logo
Trump executive order says ABA's role as law school accreditor may be revoked

Trump executive order says ABA's role as law school accreditor may be revoked

Reuters24-04-2025
April 24 (Reuters) - The Trump Administration said in an executive order on Wednesday that it is considering revoking the American Bar Association's status as the federally recognized accreditor of law schools, a change that could impact lawyer licensing, student loans and attorney mobility, legal education experts said.
President Donald Trump said he was directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to assess whether to suspend or terminate the ABA as the government's official law school accreditor, citing its 'unlawful 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' requirements,' as part of an executive order, opens new tab focused on reforming higher education accreditation. The order also calls for a similar review of two medical school accrediting bodies.
The ABA did not provide comment on the order.
Trump's order followed a similar warning by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in March which had said that the government could revoke the ABA's accreditor status. The U.S. Department of Education has recognized the ABA as the accreditor of law schools since 1952.
Bondi said in a March letter to the ABA that she wanted it to repeal its law school diversity rule and scrap a planned revision. The ABA's Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar suspended, opens new tab the diversity rule in February.
A national accreditation system like the ABA's gives law graduates more mobility and 'protects the public as well as the substantial investments law students make in legal education,' said Kellye Testy, executive director of the Association of American Law Schools.
A single accreditation system enables law graduates to work in any state and in rural areas that don't have a law school, Testy said.
If the ABA loses its accreditation status, it could lead to a "patchwork of licensure requirements," said Austen Parrish, dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law. The vast majority of states currently require law students to graduate from an ABA-accredited law school in order to sit for the bar exam.
The high courts in Texas and Florida have both said in recent weeks that they are reviewing their ABA-graduation requirement, with the Florida justices citing the ABA's former law school diversity and inclusion rule.
Having to meet different requirements from multiple accreditors and states would be a headache for law schools, said Stetson University Law Dean Benjamin Barros. It's also unclear whether any other accreditor would step in to oversee law schools, he added.
'If not the ABA, then who?' Barros said. 'Having that national standard is really important.'
Student loan access could also be affected. College and professional degree students must attend accredited programs in order to be eligible for federal student loans. The vast majority of the nation's 195 ABA-accredited law schools get their federal loan eligibility through the accreditation of their central universities, not the ABA. But 13 standalone law schools, which aren't part of larger universities, use their independent ABA accreditation for federal loan eligibility as of July, Education Department data show.
If the ABA loses its accreditation authority, those independent schools, which include Brooklyn Law School and Southwestern Law School, would likely need to seek approval from other accreditors in order for their students to qualify for federal loans, Barros said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell moved to prison camp, Trump says no plea for pardon
Ghislaine Maxwell moved to prison camp, Trump says no plea for pardon

BreakingNews.ie

time23 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Ghislaine Maxwell moved to prison camp, Trump says no plea for pardon

Ghislaine Maxwell has been transferred from a Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas to continue serving her 20-year sentence for helping the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, the US Bureau of Prisons said on Friday. Maxwell's move from FCI Tallahassee, a low-security prison, to the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas, comes a week after she met with Deputy US attorney general Todd Blanche, who said he wanted to speak with her about anyone else who may have been involved in Epstein's crimes. Advertisement Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, confirmed she was moved but said he had no other comment. Spokespeople for the US Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment. I know nothing about the case. Asked during a White House interview with Newsmax on Friday about the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, president Donald Trump said: "I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it." He added:"I know nothing about the case." Asked about what was discussed between Maxwell and the deputy attorney general last week, Mr Trump said he believed Mr Blanche "just wants to make sure that innocent people aren't hurt" should documents in the Epstein probe be released. The BOP classifies prison camps such as Bryan as minimum-security institutions, the lowest of five security levels in the federal system. Advertisement Such facilities have limited or no perimetere fencing. Low-security facilities such as FCI Tallahassee have double-fenced perimeters and higher staff-to-inmate ratios than prison camps, according to the bureau. Asked why Maxwell was transferred, BOP spokesperson Donald Murphy said he could not comment on the specifics of any incarcerated individual's prison assignment, but that the BOP determines where inmates are sent based on such factors as "the level of security and supervision the inmate requires." Mr Blanche's meeting with Maxwell came as Mr Trump faces pressure from both his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats to release more information from the Justice Department's investigations of Maxwell and Epstein. Transcripts The department is seeking court approval to release transcripts of law enforcement officers' testimony before the grand juries that indicted Maxwell and Epstein. Such transcripts are usually kept secret. Two federal judges in Manhattan are weighing the government's requests. Advertisement Lawyers for Maxwell, Epstein, and their alleged victims are due to share their positions on the potential unsealing with the judges in filings on Tuesday. Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. Neither Mr Markus nor Mr Blanche has provided detailed accounts of what they discussed. Mr Markus has said Maxwell would welcome relief from Mr Trump. Maxwell was found guilty at a 2021 trial of recruiting and grooming girls for Epstein to abuse. She had pleaded not guilty and is asking the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction.

Brazil judge hits back at ‘cowardly and treasonous' plot behind US sanctions
Brazil judge hits back at ‘cowardly and treasonous' plot behind US sanctions

The Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Brazil judge hits back at ‘cowardly and treasonous' plot behind US sanctions

The supreme court judge presiding over the trial of Brazil's ex-president, Jair Bolsonaro, has said a 'cowardly and treacherous' plot is afoot to pave the way for another attack on the South American country's democracy. Judge Alexandre de Moraes was put under sanctions by the US on Wednesday, as part of an apparent push by Donald Trump to help his ally Bolsonaro escape punishment for allegedly masterminding an attempted coup after losing the 2022 election to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Trump also slapped a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports in response to what he called the 'witch-hunt' against the far-right former president. On Friday, Moraes, a shaven-headed Muay Thai practitioner known by the nickname Xandão ('Big Al'), came out swinging. He told the court that Trump's tariffs and the 'spurious' sanctions targeting him and other supreme court justices recently stripped of their US visas, were part of an 'illegal and immoral' ruse to obstruct justice that was being engineered by a group of Brazilian 'traitors' who had lobbied foreign authorities to carry out 'hostile acts' against the country's economy. Moraes said the campaign's objectives were identical to those of the 8 January 2023 riots in the capital, Brasília, when hardcore Bolsonaro supporters stormed the supreme court, congress and presidential palace in an attempt to reverse his election defeat. Those rioters, Moraes said, had hoped to generate social chaos that would provoke a military intervention and make way for a coup. Two and a half years later, Moraes claimed that by lobbying foreign authorities to impose tariffs, the Brazilians behind the alleged plot were trying to trigger 'an economic crisis, that would create a social and then a political crisis so that, once again, there might be social instability and the chance of a new putschist attack'. 'To the disappointment of these Brazilian traitors, [that] will not occur,' the judge added. Moraes did not name the 'supposedly patriotic Brazilians' he claimed were leading the supposed plot from overseas. But his comments were an unmistakable reference to Bolsonaro's third son, the congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, who moved to the US in February and has admitted to lobbying Trump officials to pressure Brazil over his father's plight. After Trump hit Moraes with sanctions this week, the younger Bolsonaro thanked him and said: 'I have a feeling of mission accomplished'. The supreme court's coup trial is expected to conclude in the coming weeks and Bolsonaro – who has denied leading a power grab – is expected to be convicted and sentenced to up to 43 years, meaning the 70-year-old could spend the rest of his life in jail. Moraes vowed that the court's work would continue as normal, despite the 'ham-fisted' attempts at coercion. There would be no 'cowardly surrender' from its members as they sought to defend their country's democracy. Trump's attempt to pressure Brazil's government and judiciary over Bolsonaro's fate has sparked the most severe diplomatic crisis between Brazil and the US in decades. 'The US government's interference in the Brazilian justice system is unacceptable,' Lula said on Wednesday, after Trump signed his tariffs into force and hit Moraes with Magnitsky sanctions normally reserved for the perpetrators of severe human rights violations. Polls suggest most Brazilians oppose Trump's attempts to meddle in the functioning of their country's institutions. Steven Levitsky, a Harvard University political scientist and Latin America expert, believed Trump was trying to punish the government of a country which had 'done a better job than the US by quite some distance at holding an authoritarian leader accountable'. 'Right now, Brazil is more democratic than the United States,' Levitsky said. 'Brazil's democracy is flawed. It's got problems. It's polarized. But it's a real functioning democracy and of course many Brazilians are pissed off that the Trump administration is trying to use trade policy to undermine the legal process there.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store