
New $4,000–$6,000 senior tax break proposed: Who qualifies and how much you'll save
Many taxpayers 65 and older seem to have a decent shot at ultimately seeing an extra federal income tax break of some flavor on their 2025 tax returns.
Both the House version and the Senate version of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill include a new senior "bonus" deduction that would be available for those age 65 and older whose income falls within set limits.
We're talking about older adults of modest means seeing, perhaps, $480 to $720 in federal income tax savings, if some version of an enhanced deduction for seniors is approved.
The taxpayer must turn 65 before the end of 2025 to qualify for the deduction on next year's tax return. It would not matter if you're receiving Social Security benefits or delaying claiming. Seniors with a high incomes would not qualify; lower income seniors who do not pay taxes would not benefit, either.
Social Security benefits would continue to be taxed for many seniors. The president's campaign promise to end taxes on Social Security benefits is not included in either the Senate or House versions.
One provision of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, known as the Byrd Rule, prohibits Senate reconciliation bills from including any measure that changes Social Security benefits or taxes.
Offering an enhanced tax break is another way to reduce taxes for many seniors, though.
What kind of new tax break could seniors see?
Significant differences exist between the House and Senate versions relating to the enhanced deduction for seniors. As a result, it's hard to know right now exactly how any new rule might land. Here are some points to consider:
Size of the tax break: Under the Senate version, the maximum bonus deduction would be up to $6,000 for those 65 and older. Tax filers could claim this deduction on top of the standard deduction and extra deductions that already exist for seniors.
The proposed bonus deduction would be smaller — only up to $4,000 for people 65 and over — under the House version. The House GOP mega-bill passed May 22 by a single-vote margin.
At a 12% marginal tax rate, the $4,000 deduction alone for a single taxpayer who is 65 or older would result in $480 in tax savings, according to Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
That savings would be $720 if you could take a $6,000 deduction under the Senate version in this example, assuming a taxpayer with a 12% rate. Savings would vary based on the tax rate.
For a single taxpayer, the 12% tax rate applied on taxable income from $11,926 through $48,475 in 2025. Annual inflation adjustments can be made to marginal tax brackets.
Right now, taxpayers 65 and older already qualify for an additional standard deduction, which reduces taxable income, on top of the regular standard deduction, if they do not itemize deductions, such as mortgage interest or medical expenses.
New 401(k) contribution limits: What Gen X and Baby Boomers need to know in 2025
On 2025 federal income tax returns, the additional standard deduction for seniors is $2,000 if you are single or file as head of household and not a surviving spouse. The amount is $1,600 per qualifying individual if you're married, filing jointly or separately.
The "senior bonus" would apply whether you itemized or claimed the standard deduction and it would be on top of those deductions.
Who qualifies based on income limits: The Senate version is far more restrictive when it comes to cutting off seniors with higher incomes from any additional tax break.
Under both the House and Senate bill, taxpayers 65 and older could receive the full deduction if their modified adjusted gross income is no more than $75,000 for single filers and no more than $150,000 for married filing jointly.
Under the Senate version, the deduction would phase out more quickly, meaning you'd qualify for less of a tax break or not get any break, once thresholds are hit.
The "senior bonus" under the House version phases out at 4% starting at each dollar above $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint filers, according to Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
The Senate Finance bill phases out more quickly at 6%.
What's the phase-out limit?: As incomes go above those thresholds, the deduction would be smaller until it phases out completely for an individual with $175,000 in modified adjusted gross income or a married couple filing a joint return with $250,000. That's true with both bills.
How long will this tax break last?: Both the House and Senate bills put a limit on the new "senior bonus." We're looking at a proposed tax break that remain in place in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.
Odds seem good that many seniors will see tax break
"Some version is likely to make it into the final bill," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois.
"Many seniors already pay no income tax, and, unlike a refundable credit, this deduction would not benefit them," Luscombe said.
"It is not overall as generous as Trump's original proposal to not tax Social Security benefits; however, it targets the bonus more toward low- and middle-income seniors rather than wealthier seniors," he said.
Luscombe said the Senate may have come up with the higher bonus in order to appear to come closer to meeting Trump's initial proposal to not tax Social Security benefits.
"Addressing changes to Social Security benefits directly may have been difficult to do under the Senate budget reconciliation rules, so this appears to be an effort to honor Trump's proposal in a manner that works under the budget reconciliation rules," Luscombe said.
It's up for debate as to which version — House or Senate — ultimately prevails. Or even if there is some compromise figure or restrictions that are reached.
Luscombe said much will probably depend primarily on the overall budget numbers and how the provision might be paid for with revenue offsets or spending cuts or whether it adds to the projected deficit.
Again, not all seniors will benefit from this new bonus tax break.
"Keep in mind that lower-income seniors would get no benefit since they already make less than the current standard deduction," Gleckman said.
Lower-income households that do not have taxable income would not benefit, experts said, as they do not have income to offset.
"And, due to the phase-out, very few high-income older adults would get a benefit," Gleckman said.
Gleckman said the House and Senate versions primarily benefit middle- and upper-middle income seniors only.
The Tax Foundation estimates that the $4,000 deduction for seniors would cost about $22.8 billion in 2025 and $23.2 billion in 2026 in federal revenue.
The Tax Foundation estimates that the Senate version at a maximum $6,000 deduction would cost about $35 billion annually, which is about $12 billion larger than the House version or about 52% more.
Gleckman, at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said it would make sense that the Senate version could be more costly, but he did not have a specific estimate on June 23.
"Yes, the phase-out is faster," Gleckman said. "But there are far more middle-income older adults than very high-income seniors. So many people getting $6,000 is more costly than a somewhat higher number getting $4,000."
How can you plan if you're a senior to take advantage of this potential tax break?
Gleckman said planning tips would be limited because it's unknown what the rules will look like should some version pass Congress and be signed into law by Trump.
We've already gone through half of the year, as well.
In general, he said, a senior with investments could try to defer capital gains or delay withdrawals from retirement accounts if they're able to do so. You'd need to be closer to 65 than your 70s so that you're not subject to required minimum distributions to be able to delay withdrawing money from a 401(k) or other retirement savings account.
Required minimum distributions are the minimum amounts you must withdraw from your retirement accounts each year. These figures vary for everyone because they are based on your age, life expectancy and money in retirement savings.
Many retirees in their 70s must withdraw at least some money from traditional 401(k) plans and traditional retirement savings, not Roth plans, to address complex required minimum distribution rules each year.
The Secure 2.0 Act, passed by Congress in late 2022, raised the age for required minimum distributions in general to 73 for those who turned 72 in 2023 and later.
If you reached age 73 in 2024, the Internal Revenue Service notes, you could have delayed taking your first required distribution for this year until April 1, 2025, but those who delayed still must take another required minimum distribution for 2025 by Dec. 31, 2025. In other words, those savers who delay would face two required minimum distributions in 2025.
Large withdrawals in a year from a traditional pretax 401(k) will trigger taxes and possibly send you into a higher marginal tax rate — and in some cases push you beyond the thresholds for being able to claim the proposed senior "bonus" deduction.
Many times, of course, retired people combine income from retirement accounts with Social Security to pay the bills. As a result, Gleckman noted, it can be difficult for many to defer income unless they have a good deal of disposable income.
We're talking about many moving parts with what Trump calls "One big, beautiful bill" or OBBB. The proposed enhanced deduction is one provision that those 65 and older will want to watch.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
25 minutes ago
- UPI
GOP Senator Thom Tillis announces he will not seek re-election
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-NC, pictured during a Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing in February, announced Sunday that he will not seek re-election in 2026. File photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C, said Sunday that he would not seek re-election, opening up a seat in a state that was already considered a battleground in the 2026 midterm elections. Tillis made the announcement after voting against a procedural measure Saturday night to clear the way for debate on the Senate version of the Trump administration's budget reconciliation bill. "As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven't exactly been excited about running for another term." Tillis said in a statement sent to media outlets. "That is true since the choice is between spending another six years in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It's not a hard choice and I will not be seeking re-election." President Donald Trump threatened Tillis with a primary challenge in N.C. in the 2026 midterms following the GOP Senator's vote against moving the budget bill to the Senate floor for debate. Trump took to social media to criticize Tillis. "Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social account Saturday night. In a statement following the vote Saturday night, Tillis said he was putting the interests of his constituents above party politics. "I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form," Tillis wrote. "It would result in tens of billions of dollars in funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities." Tillis also noted that proposed cuts would impact rural hospitals and fall squarely on Medicaid recipients who rely on the program as their only source of medical insurance.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he's not planning to extend a pause on global tariffs beyond July 9
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire, and his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United States. Letters will start going out 'pretty soon" before the approaching deadline, he said. 'We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out,' Trump told Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" during a wide-ranging interview taped Friday and broadcast Sunday. Those letters, he said, would say, 'Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25% tariff, or a 35% or a 50% or 10%.' Trump had played down the deadline at a White House news conference Friday by noting how difficult it would be to work out separate deals with each nation. The administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Negotiations continue, but 'there's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them,' he said in the interview. Trump also discussed a potential TikTok deal, relations with China, the strikes on Iran and his immigration crackdown. Here are the key takeaways: Few details on possible TikTok deal A group of wealthy investors will make an offer to buy TikTok, Trump said, hinting at a deal that could safeguard the future of the popular social media platform, which is owned by China's ByteDance. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need, probably, China approval, and I think President Xi (Jinping) will probably do it,' Trump said. Trump did not offer any details about the investors, calling them 'a group of very wealthy people.' 'I'll tell you in about two weeks,' he said when asked for specifics. It's a time frame Trump often cites, most recently about a decision on whether the U.S. military would get directly involved in the war between Israel and Iran. The U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites just days later. Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for 90 more days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time Trump extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court — took effect. Trump insists US 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities U.S. strikes on Iran 'obliterated' its nuclear facilities, Trump insisted, and he said whoever leaked a preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months should be prosecuted. Trump said Iran was 'weeks away' from achieving a nuclear weapon before he ordered the strikes. 'It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before,' Trump said. 'And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time.' Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Sunday on X that Trump "exaggerated to cover up and conceal the truth." Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, told CBS' 'Face the Nation' that his country's nuclear program is peaceful and that uranium 'enrichment is our right, and an inalienable right and we want to implement this right' under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 'I think that enrichment will not — never stop.' Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on CBS that 'it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage." Grossi also said the U.N. nuclear watchdog has faced pressure to report that Iran had a nuclear weapon or was close to one, but 'we simply didn't because this was not what we were seeing.' Of the leak of the intelligence assessment, Trump said anyone found to be responsible should be prosecuted. Journalists who received it should be asked who their source was, he said: 'You have to do that and I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' His press secretary said Thursday that the administration is investigating the matter. A 'temporary pass' for immigration raids on farms and hotels? As he played up his immigration crackdown, Trump offered a more nuanced view when it comes to farm and hotel workers. 'I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been,' the Republican president said. He noted that he wants to deport criminals, but it's a problem when farmers lose their laborers and it destroys their businesses. Trump said his administration is working on 'some kind of a temporary pass' that could give farmers and hotel owners control over immigration raids at their facilities. Earlier this month, Trump had called for a pause on immigration raids disrupting the farming, hotel and restaurant industries, but a top Homeland Security official followed up with a seemingly contradictory statement. Tricia McLaughlin said there would be 'no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine' immigration enforcement efforts. Status of China trade talks Trump praised a recent trade deal with Beijing over rare earth exports from China and said establishing a fairer relationship will require significant tariffs. 'I think getting along well with China is a very good thing,' Trump said. 'China's going to be paying a lot of tariffs, but we have a big (trade) deficit, they understand that." Trump said he would be open to removing sanctions on Iranian oil shipments to China if Iran can show 'they can be peaceful and if they can show us they're not going to do any more harm.' But the president also indicated the U.S. isn't afraid to retaliate against Beijing. When Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo noted that China has tried to hack U.S. systems and steal intellectual property, Trump replied, 'You don't think we do that to them?'


The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump urges Senate GOP to overrule parliamentarian
President Trump urged Senate Republicans on Sunday to overrule the chamber's parliamentarian in order to pass key parts of his sweeping domestic policy bill. In a Sunday post on Truth Social, the president backed a call from Rep. Greg Steube (R-Ohio) and other GOP hardliners to ignore rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. 'Great Congressman Greg Steube is 100% correct. An unelected Senate Staffer (Parliamentarian), should not be allowed to hurt the Republicans Bill. Wants many fantastic things out. NO! DJT,' Trump wrote. The parliamentarian is the nonpartisan Senate official responsible for determining whether parts of laws meant to be passed through budget reconciliation comply with the rules for that process. Budget reconciliation bills can pass the Senate with simple majorities, thereby averting the filibuster. But those provisions must follow specific instructions passed through a budget resolution and not expand the deficit past the window laid out in the bill. Developing