Egyptian-American Discussions Address Red Sea Tensions
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth engaged in a telephone conversation with Egypt's Minister of Defense and Military Production, General Abdel Majeed Saqr, to underscore the robust strategic partnership between the United States and Egypt.
According to a statement from the US Department of Defense, the two leaders explored means to enhance mutual interests, focusing on the significance of Red Sea security. They addressed the destabilizing actions of the Iran-backed Houthi movement in Yemen, which have adversely affected the Suez Canal and the broader global economy.
In a related development, US President Donald Trump and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi discussed regional mediation efforts aimed at restoring stability. The Egyptian presidency reported that the leaders deliberated on developments in the Middle East and mediation initiatives to reestablish calm, positively influencing Red Sea navigation and mitigating economic losses.
Trump, via his Truth Social platform, highlighted the substantial military progress made against the Houthi group, who have been responsible for attacks on vessels in the Red Sea. He also noted discussions with Sisi regarding the situation in Gaza, potential solutions, and military readiness.
The United States initiated military operations against the Houthi group on March 15, following the group's declaration to resume attacks on ships linked to Israel traversing the Red Sea, the Arabian Sea, the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and the Gulf of Aden.
Since November 2023, numerous global shipping companies have altered their routes to avoid the Red Sea due to the Houthi attacks, which the group claims are in retaliation for Israel's military actions in Gaza. This rerouting has led to significant economic repercussions, particularly for Egypt. Sisi revealed that the Suez Canal has suffered monthly revenue losses of approximately $800 million as a result of the ongoing instability in the region.
Egypt has consistently expressed support for efforts aimed at ensuring the freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, given the adverse effects on the Suez Canal. However, Egyptian officials have emphasized their reluctance to join any military alliances.
Military expert Major General Samir Farag stated that while Egypt seeks assistance in securing Red Sea navigation, it prefers not to participate in military coalitions, having previously declined involvement in the US-led 'Prosperity Guardian' initiative. Farag also linked the restoration of security in the Red Sea to the cessation of hostilities in Gaza, noting that attacks on vessels subsided during the truce.
Similarly, Ambassador Hussein Haridi, a former Egyptian Assistant Foreign Minister, indicated that the United States has shown interest in involving Egypt in Red Sea affairs. He suggested that the recent communication between the defense ministers of both nations aligns with this context.
Haridi underscored Egypt's position that, despite being significantly affected by Red Sea tensions, the root cause lies in the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
15 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran will increase the speed of its military, scientific tracks: Khamenei
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said Friday his country's military and scientific tracks will proceed 'at a faster tempo than before.' A ceasefire ended Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, but many Iranians remain uneasy, struggling with uncertainty as fears of another confrontation linger. The Israeli offensive targeted key nuclear facilities and military sites, killing top commanders, nuclear scientists, and hundreds of others, while also wreaking havoc in some residential areas. The attacks triggered the fiercest fighting in history between the two adversaries, ending with a ceasefire announced on June 24.
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Egypt to Counter Any Threat to Its Water Security
Egypt has warned it will take 'necessary measures' to protect its historical rights to Nile waters, following new statements by Ethiopian officials that the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) is only the beginning of a wider dam-building plan. A senior Egyptian official, speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat on condition of anonymity, said Cairo remains committed to securing a binding agreement that regulates current and future projects on the Nile and its tributaries. 'Egypt will act to safeguard its water security in line with international law and treaties governing transboundary rivers,' the official said. 'We have always known Ethiopia has broader ambitions beyond the GERD. That's why we've insisted from the beginning on a binding agreement, not only to limit the harm from GERD but to regulate any future projects as well.' He added that Egypt considers Nile water a matter of national survival and would 'resist any threat with full force.' Cairo is closely monitoring whether Ethiopia's new dam plans will involve the Nile or other river systems, he said. 'Each case will be assessed accordingly.' The comments came after Ethiopia's GERD Coordination Office head, Aregawi Berhe, told local media on Wednesday that the dam was 'only the first step' in the country's strategy for water and energy development. 'We cannot rely on just one dam,' he said, calling for additional projects to support agriculture, which he described as the backbone of Ethiopia's economy and food security. Berhe also said the GERD was built entirely with domestic funding, pushing back on earlier remarks by US President Donald Trump suggesting American financial involvement. 'Vital lifeline' Egyptian lawmaker Mostafa Bakry described the Ethiopian statements as 'provocative' and accused Addis Ababa of seeking to impose a fait accompli, despite ongoing deadlock over the GERD negotiations. 'Ethiopia is treating the GERD as a closed chapter and is now openly discussing what comes next,' Bakry said. 'Cairo has known from the start that Ethiopia wants to build dozens of dams under the pretext of development and agriculture. But the real goal is to control the river and limit Egypt's water supply.' 'This is an existential matter for Egypt,' he warned. 'We will not tolerate threats to our survival. Ethiopia must reconsider its course before the situation escalates.' Ethiopia's latest declarations come amid renewed international attention on the Nile dispute, following comments by Trump expressing concern over the dam's potential impact on Egypt. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi welcomed the remarks and reiterated his country's reliance on US mediation to broker a final agreement. Earlier this month, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed announced the completion of GERD construction and set September as the date for its official inauguration, inviting Egypt and Sudan to attend. Cairo swiftly rejected the call, denouncing what it sees as Ethiopia's continued unilateralism on Nile issues. Skepticism Egyptian water and Africa expert Dr. Raafat Mahmoud dismissed Ethiopia's justification that future dams would support agriculture. 'Most of Ethiopia's terrain is unsuitable for conventional irrigation. It's a rugged highland that relies on rainfall,' he said. 'Even GERD was completed with great difficulty and at high financial cost. Additional dams will face the same hurdles.' He argued that Ethiopia's ambitions are driven less by development and more by geopolitical aspirations. 'This is about positioning itself as a regional power and countering Egypt's influence in Africa. It's also part of a broader effort to gain access to the Red Sea and build a naval presence there.' Still, Mahmoud said Egypt is unlikely to take immediate action unless a direct threat to its water supply materializes. 'As long as there's no measurable harm, Cairo will likely stick to diplomacy. But under international law, it reserves the right to act if its vital interests are jeopardized.' He added that many of Addis Ababa's announcements are aimed more at domestic audiences than at regional planning. 'These public statements are often designed to rally Ethiopian citizens, even when they don't reflect the realities on the ground.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
SDF Arms Dispute Derails Planned Syria Talks in Paris
A planned meeting in Paris between Syria's government and the Kurdish-led administration in northeast Syria has been postponed without explanation, the Kurdish delegation said on Thursday, as tensions persist over the future of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). The talks, originally scheduled for Friday with participation from the US envoy to Syria, French Foreign Minister, and representatives from Britain and Germany, were seen as part of a Western-backed effort to revive negotiations between Damascus and the Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES). But Syrian state television quoted an unnamed government source saying Damascus 'has not and will not accept any discourse based on threats or preconditions that contradict the principle of state unity.' The source warned against 'attempts to preserve armed formations or seek separation from state institutions,' saying such moves would only deepen division and tension. 'There is no room for any call for an 'independent identity,'' the official added, calling it 'a rejected separatist invitation' and reiterating that the only path to a sustainable political solution lies in returning to the 'fold of the state' and holding serious national dialogue under Syrian sovereignty and without foreign agendas. The source also dismissed 'preconditions' for any intra-Syrian dialogue and said any insistence on maintaining armed groups outside state control was incompatible with building a unified national army. Karim Qamar, the AANES representative in France, confirmed the postponement in comments to the Kurdish Hawar News Agency, saying the delegation had not yet arrived in Paris and there was no confirmed agenda for meetings with French or European officials. The US and France, along with other Western capitals, had been working to bring the two sides together after a July 19 meeting in Amman involving US envoy Ethan Goldrich, Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad, and SDF commander Mazloum Abdi reportedly yielded 'significant progress,' according to Kurdish sources cited by Asharq Al-Awsat. The proposed Paris meeting was expected to focus on integrating SDF forces into the Syrian army and incorporating the AANES's local governance structures into national institutions — a core sticking point in long-standing negotiations. Speaking on Wednesday to Al-Youm TV, which is affiliated with the AANES, SDF spokesperson Farhad Shami said the group considered its weapons 'a red line' and viewed them as 'Syrian arms that cannot be handed over.' Shami said the key dispute with Damascus revolved around whether SDF fighters would join the army as individuals or as a unified bloc. 'We are ready to integrate as a single unit, not as individuals. Our negotiations are not a surrender but a dialogue between equals,' he said. But the Syrian government source pushed back in an interview with state-run Ikhbariya TV, stating: 'No military entity outside the official Syrian army can be considered part of the state's structure,' and reiterated that any effort to maintain armed factions independent of state control would hinder a comprehensive national solution. Kurdish sources familiar with the negotiations told Asharq Al-Awsat that Abdi's delegation had agreed with Damascus on 'broad outlines,' including retaining the SDF as a distinct formation within a single army corps, with subordinate units based in Raqqa, Deir al-Zor, and Hasakah — areas under the group's current control. The talks in Paris, now on hold, were to be a test of whether months of quiet backchannel diplomacy could overcome entrenched mistrust — particularly over the SDF's military status and the future of Kurdish self-rule in a post-war Syria.
