Still waiting for your tax refund? Here's what might cause a delay
Auto-assessments were sent out to 5.8 million South Africans and a total of R10.6 billion was refunded.
That's an average refund of R1 828.
From Monday this week, it's the turn of those who weren't auto assessed to submit their tax returns on the SARS eFiling portal. Auto-assessments: 7–20 July 2025 Individual Taxpayers: 21 July – 20 October 2025 Provisional Taxpayers and Trusts: 21 July 2025 – 19 January 2026
While those auto assessed received their refunds in 72 hours – often quicker than that – those manually uploading tax returns may be experiencing delays.
The list below could be the reason why … Banking details under verification If SARS flags your bank details for verification, it can take up to 21 business days from when they receive all the correct supporting documents.
from when they receive all the correct supporting documents. Once verified, the refund is typically paid within 72 hours. Return selected for verification If your tax return is selected for a standard verification , the process may take up to 21 business days after submitting all required documents.
, the process may take after submitting all required documents. Refunds are usually paid within 72 hours after verification is completed. Multiple tax years submitted for audit/verification When several tax years are submitted and selected for audit or verification , SARS may take up to 90 business days to finalise.
, SARS may take to finalise. Only once all years are verified will the refund be issued (within 72 hours thereafter). Return selected for full audit A full audit can take up to 90 business days (from when all complete documents are received), unless SARS communicates otherwise.
can take up to (from when all complete documents are received), unless SARS communicates otherwise. Refund follows within 72 hours post-audit. Outstanding tax returns No refund will be paid if you have any unsubmitted tax returns. These must be filed first. Incorrect or outdated banking details Refunds won't be processed if SARS has incorrect banking information. You'll need to update and verify your details. Outstanding SARS debt If you owe SARS money, your refund may be used to offset your debt through a process called debt equalisation. Only the remaining balance (if any) will be paid to you.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
South African Lens: Pakistan's Divorce Laws Leave Women in Financial Limbo
As it stands, Pakistan follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled—regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. Image: Supplied In many societies, divorce is not just a personal rupture but a financial reckoning — especially for women. This is starkly true in Pakistan, where the legal system fails to recognise a woman's right to marital property, often leaving divorced wives with little more than the clothes on their backs. For South Africans watching global gender justice trends, Pakistan's legal landscape raises urgent questions about how tradition, law and social norms can entrench inequality in the private sphere. Despite Islam's emphasis on justice and the protection of the vulnerable, Pakistani women who exit a marriage often do so without any claim to assets acquired during the relationship. This is because Pakistan does not currently have legislation that guarantees women a share in property accumulated while married. As it stands, the country follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled, regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. The Lahore High Court recently instructed the federal government to consult on a proposed amendment to the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961. The amendment, initially brought forward by Senator Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, introduces terms such as 'matrimonial asset' and seeks to give women fairer recognition of their contributions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The court's intervention may become a turning point, as public discourse grows around the injustice of women leaving long marriages with nothing, despite having raised children, run households and sacrificed careers. To understand the impact, it helps to look beyond Pakistan's borders. Countries such as Turkey, Malaysia and Morocco — Muslim-majority states like Pakistan—have adopted laws that balance Islamic principles with modern family realities. In Turkey, marital assets are presumed to be jointly owned unless otherwise agreed. Malaysia takes both financial and non-financial contributions into account when dividing property. Morocco's Family Code permits couples to decide beforehand how to share property, with the law recognising joint management during the marriage. These countries demonstrate that religious values and women's rights need not be in conflict. Legal frameworks can uphold the dignity and equality of both spouses, particularly when marriages dissolve. Currently, Pakistan's system mirrors what legal scholars call a pure separate property regime. Under this model, property belongs only to the person who earned or acquired it. There is no assumption that marriage creates an economic partnership, and courts generally require strict proof of ownership. This often disadvantages women who have worked in the home or made indirect contributions, as they lack titles or formal income records. South Africa, by contrast, provides multiple options when couples marry, including community of property, which assumes equal ownership of assets acquired during the marriage. This legal approach acknowledges that both spouses contribute to the financial foundation of the household, even if in different ways. South African courts, when dividing property, also take into account each partner's needs, contributions and the duration of the marriage. It is a system far more aligned with the complex social reality of marriage than Pakistan's outdated laws. The cost of inaction in Pakistan is high. Women who divorce often lose access to shelter and income. Even where they have invested years in managing the home or caring for children, the law offers no recourse. Many end up dependent on their families or feel pressured into remarriage for economic survival. This perpetuates gendered cycles of poverty and limits women's agency. Pakistan has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which requires states to ensure equality in marriage and family relations, including property rights. CEDAW's guidance calls for equal access to marital assets. Other Muslim-majority countries have made strides toward compliance. Tunisia and Iran, for instance, have introduced property-sharing rules that acknowledge both partners' roles in a marriage. Pakistan, however, remains out of step. Legal reform is not only a technical matter. It is about recognising that women are equal partners in family life, deserving of financial security when that partnership ends. Amending the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance to define and protect matrimonial property would help courts provide more consistent, fair outcomes. It would also signal that Pakistan is serious about its commitments to gender equality, both to its citizens and the global community. For South Africans, watching this debate unfold is a chance to reflect on how far we have come and how far others still need to go. In a world where women's rights are constantly under pressure, the battle for fairness within the family is as important as any public policy reform. Pakistan stands at a fork in the road. One path leads to continued injustice and economic hardship for women. The other leads to fairness, dignity and the recognition of women's work — paid or unpaid—as valuable and deserving of protection. The choice, now, is in the hands of lawmakers.
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
COSATU urges unity as racial rhetoric threatens South Africa's AGOA trade benefits
Thabo Makwakwa | Published 2 days ago The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has issued a strong call for organisations across the country to tone down on divisive and destructive rhetoric that fuels racial tensions. The organisation stressed the importance of unity as South Africa seeks to renew the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) with the United States. In a statement released on Friday, COSATU's parliamentary coordinator, Mathews Parks, highlighted the potential consequences of inflammatory discourse, warning that "the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, particularly Afrikaans farmers and workers." COSATU's call comes amid the US' annual review of AGOA member eligibility, a critical process determining whether South Africa and other nations will retain preferential trade benefits. Parks expressed the federation's support for renewing AGOA before its expiry at the end of September, highlighting its significance for South Africa's economy. 'AGOA has been an important stimulant for key jobs and revenue-rich sectors such as mining, agriculture, motor manufacturing, and more,' Parks said. 'It has facilitated trade and investment between the US and South Africa, with over 600 American companies invested here and 500,000 South African jobs linked to US trade. It's a framework that benefits both nations and the continent.' He further noted that South African vehicle exports, including components like steering racks from Tunisia and rubber from Côte d'Ivoire, demonstrate the interconnectedness of regional trade, which AGOA has helped to facilitate. Parks stated the importance of a mutually beneficial trade agreement, highlighting opportunities for expanding product inclusion, supporting emerging sectors, and strengthening cooperation on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). COSATU expressed the positive reception of its proposals in Washington and lauded the solidarity shared with American labor movements, especially the AFL-CIO. The federation pledged to continue working closely with the South African government, business sectors, and US counterparts to deepen bilateral relations—while respecting sovereignty and promoting sustainable economic growth. 'Progress under President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership to reset bilateral relations is encouraging,' Parks stated. 'However, it is vital that all parties support these efforts and refrain from inflammatory language that undermines social cohesion.' The federation strongly urged organisations such as AfriForum, NEASA, Sakeliga, and the Freedom Front Plus to prioritise national unity over partisan point-scoring. 'Whilst social media clicks may entertain friends over a braai, the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, in particular Afrikaans farmers and workers.' Parks stated that legitimate grievances should be addressed through constitutional and legal channels like Parliament, the judiciary, or law enforcement, rather than through rhetoric that incites racial divisions. 'Now is the time to shed narrow racial interests and place the nation's needs first,' he asserted. 'Partisanship has its place during elections, but the current climate demands maturity and responsibility from all stakeholders. Meanwhile, In a letter dated February 11, 2025 Republican congressmen Andrew Ogles, Tom Tiffany, Joe Wilson and Don Bacon asked President Donald Trump to revoke South Africa's access to the US market through AGOA and diplomatic relations alleging that South Africa had a vendetta against Israel, allegedly committing human rights violations and was friendly with China's Community Party. [email protected] IOL Politics
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Leaked affidavit exposing Landiwe Ntlokwana's involvement in a multi-million rand scheme
According to the affidavit, Ntlokwana managed investor data, tracked payments, and even used her company's bank account — GTT Wealth (Pty) Ltd — to receive millions of rands from individuals drawn into Bushiri's now-notorious commodities investment platform. Image: Supplied A leaked affidavit has exposed Landiwe Ntlokwana, a former auditor and financial coordinator for Prophet Shepherd Bushiri, as a key figure in a multi-million rand investment scheme — and strongly suggests she is using her testimony under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act in a strategic bid to escape prosecution. According to the affidavit, Ntlokwana managed investor data, tracked payments, and even used her company's bank account — GTT Wealth (Pty) Ltd — to receive millions of rands from individuals drawn into Bushiri's now-notorious commodities investment platform. Her phone, she claims, was used by multiple committee members as the central point of contact for investor communication. 'The committee and I continued our administrative duties as described previously. My phone continued being passed around for whoever wanted to focus on that function,' she said. With a strong background in Microsoft Excel, Ntlokwana took responsibility for consolidating all investor information into a single master file, which she says was used by the IT team for internal reporting and to generate investor statements. The affidavit details the rapid expansion of the scheme and growing unrest within the church community. Ntlokwana describes how popularity surged beyond South Africa's borders, leading to complaints from international followers of Bushiri's Enlightened Christian Gathering Church who felt excluded from the opportunity. 'They started saying what was the point of belonging to a community where only a select few can participate in empowerment initiatives,' she said. These concerns, she claims, were taken directly to response, Ntlokwana says Bushiri called a closed-door meeting with her and five other women in his inner circle — Gladness, Rosemary, Shirley, Jumoke, and Memory. During the meeting, Bushiri announced the launch of a new investment round: Commodities Trade Cycle 3. This phase, however, was exclusive to high-net-worth individuals, with a minimum investment of R1 million. Despite her corporate background at firms like Grant Thornton and Allan Gray, Ntlokwana admits there were no formal contracts governing her role. Legal experts find this highly questionable. 'She's not an amateur. She knows how finance works,' said a senior investigator. 'The absence of contracts and the use of her company account are not rookie mistakes — they point to direct involvement.'Under Section 204, an accused may be granted immunity in exchange for full and truthful testimony. ''But such a deal hinges on credibility — something that could be Ntlokwana's biggest hurdle.'She handled the money, the records, and the investor lists,' the investigator continued. 'Now she's trying to claim she was just assisting — but this affidavit proves she was in control.' With Bushiri still in Malawi and his extradition proceedings stalled, Ntlokwana's testimony could close the case but she if found to be self-serving or unreliable, the prosecution could be left with little to stand on
