Serial thief loses appeal to reduce six-year jail term
Fuad Ibrahim had pleaded guilty to three separate offences—housebreaking, theft in a building and house trespass—committed between January and October 2021. He was sentenced to an aggregate of six years' imprisonment with two strokes of the cane by the Intermediate Court in September 2023.
Fuad's application for leave to appeal argued that his sentences should run concurrently, citing his family responsibilities, medical condition (hemorrhoids) and cooperation with authorities.
However, the Court of Appeal, presided by Chief Justice Dato Seri Paduka Steven Chong, with Justices Michael Lunn and Edward Timothy Starbuck Woolley, rejected the application.
The court heard that Fuad's crimes involved separate incidents over a 10-month period. These included breaking into a home in Kampong Jangsak, stealing electronics and jewellery and later stealing BND10,500 from a cafe owner's bag.
Another burglary involved breaking into a house in Limau Manis and stealing valuables while the owner was working offshore.
Despite Fuad's eventual guilty plea, the court noted that it was only entered after the trial had already been set to proceed, and not at the earliest opportunity. His long criminal history, spanning 21 prior convictions for theft-related offences since 2007, weighed heavily against him.
In delivering the judgment, the court emphasised that Fuad's offending showed a pattern of repeat criminality with no evidence of rehabilitation, justifying consecutive sentences.
The judges also found that the original sentencing judge had already been generous in granting a one-third discount on each sentence due to the guilty plea.
With no arguable merit to the appeal, the Court of Appeal concluded that granting an extension of time would serve no useful purpose, and dismissed the application.
Fuad will continue to serve his six-year sentence with two strokes of the cane.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ahmad Firdaus Mohammad represented the respondent. – Borneo Bulletin/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
3 hours ago
- Daily Express
Woman fined for unregistered products, cosmetics without notifications
Published on: Tuesday, July 08, 2025 Published on: Tue, Jul 08, 2025 By: Cynthia D Baga Text Size: The offence under Regulation 7 (1)(a) of the Control of Drugs and Cosmetic Regulations 1984 carries a jail term of up to three years, or a fine of up to RM50,000, or both, on conviction. Kota Kinabalu: A 37-year-old woman was fined a total of RM5,500 for having unregistered products and cosmetics without notifications. Sessions Court Judge Noor Hafizah Mohd Salim handed the sentence to Veronica Berman who pleaded guilty to two charges against her, on Monday. On the first count, Veronica was fined RM2,500 in default 60 days' jail for having for sale 19 types of unregistered products at 2.20pm on May 17, 2024 at the Danya Beauty Boutique in Inanam New Township, Inanam, here. The offence under Regulation 7 (1)(a) of the Control of Drugs and Cosmetic Regulations 1984 carries a jail term of up to three years, or a fine of up to RM50,000, or both, on conviction. On the second count, she was fined another RM3,000 or 60 days' jail for having 35 types of cosmetics without notifications at the same place and time. In mitigation, Veronica who was represented by counsel Khalid Murshidi, asked for a light sentence saying that it was her first offence and that she was only running a small business with a gross of income RM1,000 per month. Khalid informed the court that most of the items seized by the Ministry of Health (MOH) belonged to the vendors who rented the box at the premises owned by Veronica. According to him, after the premises was raid, Veronica did not simply accept vendors to sell their items which were not registered with the MOH. However, Prosecuting Officer Tan Pueh Li from the Pharmacy Department urged the court to impose an appropriate sentence for public safety and health, as it will not only serve as a lesson to Veronica but also as a warning to others who may intend to commit the same offence. Tan further submitted that a total of 19 types of unregistered products and 35 types of cosmetics without notifications with an estimated value of RM7,306 were confirmed to be unregistered and not notified with the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Division. She added that these products and cosmetics were neither tested nor evaluated by the Drug Control Authority, raising doubts about their quality and safety. Therefore, the use of these unregistered products and not notified cosmetics may pose risks of side effects to the public. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Free Malaysia Today
19 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Appellate court acquits man of disabled stepsister-in-law's murder
The three-member panel of the Court of Appeal said it found the conviction of Johari Ng Abdullah by the High Court to be unsafe. PETALING JAYA : A senior citizen was acquitted and discharged by the Court of Appeal today, which set aside his conviction and death sentence for the murder of his disabled stepsister-in-law six years ago. A three-member panel, comprising Justices Hashim Hamzah, Zaini Mazlan and Noorin Badaruddin, unanimously allowed Johari Ng Abdullah's appeal against the High Court's decision delivered in January last year. Hashim held that the circumstantial evidence adduced during the trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction. 'Therefore, we find the conviction to be unsafe. As such, the conviction and sentence are set aside, and the appellant's appeal is allowed,' Bernama reported him as saying. Johari, 66, a former security guard, had initially been sentenced to death by the High Court for the murder of Nor Izzati Ghazali, 26, who had dwarfism. He had been charged with committing the offence at a unit at Villa Apartment on Jalan Temenggong 19, off Jalan Sungai Jati in Klang, Selangor, at 2pm on Feb 19, 2019. In today's proceedings, Johari's counsel, Hafizuddin Salehuddin, argued that the trial judge had erred in failing to consider the reasonable possibility of another individual, namely, the deceased's stepsister, being involved in the commission of the offence. 'There is no irresistible conclusion that the appellant was the one who caused the death of the deceased. We respectfully request the court to acquit and discharge him,' said Hafizuddin, who was assisted by Hilmi Zawawi. Deputy public prosecutor Faizal @ Amrin Noor Hadi asserted that the trial judge had not erred in his findings, and urged the court to uphold the conviction and sentence. According to the facts of the case, a neighbour said in a police report that the deceased had previously complained to him and his wife about being physically assaulted and abused by Johari. A post-mortem examination revealed 24 clusters of injuries distributed across the deceased's body.
Malaysiakini
a day ago
- Malaysiakini
Mentega Terbang's religious exploration scares theocrats
'Section 298 blends well with Malaysia's populace for preserving sensitivity of religion, which is essential.' - Judge K Muniandy COMMENT | While the news cycle was dominated by the retirement of former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, an extremely important decision made by the judiciary passed unnoticed. The Court of Appeal decided that all was kosher with the 'hurt feelings law' and that the creators of the film 'Mentega Terbang' had to make their case in criminal proceedings. What is important to understand here is that the state is going to prosecute two filmmakers based on a vague law with no clear definitions and solely on the fact that 'feelings were hurt', a point made by N Suredran. 'What is wounding the feelings of one person is not wounding to another person. It is completely subjective as each person reacts differently. 'Looking at the Criminal Procedure Code, there is no definition of what wounding religious feelings consists of,' Surendran said.
