SpaceX Starship rocket explodes in setback to Musk's Mars mission, World News
SpaceX's massive Starship spacecraft exploded into a dramatic fireball during testing in Texas late on Wednesday (June 18), the latest in a series of setbacks for billionaire Elon Musk's Mars rocket programme.
The explosion occurred around 11pm local time (12pm on Thursday in Singapore time) while Starship was on a test stand at its Brownsville, Texas Starbase while preparing for the tenth test flight, SpaceX said in a post on Musk's social-media platform X.
The company attributed it to a "major anomaly" and said all personnel were safe. Its engineering teams were investigating the incident, and it was coordinating with local, state and federal agencies regarding environmental and safety impacts, the company said.
"Preliminary data suggests that a nitrogen COPV in the payload bay failed below its proof pressure," Musk said in a post on X, in a reference to a nitrogen gas storage unit known as a Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel. "If further investigation confirms that this is what happened, it is the first time ever for this design," he continued.
The Starship rocket appeared to experience at least two explosions in quick succession, lighting up the night sky and sending debris flying, according to video capturing the moment it exploded.
The 400-foot (122-metre) tall Starship rocket system is at the core of Musk's goal of sending humans to Mars. But it has been beset by a string of failures this year.
In late May, SpaceX's Starship rocket spun out of control about halfway through a flight without achieving some of its most important testing goals. The Starship lifted off from SpaceX's Starbase, Texas, launch site, flying beyond the point of two previous explosive attempts earlier this year that sent debris streaking over Caribbean islands and forced dozens of airliners to divert course.
Two months earlier, the spacecraft exploded in space minutes after lifting off from Texas, prompting the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to halt air traffic in parts of Florida.
Videos on social media showed fiery debris streaking through the dusk skies near South Florida and the Bahamas after Starship broke up in space shortly after it began to spin uncontrollably with its engines cut off, a SpaceX live stream of the mission showed. Musk called that explosion "a minor setback."
The FAA said earlier this month that it had closed an agency-required investigation into the mishap, citing the probable cause as a hardware failure in one of the engines. SpaceX identified eight corrective actions to prevent a recurrence and the FAA said it verified SpaceX implemented those prior to the late May Starship mission.
In January, a Starship rocket broke up in space minutes after launching from Texas, raining debris over Caribbean islands and causing minor damage to a car in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
[[nid:716221]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Elon Musk says first Tesla drove itself from factory to customer
[AUSTIN] Tesla chief executive Elon Musk said a Tesla Model Y SUV drove itself from the company's factory near Austin to a customer's home in the company's latest move to showcase its push into autonomous driving. In a post on X, Musk announced the company made an autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer's home, noting the delivery was made 'across town', and included highways. Musk said the delivery did not include anyone in the car and no remote operators were in control of the car. While the post did not include video or images, Musk posted that a video of the event would come soon. Tesla's head of artificial intelligence (AI) and autopilot, Ashok Elluswamy, said the vehicle reached a max speed of 72 miles per hour (116 km per hour). The delivery was one day ahead of the date Musk had earlier set for the first autonomous delivery, Jun 28, which will be his 54th birthday. Tesla's first autonomous delivery highlights Musk's bet that AI and robotics represent the future of his electric car company. It comes days after Tesla began its long-awaited robotaxi service on Jun 22, offering a select group of influencers and investors rides in a small fleet of self-driving Model Y SUVs in a limited area of Austin. Musk previewed both events in a post earlier this month on X, and has said the company plans to eventually have millions of robotaxis on the road in the future. Musk is counting on eventually churning out large numbers of robotaxis and Optimus humanoid robots to underpin the electric vehicle company's next chapter. Sales in key markets including North America and Europe remain sluggish and the company has faced a consumer backlash to Musk's role in US President Donald Trump's administration. Multiple executives have also left the company in recent weeks. The hands-free delivery is an extension of a capability Tesla touted in April, when it posted a video showing cars moving autonomously from its Texas assembly lines to logistics lots prior to shipping. It's unclear whether autonomous deliveries will become a meaningful part of Tesla's operations. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Outperformed by AI: Time to replace your analyst?
SIX artificial intelligence (AI) models recently went head-to-head with seasoned equity analysts to produce Swot (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analyses, and the results were striking. In many cases, the AI didn't just hold its own; it uncovered risks and strategic gaps the human experts missed. This wasn't theory. My colleagues and I ran a controlled test of leading large language models (LLMs) against analyst consensus on three companies – Deutsche Telekom (Germany), Daiichi Sankyo (Japan), and Kirby Corporation (the US). Each was the most positively rated stock in its region as of February 2025 – the kind of 'sure bet' that analysts overwhelmingly endorse. We deliberately chose market favourites because if AI can identify weaknesses where humans see only strengths, that's a powerful signal. It suggests that AI has the potential not just to support analyst workflows, but to challenge consensus thinking and possibly change the way investment research gets done. The uncomfortable truth about AI performance Here's what should make you sit up: With sophisticated prompting, certain LLMs exceeded human analysts in specificity and depth of analysis. Let that sink in. The machines produced more detailed, comprehensive Swots than professionals who have spent years in the industry. But before you eliminate the need for human analysts, there's a crucial caveat. While AI excels at data synthesis and pattern recognition, it can't read a CEO's body language or detect the subtext in management's 'cautiously optimistic' guidance. As one portfolio manager told us, 'Nothing replaces talking to management to understand how they really think about their business.' The 40 per cent difference that changes everything The most striking finding? Advanced prompting improved AI performance by up to 40 per cent. The difference between asking 'Give me a Swot for Deutsche Telekom' and providing detailed instructions is the difference between a Wikipedia summary and institutional-grade research. This isn't optional anymore — prompt engineering is becoming as essential as Excel was in the 2000s. Investment professionals who master this skill will extract exponentially more value from AI tools. Those who don't will watch competitors produce superior analysis in a fraction of the time. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The model hierarchy: Not all AI is created equal We tested and ranked six state-of-the-art models: 1. Google's Gemini Advanced 2.5 (Deep Research mode) – The clear winner 2. OpenAI's o1 Pro – Close second with exceptional reasoning 3. ChatGPT 4.5 – Solid but notably behind the leaders 4. Grok 3 – Elon Musk's challenger showing promise 5. DeepSeek R1 – China's dark horse, fast but less refined 6. ChatGPT 4o – The baseline for comparison The reasoning-optimised models (those with 'deep research' capabilities) consistently outperformed standard versions such as ChatGPT-4o. They provided more context, better fact-checking, and fewer generic statements. Think of it as hiring a senior analyst versus a junior analyst – both can do the job, but one needs far less handholding. Timing matters too. The best models took 10 to 15 minutes to produce comprehensive Swots, while simpler models delivered in less than a minute. There's a direct correlation between thinking time and output quality – something human analysts have always known. The European AI deficit: A strategic vulnerability Here's an uncomfortable reality for European readers: Of the models tested, five are American and one is Chinese. Europe's absence from the AI leadership board isn't just embarrassing – it's strategically dangerous. When DeepSeek emerged from China with competitive performance at a fraction of Western costs, it triggered what some called a 'Sputnik moment' for AI. The message was clear: AI leadership can shift rapidly, and those without domestic capabilities risk technological dependence. For European fund managers, this means relying on foreign AI for critical analysis. Do these models truly understand European Central Bank communications or German regulatory filings as well as they grasp US Federal Reserve statements? The jury's out, but the risk is real. The practical integration playbook Our research points to a clear four-step approach for how investment professionals should use these tools: 1. Hybrid, not replacement: Use AI for the heavy lifting – initial research, data synthesis, pattern identification. Reserve human judgment for interpretation, strategy, and anything requiring genuine insight into management thinking. The optimal workflow: AI drafts, humans refine. 2. Prompt libraries are your new alpha source: Develop standardised prompts for common tasks. A well-crafted Swot prompt is intellectual property. Share best practices internally, but guard your best prompts like trading strategies. 3. Model selection matters: For deep analysis, pay for reasoning-optimised models. For quick summaries, standard models suffice. Using GPT 4o for complex analysis is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. 4. Continuous evaluation: New models launch almost weekly. Our six-criteria evaluation framework (structure, plausibility, specificity, depth, cross-checking, meta-evaluation) provides a consistent way to assess whether the latest model truly improves on its predecessors. Beyond Swot: The expanding frontier While we focused on Swot analysis, the implications extend across the entire investment process. We list a few of these below, but there are many more: Earnings call summarisation and analysis in minutes, not hours ESG red flag identification across entire portfolios Regulatory filing analysis at scale Competitive intelligence gathering Market sentiment synthesis Each application frees human analysts for higher-value work. The question isn't whether to adopt AI – it's how quickly you can integrate it effectively. The uncomfortable questions Let's address what many are thinking: 'Will AI replace analysts?' Not entirely, but it will replace analysts who don't use AI. The combination of human plus AI will outperform either alone. 'Can I trust AI output?' Trust but verify. AI can hallucinate facts or miss context. Human oversight remains essential, especially for investment decisions. 'Which model should I use?' Start with Gemini Advanced 2.5 or o1 Pro (or the successors) for complex analysis. But given the pace of change, reassess quarterly. 'What if my competitors use AI better?' Then you'll be playing catch-up while they're finding alpha. Staying on the sidelines while competitors build AI advantage means ceding ground in an increasingly competitive landscape. The path forward The genie is out of the bottle. LLMs have demonstrated they can perform analytical work in seconds that once took days. They bring speed, consistency, and vast knowledge bases. Used effectively, they're like having a tireless team of junior analysts who never sleep. But here's the key: Success requires thoughtful integration, not wholesale adoption. Treat AI output as you would a junior analyst's draft – valuable input requiring senior review. Master prompt engineering. Choose models wisely. Maintain human oversight. For European professionals, there's an additional imperative: Push for domestic AI development. Technological dependence in critical financial infrastructure is a strategic vulnerability no region can afford. Master the tools – or be outpaced by them Embrace these tools intelligently, or watch competitors leave you behind. The winners in this new landscape will be those who combine AI's computational power with human insight, intuition, and relationship skills. The future of investment analysis isn't human or AI – it's human and AI. Those who recognise this and act accordingly will thrive. Those who don't will find themselves outperformed not by machines, but by humans who learned to work with them. Your next analyst hire might still need that coffee break. But they'd better know how to prompt an LLM, evaluate its output, and add the human insight that transforms data into alpha. Because in 2025, that's the new standard. The tools are here. The frameworks exist. The winners will be the ones who know how to use them. This content has been adapted from an article that first appeared in Enterprising Investor at The full study can be found here The writer, CFA, is chief investment officer at MHS CapInvest, where he employs advanced AI tools to enhance allocation, stock selection, portfolio construction, and risk management for different market capitalisations, He trains teams at DAX-listed companies on generative AI integration and helps investment professionals leverage tools like ChatGPT and Gemini to enhance their performance.
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Tesla completes first fully autonomous Model Y delivery ahead of schedule
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on Friday that the first fully autonomous delivery of Model Y from the factory to a customer's home across town was completed a day ahead of schedule.
