Air India pilots grounded after new takeoff scare follows Ahmedabad crash
The incident occurred in the early hours of 14 June, with the aircraft departing Delhi at 2:56 a.m. amidst thunderstorms. Flight tracking data shows that the aircraft descended unexpectedly, prompting critical alerts such as a 'stall warning' and the 'don't sink' Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) caution—both indicators of an abnormal loss of lift and altitude that require immediate pilot intervention to prevent a crash.
Despite the scare, the flight was stabilized and continued to Vienna without further incident. However, both pilots have since been grounded as the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), India's aviation regulator, investigates the event. The regulator has also summoned Air India's head of safety for questioning.
Officials familiar with the matter revealed that multiple warnings were issued during the flight's climb phase. 'Soon after takeoff, the aircraft experienced stick shaker warnings and GPWS 'don't sink' cautions. A stall warning appeared once, while the GPWS alert triggered twice,' an official was quoted as saying.
Initial flight reports reportedly mentioned only a 'stick shaker due to turbulence,' without reference to the more severe alerts. However, subsequent analysis of data from the flight data recorder confirmed the presence of both stall and GPWS warnings. These findings have surfaced amid intensified regulatory scrutiny following the Ahmedabad crash.
In response to the incident, the DGCA has ordered enhanced inspections of Air India's Boeing 787 and 777 fleets. As a precaution, Air India has temporarily reduced its international wide-body operations by 15 percent to facilitate thorough safety checks.
An Air India spokesperson confirmed the airline's compliance with regulatory protocols. 'Upon receipt of the pilot's report, the matter was disclosed to DGCA in accordance with regulations. Subsequently, upon receipt of data from the aircraft's recorders, further investigation was initiated. The pilots have been off-rostered pending the outcome of the investigation,' the spokesperson said.
Meanwhile, a preliminary report on the fatal Ahmedabad crash is expected to be released by 11 July, according to NDTV.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
2 days ago
- Arab Times
Air India crash: Startling cockpit exchange deepens the mystery
NEW DELHI, July 13: Investigators probing the crash of Air India Flight 171, which killed 260 people in June, have uncovered a disturbing detail in the preliminary report: both of the aircraft's fuel-control switches were inexplicably moved to the "cut-off" position seconds after take-off, starving the engines and causing total power loss. This action, normally reserved for post-landing procedures, triggered a chain of events that led to one of India's most puzzling aviation disasters. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, a 12-year-old aircraft, had just departed from Ahmedabad when it lost power and plummeted into a crowded neighborhood, remaining airborne for less than a minute. The cockpit voice recorder captured a pilot questioning the other with, 'Why did you do the cut-off?', to which the other replied he hadn't. It remains unclear who made the statement. At the time, the co-pilot was flying the aircraft while the captain was monitoring. After the switches were returned to their flight position, the engines began to relight. However, only one had regained thrust before the crash. Investigators are now analyzing wreckage and cockpit recordings to determine what caused the switches to be moved to "cut-off" just after take-off. The report, compiled by Indian authorities with assistance from Boeing, General Electric, Air India, and experts from the US and UK, outlines that the lever-lock fuel switches on the aircraft are designed to be nearly impossible to activate accidentally. These switches are guarded and require a lift-and-turn action to engage. Experts say the likelihood of both switches being pulled by accident is extremely low. The mysterious dual switch-off has led to speculation about whether it was an intentional act, a case of confusion, or a potential technical malfunction. Shawn Pruchnicki, a former airline investigator and aviation expert at Ohio State University, noted that such an action typically requires an underlying issue, yet no abnormality was reported by the pilots before the engines lost power. Peter Goelz, former managing director of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), expressed concern over the cockpit voice recording, which so far has revealed only a single cryptic line of dialogue. He stressed the importance of full voice identification and a complete transcript, noting that investigators still don't know which pilot moved the switches. The case has reignited calls for cockpit video recorders, which could have clearly shown whose hand was on the switches at the time. Goelz emphasized that a visual recording could help answer critical questions that audio alone cannot. The investigation also references a 2018 advisory from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which warned that some Boeing 737 aircraft may have fuel control switches installed with disengaged locking mechanisms. Though not deemed unsafe, the advisory recommended inspections. Air India, operating the same switch design in its Boeing 787-8 aircraft, including the ill-fated VT-ANB, did not carry out these checks as they were not mandatory. Pruchnicki questioned whether a fault in the switch could allow it to disengage with a single action, though other experts, including Goelz, cautioned against drawing conclusions too quickly, noting a lack of pilot complaints on the issue. Another potential concern under review is whether the aircraft's electronic control unit could have triggered the switches electronically. Former Indian AAIB investigator Capt. Kishore Chinta raised this possibility, suggesting the switches may have been tripped without pilot involvement. The report confirmed that fuel samples taken from the aircraft were satisfactory, ruling out contamination, and noted no immediate advisories were issued for the Boeing 787 or its General Electric GEnx-1B engines. However, the aircraft's Ram Air Turbine (RAT) had deployed—a sign of total engine failure. This backup power source is triggered automatically when both engines shut down or all three hydraulic systems lose pressure. Another clue to the crash's rapid progression lies in the aircraft's landing gear, which was found down. A Boeing 787 pilot explained that retracting the gear typically completes within eight seconds of take-off, but given the quick onset of engine failure, the pilot likely had no time to initiate retraction. Investigators believe the crew attempted to recover the flight, with both engines switched back to "run" shortly after the cut-off, but the timing was insufficient. The left engine was relit first, followed by the right, which had not regained full power before the crash. For families of the victims, the report offers more questions than answers. Imtiyaz Ali, who lost four relatives in the crash, said the preliminary findings lacked clarity. 'It reads like a product description,' he said. 'Besides the last cockpit exchange, there's nothing definitive about what caused this.' Ali and others hope that more information will be released in the coming months. 'This matters to us,' he said. 'We want to know what happened—not that it will change anything now—but at least we'll have answers.'
Kuwait Times
3 days ago
- Kuwait Times
Fuel to Air India engines ‘cut off before crash'
NEW DELHI: Fuel control switches to the engines of an Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff, killing 260 people, were moved from the 'run' to the 'cutoff' position moments before impact, a preliminary investigation report said Saturday. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the June 12 disaster, but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel, and the second pilot responded that he had not. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed from Ahmedabad in western India to London when it crashed, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground. In its 15-page report, the investigation bureau said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, 'the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec'. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' it said. The aircraft quickly began to lose altitude. The switches then returned to the 'RUN' position and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but 'one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'', the report said. Air traffic controllers asked the pilots what was wrong, but then saw the plane crashing and called emergency personnel to the scene. Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu told reporters that investigators probed in a 'mature, transparent' way. 'This is a preliminary report. We want the final report to come in, so let us wait for it,' he said. Earlier this week, specialist website The Air Current, citing multiple sources familiar with the probe, reported it had 'narrowed its focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches', while noting that full analysis will 'take months - if not longer'. It added that 'the focus of the investigators could change during that time'. The Indian agency's report said the US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about 'the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature'. Though the concern was not considered an 'unsafe condition' that would warrant a more serious directive, Air India told investigators it did not carry out suggested inspections as they were 'advisory and not mandatory'. Air India was compliant with all airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, the report said. The investigations bureau said there were 'no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers', suggesting no technical issues with the engines (GE) or the aircraft (Boeing). The bureau said the investigation was ongoing, and that additional evidence and information had been 'sought from the stakeholders'. Boeing said in a statement it would 'continue to support the investigation and our customer', adding 'our thoughts remain' with those affected by the disaster. Air India said it was 'working closely with stakeholders, including regulators.' 'We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses,' it said in a statement on X. The UN's International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) stipulates that states heading an investigation must submit a preliminary report within 30 days of an accident. US and British air accident investigators have taken part in the probe. Suresh Mistry, who lost his daughter Kinal in the crash, told AFP his family was still coming to terms with the loss. 'How is possible that there is an internal issue with the flight and nobody knew? Even cars these days indicate when there is a problem. How does it not happen on flights?' he said. Imtiyaz Ali, whose brother was killed along with his wife and two children, said the preliminary report took 'nothing forward' for him. 'And (it) is not even close to a closure,' he said. 'It feels like we are at the same spot, where we were a month ago when the crash happened.' The plane was carrying 230 passengers - 169 Indians, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian - and 12 crew. Dozens of people on the ground were injured. One passenger miraculously survived, a British citizen who was seen walking out of the wreckage of the crash, and who has since been discharged from hospital. Health officials in the Indian state of Gujarat initially said at least 279 people were killed, but forensic scientists reduced the figure after multiple scattered and badly burnt remains were identified.- AFP
Arab Times
4 days ago
- Arab Times
What the ‘black box' can tell us about plane crashes
NEW DELHI, July 12, (AP): A preliminary finding into last month's Air India plane crash has suggested the aircraft's fuel control switches were turned off, starving the engines of fuel and causing a loss of engine thrust shortly after takeoff. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau on Saturday, also found that one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel in the flight's final moment. The other pilot replied he did not do so. The Air India flight - a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner - crashed on June 12 and killed at least 260 people, including 19 on the ground, in the northwestern city of Ahmedabad. Only one passenger survived the crash, which is one of India's worst aviation disasters. The report based its finding on the data recovered from the plane's black boxes - combined cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders. Here is an explanation of what black boxes are and what they can do: The cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder are tools that help investigators reconstruct the events that lead up to a plane crash. They're orange in color to make them easier to find in wreckage, sometimes at great ocean depths. They're usually installed a plane's tail section, which is considered the most survivable part of the aircraft, according to the National Transportation Safety Board's website. The cockpit voice recorder collects radio transmissions and sounds such as the pilot's voices and engine noises, according to the NTSB's website. Depending on what happened, investigators may pay close attention to the engine noise, stall warnings and other clicks and pops, the NTSB said. And from those sounds, investigators can often determine engine speed and the failure of some systems. Investigators can also listen to conversations between the pilots and crew and communications with air traffic control. Experts make a meticulous transcript of the voice recording, which can take up to a week. The flight data recorder monitors a plane's altitude, airspeed and heading, according to the NTSB. Those factors are among at least 88 parameters that newly built planes must monitor. Some can collect the status of more than 1,000 other characteristics, from a wing's flap position to the smoke alarms. The NTSB said it can generate a computer-animated video reconstruction of the flight from the information collected. At least two people have been credited with creating devices that record what happens on an airplane. One is French aviation engineer François Hussenot. In the 1930s, he found a way to record a plane's speed, altitude and other parameters onto photographic film, according to the website for European plane-maker Airbus. In the 1950s, Australian scientist David Warren came up with the idea for the cockpit voice recorder, according to his 2010 AP obituary. Warren had been investigating the crash of the world's first commercial jet airliner, the Comet, in 1953, and thought it would be helpful for airline accident investigators to have a recording of voices in the cockpit, the Australian Department of Defence said in a statement after his death. Warren designed and constructed a prototype in 1956. But it took several years before officials understood just how valuable the device could be and began installing them in commercial airlines worldwide. Some have suggested that it stems from Hussenot's device because it used film and "ran continuously in a light-tight box, hence the name 'black box,'' according to Airbus, which noted that orange was the box's chosen color from the beginning to make it easy to find. Other theories include the boxes turning black when they get charred in a crash, the Smithsonian Magazine wrote in 2019. The media continues to use the term, the magazine wrote, "because of the sense of mystery it conveys in the aftermath of an air disaster.'
