US lawmakers back Australia submarine project in Pentagon letter
Details of the AUKUS plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines from the early 2030s were unveiled in 2023 under former President Joe Biden, part of efforts to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific.
The Pentagon said in June it was reviewing the three-way collaboration between Australia, Britain and the United States to ensure it was aligned with President Donald Trump's "America First agenda," amid concerns about the ability of the U.S. to meet its own submarine needs and whether Australia's vessels would be used in support of U.S. policy in the future.
In a letter to Hegseth they released on Tuesday, Republican Representative John Moolenaar and Democrat Raja Krishnamoorthi said China's expanded military capabilities and coercive actions against neighbors showed it was "credibly preparing to use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific."
The congressmen, the chair and ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) respectively, said the AUKUS framework was "a key step to dramatically enhance the collective defense of the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom in the face of the CCP's ongoing aggression."
"AUKUS has received strong bipartisan support from Congress for a reason," they wrote. "Alongside our colleagues, we understand the agreement promises to strengthen our national security alongside that of two of our closest allies."
China has described AUKUS as a product of a "Cold War mentality" and said it would lead to greater divisions and confrontation, or even conflict and war.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22
Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking
Singapore Miscalculation of MOH subsidies and grants led to $7m in overpayments, $2m in shortfalls
Asia Malaysian aide's unresolved 2009 death tests govt's reform pledge despite DAP chief's apology
Singapore Woman evacuated from lift in Supreme Court building after falling glass triggers emergency halt
Singapore 2 charged over alleged role in posting bail for man who later absconded
Business Chat with experts on brand media coverage at the latest Conversations with ST
Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving
The congressmen stressed that both the U.S. and Australia must continue to make "generational investments" within and outside the AUKUS framework to expand their respective submarine industrial bases, work forces, and force structure.
They noted Australia's $3 billion commitment to support these efforts, the first tranche of which was delivered this year.
Last week, Australia's Washington ambassador Kevin Rudd said his country was working with the Pentagon on the review and was confident that all issues raised would be resolved.
Leading the review has been Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, who has previously expressed concern that the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for deterrence against China. The congressmen copied their letter to him.
This month, Australia's Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy responded to a report that Colby had pressed Australia and Japan to clarify what role they would play if the U.S. and China went to war over Taiwan by saying Australia would not commit troops in advance of any conflict.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has also rebuffed U.S. requests to commit to lifting defense spending from 2% to 3.5% of GDP, saying instead Australia would spend what was needed for its defense. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
In landmark opinion, the World Court says climate change is an ‘existential threat'
The Paris Agreement has failed to curb the growth of global greenhouse gas emissions. THE HAGUE - The United Nations' highest court on July 23 underlined 'the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change' as it started to read out an opinion on the legal obligations of states to take action. The non-binding opinion by the International Court of Justice, also known as the World Court, is likely to determine the course of future climate action across the world. 'Greenhouse gas emissions are unequivocally caused by human activities which are not territorially limited,' judge Yuji Iwasawa said. The reading of the opinion was ongoing and the court had not yet announced its conclusions. Ahead of the ruling, supporters of climate action gathered outside the ICJ, chanting: 'What do we want? Climate justice! When do we want it? Now!' Although it is non-binding, the deliberation of the 15 judges of the ICJ in The Hague will nevertheless carry legal and political weight and future climate cases would be unable to ignore it, legal experts say. 'It is so important, it could be one of the most consequential legal rulings of our times because of the scope of the issues that it touches, which run to the very heart of climate justice,' said Joie Chowdhury, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law. The two questions the UN General Assembly asked the judges to consider were: what are countries' obligations under international law to protect the climate from greenhouse gas emissions; and what are the legal consequences for countries that harm the climate system? In two weeks of hearings in December 2024 at the ICJ, wealthy countries of the Global North told the judges that existing climate treaties, including the 2015 Paris Agreement, which are largely non-binding, should be the basis for deciding their responsibilities. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Singapore Oceanarium will enhance tourism while supporting sustainability: Grace Fu Developing nations and small island states argued for stronger measures, in some cases legally binding, to curb emissions and for the biggest emitters of climate-warming greenhouse gases to provide financial aid. Paris Agreement In 2015, at the conclusion of UN talks in Paris, more than 190 countries committed to pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 deg C. The agreement has failed to curb the growth of global greenhouse gas emissions. Late in 2024, in the most recent 'Emissions Gap Report,' which takes stock of countries' promises to tackle climate change compared with what is needed, the UN said that current climate policies will result in global warming of more than 3 deg C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. As campaigners seek to hold companies and governments to account, climate-related litigation has intensified, with nearly 3,000 cases filed across almost 60 countries, according to June figures from London's Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. So far, the results have been mixed. A German court in May threw out a case between a Peruvian farmer and German energy giant RWE, but his lawyers and environmentalists said the case, which dragged on for a decade, was still a victory for climate cases that could spur similar lawsuits. Earlier in July, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which holds jurisdiction over 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries, said in another advisory opinion its members must cooperate to tackle climate change. Campaigners say the July 23 court opinion should be a turning point, even if the ruling itself is advisory. The ruling could also make it easier for states to hold other states to account over climate issues like pollution or emissions. 'The court can affirm that climate inaction, especially by major emitters, is not merely a policy failure but a breach of international law,' said Mr Fijian Vishal Prasad, one of the law students that lobbied the government of Vanuatu in the South Pacific Ocean to bring the case to the ICJ. Although it is theoretically possible to ignore an ICJ ruling, lawyers say countries are typically reluctant to do so. 'This opinion is applying binding international law, which countries have already committed to,' Mr Chowdhury said. REUTERS
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Mussolini's great-grandson hopes skills on pitch outweigh family name
Defender Romano Floriani Mussolini, the great-grandson of Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, said he wants his footballing talent to mean more than his family name as he readies for a Serie A debut with promoted side Cremonese. The 22-year-old right back, on loan from Lazio, joined Cremonese earlier this month after the club earned promotion to the Italian top flight via the Serie B playoffs. "I'm here to play football. My surname? It has bothered others more than it's ever bothered me. It's a heavy name for others, but not for me," Floriani Mussolini told a press conference on Wednesday. "The less it's talked about, the better. I'm here to express myself on the pitch, nothing else... I want to gain valuable experience in Serie A, go up against more experienced players, and play as much as possible to showcase my abilities." Floriani Mussolini is the son of Mauro Floriani and Italian politician Alessandra Mussolini, a former member of the European Parliament for the Forza Italia party and the grand-daughter of Benito Mussolini, who was prime minister of Italy from 1922 to 1943 following a fascist coup. Floriani Mussolini, who can also play as a winger, made 37 appearances for Juve Stabia last season, who lost to Cremonese in the semi-finals of the playoffs. He joined the Lazio youth academy at the age of 13 from rivals AS Roma. "The match against Lazio will be special, it's the team I grew up with and support," he added. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Singapore Oceanarium will enhance tourism while supporting sustainability: Grace Fu "But right now I'm focused on giving my all for Cremonese, and I want to win that one." Cremonese begin their Serie A campaign away to AC Milan on August 23. REUTERS
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Japan PM Ishiba refutes reports of imminent resignation after surprise US trade deal
Japan's Prime Minister and president of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party Shigeru Ishiba at the party's headquarters in Tokyo on July 23. – Japan's embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba denied on July 23 that he was about to quit, saying that there was 'not a single grain of truth' in source-based reports that said he would step down within weeks. News of a looming resignation, likely after key political events in August, had threatened to eclipse a surprise trade deal struck with the United States just hours earlier, which shaved 'reciprocal' tariffs from 25 per cent down to 15 per cent. Despite Mr Ishiba's denials, the reality is that his position is increasingly precarious after his ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) suffered a historic defeat in the Upper House election on July 20 , following a decisive trouncing in Lower House polls in October 2024. The crushing outcome has stirred the hornet's nest and might prove to be a career-ending blow, as the LDP and coalition partner Komeito now lack a majority in both Houses of Japan's bicameral Parliament. It remains uncertain whether the US trade deal, which was universally cheered by investors and economists, will quell the brewing civil war within the LDP and offer Mr Ishiba some breathing room. The Nikkei 225 index rallied, briefly soaring more than 1,500 points to a one-year high before paring some gains to close 1,396 points, or 3.5 per cent, higher at 41,171.32. The trade deal not only provided significant relief – the 15 per cent rate is the lowest so far among countries with a trade surplus with the US – but also spared Japan from making substantial concessions in its two 'sacred cow' industries: cars and rice. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Sport Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Singapore Oceanarium will enhance tourism while supporting sustainability: Grace Fu However, it does not erase the precedent of Japanese leaders resigning in disgrace after electoral setbacks, a fate Mr Ishiba is resisting . At a half-hour news conference on July 21, Mr Ishiba used the word 'responsibility' 10 times as he tried to justify his leadership. He held his ground when confronted about apparent double standards, having been vocal for then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's resignation in 2007 after the coalition lost its Upper House majority in that year's election. Mr Ishiba countered that all he wanted was for Mr Abe to 'offer his sincere explanations as to why he should remain' – something he said he was now doing. He added that the LDP remained the largest party in the Diet, and cited the 'national crisis' of US trade tariffs as a reason why a political vacuum must be avoided. Now that this 'national crisis' has been averted, two schools of thought appear to have emerged within the LDP. One suggests that the surprisingly favourable agreement terms, after a battle that Mr Ishiba said was fought on ' national interests ', could give him the tailwind to stay on, especially if future polls reflect improved public sentiment. Yet the prevailing opinion was that Mr Ishiba should depart – on a high note, with the trade victory – after a turbulent nine months in power. The movement to force him out if he does not quit on his own accord has been gaining traction. Younger and mid-ranking lawmakers, including political scions Yasutaka Nakasone and Takako Suzuki, are leading a petition for Mr Ishiba to resign. Local prefectural chapters from Hokkaido to Ibaraki, Ehime, and Kochi have submitted formal letters requesting his resignation. According to LDP by-laws, members can force a party presidential election if a majority of lawmakers and prefectural delegates demand one. The party's election strategy chief Seiji Kihara even said that a hard reset was necessary to win back trust, suggesting that the LDP should cede power to the opposition. Two separate polls by Kyodo News and Yomiuri Shimbun this week, conducted before the trade deal was concluded, indicate that public opinion is divided over whether Mr Ishiba should quit, although a slight majority is in favour of his resignation. The Mainichi newspaper had cited unnamed sources as saying that Mr Ishiba 'will resign by the end of August', a timeframe chosen with the political calendar in mind. Mr Ishiba is slated to preside over war memorial services marking 80 years since the end of World War II, before welcoming top African leaders for a triennial summit on Japan-Africa cooperation. In the same month, the LDP will complete its post-mortem into the Upper House election results, which Mr Ishiba is expected to use as a basis for his future decisions. On July 23, Mr Ishiba sought a rare meeting with former prime ministers Taro Aso (2008-2009), Yoshihide Suga (2020-2021), and Fumio Kishida (2021-2024). He told reporters that the subject of his future was never raised during the 80-minute talks. 'Neither have I ever made statements that I will resign. There is absolutely no truth to the media reports,' he averred, adding: 'We shared a strong sense of crisis, that a split within the LDP must never occur.' He added that his immediate priority was to familiarise himself with the trade agreement, given that Japan exports more than 4,000 items to the US, and to ensure affected businesses receive the necessary support. The 15 per cent tariff rate has been broadly viewed in a positive light, with Ms Asuka Tatebayashi, a senior analyst at Mizuho Bank's global strategic advisory department, telling The Straits Times that the impact would be 'much lower and minimised' than the mooted 25 per cent. She added that no quota was set on Japanese car exports to the US, as was feared, while the deal puts an end to months of uncertainty for businesses. Tariffs on Japanese cars and car parts would be cut from 27.5 per cent to 15 per cent. And as Japan promised to buy more American rice, this would be done by increasing the ratio of US imports under an existing 'minimum access' framework that allows 770,000 tonnes of rice to be imported tariff-free per year, above which a duty of 341 yen per kilogram is charged. Meanwhile, Japan would also inject US$550 billion (S$703 billion) of investments into various sectors, including semiconductors, ships and steel . Chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, on his eighth trip to Washington, admitted that he did not expect to be able to conclude the deal on this visit. Former Japanese trade negotiator Sota Kato told ST that it was unclear what brought the deal across the finishing line now, adding that the LDP's Upper House defeat could have been a catalyst. 'The most plausible theory is that the US was in a hurry to seal the deal before the Ishiba administration is brought down and things have to start over,' said Dr Kato, who is now a research director at the Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research think-tank. He believed the deal's conclusion would hasten Mr Ishiba's departure, but wondered if Japan's next leader will come from the LDP, given that the ruling coalition does not hold a majority in the Diet. Regardless, political scientist Toru Yoshida of Doshisha University felt that behind-the-scenes horse-trading with the opposition will be inevitable, whether Mr Ishiba stays or goes. Or, he added: 'The LDP may try to secure a comeback through a snap election under a new prime minister.'
