Lawsuit filed against new petition deadline law
Jury chosen in DSS embezzlement trial
House Bill 1184 passed the House 59-9 and passed the Senate 19-15 before being signed into law by Rhoden on March 25. The bill amends the filing deadline for proposed ballot measures from six months ahead of a November election to nine months ahead of a November election.
Attorney Jim Leach, Rick Weiland and Dakotans for Health filed a lawsuit against South Dakota Secretary of State Monae Johnson in federal court on Tuesday asking a judge to stop the nine month deadline from going into effect. A notice of the lawsuit has also been sent to Johnson's office.
'The rollback means that petition circulators must seek final signatures nine months before an election instead of six months before an election, when there is less interest in political matters because the election is farther away,' the lawsuit said.
No deadlines or hearings have been set in this case. You can view the complaint in the document below.
Johnson-lawsuitDownload
'We believe in the power of the people, and the people of South Dakota have consistently used the initiative process to bring about important reforms, from healthcare access to minimum wage increases,' Weiland said in a news release. 'This new law is just another effort to silence the voices of South Dakotans and deny them the right to make decisions that impact their lives.'
The lawsuit cites a previous ruling in the case SD Voice v. Noem where South Dakota's 12-month deadline was struck down as a violation of the First Amendment.
Weiland and Dakotans for Health have won in court against state lawmakers before with a state law requiring registration for paid petition circulators.
In proponent testimony in favor of House Bill 1184, Republican Rep. Jon Hansen said courts struck down the 12-month deadline, but the state's six-month deadline, passed in 2023, wasn't long enough to complete petition signature verifications.
'We're not going outside of the bounds of what's currently being conducted in other states,' Hansen said in a House State Affairs Committee meeting on Feb. 7 in Pierre.
Hansen helped South Dakota lawmakers pass a law allowing people to remove a signature from a petition.
Zebadiah Johnson, a lobbyist with the Voter Defense Association, testified only the state of Florida would have an earlier filing deadline for direct initiative ballot measures.
In a news release announcing HB 1184 was signed into law, Rhoden also announced his veto of another petition-related bill in HB 1169 and that he signed 20 other election-related bills.
'South Dakota continues to be an example of free and fair elections. Our election system has integrity, and these bills improve our already strong system,' Rhoden said in a news release. 'America is founded on the principle of freedom, and I am proud that we live in a nation and a state where we can choose our leaders.'
Rhoden said a reason for issuing a veto on HB 1169 was because he was concerned the bill wouldn't 'withstand scrutiny in the courts.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem in ultra-competitive House race bases campaign in DC, three hours outside district
A Democrat fighting to unseat a Republican House lawmaker in Virginia is facing questions about how much time he's actually spending in the district he wants to represent. James Osyf, 40, an executive at Lockheed Martin, is the most prominent of three Democratic candidates competing against two-term incumbent Jen Kiggans (R-Va.). While the competitive 2nd Congressional District is based on the southeastern Virginia coast, Osyf is listed as the owner of a $1.7 million Washington, DC home and has registered his campaign at a capital city address, some 200 miles away from the people he wishes to serve in Congress. 5 James Osyf launched his campaign earlier this month in a bid to flip a vulnerable Republican seat. Facebook / James Osyf In addition, a review of publicly available records indicates Osyf does not live anywhere in the district. 'While it's constitutionally legal to run for a House seat from outside the district, it's a rare occurrence, and rarely successful,' Dante Scala, a professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire who has studied political campaigns for decades, told The Post. 'Voters expect, rationally enough, that they are better represented by someone who resides in their district, all other things being equal. Political opponents quickly jump on this,' he added. 'It certainly doesn't look good,' agreed Todd Belt, the director of the Political Management program at George Washington University, 'which is why candidates often fake a residence in a district in order to run there.' Kiggans, who unseated Democratic Rep. Elaine Luria in 2022 and was re-elected last year, registered her campaign in Virginia Beach, in the heart of the district. 5 James Osyf registered his campaign in Washington, DC, three hours away from Virginia's 2nd Congressional District. FEC registrations can be amended, so it is possible for Osyf to change his base of operations and his residence as the drive for votes revs up. However, GOP operatives keen on holding the toss-up seat have already taken notice. 'James Osyf is a DC resident and political opportunist who has no business representing Virginians,' National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokesperson Maureen O'Toole alleged to The Post. 'Voters don't want him in Hampton Roads, and they'll reject him next year.' 5 Rep. Jen Kiggans holds one of a handful of House seats that Democrats are carefully eyeing heading into the 2026 cycle. Earlier this month, Osyf sat for an interview with a local news outlet, The Virginian-Pilot, which claimed he 'lives in Virginia Beach.' However, property records give no indication that the candidate owns a home in the city, though that does not preclude the possibility of him renting a house or apartment. DC property records, on the other hand, show that Osyf purchased a lavish three-story home in DC's Eckington neighborhood back in 2023. 5 The Navy reservist has made standing up for veterans a key focus of his campaign. Facebook / James Osyf Real estate firm Redfin estimates the late-19th century townhome is now worth $1.86 million and describes it as a 'Commanding Victorian Brownstone' and a 'masterpiece renovation.' Osyf's campaign did not respond to repeated requests to clarify the candidate's living situation. Osyf does have at least one known connection to southeast Virginia: His LinkedIn profile indicates that he has served as a reserve officer in the Navy's Second Fleet since 2023. That fleet is based in nearby Norfolk, which is covered by a different congressional district. 5 House Republicans are facing historical headwinds heading into the 2026 midterm elections. Getty Images Osyf appears to have spent the bulk of the last decade in and around DC. His LinkedIn profile lists his current job as director of policy and program operations at Lockheed Martin in suburban Bethesda, Md., in addition to stints in the Navy Reserve in DC, San Diego and Virginia Beach. Osyf attended Georgetown University Law Center between 2015 and 2019, before being admitted to the DC Bar in January 2020, according to the DC Bar Association. Virginia law requires candidates to be residents of the commonwealth for at least one year immediately before the election in order to qualify to hold office.
11 minutes ago
School districts face uncertainty following budget cuts, but some welcome reevaluation of funds
As a new school year approaches, multiple school systems around the country told ABC News that a Department of Education funding freeze is causing confusion. Some school districts told ABC News education cuts are illegal and will hurt students, but others said they support the Trump administration's decision to reevaluate the department's funding. "Of course states and programs rely on these federal funds but we also rely on the president's leadership to ensure they are aligned with our values," Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder said in a statement to ABC News. Alaska's largest school district, a collection of Democratic states ranging from California to Rhode Island, and advocacy groups across the country have sued the Trump administration over the $6 billion funding freeze of valuable education programs. "There's going to be a direct impact in every single school in our nation. And I think people forget that," Rhode Island Department of Education Commissioner Angélica Infante-Green told ABC News. "I am here today because of the teachers, the education that I got, and it actually is a game changer," Infante-Green, who is a first-generation American and learned English through school, said. "It changes the lives of not just the students, but the community as a whole. They can participate in the American dream." Although some states support the administration's decision, Infante-Green has called it "illegal." "These are dollars that were appropriated by Congress, and this [pause] hurts kids." she said. A pause on the total $6 billion funding happened on July 1, when federal aid for schools is typically allocated each year. However, states were notified on June 30 that an ongoing programmatic review of education funding would occur, according to a Department of Education memo sent to Congress, obtained by ABC News. School districts and programs have been concerned that programs and staff could be eliminated if funding isn't restored. These funds are used to aid after-school programs, English learning acquisition, adult basic education, and many more important initiatives. States received a letter from Congress that said there would be a programmatic review to ensure the legitimacy of each program as the Office of Management and Budget suggested these programs have become misused to promote "radical left wing agendas." Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaksa, and nine other Republican senators signed onto a letter last week requesting the Trump administration reverse the funding pause, which they said prompted the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to unfreeze more than $1 billion in after-school and summer learning funding. However, OMB did not indicate whether it would be unfreezing the rest of the roughly $6 billion in federal funds for programs. Despite the uncertainty caused by the education funding freezing, the Montana Office of Public Instruction Superintendent, Susie Hedalen, is supportive of the funding pause and feels confident that Montana will see its funding soon. "I appreciate that they're [the funding] being evaluated and that we're taking a close look, because we don't need federal funds with the strings attached. We don't need the bureaucracy, and we need to make sure that we can use our funding to align to our values, not the agendas from the bureaucrats in DC," Hedalen told ABC News. Echoing other conservative education leaders who've spoken with ABC News about the pause, Hedalen believes there is a need to reevaluate the funding. "I appreciate the President's approach to take a critical look at our funding streams. That's long overdue," Hedalen said. "We are optimistic in Montana that those will continue to flow. But we do think it's important that we take a close look, and we are looking forward to having education returned to the state agencies," Hedalen added. While there is ultimately a divide regarding the funding, Infante-Green suggested most states are concerned that the pause potentially hurts kids, "everybody understands that this is not a political issue," she said, "this is about our students."
30 minutes ago
Harvard under investigation over participation in visa program for foreign students and researchers
BOSTON -- In the latest in series of Trump administration inquiries targeting Harvard University, the State Department said Wednesday it is investigating whether the Ivy League school will remain part of a government program that provides American visas for students and researchers from other countries. Harvard has faced mounting sanctions and scrutiny from Washington since rejecting demands from a federal antisemitism task force in April. Harvard has filed a lawsuit challenging $2.6 billion in federal cuts and has accused the Republican administration of waging a retaliation campaign. The statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not say why his department was examining Harvard's eligibility to take part in the Exchange Visitor Program, which allows foreign nationals to study or work in the United States through cultural and education exchange programs. It said all sponsors, such as Harvard, 'are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded.' A spokesman for Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The department said the investigation will seek to ensure that its programs "do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' The administration also has tried several times to prevent the school in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from hosting foreign students, and President Donald Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. Last month, his administration issued a finding that Harvard tolerated antisemitism, a step that could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.' Harvard's president, Alan Garber, has said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism and will not submit to the administration's demands. standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
