'Golden ticket' visa for the rich fails to pay its way
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
26 minutes ago
- West Australian
Business tax overhaul on wishlist of productivity tsar
Australia should cut taxes for small businesses and implement a new tax that allows immediate investment deductions, the Productivity Commission says, laying the groundwork for the government's economic roundtable. The proposal to cut the corporate income tax rate for business earning less than $1 billion to 20 per cent and introduce a five per cent cashflow tax would boost Australia's economy by $14 billion without worsening budget sustainability, the commission said in a report. This would help lift the nation's floundering labour productivity by 0.4 per cent. Combined, the measures would incentivise investment in the economy by $8 billion. Declining business investment has caused productivity growth to fall to less than a quarter of its 60-year average over the past decade, the commission's deputy chair Alex Robson said. "If we don't get our economy moving again, today's children could be the first generation to not be better off than their parents," he warned. "We need to spark growth through investment and competition - the best way to do that is to reform our company tax system." Businesses with annual revenue under $50 million pay a 25 per cent corporate tax rate while larger firms pay the full 30 per cent tax rate. Under the commission's proposal, businesses over $1 billion in revenue would continue to be taxed at 30 per cent. A net cashflow tax of five per cent would also allow companies to instantly depreciate the full value of investments, incentivising companies to invest in more productivity-boosting capital. The commission said it could be expanded over time if successful. A cashflow tax has previously been championed by Labor-aligned economists including Ross Garnaut and Craig Emerson. At a tax roundtable hosted by Independent MP Allegra Spender last week, former Treasury secretary Ken Henry said Australia would eventually have to move to a cashflow tax, but it would be a very big step. ANU tax policy expert Viva Hammer said implementing a comprehensive cash flow tax had one huge problem - transitioning from the current system. "The people who are going to invest will have a completely different treatment for the people who've already invested. What do you do with the existing investments?" she told the roundtable. "It's a tremendous change in the way you tax the country. So any tremendous change is going to have tremendous winners and tremendous losers." The commission also urged Treasurer Jim Chalmers to make a clear commitment to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses, while forcing regulators to consider the impact of their actions on economic growth. "You need so many licences and approvals from different levels of government to start a cafe in Brisbane that the City Council introduced a check list with up to 31 steps to guide people through the process," commissioner Barry Sterland said. The report's release came as the treasurer released a schedule for his economic roundtable, which kicks off on August 19. Day one of the three-day summit will open with addresses by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Dr Chalmers and Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock. Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood, Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson and Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally will also present to the roundtable. Among the topics to be discussed are better regulation, tax reform, artificial intelligence, boosting business investment and attracting skills.
Perth Now
26 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Business tax overhaul on wishlist of productivity tsar
Australia should cut taxes for small businesses and implement a new tax that allows immediate investment deductions, the Productivity Commission says, laying the groundwork for the government's economic roundtable. The proposal to cut the corporate income tax rate for business earning less than $1 billion to 20 per cent and introduce a five per cent cashflow tax would boost Australia's economy by $14 billion without worsening budget sustainability, the commission said in a report. This would help lift the nation's floundering labour productivity by 0.4 per cent. Combined, the measures would incentivise investment in the economy by $8 billion. Declining business investment has caused productivity growth to fall to less than a quarter of its 60-year average over the past decade, the commission's deputy chair Alex Robson said. "If we don't get our economy moving again, today's children could be the first generation to not be better off than their parents," he warned. "We need to spark growth through investment and competition - the best way to do that is to reform our company tax system." Businesses with annual revenue under $50 million pay a 25 per cent corporate tax rate while larger firms pay the full 30 per cent tax rate. Under the commission's proposal, businesses over $1 billion in revenue would continue to be taxed at 30 per cent. A net cashflow tax of five per cent would also allow companies to instantly depreciate the full value of investments, incentivising companies to invest in more productivity-boosting capital. The commission said it could be expanded over time if successful. A cashflow tax has previously been championed by Labor-aligned economists including Ross Garnaut and Craig Emerson. At a tax roundtable hosted by Independent MP Allegra Spender last week, former Treasury secretary Ken Henry said Australia would eventually have to move to a cashflow tax, but it would be a very big step. ANU tax policy expert Viva Hammer said implementing a comprehensive cash flow tax had one huge problem - transitioning from the current system. "The people who are going to invest will have a completely different treatment for the people who've already invested. What do you do with the existing investments?" she told the roundtable. "It's a tremendous change in the way you tax the country. So any tremendous change is going to have tremendous winners and tremendous losers." The commission also urged Treasurer Jim Chalmers to make a clear commitment to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses, while forcing regulators to consider the impact of their actions on economic growth. "You need so many licences and approvals from different levels of government to start a cafe in Brisbane that the City Council introduced a check list with up to 31 steps to guide people through the process," commissioner Barry Sterland said. The report's release came as the treasurer released a schedule for his economic roundtable, which kicks off on August 19. Day one of the three-day summit will open with addresses by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Dr Chalmers and Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock. Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood, Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson and Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally will also present to the roundtable. Among the topics to be discussed are better regulation, tax reform, artificial intelligence, boosting business investment and attracting skills.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Big business in Jim Chalmers' sights as Treasurer weighs new cashflow tax on Australia's largest companies
Treasurer Jim Chalmers is weighing up the introduction of a new cashflow tax on Australia's largest companies following a bold recommendation from the Productivity Commission. In an interim report released late on Thursday night, first ordered by the Treasurer ahead of Labor's upcoming productivity roundtable, the Commission proposes the creation of a two-tier corporate tax system, with cuts for smaller operators funded by hikes for big business. Under the proposal the corporate tax rate for businesses with revenue under $1 billion would be slashed to 20 per cent, while around 500 companies, including major banks, miners and supermarkets, would miss out on a cut. Instead, Australia's biggest businesses would face a new five per cent net cashflow tax in order to ensure the changes remain budget-neutral. "Lower company tax rates are likely to attract more overseas firms to invest in Australia, help people start and grow businesses, and strengthen the ability of smaller Australian firms, which contribute the bulk of capital investment, to compete with larger ones," the report said. Big businesses and those which cross the revenue threshold triggering the new tax will be able to reduce the burden via an immediate full deduction for their capital spending. According to the Productivity Commission's deputy chair, Alex Robson, the proposal will help to boost flagging capital expenditure, as well as improve the flatlining productivity rate. "If we don't get our economy moving again, today's children could be the first generation to not be better off than their parents," he said. "We need to spark growth through investment and competition – the best way to do that is to fix our company tax system. "Our proposed reforms will begin to shift the company tax system towards one that better supports investment and productivity growth. "In the past ten years productivity grew by less than a quarter of its 60-year average. To turn this around, we need business to expand and invest in the tools and technology that help us get the most out of our work." Capital expenditure from non-mining companies has dropped 3.2 per cent as a share of GDP since the end of the Global Financial Crisis, with the Commission claiming their proposal could help to reverse the trend. It estimates the tax changes could result in $8 billion worth of investment in the economy while remaining revenue-neutral in the medium-term. The Commission's modelling also suggests the proposal would increase the total size of the economy by $14 billion over the next decade. Mr Chalmers is expected to discuss the final report, one of several he commissioned earlier this year, at the upcoming productivity roundtable. Support for the proposal is likely to be mixed, with the Business Council of Australia, which represents the CEOs of prominent companies which would all be hit with the tax, having previously pushed for a flat corporate tax cut to bring the rate to 25 per cent. Commonwealth Bank chief executive Matt Comyn, though, has said reductions to the corporate rate should not be a priority.
