
Alienated fans fear money-driven ticket exploitation is pricing out regulars
It is the time of year when season-ticket holders receive an email from their beloved club spelling out how much it will cost to follow them through thick and thin once again. The email often lands without warning of an increase, that bit saved for lower down after explaining the financial challenges and how the owner wants to invest to bring success. Generally it will say it was a 'tough but necessary decision' to charge for loyalty. For many fans this is becoming harder and harder to swallow.
In the Premier League, amid increased TV and prize money, chiselling extra out of those who almost feel obliged to attend seems unnecessary. The owners and directors who do this are well aware that fans, on the whole, will keep coming back. Football is such an integral part of many people's lives that they cannot imagine not making every possible trip to a place they regard as a second home and are willing to cut back elsewhere to prove their commitment.
Eleven Premier League clubs have announced their prices for next season. Five have frozen prices (Liverpool, West Ham, Tottenham, Leicester and Brentford) and six have upped the cost. There has been an average 5% increase at Newcastle, Brighton and Manchester United, while Nottingham Forest have gone as high as 8.5%. Arsenal's prices have gone up by 3% or 5% depending on the location of the seat. Everton are increasing prices – but at a new stadium. The UK's annual inflation rate was 3% in January.
Season-ticket holders were previously viewed as the lifeblood of clubs across the pyramid, the income from renewals in the spring allowing teams to plan for summer recruitment. But in the Premier League the money raised from TV deals has changed the picture: a good amount of focus now goes on selling single match tickets at higher prices and some clubs do not offer lapsed season tickets for sale again.
Premier League rules say clubs must have concessionary tickets but the category is not defined and some clubs are manoeuvring to offer them only in certain parts of the ground to ensure premium seats can be sold at the highest value. A rewriting of the stipulations would help young fans, and the game needs the next generation to have access to matches.
There are factors that clubs may give little thought to because they are out of their control but the rising cost of transport, food and drink make a day out at the football more expensive than ever before entering the ground.
Clubs are adept at exploiting loyalty and give the impression they do not understand fan culture, paying for light and pyrotechnic shows when most people attending matches only want affordable football. The Football Supporters' Association (FSA) has a long-running campaign, Stop Exploiting Loyalty, that aims to unite fans and give them a stronger collective voice.
'Whilst some clubs do have really good dialogue with their supporter representatives, either their supporter organisations or fan advisory boards, we do have some concerns that clubs are not providing key information in adequate time to allow for proper feedback and dialogue,' an FSA spokesperson says. 'Fans across the league feel there is a move away from the traditional culture of English fans and fear clubs are using money-driven agendas that will ultimately impact a club's support.'
There will be changes at Old Trafford next season when certain longstanding match-goers will be moved so their seats can be repackaged as hospitality spots, which will be far more valuable. United have been open about it, saying: 'Some of the general admission tickets directly adjacent to the home and away dugouts will be converted to hospitality seats, reflecting the high value of this unique location.' They are not the first to monetise seats in that area of a ground. The Etihad Stadium has the Tunnel Club and Chelsea are selling seats in the equivalent position for £12,500 for certain fixtures.
Sign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotion
It may be difficult for many people to accept the increasingly corporate nature but most fans understand how the Premier League has evolved. Eye-watering fees for certain people might have brought the lowering of prices elsewhere but this is not the case.
When a new stadium is built it offers a blank canvas and in the coming years there is the potential to redesign the traditional plans and have season tickets, about two-thirds of capacity, sold cheaply in specific blocks and premium seats being made more expensive. These sort of suggestions are being heard in meetings at clubs who are planning a new stadium but it would take a bold decision-maker to go away from the status quo.
Concentrating one-off visitors in particular areas could bring additional financial benefits for clubs. Different in-stadium merchandise or food options, for example, could be made available to such fans, whose wants tend to differ from those of supporters who attend every match.
Clubs need to be careful. The football experience is not only about the action on the pitch but what happens in the stands. The attenders who come for a solitary fixture want an experience to remember and part of that is a lively atmosphere. It is often up to the regulars to create the noise but if they are priced out, quiet stadiums could follow and that would harm the product for day-trippers and TV audiences.
'Clubs benefit massively from huge broadcasting and sponsorship deals, income that is way above and beyond the income of ticketing,' the FSA says. 'Small increases here and there impact the supporters way more than it benefits the club. Cash-grab agendas will only damage the atmosphere and that core local support that the Premier League has built itself on. As fans, we also love being the best in the world. We helped build it – it is important this isn't exploited.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
18 minutes ago
- Metro
Mikel Arteta accused of making Arsenal transfer mistake with £45m star
William Gallas has accused Mikel Arteta and Arsenal of making a potentially costly transfer mistake. The Premier League runners-up have been one of the more subdued clubs during the summer transfer window and are yet to make any signings. Arsenal are, however, set to welcome three new players to the Emirates Stadium in Martin Zubimendi, Kepa Arrizabalaga and Christian Norgaard. In terms of outgoings, Jorginho and Kieran Tierney have left on free transfers and Raheem Sterling has returned to Chelsea following his dismal loan spell. Thomas Partey also looks set to leave the club and Gallas believes it would be a mistake for Arsenal not to keep him at the Emirates Stadium. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. The Ghana international held talks over a contract extension following arguably his best season with Arsenal but is yet to reach an agreement with the Gunners. Reports claim Partey has now decided to leave, given his current contract expires next week and he has attracted interest from several European clubs. Barcelona, Atletico Madrid and Juventus have expressed interest in signing Partey, who has made 167 appearances for Arsenal since his £45m move from Atletico in 2020. 'I think with his quality, he could stay at Arsenal,' Gallas told Genting Casino. 'With what he has offered to the club over the last few years, he can easily stay. 'And with their depth right now, I think it is best to add, not replace. I'm not sure of the reasons why he might leave, but I'm not sure it would be the best thing if he left.' The signings of Zubimendi and Norgaard will compensate for Jorginho and Partey's departures from Arsenal. After signing those two midfielders and Chelsea goalkeeper Kepa, Arteta will prioritise a deal for a new striker, with Viktor Gyokeres and Benjamin Sesko high on his wishlist. 'Arsenal have been looking for a striker for, I don't know exactly how long, but a top class striker should have arrived at Arsenal two or three years ago,' Gallas added. 'They didn't sign one. They obviously didn't think it was that important to add a top class striker. 'And I think that, when you look at their season, unfortunately, they didn't want the Premier League badly enough on a couple of occasions where they came close – last season, and also two years ago. 'They didn't want it enough to go and add that last missing piece of the puzzle. So now they are being linked with strikers again, just like they were in January. 'I hope they do get one of the strikers they want, because I hope they want the same thing every fan wants, which is to win the Premier League next season. More Trending 'If they want to have a chance at winning the league next season, for me, it depends on if they go and sign a striker who knows the Premier League very well and has proven they can score the right amount of goals at the top level. 'And I think the only player who fits that description right now is Alexander Isak. 'I know it will cost a lot of money, but he constantly scores more than 20 goals and seems to keep improving each year in the Premier League. 'So Arsenal should break the bank for him. He is the last piece of the puzzle, I feel, a perfect striker.' For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Valencia captain sends message to Cristhian Mosquera as club respond to Arsenal transfer bid MORE: Chelsea agree £55m deal and make decision over Emiliano Martinez transfer MORE: Harvey Elliott taunts Germany with wild gesture as England win Under-21 Euros


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Transfer news live: Chelsea target set for medical in £55m deal as Mbeumo makes Man Utd decision
The transfer window is now open again following the start of this summer's Club World Cup with clubs able to accelerate deals ahead of the new season. Arsenal chiefs are reportedly in talks with Eberechi Eze as the look to bring a striker to the club in this window. The Gunners have already agreed a fee for Brentford captain Christian Norgaard in a surprising move after contract talks with Thomas Partey stalled. They have also agreed to pay above the release fee for Spanish midfielder Martin Zubimendi and Mikel Arteta wants to sign RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko. Manchester United, meanwhile, have secured Matheus Cunha from Wolves for £62.5m and are negotiating with Brentford about Bryan Mbeumo, having submitted an improved offer. Florian Wirtz is now officially a Liverpool player after agreeing a record £116.5m deal for the German superstar and completed the medical last Friday, while Reds defender Jarell Quansah is set to go the other way in a £35m deal to join Bayern Leverkusen. Chelsea are set to sign Jamie Gittens after Borussia Dortmund accepted an offer of £55m for the former England Under-21s winger, who will have a medical, while the Blues are also competing with Newcastle United for Brighton's Brazil forward Joao Pedro. ew Timothy Fosu-Mensah believes hard work will pay off in long bid to find new club Timothy Fosu-Mensah is convinced his hard work 'won't go unnoticed' as the former Manchester United defender looks for a new home two years on from playing his last competitive match, reports Simon Peach of PA. The Ajax youth product made his breakthrough at Old Trafford, where he graduated from the academy and made 30 first-team appearances – a figure that would have been higher were it not for loans and injury. Timothy Fosu-Mensah believes hard work will pay off in long bid to find new club The 27-year-old is looking to kickstart his career after spending a season as a free agent. Jamie Braidwood29 June 2025 10:44 Bryan Mbeumo intent on Manchester United move Brentford are widely reported to have last night rejected a bid of £62.5m for Bryan Mbeumo from Manchester United. It's the second offer that the London club have knocked back for their forward as they hold out for a bigger fee. A blow, then, for Manchester United - though The Athletic report that Bryan Mbeumo has told both Brentford and Tottenham, another suitor, that he only desires a move to Manchester United if he is to be sold this summer. Talks continue. Jamie Braidwood29 June 2025 10:39 Chelsea and Newcastle have bids turned down for Brighton's Joao Pedro Chelsea and Newcastle are battling to sign Brighton's Joao Pedro, with the Seagulls reportedly turning down two bids for the Brazil forward. According to the BBC, Brighton want up to £60m for the 23-year-old and neither Chelsea or Newcastle, who are reportedly the clubs interested, have fallen short of that valuation. Jamie Braidwood29 June 2025 10:38 Jamie Gittens to have Chelsea medical after £55m offer accepted Jamie Gittens is set to have a medical at Chelsea after Borussia Dortmund accepted a £55m bid for the English winger. The 20-year-old has agreed a seven-year contract and the clubs have no agreed terms after negotiations began before the Club World Cup. Gittens, an England Under-21s international, moved to Dortmund in 2020 after coming through Manchester City's academy. 29 June 2025 10:34


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pride organisers warn Trump's DEI purge directly hitting UK events as corporate sponsorships drop
UK Pride faces a 'critical' funding crisis amid warnings that Donald Trump 's assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the US is having a direct impact on firms in Britain. The UK Pride Organisers Network said 75 per cent of Pride events across the UK seen a decline in corporate sponsorships this year, with a quarter experiencing funding drops of more than 50 per cent. Meanwhile, GoFundMe has reported a 'remarkable' 82 per cent increase in organisers resorting to crowdfunding events to bridge the gap in funding. Pride organisers have told The Independent that big corporations who have long sponsored them are 'pulling back their funding in all aspects', especially those with head offices in the US, after Trump issued a series of executive orders targeting diversity programmes in the public and private sectors, with many corporations such as Amazon and Google scaling back their DEI efforts since February. While Pride has grown as a movement across the UK for a decade, Dee Llewellyn, chair of UK Pride Organisers Network and director of partnerships and growth for London Pride, said corporate funding has 'fallen off a cliff', causing a number of events across the country close their doors, including big events such as Liverpool. The situation has led one expert to warn that 'the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over' for LGBTQ organisers. Mrs Llewellyn fears the LGBTQ community could experience 'five years of difficulty and struggles' as Trump fully implements the DEI cuts, adding 'it is the start of that process now.' 'I think we will see more global brands declining, not because they don't want to participate, but because they don't have the EDI budget to do so,' she added. 'It's not the people on the ground in the UK either, I've had brands that have withdrawn this year that were absolutely devastated to have to do it. 'But they've had their budgets cut from America and there was absolutely nothing they could do to argue or fight that in the UK.' Pride events across the country receive a bulk of funding from big businesses, varying on a scale of a minimum of 50 per cent funding to events like London, where approximately 95 per cent of the funding comes from corporate partnerships. Gary Richardson, an organiser from Worthing Pride whose regional celebrations were almost cancelled this year, said: 'It very much seems if they've got offices overseas, specifically in America, the DEI conversations that are happening there seem to be drip feeding into the economy over here'. John Hyland, former co-chair of Liverpool Pride and the Community Partnerships and Individual Giving Lead for LGBTQ charity Sahir, close supporters of Pride celebrations in the city, echoed Mr Richardson's point: 'When America sneezes, we all catch a cold.' 'Businesses seem to be a bit more reluctant to support LGBT organisations, which is having a massive impact on the likes of Pride,' he added. Pride in Liverpool had to cancel its plans this year due to 'significant financial and organisational challenges, which have impacted timescales and resulted in it reverting to an almost entirely volunteer-led operation.' Organisers severed ties with key sponsor Barclays in May after the bank's boss said it would prohibit Trans women from using female toilets in its buildings following the Supreme Court Ruling which ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. 'I think definitely in light of what's happened with the Supreme Court ruling, we've had a number of number of transgender community-led protests happen in Liverpool,' said Mr Hyland. 'If there's a year where we need Pride to happen, it's this year and our community has been very vocal about that.' As well as a decrease in corporate sponsorships, organisers have cited that local communities have struggled to fill the financial hole in Pride events planning due to the cost of living. Mr Hyland said that calls for support from local businesses in Liverpool fell through because 'they haven't got that kind of money.' On an average year where it costs around £140,000 to produce Worthing Pride over a weekend, 60 per cent of budgeting comes from sponsorship, while the rest comes from ticket sales. This year, the organisers are aiming for 70 per cent from ticket sales and 30 per cent from sponsors. Instead of receiving support from five to six big sponsors, they've managed to accrue 20 small sponsorships instead, with a number of companies offering pro bono support. Dr Francesca Ammaturo, senior lecturer in in Sociology and International Relations at London Metropolitan University, author of forthcoming book The Politics of Pride Events: Global and Local Challenges, said that while big businesses have taken on Pride as an issue of corporate responsibility, organisers have relied on corporate sponsorship because public funding has not always been accessible to the LGBTQ+ community. 'Pride events have become really dependent on them,' she said. 'Now when you insert the rollback that Trump is enacting on DEI policies, that is sending shockwaves not just across the US, but also across the globe because of globalisation. She added: 'The repercussions for these companies to sponsor pride events even beyond the US could be creating some backlashes at home. 'It's quite difficult for LGBT organisers today to accept that the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over, at least for now until we realise what is the next political that we will encounter.' Dr Ammaturo added that big business involvement in Pride had always been 'a very superficial commitment' more akin to 'a marriage of convenience which was conducive to a certain veneer of rainbow washing'. Mrs Llewellyn said that despite the radical funding cuts, Pride will persist in the UK, adding: 'It's essential now more than ever, really more than it has been over the past 10 years for us to be able to stand together as a community to have that safe space for us to join together. 'Pride is a protest. That is what it was born and rooted in,' she added. 'We've been through lots of hardships as a community, but when we stand together and we unite our voices, that is when we're strongest.'