Terrified passenger writes farewell note as Tokyo-bound Boeing 737 plunges nearly 26,000 feet
Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism said that the aircraft dropped from 11,000 meters (36,000 feet) to just 3,000 metres (9,800 feet) in under 10 minutes after the flight crew received a cabin pressure alert and declared an emergency, reported The Standard.
Flight data confirmed the aircraft's descent of nearly 8,000 meters in just minutes. The aircraft made an emergency landing at the Kansai International Airport in Osaka.
Passengers were forced to remain onboard for over an hour before being allowed to disembark. Although all 191 passengers and crew members onboard survived without physical injuries, the emotional toll was immense. Passenger says she wrote a farewell note
According to The Standard report, a woman identified as Wang, said there was an eerie silence inside the aircraft after oxygen masks dropped. Wang elaborated that she felt she was going to die and seeing the flight attendants on the verge of tears triggered panic.
Another passenger told the outlet that she wrote a farewell note to her husband as the aircraft plunged. Many expressed their shock, fear, and frustration on social media. According to the SCMP report, a passenger described the incident as 'violent and abrupt.' Boeing 737 is back in spotlight
The SCMP report added that, following passenger complaints, Spring Airlines Japan has allegedly offered 15,000 yen (approximately $104) in compensation to each passenger.
The incident, however, has once again brought attention to safety concerns around the Boeing 737 series. The model has been involved in at least 12 fatal crashes globally since 2000, including the China Eastern Airlines MU5735 crash in 2022 and the Jeju Air crash in South Korea in 2024. FAQs:
1. What happened on the Spring Airlines Japan flight on July 1, 2025?
A suspected cabin pressure failure forced the aircraft to make an emergency descent from 11,000 to 3,000 metres, triggering oxygen masks and emergency landing procedures.
2. Were there any injuries?
No physical injuries were reported, but many passengers experienced psychological trauma.
3. Where did the plane land?
The Boeing 737-800 diverted to Kansai International Airport in Osaka.
4. What kind of aircraft was involved?
A Boeing 737-800, a model that has faced scrutiny due to past global safety incidents.
5. Will passengers receive compensation?
Spring Airlines Japan is offering 15,000 yen to affected passengers, but it must be claimed directly.
6. Is the airline related to Spring Airlines in China?
Spring Airlines Japan is a separate entity partially owned by Japan Airlines. The Chinese parent company clarified it was not involved in the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Deliberate human intervention is the reason for the accident: Capt Mohan Ranganathan
NEW DELHI: Aviation safety consultant and former Boeing aircraft trainer Captain Mohan Ranganathan states that the findings of the inquiry report of the June 12 Dreamliner Air India crash made public on Saturday prove the accident to be a case of "deliberate human intervention. "The preliminary report by the Aircraft Accidents Investigation Bureau (AAIB), an independent investigative unit. constituted by the Civil Aviation Ministry, reveal a conversation between the cockpit crew with one of them expressing shock over the fuel supply being cut-off to the engines and questioning the other. The report states, "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," The co-pilot Clive Kunder was flying the plane during take-off and he had 1000-plus hours of flying. The highly experienced First Officer Captain Sumit Sabharwal, with more than 8,000 hours of flying was in the cockpit with him. Capt Ranganathan states, "The fuel switch does not change automatically. It needs to be moved physically from one slot to another slot and can only be done as a deliberate action." This switch to stop fuel supply is provided as an emergency measure so that pilots can salvage the situation in case of any major fire related incidents, he explained. "This is a case of deliberate human intervention. It was not accidental," he stressed.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Air India crash: Fuel switches abruptly moving to 'cut-off' may have triggered calamity, reveals AAIB preliminary report
A month since India's worst aviation accident in decades, answers of a vague nature have finally began trickling in to explain Air India flight 171's crash on June 12 this year. The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner was airborne for less than 40 seconds after taking off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, before it nosedived into the hostel block of the city's B. J. Medical College. The catastrophe saw only 1 survivor, Vishwas Kumar Ramesh, with the remaining 229 passengers on board, 12 crew members perishing. The on-ground casualties for the crash was estimated to be 19, bringing the total death toll to 260. AAIB preliminary report finds fuel being 'cut-off' to Air India flight 171, seconds before crash In the early hours of July 12, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau released its 15-page preliminary report, which reveals the trigger behind the crash to be quite ominous and inexplicable. As per cockpit voice recordings retrieved, one pilot realised that the fuel switches, set to 'run' when a plane takes off and is airborne, had been switched to 'cut-off'. This prompted him to ask the other pilot, "Why did you cut off?", to which the latter replied, "I did not do so". For clarity, the fuel switches of a plane are set to 'cut-off' following the plane's landing and at no point in-between. Aviation expert John Cox has weighed in on the situation via Reuters, clarifying that a pilot could not accidentally move the fuel switches. The seemingly foolproof mechanism is actually much more nuanced. A BBC report outlines that the fuel switches are actually safeguarded with a lever-lock mechanism, specifically designed to prevent accidental activation. Speaking to them, a Canada-based air accidents investigator further affirmed, "It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely". Following the crash, Boeing, owing to its growing history of faulty aircraft, came under severe backlash. Their official statement on the matter so far reads, "We will defer to the AAIB to provide information about AI171, in adherence with the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization protocol known as Annex 13".
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India Crash Investigation: FAA Warned of Fuel Control Switch Issues Years Earlier, ET Infra
Advt FAA advisory on Fuel Control Switch Advt Skepticism By , ETInfra NEW DELHI: The Preliminary Report from Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft accident on June 12 highlighted that initial cut in the flow of fuel to the engines right after take off has been identified as one of the major causes of the accident which killed 260 to the report, the switches in the cockpit which control the flow to both the engines transitioned from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' position one after another leading to decrease in the aircraft's take-off altitude and the required thrust. Based on the cock voice recorder, the report also indicated that both the pilots were caught unaware of the transition in the position of the fuel control switch.'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other, why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the preliminary report to the preliminary report, after the initial fuel cut off to the engines, the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorders recorded that after a few seconds, the switches again transitioned from from 'CUTOFF' to 'RUN', leading to a renewed supply of fuel to the engine and thrust.'When fuel control switches are moved from CUTOFF to RUN while the aircraft is inflight, each engine's full authority dual engine control (FADEC) automatically manages a relight and thrust recovery sequence of ignition and fuel introduction,' the report the relighting of the engines was too late and the aircraft with full speed crashed outside the perimeter of Ahmedabad airport into a medical college building, killing 241 crew and passengers on board and 19 people on report highlighted that US' aviation safety regulatory body, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), had earlier in 2018 issued an alert regarding potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature, the one similar to onboard the fatal Air India's Boeing 787 FAA, in an 2018 advisory, had alerted airline operators and owners about potential for disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature onboard several aircraft models, including Boeing 787.'If the locking feature is disengaged, the switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting the switch during transition, and the switch would be exposed to the potential of inadvertent operation. Inadvertent operation of the switch could result in an unintended consequence, such as an in-flight engine shutdown,' according to the advisory from FAA, dated December 17, preliminary report stated that the FAA did not consider the airworthiness concern related to fuel control switch as an unsafe condition that would warrant airworthiness directive which necessitates mandatory action.'As per the information from Air India, the suggested inspections were not carried out as the SAIB (Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin) was advisory and not mandatory. The scrutiny of maintenance records revealed that the throttle control module was replaced on VT-ANB (the aircraft's registration) in 2019 and 2023. However, the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch. There has been no defect reported pertaining to the fuel control switch since 2023 on VT-ANB,' the AAIB's preliminary report to the advisory alert note from FAA's, the fuel control switch is manufactured by North Carolina-based Honeywell, which is engaged in avionics and aviation products manufacturing and preliminary report from AAIB has drawn a bit of skepticism from industry experts.'The preliminary report is sketchy, with not much data and does not say as to who was flying the aircraft at the moment of crash,' said Amit Singh, Founder, Safety Matters Foundation and who had earlier served as Chief of Safety and Director of Flight Operations at erstwhile AirAsia aircraft was operated by two pilots, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder.'The report has not released FDR (flight data recorder) data and the CVR (cockpit voice recorder) data. The released data does not show continuity. Even the CCTV image showing RAT (ram air turbine) deployment does not have the time stamp,' added outlined that all the recovered parts of the aircraft will be sent for testing for further detailed AAIB team investigating the Air India crash comprises Sanjay Kumar Singh as Investigator-in-Charge, Jasbir Singh Larhga as Chief Investigator, Vipin Venu Varakoth, Veeraragavan K and Vaishnav Vijayakumar as investigators.
