Ray McAdam: ‘I don't believe a directly elected mayor would be effective for Dublin'
During his 12-month term, he hopes to focus on regeneration, investment and restoring civic pride, but rejects the idea that a directly elected mayor for the capital is a better way to achieve such change.
He believes local government works best through collaboration, and thinks a directly elected mayor with their own policy platform could stick a spanner in that machine.
'I don't believe a directly elected mayor would be effective for Dublin,' Mr McAdam said.
'The best way to explain my view is that if you look at the current coalition we have in Dublin City Council, it's made up of Fine Gael, the Greens, Fianna Fáil and Labour. The leader of the largest party is Fine Gael, we would have the mayoralty for five years, as how a taoiseach would be elected.
'The deputy lord mayor would probably be two-and-a-half years to the Greens and Fianna Fáil, because they're the same number of seats.'
Mr McAdam said the council's committee chairpeople would then be responsible for their respective departments, in much the same way as the national government functions.
While the level of control afforded to the Lord Mayor under the current system is up for debate, Mr McAdam said it will not stop him trying to push for effective change.
'I need to make sure that I drive my own agenda. I want to keep that narrow and I need to keep it focused,' he said.
'I have 12 months, 365 days, 52 weeks. I want to make every single day count.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
'We are not good at maintaining things. And I make no apologies for saying it. We have to knock heads together, from the chief executive down. I have a very good working relationship with the chief executive, but this silo mentality needs to end.
'We are there to serve Dubliners. If we are going to install these structures, then we need to maintain them.
'I don't want to hear, 'it's not our responsibility', or 'it's environment or transport, or active travel'. Just get it done.'
We need to do maintenance better in this city, and you can quote me on that
As if to prove his point, Mr McAdam addresses the issue of broken bulbs all along the roadside of Dublin's landmark Samuel Beckett Bridge, brought up by our photographer at the start of our meeting.
'We need to do maintenance better in this city, and you can quote me on that,' he said.
'When you're driving across that bridge next week, those lights will be fixed.'
He also believes Dublin residents should contribute more to their local communities and areas, injecting a sense of civic pride back into the city.
'Dubliners expect their city to be maintained well and, my philosophy is, if we're not looking after the city and maintaining the city well enough, we can't expect more of Dubliners,' he said.
'We have a responsibility to show leadership.'
As a councillor for the north inner city since 2009, Mr McAdam knows all too well how urban decay can spread if left unchecked.
During his inaugural address as Lord Mayor on June 30, he said: 'Let's treat dereliction as a civic emergency and respond with the ambition it demands.'
As part of that drive, he wants to create a publicly accessible vacancy map of the city and use his experience on the council's urban regeneration working group to push the measures it is currently formulating.
One of the expected key suggestions from the group, which will issue its final report in September, is the creation of a so-called special purpose vehicle (SPV) owned by the council for investment.
He hopes this could drive regeneration projects in the vein of Limerick 2030.
'When you are in a housing supply crisis like we're in, we need to be able to provide units or homes at scale,' Mr McAdam said.
'That's where I think the SPV provides Dublin City Council an opportunity.
'We have a number of streets, or a number of areas where we have now acquired direct properties. The housing department wanted to refurbish them for public housing use, but the time to get through design and planning and all of that was too cumbersome.'
The SPV, he said, would aim to streamline the process of turning an empty building into a usable site through a dedicated regeneration unit.
The broader dereliction conversation is taking place against the backdrop of the so-called '10 big moves' recommended in last year's Dublin City Taskforce report, which aimed to revitalise the capital.
Those measures, including 1,000 extra gardaí, the revitalisation of O'Connell Street and wide-ranging upgrades to council complexes and derelict sites across the city, have seen an initial injection of €114m under the Government's Urban Regeneration and Development Fund.
But that pales in comparison with the measures' overall projected price tag of up to €1bn.
The Lord Mayor thinks October will hold more news on that front.
'With the upcoming budget, I'm confident we will start to see the early indications of funding, but also the early allocations of funding,' he said.
'I don't expect all of this funding in one year, I don't think anyone does. But I do expect a clear direction of travel.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Government VAT row: tensions ahead
With many Government ministers now scattered to the beaches and byways, attention to matters in Leinster House has turned briefly quiet. But the reverberations from a row over VAT on hospitality still linger, offering a taste of fractious budgetary debates to come in September. The flare-up, pitting Fianna Fáil against Fine Gael, may seem familiar. It echoes the tensions seen earlier this summer over third-level college fees and once again highlights the uneasy balance at the heart of the Coalition. The proposal to reduce the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent was a Fine Gael manifesto pledge that found its way, with caveats, into the Programme for Government. But enthusiasm for the measure is not universally shared. Simon Harris, eager to demonstrate economic support for small business and the regions, has championed the move. However, his party colleague, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe, was notably blunt in the Summer Economic Statement. The cut, he noted, would consume nearly two-thirds of the pot set aside for tax measures. READ MORE That alone was enough to raise eyebrows. More pointedly, Fianna Fáil's Minister of State Niall Collins described the proposal as an unnecessary concession to a 'price-gouging' industry. Fine Gael countered that hospitality is a major regional employer under pressure from rising costs. Both sides later sought to play down the public spat. Coalition tensions are nothing new, but the nature of this disagreement suggests tougher debates to come. While calling the 2026 budget a 'hairshirt' one would be absurd, it is clear nonetheless that the era of fiscal generosity is drawing to a close. Trade-offs are inevitable. One such compromise may involve delaying the reduction until mid-2026. That might provide enough breathing room for competing demands, though no one will be entirely satisfied. In the end, the episode may be remembered as a sideshow to more serious economic challenges. Still, it has cast a light on the limits of coalition unity in an era of fiscal tightening.
Irish Examiner
19 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
'It's crazy': Mother and her newborn without water for six days in North Cork village
A Co Cork mother and her newborn baby were discharged home from hospital to discover the water supply in their home had been cut off for six days. And a neighbouring farmer was forced to constantly draw water for his 200-strong herd of cattle during the same period in the North Cork village of Ballyhooly. The cases have been highlighted by local councillors who claim that Uisce Éireann is letting potentially hundreds of thousands of litres of water leak daily as a result of its decision to reduce the number of repair crews in the region. Senior county council officials have agreed to write to the utility as a matter of urgency. In particular, councillors are pointing to Uisce Éireann's decision to halve the number of repair crews, from two to one, in the Fermoy Municipal District Council area which covers Ballyhooly. The North Cork village has been dogged by water outages for many months, primarily due to an ageing water main which is constantly fracturing. Water cut off for five days A recent leak left residents without any water supply from a Thursday to the following Tuesday. Fianna Fáil councillor Frank O'Flynn claimed the crew reduction is leading to the three main towns in the district — Fermoy, Mitchelstown, and Doneraile — getting priority, with other areas forced to wait if there are leaks. He raised the issues in Ballyhooly, and both he and Fine Gael councillor Kay Dawson described it as 'ironic' that the utility has introduced a hosepipe ban when it has been ignoring leaks for months on end. 'None of this[hosepipe ban] makes any sense when these leaks aren't being fixed. This is where the water is being wasted in huge quantities,' Mitchelstown-based Ms Dawson said. Mr O'Flynn said. 'Having just one [repair crew] is absolutely crazy. It isn't good enough and not fair on the existing crew. They are working above and beyond call of duty.' Repair crew 'can only cover major emergencies' Northern Division chairman Independent councillor William O'Leary said he had spoken with the only crew left in the Fermoy municipal area and was told they couldn't even travel to the region's second-largest town, Mitchelstown, unless there is a major emergency there. As a result, he said that villages like Ballyhooly are way down the pecking order when it comes to carrying out repairs. Labour councillor Ronan Sheehan said a similar issue is happening in the Duhallow region in the North-West of the county. Fianna Fáil councillor Bernard Moynihan, who lives in that region, said the utility is struggling to cope with the problems. 'There's huge issues with leaks in Boherbue and Freemount. It's brutal. There are fewer teams on the ground to repair them. It's an absolute disaster,' he said. Northern Division manager Niall Healy said he would raise the issue with the utility as a matter of urgency.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
ieExplains: Why does every infrastructure project in Ireland take so long?
Ahead of the 2024 general election, then-Taoiseach Simon Harris was adamant Ireland needed a new Government department, one solely dedicated to the delivery of infrastructure. While Fianna Fáil was cooler on the idea, there was general agreement across the political spectrum: Ireland does not build things quickly enough. On Tuesday, there was confirmation of this in a new report that confirmed what everybody already knew. While the department of infrastructure did not get established, public expenditure Minister Jack Chambers was given the explicit title of infrastructure when he assumed the role in January. In May, he announced a new Accelerating Infrastructure Taskforce. The taskforce, chaired by the minister, was established to "oversee the department's programme of reform to unblock barriers and accelerate infrastructure delivery". Why is it needed? The need for a taskforce is down to a simple fact: building in Ireland takes too long. Mr Chambers said on Tuesday "every element of the project life cycle has delayed things". "What's been set out here is that for infrastructure projects, the timeline has doubled in 20 years," Mr Chambers said. What does the report say? Tuesday's report uses examples from the likes of Uisce Éireann, which says the lead-in time for a small wastewater treatment project in Ireland is seven-10 years, and ESB Networks, which said the development cycle for an electricity substation has reached seven years. Major road projects can now have a development cycle of up to 15 years, it says, and these timelines have more than doubled compared to the development cycles typical just 20 years ago. This matters, because longer project lifecycles are costing more, and impeding the ability to provide adequate housing. It also delays the achievement of climate and environmental goals. The report also raises questions about the ability of the Irish construction sector to meet the challenges of infrastructure. It says the construction sector employed 236,800 people in 2007. At the beginning of this year, an estimated 178,000 people were directly employed in the sector, considerably fewer than 2007. The report says given limited labour availability, the capacity of the construction industry to expand to meet all of the investment needs in the economy must be carefully considered. The report says the key issues with Ireland's slow delivery are: a lack of public information which magnifies opposition, regulatory burden, risk aversion, insufficient co-ordination on approvals, slow processes, and procurement challenges. Do legal challenges play a part? According to the stakeholders, yes. The words "judicial review" appear in the review a total of 50 teams, with Mr Chambers saying he was concerned these were "too often being used as a mechanism and a tactic to obstruct and delay, and this distorts the intended purpose of judicial review from a remedy of last resort to a tactical tool to delay infrastructure development and clog up our courts". But put to him this view paints those who take legal cases as "bogeymen" in the face of a Government inability to deliver infrastructure, Mr Chambers said everything needed to change internally within how the State regulates and oversees projects. Read More Excessive regulation delaying key infrastructure projects, Cabinet to hear
