Lula visits former Argentine President Cristina Kirchner in house arrest
BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) -After participating in Mercosur trade talks in Buenos Aires, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva visited former Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner on Thursday at her apartment in Buenos Aires, where she is serving a six-year sentence for corruption.
Kirchner called Lula's visit "a political act of solidarity," in a post on X following the meeting, and said that the Brazilian leader had also been a victim of political persecution. In 2017, Lula faced a corruption conviction for which he served 19 months in prison.
Lula, a leftist leader, did not meet privately with Argentine right-wing libertarian President Javier Milei, who has called him a "communist" and "corrupt." During the trade summit and Lula's first visit to Argentina since Milei took office, Brazil took up the rotating presidency of the Mercosur bloc.
Kirchner was president of Argentina from 2007 to 2015 and last month began serving a sentence for participating in a fraud scheme that steered public road work projects to a close ally while she was president. The sentence, upheld in June by the country's Supreme Court, also bars Fernandez from holding office.
In recent days, supporters of Kirchner have rallied outside of her apartment, hoping to catch a glimpse of the prominent opposition figure when she appears on her balcony.
After the Supreme Court upheld Kirchner's sentence, Lula said on social media site X that he called Kirchner to express support and spoke to her "about the importance of staying strong in this difficult moment."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
ICC prosecutor ordered to recuse himself from Venezuela investigation
Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, was ordered by the court to recuse himself from its investigation into alleged crimes against humanity in Venezuela over a conflict of interest in the case. Khan, a British attorney who is on leave from the ICC due to an unrelated investigation, has since 2021 led the ICC's investigation in Venezuela, where President Nicolás Maduro is accused of arbitrarily detaining, torturing and executing his political opponents.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bruno Henrique of Flamengo charged, faces possible 2️⃣-year ban
The Prosecutor's Office of the Superior Court of Sports Justice (STJD) charged Bruno Henrique, Flamengo's forward, with match-fixing this Friday (1). Information from the portal Uol. He risks being suspended for up to two years for deliberately getting a yellow card in a match against Santos in the 2023 Brasileirão. There is no date yet for the trial. The charge includes evidence from the criminal case against Bruno Henrique, which, according to attached conversation screenshots, shows he clearly informed his brother Wander Nunes Pinto Junior when he would receive the card that would suspend him. Wander then confirms he will place bets on a betting site after receiving such insider information. Bruno Henrique was charged based on two articles of the Brazilian Code of Sports Justice (CBJD): 243 (1st paragraph) and 243-A. Article 243 addresses "deliberately acting in a way that harms the team you defend." There is an aggravation for having gained financial advantage. The prescribed punishment ranges from 360 to 720 days. The second article refers to "acting contrary to sports ethics, with the aim of influencing the result of a match, event, or equivalent." The penalty ranges from 12 to 24 matches. There is a possibility that the 34-year-old player may face a preventive suspension requested by Luis Otávio Veríssimo Teixeira, the president of the STJD. Bruno Henrique was preserved in the match against Atlético-MG last Thursday (31). He is expected to return to Flamengo's starting lineup on Sunday (3), against Ceará. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here. 📸 Wagner Meier - 2025 Getty Images
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
After Skydance Doesn't Deny ‘Side Deal' With Trump as Part of CBS Settlement, Sen. Warren Repeats Call for Investigation Into Potential ‘Criminal Behavior'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren isn't convinced that Paramount Global and Skydance Media did not engage in 'corrupt side deals or political favors' with the Trump administration to get their merger approved. Warren, the senior U.S. senator from Massachusetts, had sent letters to Skydance CEO David Ellison (on July 21) and Paramount Global's three co-CEOs (on May 19), co-signed by Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and Ron Wyden (D-Oregon). The senators asked questions about Paramount and CBS's $16 million settlement with President Trump over his '60 Minutes' lawsuit and the Skydance-Paramount merger deal — with the senators suggesting the settlement amounted to a bribe. More from Variety Skydance Tells Senators It Wasn't Involved in Colbert 'Late Show' Cancellation, 'Fully Complied' With Anti-Bribery Laws in Paramount Deal Shari Redstone Invokes Father Sumner Redstone's 'Steadfast Belief That Content Is King' in Final Quarterly Earnings Call as Paramount Global Owner Paramount Captures Small Q2 Profit Ahead of Sale to Skydance Both Skydance and Paramount replied to the senators in letters dated July 31, with executives from both companies affirming they complied with all laws. But Warren wasn't satisfied with their answers. 'These dodgy responses raise even more questions about whether Paramount and Skydance engaged in corrupt side deals or political favors to get their merger approved — and reveal why we need a full, independent investigation into whether there was any criminal behavior,' Warren said in a statement Friday. Reps for Paramount Global and Skydance declined to comment. In the letter to Ellison, the senators noted that Trump has claimed he had a side deal with Skydance under which the new owners of the merged company are expected to contribute $20 million in advertising, public service announcements and 'similar programming' that promote causes he favors. That purportedly would be in addition to Paramount's $16 million payment to settle his lawsuit accusing '60 Minutes' of deceptively editing a pre-election interview with Kamala Harris. Stephanie Kyoko McKinnon, Skydance's general counsel and co-president of business operations, in her reply to the senators, didn't directly address the question of whether Skdyance has a 'side deal' with the president for free advertising or other airtime. She wrote, 'Skydance was neither a party to the lawsuit nor to Paramount's settlement of its litigation with the President.' Paramount has said that its settlement with Trump 'does not include PSAs or anything related to PSAs.' Warren on Friday said the alleged 'secret side deal' between Trump and Skydance 'is a big open question.' 'Paramount contradicts President Trump's claim, while Skydance does not deny the existence of this side deal — and refuses to disclose any terms,' Warren said. She added, 'Skydance's statements regarding meetings with not just 'federal regulators' but also 'the Administration' raises serious concerns and more questions: Did the Skydance CEO meet and speak with President Trump or top White House officials? Who met whom, when, and what other deals were made?' On July 24, the FCC approved the Skydance-Paramount deal, which is now set to close Aug. 7. Two days prior to the agency's approval, Skydance's McKinnon sent letters to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr promising that Skydance would install an ombudsman at CBS to review 'complaints of bias or other concerns' and guaranteeing that the merged Skydance-Paramount would not implement any diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Paramount Global, Trump and the FCC's Carr have each said the approval of the Paramount-Skydance deal was separate from Trump's lawsuit against CBS. Skydance's McKinnon wrote in her July 31 reply, 'Throughout its history and during the review of the proposed acquisition of Paramount, Skydance has fully complied with all applicable laws, including our nation's anti-bribery laws.' The senators also asked Ellison if he or other Skydance execs were involved in CBS's decision to cancel 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.' According to McKinnon, Skydance was not part of that decision. 'Paramount did provide notice of its decision to Skydance [about Colbert's show being canceled], but only after Paramount reached its own independent decision, and shortly before Paramount publicly acknowledged the cancellation,' she wrote. CBS said the cancellation of Colbert's show was 'purely a financial decision' and has said Skydance did not participate in the decision. In response, Warren said, 'Skydance admits it knew in advance that Paramount canceled the 'Late Show With Stephen Colbert,' just days after Colbert called out Paramount for its 'big fat bribe.' These giant corporations must think Americans are fools if they think these half-answers resolve serious questions about whether they bribed their way to a merger approval.' In their July 31 reply to the senators' inquiry, Paramount co-CEOs George Cheeks, Brian Robbins and Chris McCarthy wrote that, regarding the $16 million settlement, the entire amount (except for fees and costs) will be allocated to a future non-profit presidential library. 'No amount will be paid directly or indirectly to President Trump… personally,' they said. 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret, or a commitment to air public service announcements (PSAs) and expressly recognizes that we stand by our reporting. There are no other material terms to the settlement,' Cheeks, Robbins and McCarthy wrote. The Paramount execs also referred to comments made by Cheeks, who also serves as CEO of CBS, at the Paramount Global shareholder meeting on July 2, when he said in part: 'Companies often settle litigation to avoid the high and somewhat unpredictable cost of legal defense, the risk of an adverse judgment that could result in significant financial, as well as reputational damage, and the disruption to business operations that prolonged legal battles can cause.' According to the Paramount execs, the company 'did not alter its oversight of '60 Minutes' or block any '60 Minutes' content to facilitate approval of the proposed transaction.' They noted that in January 2025, Paramount appointed Susan Zirinsky as interim executive editor of CBS News with 'responsibility for standards throughout the news organization, including '60 Minutes.'' They said Zirinsky's appointment and 'other personnel decisions' involving CBS News were 'unrelated to the litigation or the proposed merger.' In April, Bill Owens, just the third executive producer of '60 Minutes,' announced he would leave the show. Owens cited interference from Paramount execs as preventing him from making 'independent decisions based on what was right for '60 Minutes,' right for the audience.' The Paramount co-CEO's letter is available at this link, and the Skydance letter is at this link. RELATED: Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
