logo
Met Police chief says football clubs should pay for their own policing

Met Police chief says football clubs should pay for their own policing

Independent9 hours ago
Football clubs should contribute more of their own money to the £70 million cost of policing their matches, Met Police chief Sir Mark Rowley has said.
A 'polluter pays approach' should be adopted for policing football games, Sir Mark said, as he questioned why organisers of events which require policing do not pay for it.
It comes after Sir Mark expressed disappointment in a Sunday Times article at Chancellor Rachel Reeves' decision to increase police funding by 2.3 per cent above inflation each year in the recent spending review.
Appearing on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Sir Mark was pushed on how the Met plans on cutting costs. He cited heavy job losses in the Met police force, but also pointed at other opportunities to cut expenditure.
'It also falls elsewhere. Policing of football matches across the country, mainly Premier League, cost policing £70 million it doesn't get back from football clubs. In London, it's more than a third of that,' he told the BBC.
There should be a 'polluter pays approach', he said, adding: 'If you're running a profit making event that because of the nature of it, requires security, requires policing to support your security because of the criminality that is going to be experienced, why isn't the organiser paying for that, rather than local communities who lose their resources to go to football matches?'
Sir Mark has also called for an uphaul of the UK's current 43-force policing system to help streamline costs. The creation of 12 to 15 bigger police forces would allow authorities to better utilise modern technology and would reduce 'expensive' governance and support functions.
'The 43-force model was designed in the 1960s and hasn't been fit for purpose for at least two decades,' Sir Mark wrote in The Sunday Times. 'It hinders the effective confrontation of today's threats and stops us fully reaping the benefits of technology.
'We need to reduce the number of forces by two-thirds, with the new bigger and fully capable regional forces supported by the best of modern technology and making better use of the limited funding available.'
Asked about the cuts he plans to make to policing, Sir Mark said: 'So we've cut 1,600 over the last couple of years… 1,700 officers and staff this year, that 3,300 out of an organisation just over 40,000 is a big hit.'
The Met has not got all of the details on the spending settlement but Sir Mark is 'nervous about whether we'll be able to make ends meet with that', he said, which is why he is calling for police reform.
Put to him that he had warned he would have to de-prioritise some crimes, and asked what the force will not investigate, Sir Mark said: 'So I don't want policing activity to fall off the list, and I know that the mayor and the Home Secretary have pushed hard for the most police funding that we can get.
'We are determined to improve day in and day out experiences of Londoners on the streets. We can only do that if we focus ruthlessly on police work.
'When new recruits join they expect they're going to spend most of their time protecting the public, enforcing the law, catching criminals. Within a couple of years 80% of them are saying 'I spend most of my time safeguarding the vulnerable, that's critical work, but that's not the core work of policing'.
'So we need help to cut away some of these areas where other pressed public services have effectively pushed work to the police. There are 80,000 missing children from children's home a year in the country. That is really problematic.'
Sir Mark said the police reforms are 'essential', adding: 'If we look at the spending on policing and public safety from the 80s through to the noughties, it was a much higher level than it is today. Over the last decade or more, the proportion that governments are prepared to put to policing is much lower. I don't see that changing dramatically.
'So we've got to make the best use of every pound that governments can give to us.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wimbledon organisers apologise after line-calling system turned off in error
Wimbledon organisers apologise after line-calling system turned off in error

The Guardian

time33 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Wimbledon organisers apologise after line-calling system turned off in error

Wimbledon organisers have apologised after the electronic line-calling system was turned off in error at a crucial moment in Sonay Kartal's match on Centre Court. The British No 3's opponent, the 34-year-old Russian veteran Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, accused the All England Club of home bias and said a game had been stolen from her when the AI-enhanced technology missed a call. Pavlyuchenkova, on game point, became convinced that a Kartal shot had landed long but there was no 'out' call by the system which controversially replaced line judges this year. The umpire, Nico Helwerth, who did not know the system had been turned off, said the technology was 'unable to track the last point', which had to be replayed. 'I don't know if it's in or it's out. How do I know? You cannot prove it, because she's local they can say whatever. You took the game away from me,' Pavlyuchenkova said after Kartal won the point and went on to break for a 5-4 lead. 'They have stolen the game from me, they stole it.' A Wimbledon spokesperson said the club had apologised to the players after finding that the technology was 'deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game'. Pavlyuchenkova went on to overpower Kartal, who later said she was 'devastated' that her fairytale run had ended with a 7-6 (3), 6-4 defeat on her Centre Court debut. Cameron Norrie became the last Briton standing after battling through to the Wimbledon quarter-finals in a five-set epic which also was not short of drama. The 29-year-old defeated his Chilean opponent Nicolás Jarry in four and a half hours and became the only British player to reach the second week of the tournament despite a promising start from several hopefuls. Norrie, the British No 3, fell to the floor after his 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 win in front of a roaring No 1 Court crowd. Spectators appeared to boo Jarry when the South American confronted Norrie as the pair were shaking hands at the net. Jarry, the 29-year-old world No 143, had earlier complained to the umpire after appearing frustrated with how long Norrie was taking to serve. 'It is not a nervous tic, it is something he can control,' Jarry said. He later denied there had been a spat, saying all he had told Norrie at the net was the Briton had deserved to win. In an on-court interview after the match, Norrie said of the five-set epic: 'I just had to keep fighting.' The former top 10 player, who was knocked out of the Wimbledon semi-finals in 2022 by Novak Djokovic, went on: 'I think at the beginning of this year I was struggling a little bit with confidence and had some doubts – and just wanted to enjoy my tennis a little bit more. 'I'm doing that and I enjoyed it today, so it was a bonus today, but I was more happy I was enjoying it and I was playing point for point, that's what mattered.' When asked about the courtside drama, he added that Jarry had told him he was 'a little bit vocal'. Kartal, ranked 298 in the world this time last year and 51 now, earlier said she was proud of her performance this week. 'Probably for the rest of the day I'll be a bit sad,' the 5ft 4in Brighton native told reporters. 'But I think tomorrow I'll probably wake up, and I can look back on this week and be super proud of it and step back and think, you know, fourth round of a slam, it's the first experience, and for it being here, having beaten the players that I did to do that.' Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion She said she had 'goosebumps' entering and exiting Centre Court to thunder and lightning. Her match was as dramatic as the weather after the embarrassing malfunction with the AI-enhanced Hawk-Eye technology. After an investigation which included speaking to the players, Helwerth, Hawk-Eye operators and a review official, a spokesperson for the All England Club said: 'It is now clear that the live electronic line calling (ELC) system, which was working optimally, was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system. 'In that time there were three calls not picked up by live ELC on the affected part of the court. Two of these were called by the chair umpire, who was not made aware that the system had been deactivated. 'Following the third, the chair umpire stopped the match and consulted with the review official. It was determined that the point should be replayed. 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology. The live ELC system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the review official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen. 'In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes.' Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper, the British No 1s, have both complained about the new technology and questioned some of its calls. Speaking after her win, Pavlyuchenkova said she believed the umpire should have called the ball out rather than making them replay the point. 'He was probably scared to take such a big decision. I think they should … that's why we have a chair umpire,' she told reporters. 'Otherwise, I think soon let's just play without them, right, and then we're going to have everything automatic. I think we losing a little bit of the charm of actually having human beings … it just becomes a little bit weird and, like, robot sort of orientated.'

MP recalls childhood abuse as he calls for law change to make domestic abuse a specific criminal offence
MP recalls childhood abuse as he calls for law change to make domestic abuse a specific criminal offence

Sky News

time38 minutes ago

  • Sky News

MP recalls childhood abuse as he calls for law change to make domestic abuse a specific criminal offence

Why you can trust Sky News An MP who decided until recently to "never speak" about the abuse he suffered as a child has shared his harrowing story so that "no kid has to go through" what he did. Josh Babarinde describes being physically abused by his mother's former partner from the age of four, and remembers crying himself to sleep under the covers "hearing shouts, hearing screams and things smash". He says he became hypervigilant growing up and felt safe at school but "like he was treading on eggshells" in his own home. The Eastbourne MP, who is also the Liberal Democrats' justice spokesperson, says his experience has driven his politics. He is calling on the government to stop abusers "slipping through the net" and being released from prison early. Opening up about his story in his twenties was "difficult" but looking back, Mr Babarinde says, he is "so proud of the resilience of that kid". The MP recently found his childhood diary containing Star Wars drawings alongside an entry he wrote from the bathroom. The diary, he recalls, wrote: "I'm really going to try to go (to the toilet) but I can't. Oh my goodness, I'm gonna be in so much trouble, I'm going to get smacked so hard." Then an entry five minutes later: "I still haven't done anything, I'm going to be in so much trouble." He says reading the entry reminded him of how "helpless" he felt. "It was mortifying," he says. "An abuser takes away your sense of self-worth." The 32-year-old is calling on the government to change the law to make domestic abuse a specific criminal offence. The change would mean, he argues, abusers can no longer effectively disguise their history under other offences like assault. He says the Ministry of Justice's early release scheme, which has seen thousands of prisoners released early to ease overcrowding, has failed to exclude domestic abusers despite government promises because there is no formal categorisation for offenders. It is impossible, he argues, to know exactly how many domestic abusers are in prison currently so perpetrators are "slipping through the net" on early release. 2:39 Mr Babarinde says the uncertainty means victims and survivors are not able to prepare for their abuser's release. He said: "They might need to move house or move their kids to a new school, shop in different places. All of these kind of things are so important, and so that's why that commitment the government made was so important." A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice said: "Our thoughts are with all victims of domestic abuse - it takes immense courage to speak out.

Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence
Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence

Palestine Action has created a secret website to recruit activists in an attempt to thwart the Government's terror ban on the group. The organisation is directing its supporters to a secret platform under the name Direct Action Training. Under the website, which was registered late on Friday, just before the ban took effect at midnight, Palestine Action has been privately messaging potential recruits encouraging them to 'join the front line against Zionism', The Telegraph reports. The recruitment message, which was sent on the encrypted app Signal, declares: 'While Palestine Action is banned, we do not want this draconian move from the Home Secretary to deter your dedication to your solidarity with Palestine'. 'Direct action is for everyone, regardless of the name it falls under. We do believe that by staying focused and targeting the heart of the war machine again and again, the people will be able to shut the Zionist supply chain.' The website for Direct Training has its IP address in Iceland, which is not a part of any major international surveillance alliances and is known for its strong data protection laws. To register with the website, prospective recruits are required to fill out a form in which they are asked 14 questions ranging from their personal details to testing their 'dedication to the Palestinian cause'. The form also notes that training be aimed at 'dismantling the Zionist war machine in the UK'. The move comes after the Home Office on Friday welcomed a ban on Palestine Action, with the group failing to block its proscription as a terrorist organisation in a late-night legal bid. Lawyers representing co-founder Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, asked for the decision to be delayed at least until July 21. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Palestine Action argues it is a protest group that has never incited or encouraged violence, but does support civil disobedience. Activists protest against the continuing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country. Police on Saturday arrested almost 30 people on suspicion of terrorism offences after protesters gathered in Parliament Square holding signs supporting Palestine Action, just hours after a ban on the came into effect. Around two dozen people, including a priest, professor and an emergency care worker who is just back from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group, which is now a proscribed terrorist organisation. They held signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Shortly after their arrival, police officers could be seen engaging with the protesters and the Met said it had began making arrests. Several people were seen being carried away by officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. 'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence. Arrests are being made.' They later added: 'A total of 29 arrests were made during this afternoon's protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. They remain in custody.' Campaign group Defend Our Juries said today's protest will be the first in a series of actions which will see activists take to Parliament Square every week. The Met Police issued a warning ahead of the protest, stating there are a number of events taking place in London this weekend and 'anyone attending should be aware that officers policing these will act where criminal offences, including those related to support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed'. Proscription makes it a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT) to invite or express support for an organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos, the Met said. It is also illegal to belong to the organisation or publish similar signs of support online. Police arresting protesters in Parliament Square were met with cries of 'Met Police you are puppets of the Zionist state' and 'leave them alone'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store