Institutions like the BCCI, football, hockey, wrestling, badminton, shooting federations or cricket academies, schools, and the media must actively work to promote inclusivity. Religious identity should neither be a qualification nor a disqualification. Performance, character and discipline must remain the only criteria. At the same time, fans must be made aware of the dangers of communalising sports. Booing a player based on religion is not just wrong — it is un-Indian. The message must be clear: In blue, we are one. Sports is the only religion in India that does not discriminate. It is played by all, loved by all, and celebrated by all. It brings joy in a way that no temple, mosque, or gurdwara can promise. At a time when division is easy and outrage is cheap, sports reminds us of what we can be — an India where a Muslim fast bowler, a Sikh spinner, a Christian batter, a Hindu captain, a Sikh hockey captain, a girl shooter or wrestler, a Christian or Muslim boxer, or badminton players win together, lose together, and always play together. That is the India we cheer for. That is the India we must strive to protect. The writer is former vice-chancellor, Jamia Millia Islamia, former Lt Governor of Delhi, and currently, chairman, Advanced Study Institute of Asia
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'2-2, things could've been different': Sachin Tendulkar's bold verdict on Shubman Gill's captaincy in England series
India batting legend Sachin Tendulkar, on Tuesday, shared his verdict on Shubman Gill's captaincy during the recently concluded Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, where India held England to a 2-2 draw in the gruelling five-match series. It was Gill's first assignment as India's Test captain, following Rohit Sharma's retirement from the format in May, just weeks before the squad was announced for the tour. India drew the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series 2-2 against England Speaking in a video on Reddit, where he analysed various aspects of the series, Tendulkar said that while the result could have gone differently, he felt Gill did well in his debut captaincy stint. "All in all, a fantastic result. 2-2, things could've been different, but there are no ifs and buts in cricket," said Tendulkar. The former India batter also highlighted how Gill constantly searched for ideas, tweaking his plans each time England built a solid partnership. He noted that Gill remained calm and composed under pressure. "Captaincy has a lot to do with how the bowlers are bowling, how disciplined they are and how long they can persist with their plans," said Tendulkar. "Sometimes what happens is that if things are not going the bowlers' way, they start experimenting. That is when the captain feels that the fielders he has on the ground is not enough, he needs more, because runs will be coming from everywhere. "He still looked calm and composed, but when partnerships happen, it becomes difficult for any captain, and the priority becomes to dry their runs." Overall, Tendulkar was impressed with how Gill silenced Bazball throughout the series and denied them a win at home. "Overall I felt he controlled the team well. There were areas things could've been different but, everyone has their opinion. This was his first series and possibly against the most attacking side in Test cricket. I don't think any other team bats the way this England side does," he said. Tendulkar also analysed Gill the batter, who went on to score 754 runs in 10 innings across the series - the most by an Indian captain in a single Test series in history and the second-most after Don Bradman's 801 against Australia at home in 1937. "Shubman batted brilliantly throughout the series, he looked calm and composed, organised," said Tendulkar. "When it comes to quality batting, you've got to have a clear head and a game plan. And he was extemely consistent as far as his thought process is concerned because it reflects on your footwork. If you are not clear in your head, your body doesn't respond accordingly. His body responded brilliantly, he looked so much control he had so much time to play the ball. "There was precision in his footwork. The most important thing that I noticed was the respect to a good ball. Where the tendency sometimes is to push the ball on your front foot even if the ball is not near your foot, he was able to defend there. And consistently defend well on front foot. His ability to leave was very good. Overall, shot selection was very, very good and precise."
