Campaigners submit petition against Sowerby Bridge incinerator
In February, campaigners raised £10,000 to launch a legal challenge against the decision, but the High Court later refused one of them, Malcolm Powell, permission to apply for a judicial review.Mr Powell is planning to appeal against that ruling, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said.
Formally presenting the petition, Sowerby Bridge Labour councillor Simon Ashton said the uncertainty around the situation was affecting residents and cited air quality and health impacts as being among the main objections to the incinerator. "Constituents have raised their voice and I urge this council to listen – please heed this petition and consider rescinding the permit," Ashton told the meeting.Calderdale Council initially rejected a first application from Calder Valley Skip Hire (CVSH) to run the incinerator at its Rochdale Road site, before that decision was overturned on appeal. A public inquiry later effectively backed the council's original position, however. CVSH then submitted a second application, which was granted by the local authority alongside conditions, one of which would require continuous monitoring of air quality in the area.Among opponents' grievances is the fact the second application was decided by officers, rather than debated by councillors in public.Calderdale Council leader Jane Scullion told Wednesday's meeting that potential changes to the authority's planning system, which would mean councillors have the final say on such proposals, would be considered at the council's next Cabinet meeting.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK companies that pay suppliers late will be fined under new law
Companies that continually pay their suppliers late will face fines under new legislation announced today. Sir Keir Starmer said 'it's time to pay up' as the Prime Minister announced plans to impose fines on large companies that persistently pay suppliers late. As many as 38 businesses shut down each day, partly owing to late payments, according to the Government, with tradespeople, shopkeepers and start-up founders particularly vulnerable. It is estimated that late payments cost the economy £11bilion a year. 'Late payments are one of the biggest barriers to small business growth - causing cashflow problems that stop firms from scaling up and investing in their future,' the Government said. 'Every day, hardworking businesses close their doors because they aren't paid on time.' The small business commissioner will be handed new powers, including carrying out spot checks and enforcing a 30-day invoice verification period to speed up resolutions to disputes. The legislation will also introduce maximum payment terms of 60 days, reducing to 45 days, to ensure businesses are paid on time. Small businesses have been quietly battling late payments, with the issue only worsening since the cost of living crisis. Research by the Federation of Small Businesses trade body in 2023 found if late payments had been made on time, 50,000 business closures could be avoided each year. The definition of prompt payment for a small business suppliers, as per the Prompt Payment Code (PPC), is to pay 95 per cent of invoices from small businesses with fewer than 50 employees within 30 days. However, the code is voluntary and plenty of businesses flout the rules. The Prime Minister said: 'From builders and electricians to freelance designers and manufacturers - too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments instead of doing what they do best – growing their businesses. 'It's unfair, it's exhausting, and it's holding Britain back. So, our message is clear: it's time to pay up.' Tina McKenzie, policy chair of the FSB added: 'Today's plan is an encouraging commitment from the Government to take the side of small businesses in the great growth challenge ahead.' The crackdown on late payments is part of a wider package, including plans to pump £4billion of financial support into small businesses. This includes £1billion for new firms, with 69,000 start-up loans and mentoring support.
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is this tough US-EU trade deal a triumph for Brexit Britain? Only in leavers' most delusional fantasies
Those who misled the country over Brexit are usually quieter these days. They do not hang their heads in shame, but change the subject whenever they can. They deflect with their new war-cry that Britain must also leave the European convention on human rights. As the effects of their wicked Brexit folly worsen by the month, they rarely get a chance to whoop: 'We were right!' So their glee was unrestrained when the great US global bully gave Britain a less hard beating with a 10% tariff on its goods, compared with the EU, which was walloped with 15%. Their joy overflowed when the business and trade secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, conceded: 'I'm absolutely clear, this is a benefit of being out of the European Union, having our independent trade policy, absolutely no doubt about that.' But what else can a trade secretary, speaking through gritted teeth, actually say? In his attempts to attract foreign investment, he can hardly tell the truth about the damage done by leaving the EU. These advocates of Brexit should gloat while they can. When the French prime minister called the EU's deal with Donald Trump a 'soumission' (submission), Kwasi Kwarteng seized on the word in a piece for the Telegraph, writing: 'For the French, with their memories of capitulation to the Nazis in 1940, the word is even more associated with abject humiliation than it is in English.' Yes, that's the same Kwarteng who hurled the British economy over a cliff only three years ago. 'This trade deal is the EU's greatest humiliation since Britain voted to leave', read the headline on his column. But he would never confess that the difference between a 10% and 15% tariff with the US is minimal, since we trade twice as much with the EU as the US. It barely equates to the regular variation in exchange rates: in other words, it's 'a rounding error', the Centre for European Reform's trade expert, John Springford, told me, when compared with the hammer blow Britain gave itself with Brexit. The UK-India trade deal signed with the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, last week was greeted with another Brexiter whoop from the Conservative peer Daniel Hannan. Also writing in the Telegraph, he said: 'My party, and Brexiteers more widely, should be taking credit for having done what all the clever Europhiles have spent six years telling us was impossible. Instead of moaning, we should welcome Starmer's belated understanding that world's biggest and fastest-growing markets are outside the EU.' But the Tory leader took another view: 'Keir Starmer called this 'historic.' It's not historic, we've just been shafted!' Kemi Badenoch said, dismissing the India agreement as a bad deal that would increase immigration. I don't know whether clever men like Kwarteng and Hannan are blinded by Brexit monomania or paralysed by the awful knowledge of the damage they have inflicted on their country, unable to confess an act of treachery and delusion hardly matched in British history. But as ever, facts are too inconvenient for them to deal with. Yes, the India deal is the biggest and most substantial trade deal since leaving the EU. Yes, it's a deal that would have been impossible to do from inside the union. But how big is it? It will add 0.13% to our economy. That's better than the Australia agreement, worth just 0.08%, the New Zealand deal, worth 0.03%, or the proposed US agreement, worth 0.16%, according to Department for Business and Trade analysis. But our fragile economy needs all the help it can get, so hurrah for Brexit and our new trade deals! But the gloaters ignore the context: our great Brexit losses. Here's the Office for Budget Responsibility's assessment: 'Our forecasts have assumed that the volume of UK imports and exports will both be 15% lower than if we had remained in the EU.' That 15% loss in trade 'will lead to a 4% reduction in the potential productivity of the UK economy'. In other words, as Jonty Bloom of the New World calculates, we need 50 India trade deals to make up for Brexit, because Britain does more than 40% of its trade with the EU – more if you include the European Economic Area and Switzerland. India has just 2% of our trade. Brexiters bleat that Labour is sneaking us into the EU by the back door, with deals on Horizon, the EU's research and innovation funding programme; soon, hopefully, Erasmus; and maybe a youth experience scheme. We hope for agricultural products and energy deals. But even these, say the trade experts, are still small potatoes. Major attempts to rescue Britain's 4% loss in productivity since 2020 hit the concrete walls of Boris Johnson's monumentally bad trade and cooperation agreement. Brexit zealots protest against agreements to keep a dynamic alignment with EU standards that would make trade easier. But it doesn't apply to our internal environmental standards: outside EU rules, we have let our water quality fall behind the EU. More than 85% of bathing waters in the EU are rated excellent compared with just 64% in the UK, with the gap rising every year, reports the European Movement. Public opinion has shifted rapidly: we are now a 'Bregretful' country, where only 31% still think it was right to leave and 61% say Brexit has been more of a failure than a success. Who do they blame? The Conservatives and Boris Johnson are top of the list, with 88% and 84% respectively holding them responsible. More than two-thirds (67%) blame Nigel Farage. A majority of Britons (56%) want to rejoin the EU as the grim reaper carries off old Brexiters, replacing them with young, pro-European voters. Don't expect bolder moves from the Labour government in its current frame of mind. Though defence and security draw us towards ever closer union, public opinion is not to be trusted. If people were confronted now with actual re-entry terms – paying in, free movement, joining the euro, no special deals – their answers might change. The mood might also be different if the far right continues its gains in EU countries, dividing the union's values. What might it take to throw off the economic, political and psychological darkness of Brexit? A clever – or Cleverly? – new Tory leader daring to break with the past, confessing the error of Brexit and taking us back into the EU, once and for all. It may take another generation to recover. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘I've got more in common with Reform': More Tories consider joining Farage
Boris Johnson loyalists are among three former Conservative frontbenchers who are considering defecting to Reform UK. The trio all lost their seats at the general election last year and believe that they now have more common ground with Nigel Farage's party than with the Tories. This week, Adam Holloway, who served as a whip under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss, became the eighth former Conservative MP to join Reform. The party's lead in the polls has prompted Sir Keir Starmer to regard Mr Farage as 'the real leader of the opposition' instead of Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader. One former MP in the Red Wall – Labour's traditional northern and Midlands heartlands which were won by the Tories under Mr Johnson in 2019 but lost to Labour in 2024 – claimed Mrs Badenoch was 'falling short'. They said: 'There's a lot of frustration that Kemi hasn't even defined what conservatism even stands for or means. It's leading people to wonder if they belong in the Conservative Party. 'Reform has details to work out but at least there's a much clearer definition of the country they want to see. And that's where Kemi's falling short at the moment. 'I don't feel that the Conservative Party is currently my home. I've got more in common with Reform than I have with Conservatives at the moment.' Reform outflanking Tories on immigration Another potential defector is understood to be Jonathan Gullis, another ex-Red Wall MP who represented Stoke-on-Trent North during the previous parliament. Mr Gullis, a former education minister, is said to view himself as more ideologically similar to Reform than the Tories as things currently stand. Both parties have vowed to cut taxes and red tape, slash legal and illegal migration and abolish the Labour Government's legally binding net zero targets. However, Reform has outflanked the Tories on the Right by vowing a 'one in, one out' immigration policy and committing to leaving the European Convention of Human Rights (EHCR). Mrs Badenoch has said she is 'minded' to withdraw the UK from the treaty but is expected to wait at least a couple of months before finalising her party's position. It is believed that Mr Gullis feels 'some temptation' to switch sides and join Reform. But he has yet to make a decision and is mindful of a mid-August deadline for would-be Tory candidates at the next election to register their interest. A third former Tory MP confirmed they have held informal talks with Reform figures and said they had received 'a lot of nudges' from people reaching out. They said: 'In future, if I stand again as a candidate, I don't know. I'm a lifelong Conservative and I want a genuinely Conservative government. 'But even if we won the next election and wanted to leave the ECHR, you'll always have those 20 or 30 MPs who are there who will sabotage any attempt to make any changes to things.' Reform 'fundamentally Left-wing on welfare' Mr Holloway's defection followed those of former cabinet ministers Sir Jake Berry, a former Tory chairman, and David Jones, who served as Wales Secretary, earlier in July. A former veteran, Mr Holloway was a stalwart of the Tory Right and one of the 28 'Spartan' MPs who voted against Theresa May's Brexit deal on all three occasions in 2019. Some of his former parliamentary colleagues lamented his decision to change allegiances but were clear they would not follow suit. One said: 'My general view is that obviously what Reform are saying on migration and culture war stuff is the sort of thing that the Tory Party should have been saying a long time ago. 'But why would I give up on the Tory Party to go and join a party which is fundamentally Left-wing on issues of welfare, state interventionist and protectionist? There is no plan for succession, it's a one-man band.' Another ex-MP added they were 'sad and frustrated' by Mr Holloway's defection but could 'understand' his logic. 'I'm a blue-blooded Tory,' they added. 'I will stay in the party and fight to help Kemi or whoever the leader is to help put things right. I love Kemi and I think she will make a great prime minister if she can get there. 'But I think we're in this really odd space at the moment, where the Conservatives still haven't been forgiven for being a wet bunch of w-----s during the last parliament and never quite doing anything. 'We said we were going to deal with immigration and ended up doing f--- all.' Reform is currently leading the polls with an average of 29.6 per cent of the vote, more than seven percentage points ahead of Labour, on 22.2 per cent, and almost 12 ahead of the Tories who are polling at 17.8 per cent. Mr Farage is currently in the midst of a six-week 'summer offensive' aimed at setting out his party's stall on crime and attacking the records of Labour and Tory governments on the issue.
