logo
Hawaii keiki face mixed trends in well-being vs. mainland peers

Hawaii keiki face mixed trends in well-being vs. mainland peers

Yahoo10-06-2025
Hawaii's children are increasingly affected by housing instability and parental job insecurity, ranking the state among the worst in the nation for economic well-being, according to the 2025 KIDS COUNT Data Book released Monday by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
The annual report, now in its 36th year, evaluates child well-being across four categories—economic well-­being, education, health, and family and community—using 16 key indicators.
Hawaii ranked 24th overall in the nation, a slight improvement from 29th in 2024, but trends in housing and employment signal urgent challenges ahead.
More than one in three children in Hawaii lived in households burdened by high housing costs in 2023—the fifth-worst rate in the country. Though the state saw a slight improvement in housing cost burden from 38 % in 2019 to 35 % in 2023, the issue remains more severe than the national average of 30 %.
At the same time, the share of children whose parents lacked secure employment jumped from 24 % to 28 % over the same period, diverging from the national trend, which saw a modest improvement.
Hawaii's rank in this category dropped from 16th to 36th in the nation.
'It took the lowest-income families a decade to recover from the Great Recession, and now we are once again facing the threat of a greater share of our keiki growing up in economic hardship, which can have harmful lifelong effects on their well-being, ' said Ivette Rodriguez Stern, junior specialist at the University of Hawaii Center on the Family. 'Without bold action from our leaders, it will be difficult for our children and their families to climb out of the upcoming economic hole they're likely to experience.'
The warning comes as the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization predicts a potential recession, and as proposed federal budget cuts threaten to push thousands of local families out of vital food and health care programs.
Deborah Zysman, executive director of Hawaii Children's Action Network, said the report's findings must serve as a call to action.
'Year after year, the KIDS COUNT Data Book reminds us that more can and must be done to support the economic well-being of Hawai 'i's children and their families. With the looming threat of a recession and harsh cuts to crucial programs, our state's leaders must act now to prevent our children's well-being from deteriorating further.'
Education indicators were another weak spot for Hawaii, with the state ranking 29th in this domain.
The share of fourth graders not proficient in reading rose to 68 %, slightly better than the national average of 70 % but still trending in the wrong direction. Eighth grade math proficiency worsened from 72 % not proficient in 2019 to 77 % in 2024—worse than the national rate of 73 %.
Preschool access remained stagnant, with 54 % of 3-and 4-year-olds not enrolled, matching the national average. However, on-time high school graduation improved slightly, with 86 % of students graduating on time in 2022 compared with 85 % in 2019.
Where Hawaii shines is in the health of its children. The state ranked 10th in the nation, with only 3 % of children lacking health insurance—the third lowest rate nationally—and one of the lowest child and teen death rates in the country, improving from 24 per 100, 000 in 2019 to 18 in 2023.
Despite those strengths, the share of low birth-weight babies increased slightly from 8.4 % to 8.7 %, and childhood obesity worsened, with 29 % of children ages 10 to 17 considered overweight or obese—just below the national rate of 31 %.
The state also ranked 14th in the family and community domain. The state's teen birth rate dropped significantly from 16 to 11 per 1, 000, and the percentage of children living in high-­poverty areas improved from 5 % to 4 %. The rate of children in single-parent households held steady at 34 %, matching the national figure.
Overall, experts say the report offers a critical snapshot of the challenges and opportunities facing Hawaii's youngest residents.
The full 2025 KIDS COUNT Data Book is available at and data for Hawaii can be found at.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best CD rates today, August 5, 2025: Lock in up to 5.5% APY today
Best CD rates today, August 5, 2025: Lock in up to 5.5% APY today

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Best CD rates today, August 5, 2025: Lock in up to 5.5% APY today

The Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds three times in 2024. As a result, deposit account rates are on the decline. The good news: You can lock in a competitive return on a certificate of deposit (CD) today and preserve your earning power. In fact, the best CDs still pay rates above 4%. Read on for a snapshot of CD rates today and where to find the best offers. Where are the best CD rates today? CDs today typically offer rates significantly higher than traditional savings accounts. Currently, the best short-term CDs (six to 12 months) generally offer rates around 4% to 4.5% APY. As of August 5, 2025, the highest CD rate is 5.5% APY, offered by Gainbridge® on its 5-year CD. There is a $1,000 minimum opening deposit required. The following is a look at some of the best CD rates available today from our verified partners. Este contenido insertado no está disponible en tu país o región. Historical CD rates The 2000s were marked by the dot-com bubble and later, the global financial crisis of 2008. Though the early 2000s saw relatively higher CD rates, they began to fall as the economy slowed and the Federal Reserve cut its target rate to stimulate growth. By 2009, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, the average one-year CD paid around 1% APY, with five-year CDs at less than 2% APY. The trend of falling CD rates continued into the 2010s, especially after the Great Recession of 2007-2009. The Fed's policies to stimulate the economy (in particular, its decision to keep its benchmark interest rate near zero) led banks to offer very low rates on CDs. By 2013, average rates on 6-month CDs fell to about 0.1% APY, while 5-year CDs returned an average of 0.8% APY. However, things changed between 2015 and 2018, when the Fed started gradually increasing rates again. At this point, there was a slight improvement in CD rates as the economy expanded, marking the end of nearly a decade of ultra-low rates. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 led to emergency rate cuts by the Fed, causing CD rates to fall to new record lows. The situation reversed following the pandemic as inflation began to spiral out of control. This prompted the Fed to hike rates 11 times between March 2022 and July 2023. In turn, this led to higher rates on loans and higher APYs on savings products, including CDs. Fast forward to September 2024 — the Fed finally decided to start cutting the federal funds rate after it determined that inflation was essentially under control. In 2025, with the funds rate remaining unchanged since December, we're beginning to see CD rates come down from their peak. Even so, CD rates remain high by historical standards. Take a look at how CD rates have changed since 2009: Understanding today's CD rates Traditionally, longer-term CDs have offered higher interest rates compared to shorter-term CDs. This is because locking in money for a longer period typically carries more risk (namely, missing out on higher rates in the future), which banks compensate for with higher rates. However, this pattern doesn't necessarily hold today; the highest average CD rate is for a 12-month term. This indicates a flattening or inversion of the yield curve, which can happen in uncertain economic times or when investors expect future interest rates to decline. Read more: Short- or long-term CD: Which is best for you? How to choose the best CD rates When opening a CD, choosing one with a high APY is just one piece of the puzzle. There are other factors that can impact whether a particular CD is best for your needs and your overall return. Consider the following when choosing a CD: Your goals: Decide how long you're willing to lock away your funds. CDs come with fixed terms, and withdrawing your money before the term ends can result in penalties. Common terms range from a few months up to several years. The right term for you depends on when you anticipate needing access to your money. Type of financial institution: Rates can vary significantly among financial institutions. Don't just check with your current bank; research CD rates from online banks, local banks, and credit unions. Online banks, in particular, often offer higher interest rates than traditional brick-and-mortar banks because they have lower overhead costs. However, make sure any online bank you consider is FDIC-insured (or NCUA-insured for credit unions). Account terms: Beyond the interest rate, understand the terms of the CD, including the maturity date and withdrawal penalties. Also, check if there's a minimum deposit requirement and if so, that fits your budget. Inflation: While CDs can offer safe, fixed returns, they might not always keep pace with inflation, especially for longer terms. Consider this when deciding on the term and amount to invest.

Forecasts predict a dismal decade for stocks. Here's what to do.
Forecasts predict a dismal decade for stocks. Here's what to do.

USA Today

time3 days ago

  • USA Today

Forecasts predict a dismal decade for stocks. Here's what to do.

Over the past several decades, the U.S. stock market has yielded average annual returns around 10%. What if those days are over? In recent forecasts, Vanguard projects the stock market will rise by only 3.3% to 5.3% a year over the next decade. Morningstar sees U.S. stocks gaining 5.2% a year. Goldman Sachs forecasts the broad S&P 500 index will gain only 3% a year. Those numbers aren't outliers. A roundup of market prognostications, charted by Morningstar, finds no one projecting annual returns higher than 6.7% for the domestic stock market in the next 10 years. In June, USA TODAY noted that many analysts predict the stock market will end the year with only meager gains. Some readers reacted with surprise, others with disbelief. Stock indexes have been posting record highs, despite lingering inflation, a softening job market and rising import tariffs. As it turns out, those record highs are one reason forecasters don't expect much from the stock market over the rest of this year, nor in years to come. Here, then, is a closer look at why economist have dim hopes for the stock market in the next decade, and what everyday investors can do about it. Stocks are overpriced The simple reason forecasters don't expect much from the U.S. stock market over the next decade: stock prices are already very high. Stock indexes have been breaking records. To analysts, that means many stocks are overpriced. Bargains are fewer. The indexes have less room to grow. Just how overpriced is the stock market? Economists have a yardstick to measure that. It's called the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, or CAPE ratio. It measures a stock's price against corporate earnings. It tells you, in effect, whether the stock is overvalued or undervalued. Right now, the CAPE ratio for the S&P 500 stands at 38.7. That means stock prices are very expensive, relative to earnings. 'Right now, the U.S. stock market is trading at more than double the post-World War II average price-to-earnings ratio,' said Randy Bruns, a certified financial planner in Naperville, Illinois. There are two prior moments over the past century when the CAPE Ratio was really high. One was in 1929. The other was in 1999. In the decades that followed those peaks, the stock market sank like a stone: The Great Depression of the 1930s, and the dot-com bust and Great Recession of the 2000s. 'Our projection is that that ratio is going to somehow come down,' said Paul Arnold, global head of multi-asset research at Morningstar. Investors forget to buy low No one is forcing anyone to purchase expensive stocks. Why, then, do investors keep buying them? It's easy to recite that old investing adage about buying low and selling high. It's harder to follow the rule, especially when you don't know how high is too high. Purchasing stocks when the market is high sounds like a flagrant violation of the buy-low rule. And yet, investment advisers routinely encourage consumers to keep buying stocks when prices are high. The reason: Stocks tend to rise over time. Even if you buy high, you can bet the market will eventually climb even higher. All those headlines about stock-market records function like ads for stocks. And investors keep buying them, pushing prices up. 'When stocks are going up, investors have this tendency to think that now's the time to get in,' said Todd Schlanger, senior investment strategist at Vanguard. 'Stocks are one of the few things people don't like to buy on sale.' The stock market is too 'concentrated' Here's another reason many forecasters are down on U.S. stocks, and especially the monster stocks known as the Magnificent Seven: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Tesla. Together, the Seven represent 34% of the overall value of the S&P 500, up from 12% in 2015, Motley Fool reports. That's called market concentration, and it can be a bad thing. Investors are urged to diversify: Not to hold only stocks, and not to hold too much of any one stock. The problem with the Magnificent Seven, Goldman Sachs reports, is that their massive growth is unsustainable: 'It is extremely difficult for any firm to maintain high levels of sales growth and profit margins over sustained periods of time.' Those seven stocks are 'already priced to perfection,' Schlanger said. That's a gentle way of saying that they are expensive. Vanguard forecasts that growth stocks, the category dominated by the Magnificent Seven, will grow by only 1.9% to 3.9% a year over the next decade. That does not mean the Magnificent Seven stocks are going to crash. 'I find it hard to believe that something would happen that would throw one of those companies into a tailspin,' said Catherine Valega, a certified financial planner in Winchester, Massachusetts. 'The larger companies have resources to pivot, if they need to.' Forecasters question, though, whether the Magnificent Seven will continue to grow at the same fevered pace of the past. 'If those companies are booming, that's great,' Bruns said. 'But when the writing on the wall hits for those seven companies, it'll be bad news for the S&P 500 as a whole.' What to do about those gloomy stock forecasts? If you want to avoid market concentration and overpriced stocks, forecasters say, here are some places to look:

Trump Is Now Running the Worst Economy Since His Last Term in Office
Trump Is Now Running the Worst Economy Since His Last Term in Office

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Now Running the Worst Economy Since His Last Term in Office

The last time America's job numbers were this bad—besides the pandemic—was during the Great Recession. Revisions to the last three months of job reports have moved the three-month growth average to 35,000, a lag that hasn't emerged since 2010, and which some economists have said could indicate a recession is on the horizon. 'The labor market is much weaker than originally reported the last two months. While payrolls grew 73k in July, May and June data were revised down a total of 258k to 19k and 14k, respectively,' wrote Economic Policy Institute economist Elise Gould. The health care and social assistance industries supplied practically all the new jobs over the last three months, while other sectors—including manufacturing, professional and business services, warehouse, retail, and government—lost jobs, according to the new figures. 'Without health care, the last three months of payroll gains look like this: -53,000 in May, -45,000 in June, and -300 in July,' reported Bloomberg U.S. economy editor Matthew Boesler. EPI chief economist Josh Bivens posited that if the U.S. enters a recession in the coming months, the 'rapid softening/deterioration in the labor market' over the last three months will likely be marked in retrospect as the start of the country's economic decline. Trump administration officials blamed the abysmal numbers on 'seasonal adjustment quirks,' though they failed to provide rationale on what made this season so different. In light of that, economists had their own ideas, pointing directly at Donald Trump's trade policies. 'I've been calling this a 'Frozen' job market for awhile. Now I would call it a red flag,' wrote Navy Federal chief economist Heather Long. 'Companies do not want to hire or invest with this much uncertainty about tariffs, inflation, etc.' Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store