logo
‘Raise a ruckus': Fiery Jane Fonda ends Aussie tour with a bang

‘Raise a ruckus': Fiery Jane Fonda ends Aussie tour with a bang

7NEWS16-06-2025

Hollywood legend Jane Fonda has wrapped up her tour of Australia with a powerful message — she'll return, but first, she's heading back to the U.S. to 'raise a ruckus.'
The 87-year-old Oscar-winning actress and outspoken activist captivated audiences in Sydney and Melbourne as part of the Wanderlust True North Series.
In conversation with veteran journalist Liz Hayes at ICC Sydney on Sunday night, Fonda reflected on her film career, activism, and personal journey — offering a glimpse of what's next.
'I'm coming back,' she said, revealing she's already received an invitation to trek through the outback.
'I met a fantastic woman — I can't remember where — she said she'd hiked 26 miles, so I'm gonna come back and do it, and spend time with some Aboriginal women.'
But as her whirlwind visit drew to a close, Fonda admitted it hadn't been easy watching events unfold back home.
'I love Australia, but it is very hard being here and looking at what is happening in my country, my city, my state,' she said.
'I go home tomorrow, and I'll just go home and raise a ruckus — it's hard to do it when you're not there.'
That promise to 'raise a ruckus' wasn't just rhetoric.
'There's an oil well in Santa Barbara, California — in 2015 it leaked and spilled oil everywhere — they're trying to start it up again, so I might chain myself to that,' Fonda said, adding that she had been meeting with Greenpeace during her trip Down Under.
At a previous event in Melbourne — rumoured to have earned her a $300,000 speaking fee — she gave a blistering critique of American politics.
Known for her lifelong activism, Fonda didn't hold back, targeting former President Donald Trump with an expletive-laden tirade that stunned the crowd of over 1,000 attendees.
'F**k those neoliberals and fascists and people who don't move to love,' she said.
'We have to move to love and empathy.'
Her call to action was fiery and unapologetic, as she warned that many working-class Americans would soon experience 'buyer's remorse' over their political choices.
'In the United States, 78 million people voted for Trump — not all of them MAGA,' Fonda said, explaining that many blue-collar voters had been failed by the Democratic Party.
'But people are hurting — men and women — and they're going to realise it.'
This unwavering political voice is nothing new for Fonda.
She first stirred controversy as an activist in the 1970s for her support of the Black Panthers, the Women's Movement, and the plight of Native Americans.
Fonda's opposition to the Vietnam War and the U.S. government's involvement in it sparked huge backlash.
After a controversial trip to North Vietnam in 1972, her critics slammed her with the moniker 'Hanoi Jane,' and some U.S. politicians even called for her to be tried on charges of treason.
Asked on Sunday about the hatred directed toward her during that period, Fonda said being part of a 'movement' helped her endure.
'I was not alone — I was part of a posse that had my back. I knew that what I was doing was right... you just go through it.
'And then they die or go to jail, and you're left,' laughed Fonda.
'I'll outlive all those f******,' she said to an applauding audience.
Fonda has since been arrested multiple times throughout her 80s for civil disobedience during climate rallies.
'It feels so good to be arrested,' she joked.
Fonda's legacy is as layered as it is iconic.
The daughter of Oscar-winning actor Henry Fonda and sister to the late Peter Fonda, she's known for roles in classics like Barefoot in the Park, Barbarella, 9 to 5, On Golden Pond, and Monster-in-Law.
Some of her most acclaimed work came in films with powerful social messages, such as They Shoot Horses, Don't They?, Klute, and Coming Home — the latter two earning her Academy Awards for Best Actress.
She's also picked up seven Golden Globes, two BAFTAs, an Emmy for her work in the Netflix series Grace and Frankie, and nominations for both a Grammy and a Tony.
Earlier this year, she was honoured with the Screen Actors Guild Life Achievement Award, delivering a rousing speech urging empathy in politically divisive times.
From Hollywood screens to protest lines, Jane Fonda remains a powerhouse of passion, purpose, and provocation — and if her time in Australia is any indication, she's not slowing down anytime soon.
But what's the octogenarian most proud of?
'If your early childhood is traumatic, you put an armour around your heart,' explained Fonda, who has spoken at length about losing her mother to suicide at age 12, and her often emotionally distant relationship with her father.
'It's hard to get rid of that armour — it takes a lot of work.
'The armour is beginning to fall away and my heart is beginning to soften — that's what I'm proud of.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

REVEALED: The most moronic 000 calls made to WA Police
REVEALED: The most moronic 000 calls made to WA Police

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

REVEALED: The most moronic 000 calls made to WA Police

A woman calling to vent her frustrations about Donald Trump being elected US president, a male asking for help to change his car tyre and even a person requesting assistance to find their lost television remote. These are among the thousands of moronic and time-wasting triple-0 requests received by WA Police last year. Of the 44,275 triple-0 calls made to police in 2024, one in 10 were regarded as 'non-emergencies' and redirected to a lower priority queue. These included a woman reporting ducks crossing a busy highway, a man asking for help to change a tyre, a person needing help finding their TV remote and a woman calling to rant about American politics. Bizarrely, one man even called triple-0 because his neighbour's tree was blocking his view. Superintendent Rohan Ingles, of the state communications division, said the vast majority of people called triple-0 for the right reasons, but said there were a 'handful' of people who did not. Superintendent Rohan Ingles said the vast majority of people called triple-0 for the right reasons, but said there were a 'handful' of people who did not. Credit: Michael Wilson / The West Australian He said these calls wasted critical time that could be used to save people's lives. 'Misusing the emergency line by reporting trivial or non-urgent matters delays our ability to respond to genuine emergencies and puts lives at risk,' Supt Ingles told The West. 'Triple-0 is a critical service. When someone calls for police help in a life-threatening situation, every second is crucial.' Supt. Ingles urged callers to call 131 444 in non-emergency situations and said non-essential triple-0 calls 'tied up critical resources'. Of the 1.2 million calls made to WA Police in the past 12 months, 786,500 were made to 131 444. 'There are many situations which are clearly not emergencies, and those calls tie up critical resources,' Supt Ingles said. 'There is no benefit to calling triple-0 in the hope of a faster service than 131 444. 'Non-urgent calls are quickly identified and rerouted to a lower priority queue.' Triple-0 should only be reserved for emergencies, including situations where someone is seriously injured or in need of urgent medical help, witnessing a serious accident or crime, or when life or property is at risk. People misusing triple-0 in WA can be charged with creating a false belief — an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 12 months imprisonment and a $12,000 fine.

Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come
Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come

Though a peace deal has been struck between Israel and Iran, the ceasefire still hangs precariously in the balance. Worse for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally, the war his government decided to start with Iran has proven to be a grave miscalculation that will linger in the memories of Israelis and Americans for years to come. First, the attack gave Iran the opportunity to show its retaliatory strength to the world. Second, it revealed Israel's vulnerability and utter dependence on the United States. Initially, the US and Israel appeared to be in lockstep, with the president and the prime minister showering respective praise on each other following the US airstrikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. If the US had joined Israel's campaign against Iran in full, it would have been a major victory for Netanyahu. But within days, Donald Trump was telling global media that the US had entered the war to 'save Israel', and was savaging the Israeli Defence Forces for breaking the ceasefire, telling reporters that neither Iran nor Israel 'know what the f--- they're doing'. Any embarrassment caused to Netanyahu by Trump's total claims of victory in Iran will now have been balanced by him declaring Netanyahu a great wartime leader, and calling on the Israeli judiciary to drop their bribery and fraud charges against the prime minister. Loading For much of his political career, Netanyahu has relentlessly viewed his personal ambitions and Israel's security through the prism of conflict rather than peace. Historically, Netanyahu's idea of 'peace through strength' has meant an ability to hit opponents hard, and force them to make peace on his terms. And while Netanyahu would have always expected the US to enter the conflict because Israel is unable to do the heavy lifting alone, dragging into the fray a president whose aversion to international conflict was a selling point to many American voters has placed Trump in a quandary: whether to keep his election promise of not involving the United States in another endless Middle East war, given America's Iraq and Afghanistan fiascos, or to back Israel in its moment of need. But where he expected a relatively sharp and swift victory, to which Israel has been accustomed, Tehran was able to make maximum use of its missile and drone arsenals, and to rely on the Iranian people's historical love of their country, to rally behind the government of the day – no matter whether popular or not – in the face of foreign aggression.

Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come
Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Netanyahu went all in on Trump. His grave miscalculation will echo for years to come

Though a peace deal has been struck between Israel and Iran, the ceasefire still hangs precariously in the balance. Worse for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally, the war his government decided to start with Iran has proven to be a grave miscalculation that will linger in the memories of Israelis and Americans for years to come. First, the attack gave Iran the opportunity to show its retaliatory strength to the world. Second, it revealed Israel's vulnerability and utter dependence on the United States. Initially, the US and Israel appeared to be in lockstep, with the president and the prime minister showering respective praise on each other following the US airstrikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. If the US had joined Israel's campaign against Iran in full, it would have been a major victory for Netanyahu. But within days, Donald Trump was telling global media that the US had entered the war to 'save Israel', and was savaging the Israeli Defence Forces for breaking the ceasefire, telling reporters that neither Iran nor Israel 'know what the f--- they're doing'. Any embarrassment caused to Netanyahu by Trump's total claims of victory in Iran will now have been balanced by him declaring Netanyahu a great wartime leader, and calling on the Israeli judiciary to drop their bribery and fraud charges against the prime minister. Loading For much of his political career, Netanyahu has relentlessly viewed his personal ambitions and Israel's security through the prism of conflict rather than peace. Historically, Netanyahu's idea of 'peace through strength' has meant an ability to hit opponents hard, and force them to make peace on his terms. And while Netanyahu would have always expected the US to enter the conflict because Israel is unable to do the heavy lifting alone, dragging into the fray a president whose aversion to international conflict was a selling point to many American voters has placed Trump in a quandary: whether to keep his election promise of not involving the United States in another endless Middle East war, given America's Iraq and Afghanistan fiascos, or to back Israel in its moment of need. But where he expected a relatively sharp and swift victory, to which Israel has been accustomed, Tehran was able to make maximum use of its missile and drone arsenals, and to rely on the Iranian people's historical love of their country, to rally behind the government of the day – no matter whether popular or not – in the face of foreign aggression.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store