Defence minister slams ‘baseless' claim India bowed to pressure to end Pakistan conflict
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was speaking at the opening of a discussion in parliament on the April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir, in which 26 men were killed.
The attack led to a fierce, four-day military conflict with Pakistan in May, the worst between the nuclear-armed neighbours in nearly three decades.
'India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved,' Singh said.
'To suggest that the operation was called off under pressure is baseless and entirely incorrect,' he said.
India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh (right) on May 5. Singh has rejected US President Donald Trump's claim that he brokered the truce between India and Pakistan. Photo: Reuters
Singh's comments came as the Indian Army said that it had killed three men in an intense gun battle in Indian Kashmir on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will Chinese Z-10ME attack helicopters now power Pakistan air force?
Images circulating online suggest Pakistan's military has received a shipment of Chinese-made advanced attack helicopters, a version of which has been deployed by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) near China's mountainous border with India In the past week, photos and videos of the Z-10ME , the export version of the Chinese multirole attack helicopter, have appeared on Pakistani social media accounts. On Tuesday, a social media user believed to be an active-duty member of the Pakistan Army uploaded a video clearly showing the helicopter airborne, apparently conducting field airport support missions from a military base. The video was captioned: 'First look at Pakistan's Z-10ME attack helicopter armed with next-gen air-to-ground missiles.' This followed a photo posted on Monday by another user showing a Z-10ME undergoing ground maintenance. The helicopter bore the words 'Pakistan Army' and serial number '786-301' on its fuselage and tail. The image marked the first credible evidence of the Z-10ME's operational status within the Pakistan Army Aviation Corps.
South China Morning Post
10 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US, Nato seek to supply Ukraine with weapons paid for by allies
The US and Nato are working on a novel approach to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from Nato countries to pay for the purchase or transfer of US arms, according to three sources familiar with the matter. Advertisement The renewed transatlantic cooperation on Ukraine comes as US President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with Moscow's ongoing attacks on its neighbour. Trump, who initially took a more conciliatory tone toward Russia as he tried to end the more than three-year war in Ukraine, has threatened to start imposing tariffs and other measures if Moscow shows no progress toward ending the conflict by August 8. The president said last month the US would supply weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but did not indicate how this would be done. Nato countries, Ukraine, and the United States were developing a new mechanism that would focus on getting US weapons to Ukraine from the Priority Ukraine Requirements List, known by the acronym PURL, the sources said. Advertisement Ukraine would prioritise the weapons it needs in tranches of roughly US$500 million, and Nato allies – coordinated by Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte – would then negotiate among themselves who would donate or pay for items on the list.
RTHK
10 hours ago
- RTHK
Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban
Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban US federal officials are barred from detaining people based solely on 'apparent race or ethnicity', speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a 'bus stop ... or day laborer pick up site'. File photo: Reuters A US federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel late on Friday ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc". Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region." (Reuters)
