Alberta is overhauling its energy market. Here's what's happening, and why
Alberta is overhauling its energy market through a suite of changes aimed at making the system more reliable and affordable – a gargantuan task that involves a raft of reviews, consultations, and legislative and regulatory changes.
One of the largest drivers of that transformation is the development of the Restructured Energy Market. The REM process is examining the main rules and principles that govern Alberta's electricity market in an effort to ensure that the system remains as reliable and affordable as possible.
The REM is being overseen by the Alberta Electric System Operator, which operates the province's power grid. The United Conservative government tasked the AESO with developing a new system for how the electricity market operates following years of volatile prices and, later, shortages that led to provincewide outages and pleas for consumers to power down.
The REM redesign process began as the Market Pathways initiative, launched on Aug. 1, 2023. In March of 2024, however, the government changed its directive to the AESO. It asked for a much broader overhaul, which was renamed the REM.
Alberta's power system is unique in Canada in that it has no central or Crown power provider. Instead, private companies run the plants that feed electricity into the grid. The AESO works with the industry and the government to manage and plan that market.
Alberta restructures utilities rules ahead of major power market overhaul
The overhaul comes as jurisdictions across North America grapple with how to meet rocketing demand for electricity. Industries are becoming increasingly electrified to reduce carbon emissions, and governments are trying to attract power-thirsty data centres. Alberta, for example, is aiming for $100-billion of investment over a few years.
Electricity generation technology has changed dramatically over the past few years. First, coal-fired power plants, which ran 24/7, were phased out. Most producers pivoted to natural gas-fired power stations, which present more flexibility and, for the most part, provide reliable – and cleaner – electricity, no matter the weather.
Then came what Matt Davis, the vice-president of policy with Edmonton-based Capital Power, called the 'spectacular build-out' of wind and solar. 'I don't think there's enough appreciation of what that actually does to the system and how challenging it is to operate.'
All those changes, coupled with the growing use of batteries to store power and improve reliability, has completely changed the the way Alberta's grid operates.
'Obviously the sun comes up in the morning and goes down at night. We know the wind doesn't always blow,' said Jason Wang, a senior electricity analyst with Pembina Institute, a think tank. 'It's important for electricity markets to be able to make sure it's an even playing field for all types of generation, but also for that reliability to be maintained.'
Those in Alberta's utilities sector say that the complexity of the REM review is off the charts – particularly when combined with other changes happening around the same time, including new transmission regulations, local access fees and distribution.
It's not easy, agrees Alberta's Affordability and Utilities Minister Nathan Neudorf.
'But we thought, 'If we're going to undertake this work, there's no point in doing it half-measure,' he says. 'If we were going to do some significant portions, why don't we do it fully – completely engage with stakeholders and make this adjustment all at the same time – so that we don't have to go through this multiple times over multiple administrations.'
Report finds Alberta's restrictive renewables policies dampened investment
Opinion: Free the market for renewable energy in Alberta
Alberta wants a new market in place by 2027. Other jurisdictions such as Texas, Ontario and California have undertaken similar reviews, but took much longer to implement changes.
Alberta could have taken its time, Mr. Neudorf says, but industry urged speedy completion of the task to avoid prolonging the market uncertainty that undermines investment.
But Pembina's Mr. Wang reckons the accelerated timeline has created more uncertainty – particularly when combined with the government's seven-month ban on renewable power project approvals in August, 2023.
'In a different world, the government could have said, 'We want to make market changes, but they won't be implemented until 2030, maybe even like 2034, 2035,' so that they were slowly phased in. Then investors would have short-term certainty, and they would have that longer-term certainty.'
The REM was initially to be completed by May, but that timeline has been pushed back owing to the scale of the exercise and concerns of the utilities sector. For example, AESO scrapped a mandatory day-ahead market rule that would have had participants agree a day ahead of time on the price and the duration of power production, and which industry said was far too complex.
Reliability and planning standards will likely be implemented within the next year, and Mr. Neudorf anticipates that most of the decisions around the REM will be made by this summer. The province has already tabled Bill 52, which allows changes to be made at a rapid clip, rather than going through another year of public consultations. More legislation is slated for fall or spring.
For the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, the REM raises broader economic concerns. The community has been investing in renewable power installations in Southern Alberta since around 2018.
But the price of power from its renewables sites dropped significantly; in the final quarter of 2024, revenue was down roughly 12 per cent, says Jason Schulz, Athabasca Chipewyan's executive director of strategic advisory services.
Promised power transmission infrastructure was never built to support renewable energy projects either, he says, which caused congestion on the grid. Electricity 'pretty well just gets dumped' as a result, he says, adding that the REM is unlikely to change that, given the distribution model being considered.
Still, he's hopeful the REM will be a good news story for those in the power sector. With some positive decisions and others yet to be determined, he says, 'time will tell.'
Capital Power's Mr. Davis is pleased the REM process has recognized the value of dispatchable, flexible generation capacity, be it batteries or gas-fired generators. 'There's more of an inherent acknowledgement that there is additional value to those resources because they provide critical reliability attributes to the system.'
Bob Myles, chief executive of Calgary-based Canadian Utilities Ltd., says he's much more optimistic about the REM today than he was six months ago, given how much the AESO is listening to industry.
'There were a lot of doubters for a long time, that a lot of the comments were not being heard,' he says. 'Do we have everything figured out yet? No, there's still some issues that could have significant negative impacts on generators. But I believe now we're heading in the right direction, in a better direction.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Interest in ‘elbows up' merchandise waning ahead of Canada Day, businesses say
When Rachael Coe decided to launch an 'elbows up' merchandise line at her store in Yarmouth, N.S., in March, she said it was an immediate bestseller. Within a week, Coe said her Timeless Memories shop had already made 400 sales. By the end of the first month, she had sold 2,500 products ranging from T-shirts to hoodies to car decals. Demand for items bearing Canada's rallying cry against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and annexation threats was so high that Coe launched a website to keep up with the surge. 'It was a response from all over Canada,' she said. 'We reached every single province then we started covering worldwide. Our 'elbows up' merch went everywhere.' Many Canadian businesses hopped on the patriotic trend that also saw Ontario Premier Doug Ford wearing a 'Canada is not for sale' ball cap ahead of a January meeting with Canada's premiers and prime minister. But Coe's sales started slowing down by May. And despite a slight boost ahead of Canada Day, she said the 'elbows up' line is now selling at similar rates to the classic red-and-white merchandise she sells every year around this time. Although business owners say they are selling more Canada-themed products this year leading up to July 1, many have also noted a decline in 'elbows up' merchandise sales. The rallying cry, initially embraced as a grassroots movement at the height of cross-border trade tensions and Trump's musings about making Canada the 51st state, has shifted to a more generic expression of Canadian pride amid continued tensions, retailers and experts say. Others note that the phrase 'elbows up' has increasingly been used in a partisan context, contributing to the marketing shift. Stephanie Tomlin, Toronto-based owner of the online business Shop Love Collective, said she saw an explosion in 'elbows up' merchandise sales in March, selling as many as 10 or 15 products per day. Similarly, her sales began to stagnate in May. Leading up to Canada Day, she said she's selling 'quite a bit more' merchandise compared with previous years, but that's due to interest in Canada-themed products across the board. 'I think the climate in Canada is a little bit more settled after the election and that … we feel like we will never be the 51st state,' Tomlin said, adding that Canadian patriotism is becoming less combative as annexation talks have died down. Howard Ramos, a professor of sociology at Western University, said 'elbows up' became 'more partisan than it used to be' when Prime Minister Mark Carney embraced the phrase in his election campaign ads in late March. 'It's just added to how the expression is dying down as a pan-Canadian claim,' he said. 'Now you see on social media, especially from Conservative handles, the use of 'elbows up' in a sarcastic way to criticize Mark Carney or Liberal policies.' Negative online comments about the 'elbows up' movement have discouraged Coe from promoting her products on Facebook. But when she's interacting with customers in her Yarmouth shop, she said the phrase isn't as divisive. 'It's not a political term, and it simply means that you're defending your country, and everyone should be defending our country, just like you would defend (against) a goal in hockey,' Coe said. Danielle McDonagh, owner of Vernon, B.C.-based Rowantree Clothing, said she stopped promoting her 'elbows up' merchandise on a large scale when she noticed the phrase being interpreted as an 'anti-Conservative' and 'boomer' movement. For McDonagh, increased concern about the political climate in the United States has also chipped away at the lightheartedness of the 'elbows up' movement. 'I think some of the levity is gone for me,' she said. While sales of her 'elbows up' products have dropped by about 90 per cent since hitting 1,000 in the first month, she said she continues to promote the merchandise in small batches at local markets in Vernon. Business owners say their customers continue to prioritize supporting the Canadian economy, as they are routinely answering questions about where their products are manufactured. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. And the push to buy Canadian isn't just coming from this side of the border. Coe said many American tourists arriving by ferry from Maine visit her shop in search of Canadian merchandise. '(Tourists) want to support us just as much as Canadians want to support us,' Coe said. McDonagh said her business sees similar interest from Americans. 'I'm shipping a lot of Canada-centric merchandise to the States, which I just love,' McDonagh said. 'People chat with me on my site and say … we're supporting you.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer. N/A Markets News
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Your SIN is a 'master key.' Here's why you must protect it
Dave has learned the hard way that you don't want the wrong person getting a hold of your social insurance number. In 2024, he became a victim of identity fraud. Someone used his SIN to open a bank account and get their hands on some quick cash. And while he didn't lose any of his own money, his credit score tanked for a period. "The most frustrating part was being told, 'Hey, there isn't much we could do about this. Your information is on the dark web. It will be used again.' And months later, it was used again," Dave, of Laval, Que., told Cost of Living. Dave isn't his real name. CBC has agreed to identify him by a pseudonym, as police have told him that further exposing his identity could lead to more challenges. Dave was one of 4.2 million Desjardins customers that had their data leaked in 2019. And they aren't the only victims. Over the past few years, customers with Sobeys, Ticketmaster, London Drugs, Nova Scotia Power and the Canada Revenue Agency, to name a few, have had their data breached. And since more businesses and organizations have started asking for social insurance numbers, experts are cautioning people to be very selective about who they share their SIN with. "It's the most sensitive, secret and unique identifier. Essentially, it's the master key to our identity in Canada," said Claudiu Popa, co-founder of KnowledgeFlow Cybersafety Foundation, which advocates for online safety for Canadians. SINs The social insurance number was created with the launch of the Canadian Pension Plan in the 1960s and used to track who was eligible, as well as for various employment insurance programs. According to Popa, there aren't many places that actually need to know it. A new employer needs your SIN, as does your bank and some government agencies, like the CRA. But more organizations are asking for people's SINs. Popa says that includes gyms, landlords, insurance companies and schools. He says none of these places need your SIN, but that doesn't stop them from asking. That's because it's an easy way to check someone's credit with a unique number. But some companies are also using it as an identifier for customers. "It has just become a lazy way of uniquely identifying people, and unfortunately it places people at the risk of privacy breaches," said Popa. So what do you do if someone asks for your SIN? Just say no. But as the cliché goes, that's easier written into a CBC article than done in real life. Just ask Greg Pace. When Pace made a major career change from an RCMP officer to a farmer, he figured it was a good idea to take some classes to gain more knowledge about the new field. But midway through the government-sponsored classes, someone from the program pulled him aside and informed him he hadn't put his SIN in his paperwork. "I felt there was a lot of social pressure to comply. And yet I knew it wasn't the right ask — that they were, I felt, overstepping," said Pace. Pace, whose background as an RCMP officer taught him to be wary of sharing personal information, asked why, but wasn't given a reason. So he refused, and when it became obvious he was no longer welcome, he left the course. Compromised What makes the social insurance number so valuable to fraudsters, compared to a credit card number or bank password? Popa says it's because, unlike other pieces of information, it isn't easy to change. Dave knows that all too well. Just in the past year, fraudsters have tried to open two different bank accounts in his name and have bought multiple iPhones online. And the onslaught of fraud came just as Desjardins' offer of free credit monitoring was running out. It's taken Dave a lot of time to talk to banks, credit bureaus and police to get it all straightened out each time. And it's not just a hassle. It can tank his credit score. "To know that somebody could use … your information in a fraudulent manner, something that you worked so hard to build, is extremely frustrating," said Dave. Since the Desjardins breach, some have requested new SINs. But that doesn't happen often. It requires proof that the number has been used in fraud, not just that the information has been leaked. And fraudsters are clever, Popa says. They'll often wait until their victims' credit monitoring has run out, which is usually public information. In an email to CBC, Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) says it takes steps to protect people from having their SIN compromised, including awareness campaigns, fraud prevention resources and secure application processes. It says that if your number is compromised, you should file a police report, notify the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, contact a credit bureau and report it to any affected government programs. It doesn't, however, recommend applying for a new SIN. "Having multiple SINs can increase fraud risk. Getting a new SIN does not erase the old SIN and does not protect it from future abuse," said ESDC spokesperson Saskia Rodenburg. A different method? There is another potential solution: digital IDs. This system would allow you to share only what you want to share and nothing else. "You might have something like a digital wallet that's in your phone, or in your smart tablet," said Joni Brennan, president of the non-profit Digital ID and Authentication Council of Canada. One piece of information on the ID could be your verified income, for example, which you would be able to share with whichever person or organization that requires it. This way, she says, you could share only the information that's necessary, or that you want to share. Some regions are taking the necessary steps, like B.C., but don't expect a Canada-wide digital ID anytime soon. That's because provinces have a lot of jurisdiction over credentials. And as that progresses, Brennan says finding ways to protect our SIN needs to be an ongoing conversation. "As we see, new technologies come forward that might create new ways for bad folks to do bad things, [so] the space that's focused on security and protection and privacy needs to continue to evolve, as well."
