Centre eyes over ₹45,000 crore from divestment in FY26, bets on sale of IDBI Bank
The stake sale in IDBI Bank is likely to fetch ₹30,000–35,000 crore, while ₹10,000–15,000 crore could come from the offer for sale (OFS) of equity in other listed public sector undertakings (PSUs), the people mentioned above told Mint on the condition of anonymity.
'The long-pending IDBI Bank stake sale is expected to conclude this fiscal. It's the biggest-ticket item in this year's divestment plan," said the first person cited above. 'The rest is likely to come from minority stake sales in listed PSUs."
The central government and Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) together own 95% of IDBI Bank and plan to divest 60.72% of the combined shareholding. The privatization plan was first announced in the Union Budget for 2021–22.
Also read | Centre may raise about ₹10,000 crore in FY25 divestment, largely from OFS route
'The return from IDBI is a question of the quantum of stake sale from the government," said Rishi Shah, partner and economic advisory services leader, Grant Thornton Bharat. 'At current market valuations, there is a potential for a windfall gain for the exchequer."
No divestment target
The Centre has stopped setting separate disinvestment targets since FY24. However, the budget estimate (BE) for miscellaneous capital receipts (MCR), which includes proceeds from equity investments and public asset management, is pegged at ₹47,000 crore for 2025-26.
For 2024-25, the MCR was revised to ₹33,000 crore from ₹50,000 crore pegged in the budget estimates.
Economists note that 'miscellaneous capital receipts" is largely a matter of nomenclature, but the key issue is the government's ability to mobilise funds under it.
'It (divestment) will depend on market conditions, the valuations and the inherent strength of the company, which is put up for disinvestment," said Devendra Kumar Pant is the chief economist at India Ratings & Research. 'While in the last few years the government has not been able to meet its miscellaneous capital receipt/disinvestment targets in the last few years, earlier (in 2017-18) the government was able to overachieve its targets."
Read this | Mint Primer: Is now the best time to pursue divestment?
'Probably a relook at reasons of over-achievement vis-a-vis under-achievement could help in fine-tuning the strategy," he added.
The central government has only met its disinvestment targets once in the last 10 years, in 2017-18. That year, it exceeded the target of ₹1 lakh crore, with actual proceeds of ₹1,00,056 crore
The divestment proceeds stood at about ₹10,000 crore in FY25, with most of it from the government's minority stake sales in General Insurance Corporation of India ( ₹2,345.55 crore), Cochin Shipyard Ltd ( ₹2,015.32 crore), and Hindustan Zinc Ltd ( ₹3,449.18 crore), among others.
'There is no fixed divestment target anymore. The government has moved away from a numbers-driven approach to one that prioritizes strategy and value," said the second person, mentioned above.'It is a more pragmatic and calibrated process now, focusing on the right timing, favourable market conditions, and long-term value creation from public sector equity sales."
A spokesperson of the ministry of finance didn't respond to emailed queries.
'The government's move away from rigid divestment targets is a pragmatic acknowledgement of market realities. History shows us that actual receipts often fell short of targets. The important part is that the government is able to meet its target, which in turn enhances the credibility in the larger market," said Shah of Grant Thornton Bharat.
Also read | Centre may revive plan for fertiliser PSUs divestment in a phased manner from FY26
In January 2024, Mint had reported that there were as many as eight strategic disinvestment plans at various stages, which included selling the government's stake in the BEML Ltd, Shipping Corp. of India Ltd, HLL Lifecare Ltd, Projects & Development India Ltd, and Indian Medicines Pharmaceutical Corp. Ltd., among others.
Most of these have made little progress and could be taken up in the coming years, depending on the market conditions.
Fertilizer PSU sales still on hold
There's no plan yet to revive the strategic sale of state-owned fertilizer companies during 2025-26, the second person mentioned above said.
"Divesting India's fertilizer PSUs presents complex challenges, balancing efficiency with food security," the second person quoted earlier said. 'While privatisation could enhance efficiency, it risks price volatility and market instability."
To be sure, the current subsidy regime complicates private sector participation, and many PSUs face financial and operational inefficiencies. Environmental concerns, job losses, and regulatory hurdles further complicate the process.
In 2022, Niti Aayog had identified eight fertilizer PSUs for strategic sale, but the Centre put the plan on hold the next year as it prioritised increasing domestic production.
And read | Budget 2024: Divestment target for FY25 may be at least 20% lower than last year's
These included Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corp. Ltd, Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore, FCI Aravali Gypsum and Mineral Ltd, Madras Fertilizers Ltd, National Fertilizers Ltd, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers, Fertilizer Corp. India Ltd and Hindustan Fertilizer Corp. Ltd,
The central subsidies for fertilizers have seen a significant cut, from ₹1.71 trillion (revised estimates) in 2024-25 to ₹1.68 trillion (budget estimates) in 2025-26.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Trump's tariff move isn't likely to shake India's oil ties with Russia
Donald Trump has made a lot of noise about India's oil trade with Russia, calling it profiteering and threatening to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian goods. But New Delhi isn't blinking. As reported by TOI, a senior Indian government official put it plainly, 'We will go solely by the interest of our consumers and opt for the best option price-wise. If Russian crude works out cheaper than what we can get from other sources, why should we penalise our consumers?' The Centre has so far not made any move to wean off Indian oil refiners from Russian crude, which comes at a steep discount compared to purchases from west Asia or US. It has not just helped keep domestic pump prices lower, but also benefited European countries, which have been major buyers of diesel and jet fuel from India, sources told TOI. The economic logic is straightforward. Russian oil has been cheaper than what's available from West Asia or the US. India's refiners are not just cutting costs—they're helping stabilise fuel prices at home. And here's the kicker: Europe benefits too, as Indian refiners export refined fuels like diesel and jet fuel, some of which reach European markets. Trump's pressure tactics and the political showmanship Trump's frustration is spilling over into tariff threats. His core accusation? 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine .' He followed that with, 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' No actual figures were given. But just last week, he'd already slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and floated a possible jump to 100 per cent unless India stops buying Russian oil. Trump's new deadline is August 7. If Russia doesn't agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, he's hinted at secondary sanctions on countries that continue trading energy with Moscow. That includes India, China, and Brazil. But these threats are running into hard economic and political realities. Why Russian oil imports still makes sense for India After the West sanctioned Moscow in 2022, Russia started offering deep discounts on its oil. That's when India stepped in. It now buys around 1.7 million barrels a day of Russian crude, according to Bloomberg data. India isn't just stockpiling it. In the first half of this year, it exported 1.4 million barrels a day of refined fuels. About 40 per cent of that was diesel or gasoil, and 30 per cent was petrol and blending components. Refiners blend multiple sources of crude before producing fuels, so it's not always clear which exports came from Russian barrels. But the volume speaks for itself. And the trade hasn't slowed down. Over the weekend, at least four tankers delivered millions of barrels of Russian crude to Indian ports. India pushes back: No apologies, no shift in strategy India's Ministry of External Affairs had a sharp response. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' it said. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' It also pointed out that the US and EU themselves continue to trade with Russia, even when there's no national compulsion. India's position has been consistent. The decision to buy Russian oil was triggered when traditional suppliers diverted their barrels to Europe. It was the US, in fact, that nudged India to continue those purchases—albeit within the G7's price cap. Energy Minister Hardeep Singh Puri told CNBC in July that the Russian crude trade helped global prices stay in check, saying India was advised by Washington to keep buying—'but within the price cap.' NSA Doval heads to Moscow National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is heading to Moscow this week. The visit is expected to offer clarity on how India plans to navigate what officials call a 'geo-economic trilemma': cheap energy, political pressure, and long-term security interests. India has not made any move to scale back Russian imports. If anything, officials are eyeing additional discounts in light of Trump's bluster. Even business circles in Delhi are calling out the former US president's rhetoric. A statement from trade research body GTRI summed it up, 'India's oil trade with Russia has taken place with full transparency and broad understanding with the US… Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India citing oil trade is not only unjustified—it ignores market realities, misrepresents trade data, and undermines a key strategic partnership in the Indo-Pacific.' The BRICS factor and Dollar alternatives This isn't just about oil. Trump has also slammed India's involvement in BRICS and the bloc's discussions around alternatives to the US dollar. He's claimed India has the 'most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers' and is using tariffs as leverage to open up Indian markets to US agriculture and dairy—an area where India has refused to budge. One official noted that despite discussions, India would not allow imports of genetically modified American corn and soybean. Nor would it revise its stand on farm and dairy tariffs, which Trump has repeatedly criticised. India's energy alternatives, but only if needed If forced to diversify, India could boost imports from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the US. In fact, last week saw India's largest refiner suddenly snap up several million barrels from the US and UAE—moves widely interpreted as precautionary, not strategic shifts. India had, during trade talks, shown interest in ramping up imports of American gas, fertiliser, and defence equipment to improve the trade balance. But there are limits. Modi has refused to open up sensitive sectors like dairy, even as the US pushes hard. Trump and Modi were once seen as political allies. That relationship has cooled. The current standoff is the latest in a string of Trump-led escalations over oil, trade barriers, and foreign policy. From threatening to block access to US markets over India-Pakistan tensions, to taking credit for peace deals India denies happened, Trump's combative posture has worn thin in Delhi. His latest push threatening penalties on anyone still paying for Russian oil reflects growing frustration with Putin's unwillingness to compromise. Trump's nuclear submarine move last week, reportedly in response to Dmitry Medvedev's rhetoric, only adds to the volatility. But India, for now, isn't shifting course. As one Indian official summed it up, 'We are guided by what's best for Indian consumers, not what's best for Washington politics.' And that might be the line that defines this whole saga.


Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Cloud over MGNREGS restart in Bengal as Centre yet to clear labour budget
THE RESUMPTION of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) in West Bengal remains uncertain as the August 1 deadline set by the Calcutta High Court for restarting the scheme is over and the Centre is yet to clear the state's labour budget for the financial year 2025–2026, The Indian Express has learnt. According to sources, the West Bengal government had written to the Union Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) seeking approval to its labour budget, but the same has not been done so far. The labour budget is approved by the Empowered Committee headed by the Union Rural Development Secretary. States generate their demands for funds using NREGASoft, the management information system of the MGNREGS, only after this committee clears their labour budget proposals. Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said on Monday that the Central government is committed to the development of West Bengal and the welfare of its people. He alleged that the Mamata Banerjee government has 'failed miserably' in effectively implementing MGNREGS, but did not say anything about the resumption of the scheme in the state. 'From the year 2019 to 2022, Central teams visited 19 districts of West Bengal. During these visits, the Central teams found many anomalies and irregularities in the works of MNREGA in the state such as absence of work at the site, dividing the work into portions against the rules, misappropriation of funds… flouting rules and norms of MNREGA,' Chouhan said in a post on X. 'Due to these unethical actions of the state government, misuse of public money and lack of improvement in the system, the Ministry of Rural Development has stopped the release of funds of the state government under Section 27 of the MNREGA Act,' he said. Under the MNREGS, the MoRD releases funds to states 'based on agreed labour budget'. Generally, the states' labour budget proposals are approved by the MoRD by the end of January or before the beginning of the financial year (April-March). In West Bengal's case, no labour budget has been approved after FY 2021-22 after the Centre suspended the implementation of the scheme in the state. By invoking Section 27 of MGNREGA, 2005, the Centre had stopped release of funds to West Bengal with effect from March 9, 2022. In an order on June 18, 2025, the Calcutta High Court directed that the 'scheme be implemented prospectively with effect from August 1, 2025'. However, West Bengal officials say they have not received any intimation from the Centre about resumption of the scheme in the state. They have also been urging the ministry to approve of the labour budget but the same has not happened yet, said an official. The ministry officials have maintained silence so far on the issue of Bengal. Asked whether the MoRD challenged the June 18 order of the Calcutta HC, the officials did not respond. They also did not respond to queries on non-approval of Bengal's labour budget. According to sources, the Centre has not yet challenged the court order yet. On July 22, Union Minister Chouhan told the Lok Sabha that the High Court order is 'being studied in the ministry to decide further course of action'. In January this year, West Bengal's Rural Development Minister Pradip K Mazumdar wrote a letter to Chouhan, seeking an appointment for a meeting, which has not happened so far. Earlier, multiple meetings between the Centre and West Bengal government officials have taken place but the issue has not been resolved till date. Before the Centre suspended the MGNREGS in March 2022, West Bengal figured among the top performers with 51 lakh to 80 lakh families in the state availing of the scheme annually between 2014-15 and 2021-22. The data available on the NREGS portal shows that the number of households working through the rural job guarantee scheme stood at 51 lakh in 2014-15, 61 lakh in 2015-16, 58 lakh in 2016-17, 52 lakh in 2017-18, 43.89 lakh in 2018-19, 54.57 lakh in 2019-20, 79.64 lakh in 2020-21 and 75.97 lakh in 2021-22.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Why Trump's threat is unlikely to wean India off Russian crude
AI photo NEW DELHI: Trump's latest threat is unlikely to affect India's decision to source crude from Moscow as long as it's cheaper than the alternatives. "We will go solely by the interest of our consumers and opt for the best option price-wise. If Russian crude works out cheaper than what we can get from other sources, why should we penalise our consumers?" said a senior government source who did not rule out the possibility of India exploring further discounts from Moscow in the light of Trump's threat. Sources said NSA Ajit Doval's visit to Russia, beginning Tuesday, will yield clarity on the geo-economic trilemma. The Centre has so far not made any move to wean off Indian oil refiners from Russian crude, which comes at a steep discount compared to purchases from west Asia or US. It has not just helped keep domestic pump prices lower, but also benefited European countries, which have been major buyers of diesel and jet fuel from India, sources said. Biz circles agree with Centre's criticism of Trump's latest diktat Business circles in New Delhi agreed with the Centre's criticism of Trump's latest diktat. "India's oil trade with Russia has taken place with full transparency and broad understanding with the US. One of the key reasons India stepped up Russian oil purchases was to help stabilise global oil markets after Western sanctions disrupted traditional supply chains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here Undo By maintaining diversified and affordable energy access, India contributed to preventing a global oil price shock. Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India citing oil trade is not only unjustified - it ignores market realities, misrepresents trade data, and undermines a key strategic partnership in the Indo-Pacific," trade research body GTRI said in a note. Interestingly, Trump's sudden bid to arm twist India into abandoning purchase of Russian crude follows declining purchase from Moscow because of sheer logic of markets. In May, India's crude petroleum imports from Russia fell almost 10% to $9.2 billion. Trump's latest comment is expected to create fresh uncertainty among American buyers, who are in talks with Indian exporters for placing orders for the busy Christmas season. The government's firm stand on farm and dairy is seen to have come as a blow for Trump, who had gone public over a dozen times claiming that India had agreed to slash tariffs. Shaken by the govt's steadfast opposition to blocking genetically modified American corn and soybean as well as its public rebuttal of claims over the US mediating a ceasefire during Operation Sindoor have hurt Trump's claim to have brokered several peace deals - one in each month of his second term as president. During the talks, negotiators had indicated the government's willingness to step up purchases of American oil, gas, fertilizer and defence equipment to improve the trade balance which is tilted in India's favour. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025