City of Johannesburg councillor allegedly used municipality's BMW X3 for political activities in KZN, says DA
The DA in Johannesburg is requesting an urgent investigation into the use of a city-owned luxury vehicle by one of the members of the Government of Local Unity (GLU) for party activities.
The party claims that one of the members of the mayoral committee travelled to KwaZulu-Natal last weekend using the City's BMW X3.
This vehicle was part of the security detail for members of the mayoral committee before the South Gauteng High Court put an end to the City's controversial VIP Protection Policy.
In a statement, DA shadow MMC for Public Safety, Solomon Maila, said the mayor should investigate if the implicated councillor is in contempt of court.
'The DA in Johannesburg has written to Executive Mayor Dada Morero to ensure that a full investigation is conducted into allegations that a member of his Mayoral Committee travelled to the eThekwini area in KwaZulu-Natal for party-political activities during the weekend of 30 May to 1 June 2025 using the City's official BMW without consent.
'The DA understands that this vehicle was procured as part of the City's implementation of the VIP Protection Policy that was declared unconstitutional and invalid Gauteng High Court on 2 January 2025,' he said.
The municipality bank card is used for fuel
Maila said whistleblowers had informed them that the BMW X3 had been refuelled twice over the weekend when it was in use at the ratepayers' expense.
'Which suggests that it travelled for more than 1000 km in that period.
'According to the DA's sources in the city, the First National Bank (FNB) card linked to the said vehicle was used for the refueling and the payment of tollgates to and from KwaZulu-Natal,' Maila said.
He said this was an abuse of municipal resources if the allegations are true.
'These allegations point to a possible unlawful use of a motor vehicle without the necessary consent. If proven, these allegations would mean that the said MMC has also acted in contempt of the High Court, which is another criminal offence,' he said.
The DA says it wants the mayor to investigate the movements of the vehicle between May 30 and June 1, 2025.
ALSO READ: DA tables motion of no confidence in Johannesburg mayor and speaker
'Criminal charges must be laid'
The DA also wants to know the identity and portfolio of the MMC who used the vehicle, as well as details about the driver and their role within the Department of Public Safety.
'The DA will not rest until there is full accountability. Criminal charges must be laid against the implicated MMC and every municipal official in the city who aided and abetted the MMC in the commission of these alleged criminal offences.
'The culture of criminal impunity in the city must be nipped in the bud,' he said.
NOW READ: 'Joburg is in free fall' — Next month could be make or break for Mayor Dada Morero
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
37 minutes ago
- The Herald
Shift in voter support as DA retains Ward 34 with narrow margin
While the DA retained the hotly contested Ward 34 in Nelson Mandela Bay on Wednesday, the result shows a shift in voter dynamics, with the Patriotic Alliance closing the gap and trailing by just 188 votes. The DA secured 2,382 votes (46.56%), with the Patriotic Alliance close behind with 2,194 votes (42.89%). This is according to the IEC website. The by-election was triggered by the death of former ward councillor Johnny Arends in April. Six political parties — the DA, PA, National Alliance, ANC, EFF and PAC — pulled out all the stops in a bid to claim the ward. The National Alliance came in third with 323 votes (6.31%). The ANC followed with 118 votes (2.31%), PAC 64 (1.25%) and EFF 35 (0.68%). In the 2021 local government elections, the DA won the ward with 63.14% of the votes, followed by the National Alliance (17.12%) and PA (2.78%). DA provincial chair Yusuf Cassim said he believed the by-election was not hotly contested. 'This is because the PA brought all its members across SA here. They came out [allegedly] intimidating and bribing the voters with money and alcohol, but they couldn't beat us. 'In next year's elections, they won't be able to do that. 'They are going to have to campaign all over the country. They won't bring all their members into one ward. 'If they couldn't beat us in one ward, how will they stand a chance in an election where they're contesting across the board,' Cassim said. To celebrate the victory, the DA held a motorcade with councillor candidate Annelize Stanley and other supporters to thank the community. Stanley said she was honoured and humbled by the support. 'This is a win for all the residents of Ward 34. We worked so hard for this. 'People in this community know me because I live here. They know my history, and I will serve them well.' Stanley said a pressing issue was broken street lights. 'We are battling with rampant crime, and the sewage leaks take away dignity.‚ PA regional chair Bradley Murray thanked all its members and supporters for showing that their party was the one that could remove the DA in the ward. 'We lost by less than 200 votes, and that speaks volumes about our party considering the DA has ruled there for more than 20 years,' Murray said. 'We are happy with our performance, we're fast eating away at the blue elephant one piece at a time, and they can feel it.' Regarding the allegations of bribery and intimidation, Murray said Cassim was welcome to either report the matter to the police or notify the IEC. 'You must understand that this is very personal for Yusuf. 'The DA lost nine council seats [after the 2021 local government elections] and we are trailing by 188 votes compared to the 1,940 recorded in the 2024 national election — all this happened under his leadership. 'He is fast losing grip because we got the most votes in the Wonderwonings voting station where their candidate is from, and they're not happy about it at all.' National Alliance president Gary van Niekerk said while disappointed with the outcome, it did not come as a surprise considering the conduct of the DA and PA leading to and during the election. 'I don't know if any other party mentioned this, but when [PA president] Gayton [ McKenzie] arrived, PA supporters were giving R100 to voters, which is unacceptable. 'Even before this, he came and revamped a netball court, which was aligned with their campaign. 'On the other hand, the DA minister Dean Macpherson was here last week giving away food parcels, which is a despicable thing to do, buying votes from the poor by providing what they need most. 'They were even campaigning on Wednesday, which is not allowed, but nothing is being done about this.' Van Niekerk said IEC officials were aware of these tactics but did not act. The Herald
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Letters: Why would you want to listen to boring old Ramaphosa rattle on when there's thrilling Wimbledon on TV?
How tennis contrasts with corruption What did you do on Sunday evening, watch the exciting match between Sinner and Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final or listen to the same old drivel from President Cyril Ramaphosa? The showdown between Sinner and Alcaraz, world Number 1 and world number 2, was such a big contrast to the woman's final the previous day. Amanda Anisimova was left in tears when she was demolished by Polish star Iga Swiatek in two straight sets in just 57 minutes. The American didn't even win one game. In 114 years Wimbledon had not witnessed such a boring, one- sided game. Nevertheless credit must be given to the ruthless Swiatek who not only won her maiden Wimbledon title but also made history by becoming first Polish to win Wimbledon. But the men's final was a humdinger. Though Alcaraz fought like a matador he was out classed by the cool Italian, Jannik Sinner who held his nerve and won his first Wimbledon trophy. Now with Wimbledon dishing up such a mouth-watering clash who would want to spoil their Sunday evening and listen to the president's insipid address? Haven't we all heard it before? How many commissions, enquiries, dialogues, working committees and meetings must a country have? What's ironical and even annoying is that Ramaphosa is very particular about following correct procedure when it comes to bringing wayward ministers and officials to book yet his government is riven by mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption. How often correct procedure is not followed in the awarding of tenders and procurement? And what about him? Can the corrupt act against another corrupt? The accusations against the Minister of Police re serious and need action, not another long drawn out, expensive commission. Why couldn't he, for once, act decisively, call the two men, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and KZN National Commissioner of Police Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, to his office, let them fight it out and then he, as the referee, dismiss the loser? If he could fire the DA's Deputy Trade Minister Andrew Whitfield for undertaking an unauthorised trip to the US why couldn't he do the same against Mchunu? It would save the country so much money. Now the taxpayer will have to pay two people for the same job, one acting and the other sitting at home twiddling thumbs. But he wants to pass the buck to a commission. It could end up like the Zondo Commission. Not that the Zondo Commission which cost R1 billion was a failure but no one implicated in state capture has yet been charged. What a waste of public money! \What is he a president for if cannot act decisively at crucial times? How we need a strong man at the top who will put the country first and act without fear or favour against the corrupt, not a dawdler like Ramaphosa! | Thyagaraj Markandan Kloof World hypocrisy stinks badly THIS is not war – this is industrial-scale slaughter carried out with foreign-backed money and weapons. Every bomb that reduces a Gaza neighbourhood to rubble carries the fingerprints of powerful nations, and every bullet that tears through a child's body was financed by taxpayers around the world. Our inaction is our signature on the execution tell us these are 'precision strikes', but where is the precision in bombing a refugee camp to kill one man and murdering 126 civilians instead? Where is the accuracy in shelling a UN school sheltering displaced families, leaving the walls painted with children's blood? These aren't military operations – they're extermination campaigns. Day after day, body bags are stacking higher as they methodically dismantle an entire people, house by house, school by school, life by 'self-defence' looks like this: Children butchered with shrapnel. Babies baked alive in incubators turned coffins. Elderly people shot in the face while surrendering. What defence needs to kill 15 000 children? What security requires bombing hospitals full of patients? What is happening in Gaza cannot be explained away with speeches or softened with political language, because there is nothing complex about dropping bombs on starving children, nothing confusing about blowing up hospitals, schools, and bakeries filled with families who have nowhere else to run, and nothing justifiable about destroying an entire population while claiming it is for security. In Rafah, Israeli bombs hit a tent camp filled with families who fled there because the Israeli Defence Forces told them it was 'safe'. The fire melted children alive. Rescue workers found babies cooked inside their mothers' arms, their tiny bodies fused together by the heat. This happened on May 26 last year. And all our leaders did was sanitise the bloodshed with press conference smiles. ' At Al-Shifa Hospital, doctors performed C-sections on dead women because the bombs came too fast to save them. In Jabalia, Israeli tanks rolled over wounded civilians begging for help, crushing them into the dirt like cockroaches. In Khan Younis, Israeli tanks bulldozed through residential blocks, crushing entire families as if they were debris. When survivors dug through the rubble days later, they found a mother clutching her three children, their bodies crushed together so tightly that rescuers had to bury them in a single grave. The world's hypocrisy stinks worse than Gaza's overflowing morgues. The same politicians who cried over Ukrainian children now justify Palestinian children's deaths. The same outlets that blast Kashmir's resistance are silent when Israel starves babies. This isn't deception – it's the open slaughter of equality, where racism decides which children get to dream and which ones get buried. Yumna Zahid Ali l Pakistan Dumping: cleaning up rivers not enough MANDELA Day is a time when individuals, companies, and institutions commit themselves to making a difference, often by dedicating 67 minutes to good deeds that benefit others. For the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS), this day is an opportunity to take action through its annual Clear River Campaign, which mobilises efforts to clean rivers across the is the most valuable resource we have as humans; without it, we would not exist. It is crucial to keep our rivers and streams clear of pollutants and rubbish, as this has an adverse effect on the towns downstream. The Department of Water and Sanitation embarks on the Clear River Campaign annually to clean rivers but more importantly, to educate communities about not polluting the water resources. The campaign has been running for years, but it seems that annually, the same rivers that were cleaned the year prior still remain polluted by the nearby communities. While DWS continues to engage in public participation and awareness drives, the outcomes suggest that the message is not landing where it matters most. Community members frequently cite the failure of municipal waste collection services as a major reason for illegal dumping. If there is no accessible or consistent refuse removal, people feel they have no other option. The prescribed solution is for all spheres of government and communities to work together with the goal of ending pollution of rivers and streams. If dumping continues, the cost of cleaning polluted water places a heavy financial burden on water services providers, especially municipalities. Preventing pollution is not only more sustainable but also far more affordable than dealing with its consequences. Behaviours once learned are hard to unlearn. But progress is possible when we commit to consistent effort and collaboration. The Department of Water and Sanitation remains committed to the cause. It may not happen overnight, but with persistence and a shared vision, lasting change is within reach. | Larry Crisp Free State Department of Water and Sanitation DAILY NEWS
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Call on Joburg to act on illegal bus stations
The unregulated bus stations are allegedly a hub for illicit transport and undocumented immigration. Transport sector role players have called on authorities to investigate and close illegal bus stations operating in Joburg. African Unite Borders Bus Trucks Association chair Phumudzo Mukhwathi said yesterday there were two illegal bus stations in Braamfontein and another one near Park Station. Frustration by long-standing inaction 'These illegal stations have been operating for a long time and the government did not even try to shut them down despite the fact that we have alerted them on several occasions,' said Mukhwathi. He said the matter was reported to the City of Joburg and MMC for transport Kenny Kunene, 'but no action was taken'. 'Honestly, this is unfair competition because there are no rules in the illegal bus stations and we were also reliably informed that some of the buses using these stations are used to transport illegal things from South Africa to Zimbabwe,' he said. Police response questioned In January last year, police intercepted one of the buses ferrying a group of undocumented immigrants from Zimbabwe. ALSO READ: Bus driver arrested after transporting nearly 80 undocumented Zimbabweans Mukhwathi said there were allegations last year that some of the buses were using fraudulent permits and they alerted the police. But he said they did not get feedback about the investigation. 'If the city continues to fail us, we are going to take legal action to push them to act,' he said. Transport union promises to coordinate with city officials South African Transport and Allied Workers Union spokesperson Amanda Tshemese said they would investigate the allegations and work with relevant authorities to address the situation. 'We will engage with the MMC as well as the mayor. It only makes sense if we can all attend to the matter,' said Tshemese. 'You can't have illegal companies or immigrants operating in South Africa when you have millions of South Africans who are unemployed.' Illegal activity Nozibusiso Khambule, from an organisation fighting against illegal immigrants known as the March in March Movement, said they were aware of the illegal bus stations operating in the city. ALSO READ: WATCH: Commuters boycott the Metrobus tapping system Khambule said the operations, allegedly owned by Zimbabwean nationals, were a manifestation of the broader issue of illegal economic activities by foreign nationals 'that undermine the rule of law'. She said the existence of illegal bus stations created an unfair competitive environment for legitimate South African and foreign-owned businesses. 'Businesses using legitimate stations pay rent and taxes, adhere to municipal bylaws and safety regulations, and contribute to the formal economy,' she said. 'Illegal operations, by contrast, bypass these costs and regulations, allowing them to offer services at artificially low prices. 'This not only siphons off revenue from legitimate operators, but also risks the safety of commuters and contributes to urban decay, congestion and lawlessness in the CBD.' City of Joburg had not responded to questions by the time of publication. NOW READ: Zimbabwean man accused of raping landlord's daughter denied bail
