Cause of Tina Satchwell's death could not be determined because of decomposition, pathologist says
Tina Satchwell
, whose skeletal remains were found buried under her
Co Cork
home more than six years after she disappeared, cannot be determined, the
Central Criminal Court
has heard.
Assistant State Pathologist
Dr Margaret Bolster
told the continuing trial of
Richard Satchwell
, who denies murdering his wife, that the cause of Ms Satchwell's death could not be established during a postmortem due to the level of decomposition.
Dr Bolster said the significance of the presence of a dressing grown belt – draped diagonally from the left across the front of the body, brought under the right arm and then knotted – was 'unclear'. She said it was in 'a very unusual position'.
The pathologist said Ms Satchwell's skull had come apart from her body due to decomposition and there was no evidence of any bone fractures.
READ MORE
Under cross-examination by defence counsel Brendan Grehan, Dr Bolster said the position of the belt was 'not a usual place' to knot a dressing gown. She agreed that the belt was neither around the neck nor the body. She agreed that the positioning of it made it appear 'like something used to carry a body'.
'That was my impression when I saw this,' she said, adding that she said she has been moving bodies all her life and ligatures are very often used as a means to do so.
Dr Bolster agreed there were no bone fractures, no evidence of previous fractures or any signs of trauma to the bones.
There was no fracture to the hyoid bone in the neck which, she agreed with Mr Grehan, has not much more than the consistency of a matchstick. In her experience of cases of manual strangulation or throttling, this particular bone is fractured in about 73 per cent of cases with a much lesser incidence of fracturing, about 24 per cent, in cases of ligature strangulation.
The pathologist said she has carried out more than 30,000 postmortems in her career.
Dr Bolster was giving evidence in the continuing trial of Mr Satchwell (58) who has pleaded not guilty to murdering Ms Satchwell (45) at their home on Grattan Street, Youghal, between March 19th and 20th, 2017.
The jury has heard decomposed human remains, identified as those of Ms Satchwell, were discovered during a forensic search of the property on October 11th, 2023, some 6½ years after Mr Satchwell reported his wife missing.
After the remains were discovered, Mr Satchwell told gardaí his wife had come at him with a chisel on the morning of March 20th and that he had used the belt of her dressing gown to fend her off. He said she 'went limp' and died.
The prosecution case is that Mr Satchwell put his wife's body in a freezer in a shed before burying her in a grave dug under the stairs in their home.
In evidence ton Tuesday, Dr Bolster told Gerardine Small SC, prosecuting, that she was asked to attend the scene at Grattan Street on October 12th, 2023, and that she examined the remains of Ms Satchwell, which were wrapped in black plastic. She concluded a postmortem the following morning in the mortuary in Cork.
The pathologist agreed that the remains were skeletal and Ms Satchwell's medical records showed she was previously in good health.
The body was wrapped in what looked like a soiled bed sheet and bones could be seen protruding through the sheet, the court heard. The body was lying face down and was wearing a dressing gown.
A gold-coloured purse, labelled Playboy, was removed from the pocket, and contained various cards, including a Tesco club card and a public service card in name of Tina Mary Satchwell.
The trial continues at the Central Criminal Court before Mr Justice Paul McDermott and a jury of seven women and five men.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
38 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Gavin Pepper agrees to abide by certain orders but denies filming son of finance firm's boss
Dublin city councillor Gavin Pepper has told the High Court he is prepared to abide by orders prohibiting him from attending or filming outside the homes of staff of credit servicing and asset management firm Pepper Finance Corporation. Mr Pepper, an Independent who was elected in the Ballymun/Finglas area, and who has no connection with Pepper Finance, has denied he shot footage for social media outside Pepper managing director Ian Wigglesworth's west Dublin home or of the businessman's son, who has special needs. He told the court he and his partner have a child with special needs themselves and had every sympathy with someone in the same situation. He also said when he was outside the Wigglesworth home, he did not engage with Mr Wigglesworth's son and it was the child who approached him while he was talking on the phone to his partner. READ MORE On Tuesday, Mr Wigglesworth and Pepper were granted an interim injunction preventing the councillor from attending the Wigglesworth home or filming and watching him and his family or from publishing home addresses of Pepper employees. That application was made ex parte – meaning only the Wigglesworth/Pepper side was represented – and on Thursday Mr Pepper appeared himself saying he wished to be given time to get legal representation. Mr Pepper, who is also a taxi driver, of Plunkett Green, Finglas, Dublin, was also required to remove social media posts which contain footage of videoing which took place outside Mr Wigglesworth's home. Brian Conroy SC, for Mr Wigglesworth and Pepper Finance, said Mr Pepper has a well-established association with the far right and social media posts promoting far-right ideas. Mr Conroy said while Mr Pepper had since Tuesday agreed to some of the orders, he did not seem prepared to delete certain social media posts or not attend homes of other Pepper employees. [ Injunction granted restraining Gavin Pepper from filming home of Pepper Finance boss Opens in new window ] Mr Pepper told Mr Justice Brian Cregan he was prepared to comply with most of the orders made on Tuesday but he said a number of allegations had been made against him which were not true, including that he had recorded the Wigglesworth family. However, certain orders now sought in relation to deleting posts would interfere with his role as a democratically elected representative and his constitutional right to free speech. He needed time to get legal representation, he said. Mr Conroy said his side was particularly concerned in relation to certain posts already up in relation to Mr Wigglesworth and his family. These and other posts were clearly threatening and crossed the line in relation to freedom of expression, counsel said. His claims about Mr Wigglesworth's son 'rang hollow' when there was one video in which Mr Pepper is clearly outside the Wigglesworth home and there is clear identification of a minor who is a member of that family. Asked by the judge if he was prepared to abide by the order not to attend outside the homes of other Pepper employees, he said he was. Asked if he was prepared to take down four specific posts, Mr Pepper said he wanted time to challenge it 'because they are making out that I am a bad guy'. He did not believe 'anything I said was defamation'. The judge said he had an absolute right to express any 'understandable grievances about vulture funds' but Pepper was saying some of the posts clearly crossed the line. Pepper does not think it can be called a vulture fund, the court heard. Mr Pepper agreed to a suggestion by the judge that he would take down the posts until the case returns before the court in October when he will also have a chance to get a solicitor to argue his case in that respect. He also said he did not accept he was some sort of a bad person and he thought looking for extra orders in this way was unfair before he got representation. The judge said he would have the opportunity to address what he felt was tarnishing his name and an unfair portrayal of him so far when he swears an affidavit. The judge said he would make an order in relation to taking down four posts of June 12th, July 24th, 25th and 27th within seven days of making the order. He also made similar orders on Tuesday in relation to other Pepper employees. The orders must be complied with within seven days of them being formally made. He also gave both sides liberty to apply to the vacation courts should anything arise between now and October.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Galway woman crowned 'Best Dressed Lady' at Galway Races
Nikita Hand speaks to the media at the High Court after Conor McGregor loses his appeal over the verdict in the civil rape case. Video: Stephen Conneely
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘I beat a shovel off his head': Man sentenced for unlawful killing
A father of four beat a man to death with four blows of a shovel and told gardaí who arrived at the scene: 'I hit him with a shovel and I hope the c**t is dead,' the Central Criminal Court heard today. A sentencing hearing for Joseph Cahill (46), who pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin, heard that Cahill had previously threatened to kill the deceased after Mr Curtin came to his house, threw stones at his windows, threatened to burn the house down and demanded money. Mr Curtin left after Cahill's partner gave him €300. Insp James Ruddle of Roxboro Road Garda station in Limerick told the court that Mr Curtin returned to Cahill's house in the early hours about two weeks later, again demanding money. CCTV footage showed the deceased smashing a window of the Cahill home with a rock. The lock on Cahill's front door was broken so he had propped a shovel against it to keep out intruders. Cahill took the shovel, opened the door and struck the victim on the head, causing him to immediately fall to the ground, the inspector said. Cahill then struck Mr Curtin three more times as he lay 'defenceless and immobile' on the ground. Before delivering the blows, Cahill called emergency services and asked for the police. After delivering the fatal blows, with Mr Curtin lying motionless on the ground, Cahill told the call-taker that a man was trying to get into his house. READ MORE He waited a further eight minutes and 30 seconds before telling the call taker to send an ambulance. When asked why he needed an ambulance, Cahill said: 'I think he's dead ... I had to protect my kids. I don't give a fuck about going to jail. I beat a shovel off his head and I kept beating, to tell you the truth.' The first garda at the scene made a note of Cahill saying: 'I hit him with a shovel, I hope the c**t is dead.' Garret Baker SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions , told Ms Justice Eileen Creedon that Cahill was originally charged with murder. He said the DPP accepted the manslaughter plea on the basis that Cahill honestly believed that he was protecting himself, his property and his children but that the force used in striking Mr Curtin four times with the shovel was excessive. Gerard Curtin died on November 4th, 2023. Photograph: Garda/PA On May 30th this year, Cahill, of Sarsfield Avenue, Garryowen, Limerick pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of Mr Curtin on November 4th, 2023 outside his home. Mr Baker said the offence warrants a headline sentence of 10-15 years. In an impact statement, Bianca Hickey told the court that the deceased was a brother, father, partner and friend. She said the family has always been 'close-knit' but the killing tore them apart. She said they have watched their parents become 'completely different people'. They never got to say goodbye or kiss him one last time because his injuries were so catastrophic that his coffin had to be closed. Insp Ruddle agreed with Michael O'Higgins SC, for Cahill, that gardaí were aware of allegations over many years that Mr Curtin had smashed windows of houses and threatened the occupants. The court heard that eight days after the killing, Cahill's home was petrol bombed and the family was forced to move out of the area. Cahill's sister's home was also petrol bombed at 5am while all people living there were in bed, the court was told. When Mr O'Higgins began to read a letter of apology from his client, the deceased's family stood up and walked out of court. In the letter Cahill said he wanted to 'express how deeply sorry I am' to the victim's partner and children. He said he carries the 'massive burden' of what he did every day and has turned the lives of his own family upside down. Mr O'Higgins said his client has a long history of mental illness, polysubstance abuse and a gambling addiction. He pointed to a psychiatric report, which states that due to childhood trauma, Cahill is predisposed to act irrationally and to overreact to threats against himself and his family. He has no relevant previous convictions. Counsel asked the court to take into account that Cahill was woken on the night by a volatile man smashing his windows and trying to cross the threshold into his home. While Mr O'Higgins said the court would have to impose a custodial sentence, he asked Ms Justice Creedon to offer the 'maximum leniency' possible. Ms Justice Creedon adjourned sentencing to November 24th.
