The ‘Big' reason why you must carefully read Facebook and Instagram's terms and conditions
After years of training its
generative AI
models on billions of public images from
Facebook
and
Instagram
,
Meta
is reportedly seeking access to billions of photos users haven't publicly uploaded, sparking fresh
privacy
debates. While the social media giant explicitly states it is not currently training its AI models on these private photos, the company has declined to clarify whether it might do so in the future or what rights it will hold over these images, a report has said.
The new initiative, first reported by TechCrunch on Friday (June 27) sees Facebook users encountering pop-up messages when attempting to post to Stories. These prompts ask users to opt into "cloud processing," which would allow Facebook to "select media from your camera roll and upload it to our cloud on a regular basis."
The stated purpose is to generate "ideas like collages, recaps, AI restyling or themes like birthdays or graduations."
The report notes that by agreeing to this feature, users also consent to Meta's AI terms, which permit the analysis of "media and facial features" from these unpublished photos, alongside metadata like creation dates and the presence of other people or objects. Users also grant Meta the right to "retain and use" this personal information.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Meta used public, not private, data train its generative AI models
According to The Verge, Meta recently acknowledged that it used data from all public content published on Facebook and Instagram since 2007 to train its generative AI models. Although the company stated it only used public posts from adult users over 18, it has remained vague about the precise definition of 'public' and what constituted an 'adult user' in 2007.
Meta public affairs manager , Ryan Daniels, has reiterated to the publication that this new 'cloud processing' feature is not currently used for training its AI models, a, told The Verge,
"[The story by the publication] implies we are currently training our AI models with these photos, which we aren't. This test doesn't use people's photos to improve or train our AI models," Maria Cubeta, a Meta comms manager, was quoted as saying.
Cubeta also described the feature as 'very early,' innocuous, and entirely opt-in, stating, "Camera roll media may be used to improve these suggestions, but are not used to improve AI models in this test."
Furthermore, while Meta also said that opting in grants permission to retrieve only 30 days' worth of camera roll data at a time, Meta's own terms suggest some data retention may be longer.
'Camera roll suggestions based on themes, such as pets, weddings and graduations, may include media that is older than 30 days,' Meta's says.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold After 1 Year: Is It STILL My Daily Driver? (Long-Term Review)
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Canada's Digital Tax Just Lit A Fire Under Trump – What's Behind The Blowup?
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump abruptly froze trade talks with Canada this week because Ottawa plans to begin collecting a digital tax from big technology companies, including American giants like Google, Amazon, Meta and Uber. Trump did not hold back. In a post on his Truth Social platform, he called the tax a 'direct and blatant attack on our country'. He said the United States would respond within days with fresh tariffs on Canadian goods. The move did not come out of nowhere. Quietly passed in June 2024, the Canadian law charges a 3% levy on digital services revenue earned from Canadian users. It applies to tech companies making over $820 million globally and more than $14.7 million inside Canada. Here's what really raised eyebrows – the tax is not only forward-looking but retroactive to January 2022. That means US firms could be hit with nearly $2 billion in backdated bills. Trump's response was immediate and loud. 'We are terminating all discussions on trade with Canada. They will know the new tariffs they will be paying to do business with the United States within seven days,' he wrote on Friday. At the White House, Trump doubled down. 'We hold all the cards. Canada made a foolish move,' he said. The United States is Canada's top trade partner. Over 80% of Canadian exports go south of the border. In 2024, that trade relationship was worth over $762 billion. Any disruption, especially in sectors like energy, minerals and cars, could leave a dent on both sides. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office just three months ago, now finds himself caught between two fires. At home, business leaders are asking him to drop the tax to avoid economic fallout. Abroad, Trump's threats are growing louder. Still, Carney has not blinked. His office said on Friday that Canada 'will continue to engage in negotiations in the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses'. The tax had been in the pipeline since 2019. But Ottawa delayed implementation in hopes of a global deal through the OECD. That deal never came. So Canada went ahead. Washington sees it differently. Lawmakers from both parties had already warned that this tax would open the door to retaliatory measures. Twenty-one members of the Congress recently urged Trump to push back. The U.S. president is now doing exactly that. His team says a Section 301 probe is underway to assess how the tax hurts American companies. Such probes can lead to punitive actions like the ones Trump previously used against China and France. Canada is not alone in targeting big tech's overseas earnings. France, the United Kingdom, India, Italy, Austria and even Indonesia have rolled out similar taxes. Most charge 2% to 5%. Some, like France's 3% levy, also stirred backlash from Washington. The European Union (EU) is watching this drama unfold with unease. Their talks with the United States are nearing a July 9 deadline. If no deal is reached, Trump has said he will hit European exports – cars and steel in particular – with new tariffs up to 50%. The EU has drawn up a $111 billion list of retaliatory tariffs. Back in Ottawa, business leaders say Canada is playing a dangerous game. The Business Council of Canada warned this week that the new tax risks a major fallout. 'Canada should immediately propose dropping the DST in exchange for lifting US tariffs,' they said. But Carney seems determined to stick to his path. The first payments are due on Monday. And unless something changes soon, a trade fight may be next.
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Centre court to Oval: Cricket and tennis to drive demand for high-end sport tourism this month
As summer travel heats up, a growing segment of affluent Indian travellers is steering away from conventional vacations in favour of high-end sports tourism, with events like Wimbledon and the India-England Test match at The Oval drawing interest. With package costs starting from ₹2 lakh per day and reaching beyond ₹10-15 lakh per person for multi-day experiences, this form of travel remains niche but aspirational—and demand is rising. Companies such as Bharat Army, Indulge Global and DreamSetGo are witnessing steady bookings from high-net-worth individuals (HNIs), entrepreneurs and even millennial families for curated experiences abroad. These range from Centre Court seats at Wimbledon to dinners with sports stars, combining travel with exclusive sports access. For example, Raghav Agarwal, an entrepreneur from Kolkata, is spending £245 a day, or about ₹28,000, on tickets for The Oval through Bharat Army and combining his 14-day trip with a visit to Wimbledon. 'Late June and early July is also the sweet spot for sports fans like me visiting the UK, as a lot of the holiday makers are returning home. We've lined up Day 2 at Wimbledon and Days 1 and 2 at Lord's. It's the ideal mix of tennis and cricket," he said. Karan Bhangay, founder of Indulge Global, noted growing inquiries for future global events. 'We see that a lot of our sports tourism clients are high networth individuals (HNIs), and a handful are also serious fans who save up for such experiences. Some are ultra-networth individuals (UHNIs) too, but mainly it is the HNIs who have started to live better, travel well and are in touch with global trends thanks to Instagram and other platforms." Appeal widens Rakesh Patel, founder of Bharat Army, said many Indian travellers now prefer sports tourism that doubles as a family vacation. 'We're seeing that Indian travellers don't just want to go to locations just to watch these sports but also to explore locations where they can do holidaying along with their travel," he said. Bharat Army has already sold 12,000 travel packages for the ongoing England tour, catering not just to India-based travellers but to the global Indian diaspora. Although largely HNI-driven, sports tourism is no longer limited to just the ultra-wealthy. Millennials and Gen Z travellers, often from metros and emerging cities such as Pune, Mohali and Raipur, are seeking experiential and curated packages. Travel companies such as Thomas Cook and SOTC report a mix of interest from both families and corporate clients. 'We have successfully managed corporate bookings for race viewings at the premium Turn 1 grandstand at Abu Dhabi and Monza this year. Additionally, within our leisure business, due to the demand, we have introduced trips specially for the upcoming India-England Test match and Wimbledon," said Rajeev Kale, president and country head, holidays, meetings and visas, at Thomas Cook. 'With the release of the 2025-2026 global football fixtures as well, we're witnessing early interest for high-demand matches—with more momentum expected to build in the coming months." The India-England Test Series will be about ₹1.8-2.5 lakh per person (for 6-7 nights), according to Thomas Cook and Wimbledon will set you back ₹2.5-3.5 lakh per person (for 4-5 nights in London). For the 2025-26 Fifa football fixtures in the US, costs will be about ₹3-4 lakh per person (for 6-7 nights, mostly on the east coast). The costs for the events are on a twin-sharing basis, or two people per room, and do not include airfares. DreamSetGo, owned by Dream Sports, took around 1,500 Indians to the Champions Trophy in Dubai earlier this year, with 600 flying in just for the India-Pakistan match. The company expects demand for Wimbledon to triple this season, according to chief executive officer Monish Shah. 'The price value of these (events) is quite high, and that would require premium corporate movements like wealth managers taking their top clients for these events," he said. Love for sports Around 40% of DreamSetGo's business for events like Wimbledon comes from corporates, while the rest comes from individuals or families. Most of their travellers are HNIs. A majority—60%—still only want tickets for these events, which are priced upwards of several thousand to a lakh. They don't always want the whole package, which can then go into several lakhs per person. For instance, a one-day ticket for The Kia Oval Test match costs ₹2.3 lakh per person, excluding flights and accommodation. A four-day match experience could easily reach ₹10-15 lakh per person for Indian travellers. India's sports tourism market is still in its infancy but poised for rapid growth. A 2024 KPMG report valued the sector at $10.87 billion and projected a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18%, nearly double that of general leisure travel. Even niche sports like Formula 1 are gaining traction. A three-day race pass for Abu Dhabi F1 in December costs ₹3.5 lakh via DreamSetGo. Attending live sporting events has become a bucket list goal, said S.D. Nandakumar, president and country head, holidays and corporate tours, SOTC. 'This was once quite niche, but it now has a broader appeal to extend to families and young millennials and Gen Z travellers, particularly from cities like Bengaluru, Mumbai, Pune, Surat and Ahmedabad. Event-based tourism is expanding."
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
11 hours ago
- First Post
Hunt for AI supremacy: Meta poaches more OpenAI researchers as talent war rages on
Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away read more Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta's campaign to lure away some of OpenAI's top researchers appears to be continuing at pace, with several high-profile names reportedly switching sides in what has become one of Silicon Valley's most intense rivalries. After the Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers had left OpenAI for Meta earlier this week, TechCrunch confirmed that Trapit Bansal, an influential figure in OpenAI's research ranks, had also joined the company. Now, The Information has named four more hires from OpenAI: Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi and Hongyu Ren. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The new appointments follow Meta's launch of its Llama 4 AI models in April. The models were met with a mixed response, with some reports suggesting they had not met the expectations of CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The company was also criticised over how it used an earlier version of Llama in a benchmark widely cited in AI performance comparisons. OpenAI, Meta tensions continue Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away, though he added that 'so far, none of our best people' had accepted. Meta's chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth later addressed the remarks in an internal note, telling staff that while such figures may have been discussed at senior levels, 'the actual terms of the offer' were more complex. The race to secure top-tier talent has become increasingly fierce, as tech giants seek an edge in developing powerful foundation models and generative AI systems. Meta's latest recruitment wave suggests that, while some key OpenAI figures have resisted its advances, the company is steadily building its own cadre of AI researchers in hopes of catching up.
