Jake Tapper admits he didn't cover Biden's cognitive decline enough, claims to 'look back on it with humility'
Tapper appeared on his network Wednesday morning while promoting his new book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," set to be released next week. He was asked what he made of his conservative critics who've been speaking out against him and the rest of the media over their lack of coverage exposing Biden's mental acuity while he was in office.
"I think some of the criticism is fair, to be honest, of me," Tapper responded. "Certainly I'm not going to speak for anybody else, but knowing then what I know now, I look back at my coverage during the Biden years and I did cover some of these issues, but not enough. I look back on it with humility."
Jake Tapper's Past Coverage Of Biden's Cognitive Decline Under Scrutiny Ahead Of His New Book
Tapper went on to say that he and his co-author Alex Thompson learned through their reporting after the election that there were "two Bidens" around 2019-2020, one that was "perfectly workable" and the other one being "non-functioning." The latter, Tapper said, "reared his head increasingly" throughout his presidency.
"And look, while it was very important – and I'm not dismissing the coverage of Biden tripping on stage or falling off his bike, that was obviously indicative of something serious that was going on – I think what we learned about the non-functioning Biden rearing his head increasingly, not being able to come up with the name of George Clooney, not being able to come up with the name of top aides in the White House," Tapper told his CNN colleague John Berman.
Read On The Fox News App
"I think that really reveals something even more significant, something even more disturbing, about a president that was not what we, the American people, should expect and be able to demand, which is somebody who is there with it 24/7, there for the 2 A.M. emergency phone call in the middle of the night," Tapper added.
Shielding Biden: Journalists Shed Light On The Media's Cover-up Of A Weakened President
Fox News Digital published a report Wednesday that outlined the coverage he dedicated to Biden leading up to his disastrous debate performance that forced him out of the 2024 presidential race.
His most aggressive coverage took place in February 2024 in the wake of Biden's press conference responding in outrage to the Hur report. Special Counsel Robert Hur declined to bring charges against Biden in the classified documents case because he determined a jury would not convict someone perceived as an "elderly man with a poor memory," based on his interview with investigators.
In interviews with Biden during the 2020 campaign and during his presidency, Tapper broached the subject of his age. However, he pumped the brakes on covering Biden's cognitive decline in the heat of the 2024 election cycle, avoiding coverage of the viral moments showing Biden freezing or wandering off, which at the time the Biden White House dubbed "cheap fakes."
Tapper similarly ignored Biden's "Where's Jackie?" gaffe from September 2022 when he called out for the late Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., at an event honoring her memory after she died in a tragic car accident weeks prior.
Ex-cnn Journalist Speaks Out On Biden Cover-up, Says White House Aides Made It Difficult On Press
Tapper also repeatedly defended Biden from his critics. In September 2023, Tapper asserted that Biden was mentally "sharp" while discussing Nikki Haley demanding cognitive tests for older politicians, suggesting that questions swirling around the president were only about whether he was "physically" able to do the job.
And in March 2024, following Biden's high-energy State of the Union address filled with shouting and attacking Republicans, Tapper took a swipe at the president's conservative critics who previously accused him of being "weak" and "senile."
"He certainly seemed like an 81-year-old, but he didn't seem incapable of doing the job," Tapper told his panel before dismissing "Weekend at Bernie's" comparisons from the right.
A spokesperson for CNN strongly pushed back at the notion that Tapper offered insufficient coverage of the Biden scandal before the debate.
"Jake Tapper is a veteran journalist whose tenacious and thorough reporting has held those in power to account on both sides of the aisle for decades," the spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "He fairly and accurately covered Senator, Vice President and President Biden through years of dogged Washington reporting, hitting every high and low of the former president's political career."
The CNN spokesperson continued, "From the campaign in 2020 to 2024 when he dropped out, Jake raised concerns about President Biden's mental stamina on his shows, questioned Biden officials directly about his health on air, and consistently encouraged open discussion and debate on the issue."
Fox News' Hanna Panreck contributed to this report.Original article source: Jake Tapper admits he didn't cover Biden's cognitive decline enough, claims to 'look back on it with humility'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Building the Constitution Pipeline is vital for New England's grid stability
In 2016, the Cuomo administration New England residents now pay a premium for foreign energy supplies instead. At any given hour, Advertisement New England imports most of that natural gas from Canada, and it imports liquified natural gas from as far away as How did we get here? In 2012, the Constitution Pipeline was But in 2016, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation denied pipeline developer Williams Cos. a water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, which the statute places largely under the purview of states. Advertisement After much legal wrangling, in 2020, Williams Cos. abandoned the critical infrastructure project. Cuomo and his allies argued pipeline would stymie renewable energy development in New York. This was an overreach of statutory power. Perhaps ironically, New England has become a casualty of New York's decisions. The siren song of climate zealots has derailed American infrastructure projects. And residents pay the price, literally. It's time to build the Constitution Pipeline Massachusetts consumes much more electricity than it generates. Though the state runs on the cheapest source of baseload power — natural gas — it had the third-highest residential electricity prices in the nation in 2023, in large part because of lack of infrastructure. Meanwhile, Infrastructure constraints have also threatened grid reliability as ISO-NE, the region's grid operator, scrambles for natural gas to produce reliable affordable and constant supplies of baseload power in an ever-growing market. The region's last two operational coal-fired power plants are set to close by 2028 and be replaced with solar power plants and battery storage that can't provide baseload power during harsh New England winters. Harsh winters mean high heating bills, which are expected to rise over the next decade without adequate infrastructure. Advertisement I have been meeting with communities in all six states that comprise New England, which also represent EPA Region 1. Businesses and industry leaders are optimistic and ready to invest in innovation, manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. But they recognize the need for more power generation and the underlying infrastructure to support it, to support the growth of industry across New England. Under the Trump administration, the EPA has worked to remove hurdles to critical infrastructure expansion to achieve energy dominance and strengthen national security. Right now, we are working to assess whether it is necessary to clarify the guide rails of states' abilities under the Clean Water Act Section 401 to deny water quality certification. The EPA has initiated a public comment period, which includes States should not block critical energy infrastructure in the name of climate change, as New York's former governor did. And states like New York should not have veto authority to dictate energy policy for, and increase energy costs of, other states. New England should come together to support American energy infrastructure, including the Constitution Pipeline project, to provide much-needed grid stability, create jobs, and reduce energy prices across the region for American families who have suffered long enough.
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump ceded leverage over Putin by pausing sanctions, Democratic report says
The Trump administration's neglect toward Biden-era sanctions targeting Russia's economy has allowed the Kremlin to revive its military and prolong the war in Ukraine, Senate Democrats argue in a report published Tuesday in anticipation of the president's deadline for Moscow to end the conflict or face severe financial penalties. The report accuses the administration of having failed to update the extensive sanctions regime built over the first three years of Russia's full-scale invasion. That lapse, the authors argue, effectively undercuts any future U.S. threats to tighten the screws on Russia's war machine.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says major US banks 'discriminated against me' as White House preps debanking executive order
Debanking is back in the spotlight this week after President Trump said Tuesday that the country's two largest US banks, JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC), denied him as a customer. "The banks discriminated against me very badly, and I was very good to the banks," Trump said on CNBC's "Squawk Box," adding that "they discriminate against many conservatives." For years, Republicans have claimed that US banks have denied accounts to certain customers for political reasons. Crypto companies have warned more recently that they weren't permitted to get banking services during the Biden era. "I had hundreds of millions. I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash. I was loaded up with cash, and they told me, 'I'm sorry, sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out,'" Trump said of his experience losing bank accounts with JPMorgan Chase. The president said he then went to Bank of America "to deposit a billion dollars plus" and was similarly denied. "He said, 'We can't do it,'" Trump told "Squawk Box" while also referencing pressure on banks from Washington, D.C., regulators as a key reason for why he and others have been denied banking services. "I ended up going to small banks all over the place," Trump added. The president's comments came in response to a Wall Street Journal report late Monday stating that the White House is preparing to draft a related executive order around debanking that would fine banks found discriminating against customers on political grounds. Bank of America did not immediately offer a response to Trump's comments. "We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed. We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right," a JPMorgan spokesperson said in emailed comments. Both of these giant lenders and their CEOs have denied debanking customers on political grounds. Learn more about high-yield savings accounts, money market accounts, and CD accounts. Trump first brought visibility to the debanking issue back in January when he confronted Bank of America's Brian Moynihan about it during a live Q&A at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives," Trump told Moynihan. The president also appeared to include JPMorgan Chase CEO Jame Dimon in his confrontation. "I don't know if the regulators mandated that because of Biden or what, but you and Jamie and everybody else, I hope you open your banks to conservatives, because what you're doing is wrong," Trump added. Two months later, the Trump Organization sued major credit card lender Capital One (COF) for allegedly debanking hundreds of its accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol in Washington, D.C. Bank regulators have already eliminated one element in supervision that has been pointed to as a culprit of debunking, known as reputational risk. Critics said this element of supervision was previously too subjective, allowing regulators additional room to penalize lenders for taking on customers they deemed risky. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," a spokesperson for the Bank Policy Institute, a D.C. banking industry advocacy group, said in an emailed statement. "The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place," BPI added. Each of the bosses for these big banks has addressed the issue by also pointing a finger at regulators. "We have not debanked anyone because of political or religious relationships, period," JPMorgan's Dimon said during a podcast interview earlier this year, in which he acknowledged that debanking happens. "The reality is that if they gave us clarity from the regulatory thing and avoid the second-guessing, that would be helpful," Bank of America's Moynihan said in a CBS interview on Sunday. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
