logo
From Hamilton's 'You'll Be Back' to backfiring tariffs – the long legacy of US trade barriers

From Hamilton's 'You'll Be Back' to backfiring tariffs – the long legacy of US trade barriers

IOL News5 days ago
For anyone who has seen the Broadway musical, Hamilton, which tells the life-story of one of the US' founding fathers, you'll be more familiar with the scene in which 'King George III' sings 'You'll Be Back' in response to the American Revolutionary War than Alexander Hamilton's role in tariffs.
Yet, Hamilton was key in what must be one of the oldest tariff proposals in the US' history. In 1789, he communicated the Act Laying Duties on Imports was to the United States House of Representatives, proposing that imported goods be more expensive, which would force Americans to buy more homemade products and boost the local manufacturing sector.
While the direct results of Hamilton's tariffs are lost to history, this Act was followed by many more. In fact, the US has a long history of imposing import duties, with serious – yet unintended – negative consequences.
The latest trade war is due to US President Donald Trump's recent imposition of tariffs, which varied widely from his first 'Liberation Day' announcement and have already been extended beyond August 1 for negotiations – except for South Africa and other countries that received a letter.
In a 1976 paper detailing the background and emergence of the US Trade Commission, author John Dobson commented amid its 146 pages that: 'Perhaps the safest conclusion one can draw from a study of tariffs in general, and the history of the US tariff in particular, is that change, and controversy are ever present and perhaps inevitable.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US House set to vote on landmark crypto bills this week
US House set to vote on landmark crypto bills this week

eNCA

time8 hours ago

  • eNCA

US House set to vote on landmark crypto bills this week

WASHINGTON - US lawmakers are on the verge of passing landmark legislation that will give the much-maligned crypto world much-wanted legitimacy, riding on President Donald Trump's recent embrace of the industry. The US House of Representatives is set to vote on three pieces of legislation this week, including one on the use of stablecoins -- cryptocurrencies pegged to safe assets like the dollar -- that, if passed, would immediately go to Trump for his signature. The raft of legislation comes after years of suspicion against the crypto industry amid the belief in the Biden administration that the sector, born out of the success of bitcoin, should be kept on a tight leash and away from mainstream investors. But after crypto investors poured millions of dollars into his presidential campaign last year, Trump reversed his own doubts about the industry, even launching a Trump meme coin and other ventures as he prepared for his return to the White House. According to federal financial disclosure forms released last month, Trump pocketed more than $57-million from the crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, that he launched with his sons last year. Trump has, among other moves, appointed crypto advocate Paul Atkins to head the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He has also established a federal "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" aimed at auditing the government's bitcoin holdings, which were mainly accumulated by law enforcement from judicial seizures. And thanks to his backing, Trump could soon be signing the stablecoin bill -- dubbed the GENIUS Act -- that the US Senate passed last month and that sets rules such as requiring issuers to have reserves of assets equal in value to that of their outstanding cryptocurrency. The Republican-led House is also considering a bill it calls the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act that aims to block the issuance of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) – a digital dollar issued by the US Federal Reserve. Republicans argue that a CBDC could enable the federal government to monitor, track, and potentially control the financial transactions of private citizens, undermining privacy and civil liberties. It would also require passage in the Senate before going to Trump for his signature.

Trump considers renaming 'soccer' to 'football' as US gears up for the 2026 World Cup
Trump considers renaming 'soccer' to 'football' as US gears up for the 2026 World Cup

IOL News

time12 hours ago

  • IOL News

Trump considers renaming 'soccer' to 'football' as US gears up for the 2026 World Cup

US President Donald Trump Image: White House/Facebook US President Donald Trump suggested that he might issue an executive order to rename soccer as 'football' in the United States. The idea surfaced after Chelsea defeated Paris Saint-Germain 3-0 in the championship match, part of preparations for the 2026 World Cup that the US will co-host with Canada and Mexico. Trump attended the match alongside FIFA President Gianni Infantino and presented medals and awards to both teams afterwards. During a post-match interview, a reporter asked Trump whether he would consider signing a new executive order officially renaming soccer 'football' in the US. 'I think we could do that,' Trump told DAZN, adding that football 'can bring the world together.' Americans have used the word 'soccer' for more than two centuries, derived from 'association football', while most of the world, including 2026 co-hosts Canada and Mexico, calls the game 'football' or a local version. Trump linked the potential name change to his broader political message. He said the US is doing well politically and financially, mentioning recent visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, and claimed that NATO leaders have told him that a year ago, the US was 'dead,' but now is 'the hottest country in the world.' 'There's a lot of truth to that, we were doing very badly as a country in an incompetent administration and now we have a hot country. It's really hot. And I think the soccer is going to be hot here too,' he told the outlet. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Trump's remarks come as the US intensifies preparations for co-hosting the 2026 World Cup, including forming a White House task force and pledging to support anti-discrimination measures. However, critics have noted a contradiction between these efforts and Trump's restrictive immigration and travel policies, which have sparked concerns that fans and athletes could face difficulties entering the US for the tournament. The crowd booed Trump several times during the match and the trophy presentation. He was jeered while standing alongside Chelsea's Cole Palmer during the ceremony, with fans also expressing disapproval during the national anthem. RT News

Trump's 30% tariff on South African imports: A politically motivated move?
Trump's 30% tariff on South African imports: A politically motivated move?

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Trump's 30% tariff on South African imports: A politically motivated move?

Donald Trump slammed SA with a tariff hike Image: Jim Watson / AFP US President Donald Trump's plan to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports is drawing sharp criticism from economists, many of whom argue the move is politically motivated rather than based on real trade imbalances. Economist Dawie Roodt believes the United States' planned 30% tariff on South African goods is being driven more by geopolitical tensions than trade data — and warns that the move could signal deeper diplomatic shifts. "This is, without a doubt in my view, driven primarily by politics — not economics," said Roodt. "South Africa is economically irrelevant to the U.S., but we play a much bigger role internationally, especially in terms of our support for certain organisations and countries the Americans don't like." Roodt's comments follow a formal letter sent by Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa, informing him of the impending tariff, which is set to take effect on 1 August 2025. In the letter, Trump criticised South Africa's 'persistent trade deficits' and suggested that the tariff could be adjusted — up or down — depending on the country's willingness to change its trade practices and political stance. Roodt, however, argued that the logic behind the tariff doesn't hold up under economic scrutiny. 'All the economic calculations behind this are wrong. This is Trump trying to pressure South Africa to change its international political stance. Of course, there are also local factors — like the land expropriation issue — but the bigger picture here is clearly political.' While the broader economy may not feel the immediate effects, Roodt warns that the agriculture and motor industries will be hit hardest. 'For an economy that's already in ICU, this is certainly not good news,' he said. President Ramaphosa has acknowledged receipt of Trump's letter and reiterated South Africa's commitment to ongoing negotiations. The Presidency also challenged the U.S. interpretation of trade data, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, while the average tariff on imports stands at 7.6%. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ As both governments prepare for further talks, Roodt said the focus should remain on diversifying trade partners — though he warns this won't be easy. 'Everyone's now chasing the same markets. Diversification takes time, but it's more important than ever,' he said. Economist Ulrich Joubert agreed, explaining that the proposed 30% U.S. tariff on South African imports is significant, especially given that the United States is South Africa's second-largest export market, accounting for $8.21 billion or 8.2% of total exports in 2024. While South Africa has a $1.23 billion trade surplus with the U.S., Joubert argued this is insignificant in the context of America's global trade. He believes the tariff is politically motivated, driven by Trump's push to reduce trade deficits with multiple countries — a goal Joubert said is unrealistic. 'Trump wants balanced trade with every country, which is economically impossible,' Joubert said. 'This move is more about politics than economics.' Joubert stressed the need for market diversification and consistent diplomatic engagement, warning that future investment could suffer if trade uncertainty persists. He also raised concern over AGOA possibly ending soon, which could further hurt key export sectors like agriculture and textiles. He called for ongoing negotiations and strategic diplomacy, stating that uncertainty and rising protectionism pose a growing threat to South Africa's export-led growth. Weekend Argus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store