FBR recovers Rs600bn as IHC vacates stay orders in 270 cases
These 270 tax-related cases were pending in the IHC for over two decades.
According to the details, three IHC division benches decided these tax-related matters.
The division bench of Justice Mohammad Azam Khan and Justice Raja Inaam Ameen Minhas decided an overwhelming majority of 173 of tax cases involving Rs424bn. Another IHC bench comprising Justice Babar Sattar and Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan cleared 94 cases in which over Rs150bn recoveries were stalled.
A bench comprising acting IHC Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Raja Inaam Ameen Minhas lifted the stay orders and decided three petitions that had in 2023 restrained the FBR to collect Rs36bn.
A two-member division bench comprising Justice Mohammad Azam Khan and Justice Raja Inaam Ameen Minhas decided 125 cases related to Income Tax References, Sales Tax References and Foreign Exchange Regulations Act.
The government's recoverable Rs290.51bn were stuck in 125 cases related to ITR. 36 STR cases involved recovery of Rs131.55bn while Rs3.16bn were recoverable in 12 cases related to FERA.
In February this year the Prime Minister met with Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi to discuss the agenda of the upcoming meeting of the National Judicial Policy Making Committee. During the meeting, the Prime Minister requested the CJP for expeditious disposal of tax-related cases.
The IMF Governance and Diagnostic Assessment teams visited Pakistan to examine the governance structure of several ministries related to fiscal policy, tax policy, corruption, procurement, audits, and anti-money laundering.
The NJPMC also advised for swift disposal of the tax-related matters, in its meeting held in April, asking the high courts to constitute special benches for expeditious disposal of tax-related cases.
Following NJPMC's advice and directions issued by the apex court in the tax matters, the IHC Judicial Registrar put up a note before the acting CJ for consolidation of all the matters.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IHC startscontempt case against PM, cabinet
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has initiated contempt proceedings against Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his entire cabinet for disregarding its order to provide reasons for not assisting a US court hearing the case of incarcerated neuroscientist Dr Aafia Siddiqui. "As the government has not reverted with the reasons despite being directed to do so, it is in contempt, leaving me with no option but to issue a notice of contempt to the Federal Government. "Office is directed to initiate a contempt petition accordingly, in which all the members of the Federal Government will be respondents. The replies of all the ministers, including the prime minister, shall be filed within two weeks from today," said a three-page order authored by Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan. The judge noted that in his last order he had given the government time to revert with its decision, while cautioning the state law officer that inaction would result in contempt proceedings. The federal government on July 15 approached the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the May 16, 2025, order of the IHC that allowed amendments to a previously settled petition concerning Dr Aafia Siddiqui - nearly a decade after its filing. The SC, however, has not yet listed the petition for hearing. Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan was to go on summer vacation from Monday (July 21). However, he had announced at the last hearing that he would hear the case on July 21. Interestingly, the IHC did not list the case for hearing before his bench. The judge, nevertheless, heard the case on Monday and later issued a blistering order, criticizing IHC Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar and the entire "demolition squad catapulted into" the IHC after the 26th amendment. Justice Khan noted that the leave schedule was announced much earlier to the date on which he had ordered to list this case today, given its importance and the need for swift dispensation of justice "On Thursday or perhaps Friday, I was informed through my PS [personal secretary] by the office that the cause list will not be issued unless the roster of the sitting judges for this week was amended with the leave of the chief justice. "That seemed to me a trivial matter and I asked my PS to move an application accordingly. I was informed on Saturday that the application was duly moved but the file remained on the table of the Chief Justice, who did not find even 30 seconds to sign it. "Whether that was by design or oversight, I cannot say for sure, but given the manner in which the roster of judges has been used as a tool for the desired outcome in specific cases, and given the government's stiff opposition to do what is right and to stand by the daughter of the nation at the critical juncture of the motion before a US Court, I may be forgiven for thinking that it was the former." He said the government filed an appeal before the Supreme Court against his earlier decision permitting amendments to the petition for continuation of this case but the SC did not take up the case. "[So] the machinations of the executive appeared elsewhere, in the form of controlling the proceedings of this court through its roster. "The legal historians would write that now, even if he wishes to by reason of imperatives of urgent justice, a judge is now not allowed to hold court by the high court establishment when he is on leave." He stated that the correct legal position is that the office cannot use the shoulder of the CJ in the exercise of administrative powers to obstruct judicial proceedings ordered by a judge. He said the motivation of a judge to hold court on a day on which he is officially' on leave would spell out whether the reason to hold court was any ulterior motive or the dispensation of justice. "I trust that all right thinking men and women would agree with me that today my decision to hold court was solely and exclusively for the purposes of dispensation of justice. He said gone were the days when a judge could pass an order even while playing golf or dining with his family, if the exigency so required. The ceremony of robes and a courtroom – or the menial triviality of a cause list as in this case were never the indispensable prerequisites for him to carry out judicial business. "This is yet another instance of the reproachable use of the administrative power to shackle the exercise of independent judicial authority, with the likely motivation to pend (until my leave ends) the government's response with reasons as to why it would not sign the amicus brief. "However, the imperatives of justice shall not be defeated by such petty means. To the extent I can, I will exercise my judicial authority to the end of upholding the dignity of the High Court and the justice it dispenses," he added. The bench will resume hearing the case on September 1.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Property tax surge sends buyers reeling
With the start of the new fiscal year 202526, a massive hike in commercial and residential property registry fees across Rawalpindi district has left citizens and buyers deeply troubled. Along with this increase, a building map fee has also been imposed on buyers. While advance tax on property registration has been reduced by 1.5 per cent, the gain tax has been raised by the same margin. Deputy Commissioners across the district have increased DC rates in all commercial and domestic zones by 10 per cent to 20 per cent. These changes have led to a sharp spike in registry costs. According to the revised rates and taxes, the complete registry fee for a five-marla house has soared to Rs350,000. In the commercial sector, registry costs have gone up by Rs500,000 to Rs1 million. Despite the hike in taxes, gain tax and map fee, the online challan fee payment system remains non-functional. As a result, even ten days into the new fiscal year, not a single registry or power of attorney has been processed. At Rawalpindi Cantonment and City Tehsil offices, registry work remains stalled. Registrations have been halted since June 15 and have yet to resume. According to the Property Registrar Office, the new DC rates have not yet been uploaded to the registry app. The app will only open for new registries once the updated rates are uploaded in the next three days. Stamp Vendors Union Secretary General Sheikh Mudasir said that this year has brought extreme financial pressure on property buyers. For a new registry, buyers must pay 1 per cent stamp duty, 1 per cent municipal corporation duty, 4.5 per cent gain tax, 2per cent map fee, 1per cent FBR e-tax, 0.10per cent online processing fee, and 1.5per cent cantonment board fee. This brings the total to 10.5per cent of the property's value for filers and up to 18per cent for non-filers. Property Dealers Association Vice President Hassan Shah said that the excessive increase in fees and taxes has opened doors for loopholes. Now buyers will declare residential properties as dilapidated structures to reduce costs with insider collusion, bringing down expenses by nearly 20 per cent. This will not only result in significant government revenue loss but also promote tax evasion and increase transactions through power of attorney, bypassing proper registration. Billing delay halts property trades Twenty-one days into the new fiscal year, residents of Rawalpindi and Chaklala cantonment boards are facing difficulties as new billing for property tax, water charges, and other revenues has yet to be issued. Sources said delays in issuing computerised bills under the new tariff - which includes a 150pc to 200pc increase in water and conservancy charges - have completely stalled property transactions and related services. Despite the old tariff being applicable to outstanding dues, billing of arrears has also been linked to the new system. As a result, citizens seeking to clear dues and complete sale or purchase of properties are being told to wait. Speaking to media, Rawalpindi Cantonment Board spokesperson Imran Habib said the new bills, including outstanding dues and revised charges, are being finalised. The delay, he added, was due to incorporating revised tariffs approved in the recent board meeting. He assured that billing would be issued within the next couple of days.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IHC issues contempt notices to PM Shehbaz, cabinet in Dr. Aafia case
Listen to article Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday issued contempt of court notices to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and members of his federal cabinet over non-compliance in the case concerning efforts for the release of Dr Aafia Siddiqui. The court directed the federal government to submit a response within two weeks. A written order, authored by Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, noted a pattern of repeated executive defiance and interference in judicial functions. "Despite the court order, the federal government failed to submit reasons before the court," the IHC said. "The court has no option left but to issue a contempt of court notice to the federal government." Justice Ejaz remarked that the judiciary had been under persistent attack. 'We have witnessed one attack after another on the pillars of justice. These attacks have repeatedly wounded the justice system and brought it to the verge of collapse.' He further stated, 'today, yet another example of assault on the judiciary has come to light.' Referring to administrative interference in the court's functioning, Justice Ejaz observed, 'justice delivery by one high court judge was being controlled through a weekly roster under the office of the Chief Justice.' 'This situation is both horrifying and absurd at the same time,' he said. 'It is a contradiction that has now become the hallmark of this high court.' Justice Ejaz also recalled that since the 26th Constitutional Amendment, a so-called 'demolition squad' had been effectively brought into the high court. 'The executive's tricks became evident elsewhere,' he said, adding that court proceedings were being restricted through the roster mechanism. He pointed out that judges wishing to hear cases during judicial vacations were denied permission by the court's administration. 'If a judge wishes to hold court during vacations to deliver justice, the high court administration will not permit it,' he said. The judge added that the government had been given ample opportunity to comply. 'The court had given the government an opportunity to present its report,' Justice Ejaz said. The Assistant Attorney General was warned earlier that contempt proceedings would be initiated if the report was not filed. Rather than submit the report, the government filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the order to submit an amended application, the court noted. 'For whatever reason, the Supreme Court did not hear the government's case,' Justice Ejaz remarked.
