Maryland parents express outrage after elementary school teacher acquitted of sex abuse
The parents of five Maryland students expressed their outrage Thursday after an Anne Arundel County elementary school teacher was acquitted of sex abuse charges.
On June 18, Matthew Schlegel, 45, a third-grade math teacher at Severna Park Elementary School, was found not guilty of 18 counts of sexual abuse and sex offenses. The jury was unable to agree on three of the charges.
Attorney Thiru Vignarajah is representing the parents whose children testified at Schlegal's trial about allegedly being abused during classes.
The five 10-year-old girls testified that Schlegel touched them inappropriately on several occasions.
The parents claim Schlegel was wrongly acquitted.
Vignarajah says the parents feel betrayed by the justice system that is supposed to protect them and their children.
"When a number of the families reached out to me earlier this week, their frustration, their devastation, and their heartbreak were not abstract. It was rooted in a feeling of betrayal by the very systems they had come to Severna Park to trust," Vignarajah said in part.
He added that the parents will continue to fight the acquittal however they can.
"They are going to fight, they are going to make clear that this is not the end, and they are going to do whatever is needed to ensure that justice is done for the sake of their daughters and for the sake of their school," Vignarajah said.
Schlegel returns to paid status after partial verdict
Schlegel was released on his own recognizance last week after the partial verdict.
In a bail review hearing, a judge ordered Schlegel's immediate release under the conditions that he does not have contact with the alleged victims or their families and cannot be unsupervised around minors.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools said Schlegel would return to paid status after a review.
A spokesperson told WJZ that the school district will finalize its review regarding Schlegel's job status and employment assignment "by our obligations under state law."
Not guilty verdict sparks controversy
Schlegel's five-week trial began on May 19. He faced 21 charges, including sexual abuse of a minor and assault.
After learning of the verdict, the parents of some of the girls who testified expressed their disappointment.
"After the last one to two years of mental health struggles and picking my daughter back up and then putting her through hell, to sit there and face the man that (allegedly) abused her, I see her as the strongest little girl I've ever met," one mother told WJZ.
On Wednesday, a group of parents made roughly 2,000 pink signs in support of the young students who testified that Schlegel touched them inappropriately during class.
The signs planted across town read, "We stand with our girls" and "We believe them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Tucker hopes to thread needle between claiming innocence, accepting responsibility
When the NFL announced on Thursday that former Ravens kicker Justin Tucker has received a 10-game suspension under the Personal Conduct Policy, the initial reaction based on the bare-bones statement was that the league completed its investigation and its in-house legal process with a finding that Tucker had done what he was accused of doing during one or more massage-therapy sessions. It quickly became clear that the suspension didn't result from the procedures created by the NFL. It came from a negotiation between the league, the union, and Tucker. Advertisement And that's what made aspects of the statement issued by Tucker's representative confusing. Especially at the outset. 'We are disappointed with the NFL's decision," Rob Roche began in the comment that was widely distributed to reporters and for the most part disseminated with little if any context or explanation. The NFL's "decision" wasn't to suspend Tucker 10 games. It was to propose (presumably) a longer suspension if the process played out and to offer Tucker a 10-game suspension. It was Tucker's "decision" to accept the 10-game suspension. That fact, obscured by Roche's statement, is an important one. Tucker accepted a 10-game suspension for something he loudly insisted he didn't do. Advertisement "Justin has always strived to carry himself in a way that would make his family and community proud," Roche added. "He stands by his previous statements." But does he? Who accepts a punishment for something they know they didn't do — especially when reasonable minds will be inclined to include that accepting a 10-game suspension represents an admission of responsibility? "In order to put this difficult episode behind him and get back on the field as soon as possible, we have advised Justin to accept this resolution and close this matter," Roche said. "The people who know Justin best know his character and understand that while he remains fully committed to excellence as a football player, he is deeply dedicated to his most important lifetime roles as a father, husband, and friend.' It's one thing to advise Tucker to take a one-game or a two-game suspension. Ten games sends a much different message. Ten games suggests that Roche and others feared the league would emerge from the hearing before retired judge Sue L. Robinson with a much longer suspension. Advertisement And so, on one hand, Tucker still says he didn't do anything. On the other hand, he has accepted a TEN-GAME SUSPENSION for something he swears he didn't do. That's a difficult needle to thread, especially if he plans to eventually sue the Baltimore Banner for defamation based on the reporting that sparked this situation in late January. For a defamation case to fly, Tucker will have to prove that the information was false (and that the Banner knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity of the information, since Tucker is a public figure). The suspension means, as a practical matter, that Tucker will also need to show that even the NFL was duped by the false allegations.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Abhorrent': Akron woman sentenced for raping infant
AKRON, Ohio (WJW) — A Summit County judge has sentenced a woman to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the rape of an infant. Kristina Jacobson, 39, was convicted last week by a jury and sentenced Thursday on multiple charges, including: One count of rape, a first-degree felony Two counts of illegal use of a minor or impaired person in nudity-oriented material or performance, both second-degree felonies One count of gross sexual imposition, a third-degree felony Close encounter: Black bear spotted on local doorbell camera 'Kristina Jacobson abused an innocent child's vulnerability and inability to defend or advocate for herself,' Summit County Prosecutor Elliot Kolkovich said in a statement. 'There is simply no excuse for this abhorrent crime.' Her husband and co-defendant, Scott Jacobson, 45, was sentenced in November 2024 to life in prison without parole after pleading guilty to multiple sex crimes involving minors. The victims were under the age of 13, according to the pair's indictment. Search continues for dad who went missing in Cuyahoga River The indictment alleges the offenses happened between December 2011 and December 2015, and between April 2024 and May 2024. Both have been classified as Tier III sex offenders. In Ohio, a Tier III sex offender is someone convicted of a 'most severe' felony sex offense, requiring registration every 90 days for life and community notification. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man Asks Sister Living with Him Rent-Free to Move Out After She Violates His 1 House Rule
A man lets his sister stay with him rent-free on one condition — no guests — but returns home to find strangers in his living room Though his sister dismisses it as 'no big deal,' he feels disrespected and unsafe in his own home After asking her to move out, his parents accuse him of being harsh, leaving him to wonder if he made the right callA man turned to the Reddit community for support after a family disagreement left him questioning his own boundaries. The 26-year-old, whose sister temporarily lived with him, found himself at odds after she invited friends over against his wishes. 'My younger sister (22F) graduated college a few months ago and moved in with me temporarily while she applies for jobs and gets on her feet since our parents moved south when we both left the house,' he explains in the since-deleted post. He says they have 'always gotten along pretty well,' making the situation even more difficult. From the start, he set a clear expectation about his home. 'The only thing I made clear when she moved in was that I'm not okay with people coming over. I don't host, ever. I don't care if it makes me weird, I just don't feel safe around unfamiliar people in my space,' he writes. His sister agreed to his terms, assuring him that she understood, but everything changed one weekend when he returned from a walk to find three strangers lounging in his living room. 'One of them was drinking from my mug. They were laughing, watching a show, super casual like this was their place,' he recalls, painting a vivid picture of his shock. His sister, seemingly unfazed, just waved and said, 'hope you don't mind.' The moment left him speechless, and he decided to leave again rather than confront the situation right away. 'I didn't say anything. I turned around and left. I was outside for like two hours just walking,' he shares. When he finally came home, the guests were gone, but the uneasy feeling lingered, and he went to talk with his sister. 'I told her I can't do this. I said I'm sorry but I need her to start looking for another place to stay,' he recalls, making it clear that his boundaries have been crossed. His sister, however, tried to defend her actions. 'She got really upset and said she didn't think it would be that big of a deal. That they were only there for an hour and they weren't loud or messy,' he recounts. But for him, it's not about the noise or the mess. 'I told her it's not about that, it's about how it made me feel in my own home. I don't think I should have to feel like a guest in my own space,' he writes, underscoring the emotional impact her decision has had on him. Now, his sister has moved in with a friend for a few days, and their parents are weighing in. 'My parents are pissed. They say I'm being extreme and ungrateful and that I should support her while she's trying to get her life started,' he shares. He reveals that his sister has even called him 'embarrassing' in the aftermath. Despite the backlash, he stands by his decision. "I honestly don't know what else I could've done," he explains. "It's not about punishing her. I just don't feel safe when stuff like this happens. Read the original article on People
