As the Ukrainians give a masterclass in modern war, our Government rehashes old plans
Within minutes these little drones, that cost no more than a few hundred dollars each, had obliterated $7bn dollars worth of aircraft. Five bases were hit, one of them over 6,000 miles away from Kyiv. By the end of the day 30 per cent of Russia's strategic bomber fleet was destroyed. These same aircraft had until recently been bombing civilian areas in Ukraine from safely out of reach of the Ukrainian military – or so Russia thought.
These bombers – mostly Russian Tu-95 Bears and Tu-22 Backfires – are also a key part of Russia's nuclear strike force. We should rejoice that these aircraft were hit. We should salute the bravery and ingenuity of Ukraine's SBU – its secret service. I'd bet that the whole operation was done without foreign (including US) assistance. It didn't use western equipment: no Himars, Storm Shadow or ATACMS. It was arguably one of the most important and successful strikes of the war. No country can suffer such a strategic loss and not be knocked backwards. I learnt long before the war never to underestimate the Ukrainians. The Russians didn't learn and they are rightly paying for it.
It is ironic that on the same day as this innovative strike the Labour Government was trumpeting (well actually re-announcing to be honest) billions of pounds of submarines to be delivered in the 2040-2050s. The threat is the here and now. The next decade will be the most challenging of our generation. Now is the time to re-arm. But that isn't going to happen under Rachel Reeves.
Yesterday's Strategic Defence Review was only part one of a three-part plan by this Government to modernise defence. We have waited nearly a year for what was originally billed as a big reset, designed to re-establish Labour's defence credentials after the disaster that was Jeremy Corbyn. It was also supposed to answer Nato and US demands for the UK to up our game on securing Europe. And it was supposed to embrace further the lessons of Ukraine.
But despite numerous statements from Keir Starmer and John Healey that we are in a very dangerous world and we need to face down the threat, the Secretary of State failed to get the money he needed from the Treasury. And it shows. Spin has replaced substance. In a sad attempt to paper over the fact he didn't get what he asked for John Healey and his team have had to resort to re-announcing programmes and capabilities put in place by the last Conservative Government.
I had to pinch myself as announcement after announcement simply rehashed what was already being done. The Complex weapons announcement, cyber, the nuclear warhead program, integrated targeting – all were part of the last defence review refresh. And in some desperate effort to try and persuade the US that we really are serious the Prime Minister confirmed that the UK would build four more submarines than already planned – in the late 2040s! Even Putin will be dead by then. It's hardly a message destined to strike fear into anyone's heart.
From the start this review has had a huge flaw. I am sure Labour thought it was a clever wheeze to outsource it to two respected but out of date individuals but it alienated the serving Chiefs of the armed forces and robbed the review of the most up to date knowledge of the new way of warfare.
At times the review seemed to be a battle between the retired and the serving. If you haven't been involved in Ukraine, you simply cannot grasp the depth of the threat and reforms required. Add to that constant interfering by the Treasury and you get a review that is devoid of answers or even money to fund the here and now. Take for example the 'Nato first pledge' – it sounds good but we have tumbled to 9 th in the Nato funding tables.
As many of us suspected this review was all about buying time for Rachel Reeves and still Labour are stalling on the decisions needed. The review itself has some good things in it – but it also lacks detail whenever a spending commitment is made, with an obvious example being UK air defence. If at the outset of this review the team had been given a proper year-by-year spending profile climbing to 3 per cent of GDP by 2030 then it would have, I am sure, been more specific and more bold.
In the end we can all argue over defence equipment. Are tanks are better than drones? Are aircraft carriers necessary in today's world? Each Secretary of State will have their own priorities informed by the serving personnel of the day. But in the end the only thing that matters to the men and women of the Armed forces is whether the Secretary of State fought their corner and got the funds to protect them and equip them, and that whatever ambition the Government has for defence it is properly funded, not hollow.
Sadly, despite the spin it didn't happen. Maybe Donald Trump will do John Healey's job for him at the Nato summit this month and insist on 3 per cent by 2030. Trump to the rescue? Not something you usually hear from me!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How just 15 undersea cables could leave Australia digitally stranded if war breaks out
Australia's former Deputy Secretary of Defence Mike Pezzullo has warned that the risk of war between China and Taiwan is growing rapidly - and if it breaks out, Australia will be forced to join in. 'We don't really have a choice,' he says. 'Our military, ports, bases, intelligence systems - they're all deeply tied to Americas,' he told 7News. Pezzullo also warned that Australia's internet could be crippled if conflict breaks out. He revealed the country is dangerously exposed, with 99 per cent of internet traffic funnelled through just 15 undersea cables. If they were destroyed by enemy submarines or unmanned vessels, the nation would be digitally isolated, opening the way for targeted strikes on military infrastructure. 'You'd want to ensure those are protected,' Mr Pezzullo said. 'But we have no missile defence systems. We're completely bereft in that area.' He also warned Australia's fuel security is dangerously fragile, with 90 per cent of oil and petrol coming through the South China Sea and only 60 days of reserves in storage. Australia's big-ticket defence projects, including AUKUS nuclear submarines and new frigates, are progressing, but Mr Pezzullo says they remain years away from completion. 'That technology is improving almost monthly, but we're playing catch-up.' Opponents of a harder stance on China point to the economic risks, but Mr Pezzullo claims that's a moot point: 'In a world war, every economy would suffer together.' He warned that defence funding must increase to three or even three-and-a-half per cent of GDP if Australia is serious about deterring adversaries. 'Plan A is always peace through diplomacy. But if you want peace, prepare for war.' He said Taiwan's defence spending, a little above two per cent of GDP, is nowhere near adequate for the threats it faces. His comments come as more than 30,000 personnel from 19 countries hone their skills in the biennial military exercise Talisman Sabre, including live-fire drills and air combat operations. The exercises are being held against the backdrop of the US pressing allies such as Australia to make clear what role they would play in a real conflict, like a potential war between America and China over Taiwan. The US is also carrying out a review of the AUKUS security pact. Defence analysts say it's unlikely the review would result in the $368 billion submarine program being scrapped altogether, it may mean more demands of Australia to contribute to America's industrial base. The military drills off the coast are also expected to be monitored by China, as it has for the past four Talisman Sabre exercises.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Kyiv attack injures five, Trump and Starmer to discuss ‘applying pressure' on Putin
A Russian air attack on Kyiv has injured at least five people and damaged a residential building, the head of the Ukrainian capital's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, said on Monday via Telegram. British prime minister Keir Starmer and US president Donald Trump are expected to discuss the war in Ukraine when they meet in Scotland on Monday. Downing Street said the talks would include 'applying pressure' on Russian president Vladimir Putin to end the invasion. The two leaders have built a rapport on the world stage despite their differing political backgrounds, with Trump praising Starmer for doing a 'very good job' in office ahead of their talks on Monday, which will focus on the Middle East and trade. It comes after Trump announced a tariffs deal between the US and the European Union after meeting European commission president Ursula von der Leyen for high-stakes talks at Turnberry on Sunday. Von der Leyen called on Sunday for Volodymyr Zelenskyy to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies, with the Ukrainian president signalling legislation to that effect could be adopted within days. 'Ukraine has already achieved a lot on its European path,' von der Leyen said on X after a call with Zelenskyy. 'It must build on these solid foundations and preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law.' After a rare outburst of public criticism, Zelenskyy on Thursday submitted draft legislation to restore the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies – reversing course on an earlier bill aimed at stripping their autonomy. 'I thanked the European commission for the provided expertise,' Zelenskyy said on X after his Sunday call with von der Leyen. 'We share the same vision: it is important that the bill is adopted without delay, as early as next week.' Von der Leyen also promised continued support for Ukraine on its path to EU membership. Russia scaled down the festivities on Sunday honouring its navy, citing security concerns amid continuing Ukrainian drone attacks. Russian authorities cancelled the parades of warships in St Petersburg, in the Kaliningrad region on the Baltic and in the far-eastern port of Vladivostok that are usually held to mark the annual Navy Day celebrations. Asked about the reason for the cancellation in St Petersburg even as Putin arrived in his home city to visit the navy headquarters, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters that 'it's linked to the overall situation, security reasons, which are above all else'. The Russian defence ministry said air defences downed 99 Ukrainian drones in several regions overnight. Later in the day, it said another 51 drones were shot down near St Petersburg. A man was killed and three other people injured by drone fragments in the region around St Petersburg, according to local authorities. On the trip to St Petersburg, Putin vowed to build more warships and intensify the navy's training, adding: 'The navy's strike power and combat capability will rise to a qualitatively new level.' French president Emmanuel Macron had a phone call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday and said later on X that he reaffirmed France's support for Kyiv and vowed to raise pressure on Moscow to force it to 'agree to a ceasefire that paves the way for talks leading to a solid and lasting peace, with full European involvement'.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim rejects South Korea's appeasement overture
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rebuffed an appeasement overture by South Korea's new liberal government, saying Monday that North Korea has no interests in talks with South Korea no matter what proposal its rival offers. Kim Yo Jong's comments suggest again that North Korea, now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia, has no intentions of returning to diplomacy with South Korea and the U.S. anytime soon. But experts said North Korea could change its course if it thinks it cannot maintain the same booming ties with Russia when the Russia-Ukraine war nears an end. 'We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed with' South Korea, Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by state media. It's North Korea's first official statement on the government of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, which took office in early June. In an effort to improve badly frayed ties with North Korea, Lee's government has halted anti-Pyongyang frontline loudspeaker broadcasts, taken steps to ban activists from flying balloons with propaganda leaflets across the border and repatriated North Koreans who were drifted south in wooden boats months earlier. Kim Yo Jong called such steps 'sincere efforts' by Lee's government to develop ties. But she said the Lee government won't be much different from its predecessors, citing what it calls 'their blind trust' to the alliance with the U.S. and attempt to 'stand in confrontation' with North Korea. She mentioned August's annual South Korea-U.S. military drills in August, which North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal. North Korea has been shunning talks with South Korea and the U.S. since leader Kim Jong Un's high-stakes nuclear diplomacy with President Donald Trump fell apart in 2019 due to wrangling over international sanctions. North Korea has since focused on building more powerful nuclear weapons targeting its rivals. North Korea now prioritizes cooperation with Russia by sending troops and conventional weapons to support its war against Ukraine, likely in return for economic and military assistance. South Korea, the U.S. and others say Russia may give North Korea sensitive technologies that can enhance its nuclear and missile programs. Since beginning his second term in January, Trump has repeatedly boasted of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed intent to resume diplomacy with him. But North Korea hasn't publicly responded to Trump's overture. In early 2024, Kim Jong Un ordered the rewriting of the constitution to remove the long-running state goal of a peaceful Korean unification and cement South Korea as an 'invariable principal enemy.' That caught many foreign experts by surprise because it was seen as eliminating the idea of shared statehood between the war-divided Koreas and breaking away with his predecessors' long-cherished dreams of peacefully achieving a unified Korea on the North's terms. Many experts say Kim likely aims to guard against South Korean cultural influence and bolster his family's dynastic rule. Others say Kim wants legal room to use his nuclear weapons against South Korea by making it as a foreign enemy state, not a partner for potential unification which shares a sense of national homogeneity.
