Asian-American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month's growth over 5 decades
Advertisement
What started as just one week in May has evolved over the decades into a month-long tribute in cities big and small.
The nature of celebrations has also evolved. Asian-American and Pacific Islander or Asian-American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month is not just about showcasing food and fashion, but hard subjects like grief and social justice.
Drummers mark the start of the 2025 Asian-American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month at an event organised by the Laotian American Society in Atlanta, in the US state of Georgia. Photo: Instagram/sabaideeatlanta
'I think the visibility and increased participation of organisations in Asian Pacific Heritage Month activities is also an indication of the increasing voice of Asian-American and Pacific Islanders in civic life more generally,' said Karen Umemoto, director of the Asian-American Studies Centre at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA).
Advertisement
'And also an indication of the spaces that we've come to collectively enter to be able to create those.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
17 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Pandas as China's most valuable and vulnerable diplomats
Anthony Albanese's recent visit to Chengdu's panda breeding base showed the enduring power of China's panda diplomacy. China has been sending pandas to other countries, sometimes for obviously political reasons, since the 1940s. The term 'panda diplomacy' became widespread when China gifted two pandas to the United States on Richard Nixon's 1972 visit. In a new paper published in The Pacific Review, we explain the importance of panda diplomacy for the Chinese state. This importance persists during times of high political tension between China and other countries that host pandas, such as the United States. And it persists despite growing concerns about it in China. No other animal can match the giant panda's combination of universal appeal and national distinctiveness. The global popularity of pandas is a rare source of soft power for China, inspiring warm feelings and cultural acceptance. But the flipside of cuteness is vulnerability. Pandas are seen as 'national treasures' in China, and nationalist netizens are becoming upset about the practice of entrusting them to foreign powers. This is not the only case where Chinese popular nationalism has been at odds with the official nationalism of Chinese foreign policy. In our article, we explore these issues by looking at the Chinese government's response to the death of a panda in an American zoo. And we examine how the panda came to be such an emotionally charged and politically powerful symbol in the first place. In February 2023, the 25-year-old giant panda Lele died of heart disease in Memphis Zoo, shortly before he was due to return to China at the end of his 20-year loan. His female companion, Yaya, went back to China soon after. Yaya had suffered from a skin condition for many years, and in 2020 American animal rights groups In Defense of Animals and Panda Voices began posting photos of the pandas appearing dirty and emaciated, with missing fur. These photos generated rumors on Chinese social media that the pandas were being fed substandard bamboo and contaminated water. Much of the outrage and concern, expressed across millions of social media posts, was couched in nationalist terms. One Weibo user commented: our national treasure panda begging for food while kneeling is the same as us 1.4 billion Chinese people begging for food while kneeling! Another complained: pandas are claimed to be national treasures, but they are more like princesses in diplomatic marriages. In the face of national interests, whether a panda is doing well or dying is fundamentally unimportant. Many called for the abolition of panda diplomacy. The Memphis Zoo controversy happened at one of the lowest points in the recent history of relations between the US and China. Former President Joe Biden had just ordered the destruction of a Chinese surveillance balloon that had spent weeks in American airspace. Planned diplomatic talks had been cancelled, and both sides were accusing each other of infringing their sovereignty. Under these circumstances, we might expect the Chinese government to exploit popular nationalist outrage directed at the United States. Instead, its response to the death and illness of the Memphis pandas was measured and conciliatory. Following Lele's death and just before Yaya's return, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the pandas had received good care from the zoo and great affection from the American people […]. China stands ready to continue to work with cooperation partners including the US to play our part in protecting endangered species. Chinese zoological authorities confirmed Lele and Yaya's conditions were normal for pandas 'in the geriatric phase of their lives.' They declared that the Memphis Zoo's care of the pandas was 'excellent.' The hawkish state-owned newspaper Global Times ran editorials exonerating the Americans, even while acknowledging nationalist concerns. It would also exonerate a zoo in Thailand where a panda died a few months later. Other newspapers ran stories about the broader benefits to China of panda diplomacy. Both the online nationalist outrage and the calming state response to the Memphis controversy show the emotional weight and political importance of pandas in China. How did they get to be so important? Historians have documented that pandas were virtually absent from Chinese art, literature and culture until the 20th century. In historical terms, the panda is an unusual political symbol. Many national animal symbols are chosen for their ferocity, such as lions, eagles, and the dragons that long symbolised Imperial China. Pandas, on the other hand, are loved for their roundness, innocence and clumsiness. If a dragon can be seen as a nation's protective parent, a panda is more like its vulnerable child. The fact that wild pandas are only found in China deepens this attachment, much as it does for Australians with koalas or New Zealanders with kiwis. Our search for mentions of xiongmao (panda) in China's People's Daily newspaper shows a developing consciousness of pandas as a rare national animal from the 1950s onwards. This was accelerated in the 1970s by the popularity of pandas gifted to other countries, and the widespread commercialization of panda images. In 1983, the wild panda population in Sichuan was brought to the brink of starvation by the flowering and death of bamboo plants. This led to the mass mobilisation of the population to save the precious bears through donations and volunteering. This incident enshrined the language of pandas as 'national treasures.' It also elevated the panda as a global icon of wildlife conservation. Today, conservation research is China's main public reason for sending pandas abroad. The 21st-century panda has many layers of accumulated symbolism. It is a symbol of China, a symbol of international friendship, a symbol of global environmental consciousness and a symbol of the universal power of cute. These symbolic layers have generated complex and contradictory political emotions around pandas in China. In 2023, there was widespread speculation that pandas would not be returning to the United States and Australia because of their poor relationships with China. That speculation turned out to be premature. But the question of whether 'national treasure' pandas should be diplomats will remain a difficult one in a world defined by both environmental and human vulnerability. David Smith is associate professor in American politics and foreign policy, US Studies Centre, University of Sydney and Minglu Chen is senior lecturer in government and international relations, University of Sydney This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
RTHK
05-06-2025
- RTHK
World War II bombs defused in Cologne after evacuation
World War II bombs defused in Cologne after evacuation Ambulances prepare to evacuate a hospital in Cologne-Deutz. Photo: AFP Jamie Clarke reports Over 20,000 people were evacuated from central Cologne on Wednesday after three unexploded World War II bombs were found, the biggest such operation in the German city since the end of the war. Bomb squad technicians defused the three American explosives, two weighing 1,000kg and one 500kg, at 7:19pm (1719 GMT) on Wednesday, having earlier set up an evacuation zone of about 10,000 square metres for 12 hours. Road and train lines were closed throughout the day, and city officials went door to door, vacating about 20,000 people from their homes and closing 58 hotels as well as numerous restaurants and businesses. The heart of the city was left deserted, with a hospital, two old people's homes, nine schools and a TV studio evacuated. Weddings had to be relocated from Cologne's town hall, and a man was taken into custody after trying to break through a barrier and enter the zone, local authorities said. The bombs had been found during building work on Monday in the Deutz area on the east bank of the River Rhine. German construction sites have regularly unearthed unexploded World War II ordnance. In Frankfurt, the discovery of a 1.4-tonne bomb in 2017 led to the removal of 65,000 people, the biggest such evacuation in Europe since 1945. In 2021, four people were injured when a World War II bomb exploded at a building site near Munich's main railway station, scattering debris over hundreds of metres. (AFP)
RTHK
04-06-2025
- RTHK
Gauff, Boisson win through at French Open
Gauff, Boisson win through at French Open Coco Gauff celebrates after she beats Madison Keys in the French Open quarterfinal. Photo: Reuters Coco Gauff battled back from a set down to beat Australian Open champion Madison Keys in an error-strewn French Open quarterfinal on Wednesday. That set up a semifinal showdown with France's 361st-ranked Lois Boisson. The second seed Gauff battled past her fellow American 6-7 (6/8), 6-4, 6-1 in a tense last-eight clash littered with a whopping 14 double-faults and 101 unforced errors. "It means a lot, especially getting through this tough match today, it wasn't an easy match and I'm very happy to get through it," Gauff said. "I'm so excited to be in the semifinals back here again and have a lot more work to do. Just savour this one today and then next one tomorrow." Keys came through a tense first set in a tie-break after blowing a 4-1 lead with a double-break, but Gauff upped her level enough to fight back. The 21-year-old was the runner-up to Iga Swiatek in a one-sided showpiece match in 2022. Keys had been hoping to challenge for a second consecutive Grand Slam title, but failed to reach the semifinals in Paris for a second time. Boisson, meanwhile, continued her dream run at Roland Garros, defeating world number six Mirra Andreeva to advance to the final four. Boisson won a thrilling battle 7-6 (8/6), 6-3 against Russian Andreeva. (AFP)
