
Are liberals destroying the image of America's ideals?
What a perfect example of fake news. By taking on the mantle of American values and attacking their opponents as destroying those values, the Heritage Foundation has done what Trump and his allies always do: They accuse their opponents of doing what they themselves have actually done.
In truth, it is the MAGA-Right that perverts and destroys our founding values. This distorted view of our founding documents was formalised in Matthew Spaulding's 2009 book 'We Still Hold These Truths.' Spaulding is a former Director of American Studies at the Heritage Foundation. In the book, Spaulding faults liberals for perverting the vision of the Founding Fathers and calls liberalism the enemy.
For example, in speaking of the 'certain unalienable truths' proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, he states that liberals have 'rejected the idea of self-evident truths and enduring principles.' How bizarre. It is liberals, i.e., Democrats, who embrace the words of the Declaration of Independence. Given the MAGA-Right's assaults on immigrants, people of colour, and women, it is clear that it is the MAGA-Right that has rejected these truths.
As I stated in my 2004 book 'We Still Hold These Truths: An American Manifesto,' the position that support for conservative arguments can be found in our founding documents is not without basis. But the MAGA-Right disavows traditional conservative positions.
They advocate instead the dismantling of the Federal government to conform more to the anti-Federalist view — a weak and limited national government — that was the basis of the Articles of Confederation, rather than the view that was adopted by the Founding Fathers after the failure of the Articles and was the basis for the Constitution — a strong and multi-faceted Federal government with proscribed checks and balances.
True, some of the Founding Fathers, such as Jefferson, were concerned that a strong federal government would constrict citizens' rights, so he proposed what became the Bill of Rights. But for the MAGA-Right, there is no recognition, appreciation, or tolerance for the point of view of the rights of others. For example, as MAGA Christians in what they consider a Christian country, they believe they can forbid gays to marry and demand that women act in accordance with MAGA beliefs. This is not protecting MAGA's freedom of religion.
This is imposing MAGA's religious views on others, violating others' rights. They pursue the denial of liberty to others. If you read Spaulding's book — if you didn't read it carefully — you could come away thinking he is a reasonable man who respects our founding documents and history. He has, for example, a section on equality and equal rights that is a powerful exposition, which one would think would presage support for all civil rights legislation as well as the DEI efforts of government. He certainly talks the talk.
But when it comes to the implementation and interpretation of these words, he doesn't walk the walk, but distorts their meaning to suit his own political ends. He and the MAGA-Right have a one-sided view of liberty. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are profoundly liberal documents for their era, relying on the balancing of powers and rights.
What the MAGA-Right is attempting to do, and in the short term is succeeding in doing, is to destroy that balance, whether it's between the branches of government or the rights of people. Their goal is to create a government and system of laws that radically depart from our historic ideals and values. This destruction of American ideals can only be stopped by the people, by their realising what the Trump administration is doing and how it affects them and their children. Only by their votes can this perversion of America be stopped.
Given the massive misinformation campaign by the MAGA-Right, for this to happen, the Democratic Party must mount a counter-campaign to inform the public about America's true ideals — what our founding documents and the Founding Fathers said — how the Trump administration cynically perverts those ideals, and how that perversion impacts us all. That is the focus of my book, 'We Still Hold These Truths: An American Manifesto.'
The MAGA-Right and Spaulding speak of equality, freedom of religion and speech, and liberty being dependent on a respect for both rights and responsibilities—these are indeed America's ideals — but they just mouth the words; their implementation of those concepts limits and perverts the Founders' meaning. And that meaning comes from the Enlightenment — the words were aspirational — not from the facts on the ground at that time.
For example, in saying that all 'men' are created equal, the Founders meant that all mankind have certain unalienable rights. Their 'self-evident' came from the fact of creation — that 'we were all of the same species; made by the same God' — not what they saw looking around them. These rights don't belong just to white men or the MAGA-Right. The traditional meaning of 'balance of rights and responsibilities' is that someone exercising his rights has the responsibility not to interfere with the rights of another.
However, the MAGA-Right's interpretation is that others have the responsibility not to interfere unjustly with the practice of their rights, such as by regulating business. They aggressively interfere with the rights of others because, again, they do not acknowledge their rights. But beyond this information campaign, the Democratic Party must rediscover the source of its policies and communicate that source to the people. This source is not 'liberal' thinking or progressive 'woke' thinking. Instead, the foundation of all its policies is the Declaration of Independence.
To this end, I have proposed a domestic Mission statement for the Democratic Party:
'To build a country of greater opportunity for all, where:
• Each and every American has a real chance to experience the promises made in the Declaration of Independence ... 'that all men (mankind) are created equal, that their Creator endows them with certain unalienable Rights ... Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness;'
• Government meets its responsibility as outlined in the Declaration... 'to secure those rights'... within the constraints of fiscal responsibility; and
• All citizens have a shared responsibility to support the government's efforts to secure those rights and promote the public good, each according to their ability, and to not, through the exercise of their rights, impinge on the rights of others.'
This statement is the moral philosophy, the heart, the soul of American democracy. This is, or was, America's common faith. I believe this is the path out of the abyss of Trumpism and back to a government and policies that will make America great again—government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
17 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Trump announces US trade deal with Vietnam
2 July 2025 19:22 WASHINGTON / HANOI (Reuters) US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the United States has struck a trade deal with Vietnam, after months of negotiations, that imposes a 20% tariff rate on many imports from the Southeast Asian rate is lower than the initial 46% levy Trump announced in April on goods from Vietnam, largely as a result of its big trade surplus with Washington."It is my Great honour to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after speaking with To Lam, the Highly Respected General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam," Trump said on Truth said that goods from Vietnam would face a 20% tariff and that any trans-shipments from third countries would face a 40% would also provide the United States with more market access, with US exports to the country facing no tariffs, he said."It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam," Trump said. The White House and the Vietnamese trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Middle East Eye
18 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Hamas says it is studying Trump's ceasefire proposal
Hamas said it was studying what US President Donald Trump called a "final" ceasefire proposal for Gaza. The group said it was "conducting national consultations" to discuss proposals it had received from Egyptian and Qatari mediators. Hamas said it aimed "to reach an agreement that guarantees ending the aggression, achieving the withdrawal [of Israeli forces from Gaza] and urgently aiding our people in the Gaza Strip". Trump said Israel had agreed to a 60-day truce, during which he would work with all parties "to end the War". He also threatened Hamas if they did not accept the deal, stating: "it will not get better - IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for the elimination of Hamas in his first public remarks since Trump's announcement. "There will not be a Hamas. There will not be a Hamastan. We're not going back to that. It's over," he said.


Arabian Post
19 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
US–Vietnam Trade Accord Sets Stage for New Era
President Trump has confirmed that the United States and Vietnam have reached a trade agreement, with a detailed framework now in place while formal terms await finalisation. The accord suspends the 46 per cent reciprocal tariff on Vietnamese imports, originally imposed in April, and paves the way for expanded market access and tighter controls on rerouted Chinese goods. Negotiations were fast-tracked to meet the looming July 9 deadline, when the temporary pause on tariffs would otherwise lapse. As part of the layout, Vietnam has committed to reducing non-tariff trade barriers and allowing greater access for US livestock, aerospace equipment and energy exports—though precise sectors and volumes remain unspecified. At the centre of the deal stands a tiered tariff system based on foreign value‑content of exports. Products most heavily reliant on Chinese components may face duties of 20 per cent or more, while Vietnamese-made goods enjoy a lower baseline of 10 per cent. US officials have asserted that this structure addresses circumvention of Chinese duties while protecting legitimate Vietnamese manufacturing. ADVERTISEMENT Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Tianjin prior to the deal's announcement, stated that Hanoi expected to finalise negotiations before the July deadline and hoped for outcomes 'earlier than two weeks.' The country's trade surplus with the US, which reached US $13.8 billion in May—up 42 per cent year‑on‑year—remains a key negotiating point. Negotiators also addressed concerns about illegal trans‑shipment: goods routed through Vietnam after being manufactured in China to bypass Chinese tariffs. US trade adviser Peter Navarro has described this practice as a serious evasion tactic; Vietnamese officials have promised to strengthen border controls and customs scrutiny. Efforts are now moving beyond tariffs, with signs that Vietnamese companies will sign memorandums of understanding to purchase US agricultural products. One such agreement involves $800 million worth of corn, wheat, soybean meal and dried distillers grains from Iowa over three years—part of a wider $2 billion agricultural import initiative. The Office of the US Trade Representative has been steering bilateral talks under the authority granted in April, rolling back country‑specific tariffs to a baseline 10 per cent while seeking comprehensive trade frameworks. Vietnam is among eighteen nations engaged in similar negotiations, alongside the UK and China. However, as negotiations progress, only those with finalized agreements can expect to retain suspended tariffs beyond July 9. Vietnamese Trade Minister Do Duc Duy led a delegation to Washington in early June, focusing on high‑tech, aviation and energy sectors. This build‑up culminated in Vietnamese officials approving a broad framework, though detailed tariff schedules and purchase commitments remain pending. ADVERTISEMENT US Treasury officials, including Deputy Finance Minister Cao Anh Tuan, have registered concern over Vietnam's ballooning trade surplus and advocated for mechanisms to facilitate greater US exports of high‑technology products. The trade deal aims to address structural imbalances and discourage asymmetry. By halting the 46 per cent tariff, both governments aim to provide breathing room for companies navigating supply‑chain adjustments. Vietnamese exporters, particularly in textiles, electronics, and furniture, had faced rising costs and uncertainty. US importers, in turn, gained steadier input pricing while Vietnam's manufacturing sector gains clearer visibility on duty obligations. The bilateral agreement falls within the Trump‑era pivot towards isolating China as a growing trade adversary. After earlier deals with the UK and China, it signals an effort to construct a network of selective, strategic partnerships centred on reciprocal trade and industrial transparency. Despite uncertainty over the finer details, the accord demonstrates mutual interest in cooperative economic alignment. Vietnam has positioned itself as a major manufacturing hub in Southeast Asia, and its compliance against illicit trans‑shipment could bolster legitimacy in global supply chains. US firms—particularly in agriculture and high-tech—stand to benefit if Vietnamese commitments materialise. Further negotiations will refine tariff bands, enforcement mechanisms, and market access mandates. Both sides aim to formalise agreements ahead of the July 9 expiration. Meanwhile, US companies tied to Vietnamese supply chains—covering electronics, textiles and agri‑inputs—are anticipating disclosures that could guide sourcing decisions. Observers on both continents consider the deal as a modest but strategic realignment. For Washington, it reduces reliance on adversarial supply routes; for Hanoi, it secures tariff relief and access to high‑value US markets. As the technical teams proceed to swap drafts and conduct consultations, stakeholders await clarity on what the detailed deal will deliver in terms of quotas, standards and timelines.