The US needs Australian beef for hamburgers, Littleproud says
American beef imports have emerged as a key negotiating item in the Albanese government's efforts to secure a tariff carve out.
The Trump administration has been pushing for Australia to loosen import rules to include beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.
The Prime Minister has confirmed biosecurity officials were reviewing the request but vowed his government would not 'compromise' Australia's strict bio laws.
But the prospect of changing laws has sparked unease among cattle farmers worried about keeping bovine diseases well away from the country's shores.
With beef imports seemingly key to securing a US tariff exemption, Mr Littleproud on Monday said there needed to be some 'perspective'.
'The United States does need Australia and other countries to import beef to be able to put on their hamburgers,' he told Sky News.
'They don't have the production capacity to be able to produce the type of beef that goes on their hamburgers.
'So this is a tax on themselves that they put on Australian beef.'
Despite being subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariffs on foreign imports, Australian beef into the US has risen by 32 per cent this year, according to Meat and Livestock Australia.
Meanwhile, the cost of domestically produced beef within the US has been climbing, as cattle farmers struggle with drought.
Mr Littleproud said the Nationals were not against importing American beef provided that it was from cattle 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'.
But beef from cattle originating in third countries was a risk because 'we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system'.
'And that's why Anthony Albanese needed to rule out straight away that he would not open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle,' Mr Littleproud said.
Mr Albanese has been clear in saying he would 'never loosen any rules regarding our biosecurity'.
But he has also said that if a deal can be struck 'in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course we don't just say no'.
Mr Littleproud acknowledged Mr Albanese's words but said 'when you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations – where there's smoke, there's fire'.
In addition to the baseline 10 per cent duties on foreign goods, Australia has also been subjected to 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium.
Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the Donald Trump's tariffs.
A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent imposts on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes.
But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it.
The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia.
Though, Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited.
The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Land and Environment Court dismisses Martins Creek Quarry expansion appeal
The Land and Environment Court has dismissed an appeal to expand a controversial hard rock quarry in the New South Wales Hunter Valley which residents hope will be the end of a decade-long fight. In 2022 resources company Daracon lodged plans to expand the Martins Creek Quarry, north-west of Newcastle, to allow it to extract more than a million tonnes of rock materials, like gravel, each year. It was expected the expansion would generate up to 160 truck movements a day through several Hunter Valley towns, including the historic Paterson village and Bolwarra. In February 2023, the NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) refused the expansion finding it would have "unreasonable" and "unacceptable" impacts for communities on the haulage route. Daracon appealed the decision, arguing it would benefit the workforce and provide materials for local infrastructure projects in the construction and roads industries, but that appeal was knocked back again by the Land and Environment Court on Wednesday. In the court's judgement, Commissioner Peter Walsh and Acting Commissioner Michael Young said negative consequences of the project outweighed the positives. "The beneficial impacts of the [application] relate principally to the supply of the quarry's product for the construction sector and particularly for infrastructure projects of public significance," the commissioners said. "The negative consequences are particularly in relation to adverse traffic and pedestrian safety implications, and social and amenity-related impacts in the local area. The Martins Creek Quarry Action Group have lobbied against the expansion of the quarry for more than a decade. Its president, Luke Barker, told ABC Newcastle Drive the majority of the community would be "in high spirits" hearing the news. He said the main reason many in the community had been against expanding the quarry was due to safety concerns and the impact on small roads in the area. "It's fantastic that the commissioner has seen what that impact has been and what that impact would be for not only this current generation of people but the generations to come," Mr Barker said. "There's people moving through the township all the time, crossing roads between the post office, the chemist, the local eateries, the pubs, supermarket. "Then we have a very high tourism aspect. It's a great stopover spot for people coming through. "It's just the impacts on the community were just too much to bear." He said the group was not against the quarry remaining operational into the future at its current size and scope. In a statement a Daracon spokesperson told the ABC the company was disappointed by the IPC's decision. "For more than a decade Daracon has led a rigorous process of environmental studies and stakeholder engagement which has seen the application amended a multitude of times to create compromises, resulting in a recommendation for approval by the then-NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure in 2022," the spokesperson said. "It is disappointing that today's decision does not uphold that. The spokesperson said the company was disappointed it would not be able to supply construction materials from the site to local infrastructure projects. "We will now take time to assess the future of the quarry," the spokesperson said.

News.com.au
26 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Two towns face jobless wave as miner warns it may halt operations
North Queensland locals have been left on edge as Swiss miner Glencore reveals it is considering shutting down two operations, placing thousands of jobs in jeopardy. The Mount Isa copper smelter and Townsville copper refinery directly employ 550 people, with 500 jobs also threatened at Dyno Nobel's Phosphate Hill operations, but lobby group Townsville Enterprise estimates 17,000 jobs are connected to the downstream copper assets. Without government assistance, the company will have to place the Mount Isa and Townsville operations into care and maintenance, according to an internal memo to staff from Glencore's interim chief operating officer on Wednesday morning. Roland Lobegeiger, a field services manager for Isadraulics, which services hydraulic component systems, told the move would be a 'significant loss' not just for his company, but the town of Mount Isa. 'Without it, the town's not going to be here,' Mr Lobegeiger said. 'There are other mines – there would be other work in the area, but would the town recover? It's hard to say. 'It would be a significant change for a lot of businesses, homes, house prices – you name it. 'It's definitely a bit of a dark cloud over the area. Everyone's still optimistic that they won't shut it down, but no one knows.' Mr Wilson's internal memo painted a grim picture of the company's position in North Queensland. 'To date Glencore has been absorbing losses hopeful that a viable solution could be found,' he wrote, according to the Townsville Bulletin. 'However, we are fast reaching the point at which Glencore cannot continue to absorb these losses. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments. 'Glencore is genuinely disappointed at the prospect of placing the smelter and refinery into care and maintenance if we do not receive adequate government support.' Talks between Glencore and the Queensland and federal governments have yet to reach a solution, with the miner on track to lose billions of dollars from the two operations over the next seven years. Senior Glencore executive Suresh Vadnagra said the company remained open to taxpayers taking a big equity stake in the refinery and smelter. 'Time is running out,' Mr Vadnagre told The Australian. 'We have been engaging with government for the past five months. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments or whether we start to planning to transition the copper smelter and refinery into care and maintenance.' It comes as smelters and refineries are struggling to operate across Australia. The country's biggest aluminium producer, the Rio Tinto-owned Tomago, has requested billions of dollars from the federal and NSW governments amid high power prices and competition with China. The Labor government has held out the possibility of providing loans and taxpayer funds to prop up Australian smelters. 'The truth is, if these facilities didn't exist, governments would be trying to build them,' Industry Minister Tim Ayres told The Australian Financial Review.

News.com.au
36 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Alleged Miznon restaurant protester ‘politically motivated' police claim
The alleged actions of a man charged with four offences after an affray outside an Israeli restaurant were not motivated by anti-Semitism, a court has been told. Antwany Arnold, 50, appeared in Melbourne Magistrates Court via video link on Wednesday for a second bail application after his first bid was denied earlier in July. Mr Arnold was charged with assault, affray, riotous behaviour and criminal damage after allegedly throwing food and chairs outside Miznon restaurant on Hardware Lane on July 4. CCTV footage shown in court captures a group of protesters chanting 'Death, Death to the IDF' and activating a siren among the outdoor tables. Police allege Mr Arnold knocked a table over and threw a pair of chairs, before having a verbal altercation with a female and throwing a chair in her direction. The court was told Mr Arnold was already on bail at the time for an earlier alleged incident, and his previous bail application was refused due to breaching a condition which prohibited him from entering the CBD. 'While police support the right to free speech, the way the accused goes about it is aggressive, violent, confrontational, and against community standards,' Detective Senior Constable Daniel Sanderson said. Mr Sanderson said Mr Arnold represented an unacceptable risk as he showed a 'complete disregard for court imposed bail'. Tim Hutton, acting for Mr Arnold, said elements of the alleged offending had been 'unfairly exaggerated' by police in their summary. The court was told Mr Arnold was a 'familiar face' in the pro-Palestine movement, with a group of supporters present in court and online. Chloe Campbell, who knows Mr Arnold from their involvement in protests, gave evidence she had never seen Mr Arnold act or behave violently. 'He's always been a joy to see when we see them at the rallies,' she said. Mr Hutton said Mr Arnold's long history of peaceful involvement in the protest movement signalled the alleged offending was 'not the norm' and was not motivated by a hatred of Jewish people. 'It's proposed the offending has been driven by anti-Semitism, I oppose this as strongly as possible,' Mr Hutton said. 'It is the most passionate condemnation of an organisation, the IDF, it is a condemnation of the atrocities and war crimes they've committed. 'That chant is not specifically calling for the murder of individual IDF soldiers but calling for the end of that organisation.' Prosecutor Alex Turner said police allege the offending was politically motivated and the community's safety was being compromised by the actions of Mr Arnold. 'Politically motivated offending is rife in the community currently,' he said. Magistrate Michelle Mykytowycz rejected the claim there was no intention of violence in the alleged offending. 'In the circumstances I have to say I completely disagree with that,' she said. 'Regardless of the purpose of the protest … I have to consider the allegations of Mr Arnold's behaviour on that day.' Mr Arnold's lawyer said delays to court proceedings could keep him in custody longer than any possible period of imprisonment that might be imposed. 'Many of these matters are likely to be heading to contest, if he was held in custody that would be an injustice given how significant the delays might be,' the court was told. 'We're looking at January, by that time Mr Arnold would have spent six months in custody, this offending would not warrant a term of imprisonment of that length.' Mr Turner said claiming to be involved in a protest should not absolve a person of criminal responsibility for their actions, submitting that a term of imprisonment would be the 'only course of action'. No decision on bail was reached and Ms Mykytowycz will hand down her decision on July 30.