The tax change that could allow thousands of new homes, ease rental pressure
Research for the Labor-aligned McKell Institute argues that an increase in the current 50 per cent discount on CGT for new units but a reduction for investors who purchase an existing detached house would encourage construction of additional 130,000 homes before 2030.
NSW could get an extra 40,000 homes while Victoria stands to gain up to 33,600 additional properties in a move that would be a stark departure from Labor's 2019 election policy to heavily curtail CGT concessions.
Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers are heading a three-day economic roundtable next month, when tax reform will be one of the key discussion points.
Labor went to the 2019 election with a policy to halve the capital gains tax concession, which had been introduced by the Howard government in the late 1990s in a move that economists say contributed to a surge in house prices, as part of a proposal to also restrict negative gearing to new properties.
But the McKell research shows a larger concession on new builds combined with reduced incentives for investors to buy existing detached homes would both lift the number of new properties while putting downward pressure on rents.
Report co-author Richard Holden, a respected independent economist, said the 1.2 million target would not be met under current tax settings.
'A key problem with our existing tax settings on property is they orient too much investment toward established dwellings at the cost of new supply,' he said.
'There is nothing wrong with the commonly held desire of everyday investors to secure their future by investing in the housing market. But this desire should be harnessed to achieve our national objectives on housing supply.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Tainted': Latham looms as inquiry resumes
A strange alliance including the Coalition and the unions stand in the way of Labor and its workers compensation reform, but it's one of its most vocal opponents – Mark Latham – who is taking the spotlight. The second hearing into Labor's controversial workers compensation reforms will get underway on Tuesday morning, after the Bill was sent back for a further inquiry by the NSW upper house earlier this year. The state government says the reforms are integral to ensuring the workers compensation scheme is financially viable and will protect workers, while opponents claim it will abandon the most vulnerable. The hearing comes as independent MLC Mark Latham, who is a member of the committee and helped refer it, faces a series of bruising scandals, including allegations he abused his former partner. Mark Latham has become embroiled in controversy. NewsWire/ Jeremy Piper. Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Latham has repeatedly denied the allegations, which are untested and part of an application for a private apprehended violence order (AVO) filed by his ex-partner, Nathalie Matthews, with the local court. Mr Latham has not been charged with any criminal offence. The Liberals have accused the state government of attempting to 'discredit' amendments to Labor's reforms, put forward by Mr Latham and the opposition, 'on the basis that Mr Latham's name is attached to them'. Shadow treasurer Damien Tudehope condemned Mr Latham's behaviour but noted the amendments were put forward before the allegations were made and defended talks with Mr Latham on the amendments. 'Mark Latham is an elected member of parliament,' he said. 'The dynamic of the manner in which the upper house operates is that I've got to deal with all people in the upper house, notwithstanding that they do and say things that I don't agree with and would never endorse. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey has so far rejected the proposed amendments. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia 'But, at the same time, I need to, in fact, occupy my position as the leader of the Opposition in the upper house and achieve outcomes which I think deliver better results for legislation throughout.' Mr Tudehope said Mr Latham had 'tainted the whole of this process by what has occurred in relation to a whole lot of other issues', in regard to the proposed amendments. Greens MLC Abigail Boyd told the ABC the party had not made 'agreements or amendments with Mr Latham of any kind', and criticised Premier Chris Minns for singling out Mr Latham's role in the amendments. 'It's really telling that the moment that these particular revelations came out, the first thing they (Labor) did was call on the Coalition and the Greens to no longer 'work with Mark Latham on a particular bill',' she said. Ms Boyd told ABC 702 host Hamish McDonald that Mr Latham had been 'very unfairly attacking' her for a long time, and that assertions that she was now working with the former Labor leader was 'very offensive'. NSW shadow treasurer Damien Tudehope said their amendments would save 'marginally less' than Labor's. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia Treasurer Daniel Mookhey has so far rejected the proposed amendments, telling reporters on Friday modelling from iCare of some of the proposed amendments would 'punish workers' and increase premiums. 'My message is clear to the Liberal Party: side with small business, side with victims of sexual harassment. Don't side with Mark Latham,' he said. The modelling reportedly found the preposed amendments put the burden on victims of sexual and racial harassment, as well as bullying, by requiring that they prove the perpetrator intended to harm them. Mr Tudehope said their own modelling showed the amendments would achieve savings 'marginally less' than those the government claims it will deliver. The government said the proposed legislation will address a 'lack of focus on preventing psychological injury' at work, adding: 'Just 50 per cent of workers with psychological claims are back at work within a year. For physical injuries, the rate is 95 per cent.' The hearing will get underway on Tuesday morning.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Mark Latham looms large as NSW workers compensation reform inquiry resumes
A strange alliance including the Coalition and the unions stand in the way of Labor and its workers compensation reform, but it's one of its most vocal opponents – Mark Latham – who is taking the spotlight. The second hearing into Labor's controversial workers compensation reforms will get underway on Tuesday morning, after the Bill was sent back for a further inquiry by the NSW upper house earlier this year. The state government says the reforms are integral to ensuring the workers compensation scheme is financially viable and will protect workers, while opponents claim it will abandon the most vulnerable. The hearing comes as independent MLC Mark Latham, who is a member of the committee and helped refer it, faces a series of bruising scandals, including allegations he abused his former partner. Mr Latham has repeatedly denied the allegations, which are untested and part of an application for a private apprehended violence order (AVO) filed by his ex-partner, Nathalie Matthews, with the local court. Mr Latham has not been charged with any criminal offence. The Liberals have accused the state government of attempting to 'discredit' amendments to Labor's reforms, put forward by Mr Latham and the opposition, 'on the basis that Mr Latham's name is attached to them'. Shadow treasurer Damien Tudehope condemned Mr Latham's behaviour but noted the amendments were put forward before the allegations were made and defended talks with Mr Latham on the amendments. 'Mark Latham is an elected member of parliament,' he said. 'The dynamic of the manner in which the upper house operates is that I've got to deal with all people in the upper house, notwithstanding that they do and say things that I don't agree with and would never endorse. 'But, at the same time, I need to, in fact, occupy my position as the leader of the Opposition in the upper house and achieve outcomes which I think deliver better results for legislation throughout.' Mr Tudehope said Mr Latham had 'tainted the whole of this process by what has occurred in relation to a whole lot of other issues', in regard to the proposed amendments. Greens MLC Abigail Boyd told the ABC the party had not made 'agreements or amendments with Mr Latham of any kind', and criticised Premier Chris Minns for singling out Mr Latham's role in the amendments. 'It's really telling that the moment that these particular revelations came out, the first thing they (Labor) did was call on the Coalition and the Greens to no longer 'work with Mark Latham on a particular bill',' she said. Ms Boyd told ABC 702 host Hamish McDonald that Mr Latham had been 'very unfairly attacking' her for a long time, and that assertions that she was now working with the former Labor leader was 'very offensive'. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey has so far rejected the proposed amendments, telling reporters on Friday modelling from iCare of some of the proposed amendments would 'punish workers' and increase premiums. 'My message is clear to the Liberal Party: side with small business, side with victims of sexual harassment. Don't side with Mark Latham,' he said. The modelling reportedly found the preposed amendments put the burden on victims of sexual and racial harassment, as well as bullying, by requiring that they prove the perpetrator intended to harm them. Mr Tudehope said their own modelling showed the amendments would achieve savings 'marginally less' than those the government claims it will deliver. The government said the proposed legislation will address a 'lack of focus on preventing psychological injury' at work, adding: 'Just 50 per cent of workers with psychological claims are back at work within a year. For physical injuries, the rate is 95 per cent.' The hearing will get underway on Tuesday morning.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump says he plans to increase US's 10pc 'baseline' tariff to 15-20pc
Donald Trump says the minimum tariff imposed on the US's trading partners, including Australia, could soon double. Speaking at a press conference in Scotland, the US president said he was planning a new tariff "for the world". Asked how high it would be, he said: "I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range." "I just want to be nice," he said. "Probably one of those two numbers." Most of the US's trading partners, including Australia, are currently subject to America's 10 per cent "baseline" tariff. Mr Trump announced higher "reciprocal" tariffs for many countries in April. However, they are not in effect because Mr Trump paused them to allow time to negotiate new trade deals. Australia was not hit with a higher "reciprocal" tariff. But Mr Trump's comments in Scotland suggest Australian exports could be hit with the new, higher world tariff. "We're going to be setting a tariff for, essentially, the rest of the world," he said. "That's what they're going to pay if they want to do business in the United States, because you can't sit down and make 200 deals." The ABC has requested further detail from the Trump administration but has not yet received a response. Before Mr Trump announced his sweeping tariff plans on "Liberation Day" in April, Australia had been trying to negotiate an exemption from tariffs. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the Australia-US free trade agreement, and Australia's longstanding trade deficit with the US, means there should be no tariff on Australian imports. But the US has taken issue with what it calls "non-tariff barriers" to trade with Australia. They include requirements for social media platforms to pay Australian media outlets for news content, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme that requires drug-makers to negotiate prices with the government rather than individual buyers. In his April tariffs announcement, Mr Trump also criticised biosecurity controls that blocked the sale of American beef to Australia. Last week, the Australian government said it was lifting those restrictions.
