Berkshire takes swig of Modelo maker Constellation; cuts BofA, Citigroup
(Reuters) - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway on Friday disclosed a new investment in alcoholic beverages producer Constellation Brands, and said it has reduced its holdings in four banks, including Citigroup and Bank of America.
In a regulatory filing detailing its U.S.-listed stock holdings as of December 31, Berkshire also disclosed it has stopped selling shares of Apple, which remained its largest common stock investment at $75.1 billion.
The filing nonetheless suggests that Berkshire remains concerned about valuations, after selling $133.2 billion of stock--primarily 490 million Apple shares--between January and September 2024, and letting its cash stake grow to $325.2 billion.
Berkshire owned $1.24 billion of Constellation stock at year end, after purchasing 5.62 million shares in the fourth quarter.
In after-hours trading, Constellation's share price rose 6.7%, reflecting what investors view as Buffett's seal of approval regardless of whether the revered billionaire investor personally did the buying.
Constellation did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Its beer brands include Corona and Modelo Especial, which in 2023 surpassed Bud Light as the top-selling beer in the United States, while its wine portfolio include Meiomi, Robert Mondavi and Kim Crawford.
Berkshire also owns a small stake in Diageo, whose brands include Guinness beer, Johnnie Walker Scotch and Smirnoff vodka.
To go with the alcohol, Berkshire also invests in Domino's Pizza, and boosted its stake by 86% in the quarter.
In Friday's filing, Berkshire said it lowered its Citigroup stake 74% to 14.6 million shares, and its Bank of America stake, until recently its second-largest common stock holding, 15% to 680.2 million shares.
Berkshire has reduced its Bank of America stake by one-third since July, when it owned 1.03 billion shares.
It has also unwound a small portion of the 700 million Bank of America shares it bought in 2017, when it redeemed $5 billion of preferred stock acquired six years earlier and used proceeds to exercise warrants at $7.14 per share.
Bank of America shares have since risen more than sixfold.
During the fourth quarter, Berkshire also reduced its stakes in Capital One and Brazilian fintech lender Nu Holdings.
It exited one stock altogether, cosmetics store chain Ulta Beauty, which it owned for less than a year.
Friday's filing does not say which investments are Buffett's and which are from Berkshire portfolio managers Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, who typically handle smaller Berkshire investments.
Berkshire also owns dozens of companies including the BNSF railroad and Geico car insurance, and its annual report expected on February 22 will include its year-end financial results.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says Big Banks "Debanked" Him -- Now He's Firing Back
President Donald Trump says two of America's biggest banks turned their backs on him and he's not letting it slide. In a CNBC interview, Trump accused JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) of demanding he close accounts held for decades and claimed Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) refused to accept a $1 billion deposit. "I ended up going to small banks all over the place," Trump said. He believes banking regulators were weaponized against him under the Biden administration and now says his team is preparing an executive order that would force federal agencies to investigate account closures rooted in political bias. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with BAC. The banks pushed back. JPMorgan said it doesn't close accounts for political reasons and supports regulatory change. Bank of America said it serves 70 million clients and doesn't apply any political litmus test, though it acknowledged that government regulations sometimes lead to ending client relationships. Capital One, meanwhile, is in a legal battle with the Trump Organization over hundreds of accounts allegedly closed for political reasons in 2021 a claim the bank denies, citing contractual terms that allowed the closures for any reason. A judge has delayed the case as Capital One moves to dismiss. Behind all this is one key risk factor: reputation. Federal regulators, including the Fed, are now moving to drop "reputation risk" from bank exams a factor many lenders say pressured them to cut ties with certain clients. The banking industry is watching closely, with groups like the Bank Policy Institute hoping a forthcoming order will rein in what they call supervisory overreach. The issue isn't just American. In the UK, political figure Nigel Farage's bank account was closed by NatWest's Coutts unit sparking backlash, resignations, and a wider review. Trump's move could now fuel a broader reckoning with how banks decide who gets to stay and who gets shut out. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir Rides Epic Hot Streak Into Earnings Report
Can anything slow Palantir down? The AI-powered, data-crunching defense tech company enters its earnings call today as the year's hottest stock on the S&P 500 — and comes just after the company on Friday inked a new $10 billion contract with the US Army. Which all begs the question: Does the US defense industry have a new top dog? READ ALSO: Berkshire Shares Tumble as Buffett Has Five Months Left at the Helm to Make a Big Deal and Tesla is Paying Up to Keep Elon Musk's Eyes On the Road Data Dump Palantir's 105% share price rise this year is impressive, but its 865% rise since the start of last year is impossible to ignore. While investors began pouring into the stock in earnest after last November's election ushered in political allies of Palantir co-founder (and human species skeptic) Peter Thiel, its success is equally indicative of the shifting terms of warfare in an increasingly digital world. While Palantir's shares have surged, traditional weapons-makers like Lockheed Martin and Boeing have been cast in the unfortunate role of the Pentagon's 'inflation shock absorber.' In fact, according to a recent Barron's analysis, shares of so-called prime defense contractors — a list that typically includes Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman — have been trading lower this year than they did when Congress passed the Pentagon purse-threatening Budget Control Act in response to the debt ceiling crisis in 2011. As the old guard wanes, Silicon Valley is ready to step into the fray. So far this year, Palantir is the clear leader of the pack: In March, Palantir delivered its first two AI-powered Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) systems to the US Army, as part of a $178 million contract it won a year earlier; that marked the first time a software company had ever served as a primary contractor for a significant hardware program. Palantir also touts that it came in on time and on budget, a rarity in the defense contracting world. Then in May, the Pentagon announced it'd be boosting an existing $480 million contract with Palantir for a separate AI-powered targeting system by an additional $795 million. Consolidation Nation: The deal announced Friday is practically an admission from the Pentagon that Palantir has become an ubiquitous contractor. The $10 billion contract actually rolls up the roughly 75 contracts the company has with the US Pentagon into one gigantic, decade-long agreement, creating a 'comprehensive framework for the Army's future software and data needs,' according to a press release. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why some top Wall Street forecasters say don't bet on rate cuts this year
Investors expect a Fed rate cut in September after weak July jobs data. But economists from Morgan Stanley and Bank of America doubt the Fed is about to loosen policy. Inflation concerns and a steady unemployment rate challenge the need for rate cuts, they say. After a dismal July jobs report, investors began to bet that the Federal Reserve would finally be willing to lower interest rates at its September meeting. But top economists at Morgan Stanley and Bank of America say not so fast. Markets are pricing in an 87.8% chance of a 25-basis-point cut in September, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. At the end of July, those odds were 37.6%. The shift has come after weak labor market data caught investors off guard; according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US economy added 73,000 in July, well below consensus expectations. But June and May job additions were jointly revised down by 258,000, creating a three-month average of 35,000, consistent with recessionary levels, said Jose Torres, a senior economist at Interactive Brokers. The report prompted President Trump to fire BLS director Erika McEntarfer. Stocks plunged on the lackluster numbers last Friday, as investors worried the US economy was headed toward a recession. "Powell is going to regret holding rates steady this week," said Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, in an August 1 email. "September is a lock for a rate cut and it might even be a 50-basis-point move to make up the lost time." But Michael Gapen, the chief US economist at Morgan Stanley, and Aditya Bhave, a senior economist at Bank of America, aren't convinced. In an August 1 note, Gapen said that rate cuts are still unlikely until 2026 because the labor market remains in good shape. While that sounds counterintuitive given the meager payroll additions, he said to look at the unemployment rate, which remained steady at a historically low 4.2%. It showed that even though job gains were slowing, so was labor force participation. "When asked about how he would interpret a slowdown in payrolls, Powell said, 'the demand for workers is slowing, but so is the it [the labor market] is in enough.' Today's nonfarm payrolls will put that simplification to the test," Gapen wrote. "Payrolls were weaker than we and the market expected and backward revisions point to a softer labor market than we had known. And yet, the unemployment rate is essentially where it has been for the past year." Inflation is still above the Fed's target of 2%, he said, and Powell reiterated his relatively hawkish approach at his July 30 FOMC meeting press conference. On Monday, Bhave wrote that BofA is also staying with its call for no cuts the rest of this year. That's partly due to tariffs and their potential inflationary impact. "The Fed is still missing by a lot more on inflation than its labor mandate," Bhave said. "If it were to cut in September, it would be putting a lot of faith in a forecast of labor market deterioration, with no evidence that inflation has peaked." Spending data from BofA clients, which portrayed a robust consumer in July, back up Bhave's worries about inflation. "The danger of premature cuts is underscored by evidence that the economy rebounded in July. Aggregated BAC debit and credit card spending accelerated last month, we saw record Prime Day spending and auto sales and air travel surged," he wrote. "A July rebound would be in line with the idea that trade policy uncertainty is receding after having peaked in 2Q." Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
