Is this the end of the world? How a galactic pile-up could bring Earth's violent finish: Cosmic ‘coin flip'
Astronomers have revealed that our Milky Way galaxy has a 50/50 chance of colliding with its massive neighbor, the Andromeda galaxy, sometime in the next 10 billion years — an intergalactic smash-up that could fling our solar system into deep space or swallow Earth whole.
Cue the sci-fi panic — or not.
'It used to appear destined to merge with Andromeda forming a colossal 'Milkomeda,'' said Professor Alis Deason, a computational cosmologist at Durham University, per The Daily Mail.
'Now, there is a chance that we could avoid this fate entirely.'
In other words: The end of the world may not be as inevitable as we thought — at least not from the galaxy next door.
The new study, published in 'Nature Astronomy,' analyzed 100,000 simulations of the Milky Way's future.
The findings — thanks to refined data from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and the European Space Agency's Gaia mission — dramatically downshifted previous predictions of a guaranteed galactic pile-up in just 5 billion years.
'In short, the probability went from near-certainty to a coin flip,' lead author Dr. Till Sawala, of the University of Helsinki, revealed to Space.com.
The findings factor in the gravitational tug of neighboring galaxies — most notably the Large Magellanic Cloud, a much smaller satellite galaxy whose pull may be yanking the Milky Way off a crash course.
'The main difference between our research and previous studies is that we benefited from newer and more precise data, and that we considered a more complete system,' Sawala said to the site.
While a 220,000 mph galaxy-on-galaxy collision sounds catastrophic, astronomers say a head-on impact is 'very unlikely.'
In fact, only 2% of simulations showed a direct hit within 5 billion years. Most scenarios had the galaxies swirling toward each other, possibly merging much later — or not at all.
Still, if they do collide, it could be a literal star show.
'We see external galaxies often colliding and merging with other galaxies, sometimes producing the equivalent of cosmic fireworks,' said Durham cosmologist Professor Carlos Frenk, via The Daily Mail.
'Until now, we thought this was the fate that awaited our Milky Way galaxy. We now know that there is a very good chance that we may avoid that scary destiny.'
But even if Earth sidesteps this stellar shakedown, don't get too comfortable.
As The Post previously reported, our sun is expected to become a bloated red giant in about 5 billion years — likely boiling away Earth's oceans or swallowing the planet entirely.
So, yeah. Pick your apocalypse.
'If [the Milky Way-Andromeda collision] happens, it might take place after the Earth and the sun no longer exist,' Sawala told The Daily Mail.
'Even if it happens before that, it's very unlikely that something would happen to Earth in this case.'
Translation: By the time the universe gets around to smashing the Milky Way, we'll probably already be toast.
Still, some experts say galactic fate is more than just an astronomer's obsession.
'The fate of our Milky Way galaxy is a subject of broad interest — not just to astronomers,' Raja GuhaThakurta of the University of California, Santa Cruz, told the Associated Press.
And while the galaxy might survive — barely — we may not.
As Sawala put it: 'Of course, there is also a very significant chance that humanity will bring an end to itself still much before that, without any need for astrophysical help.'
Talk about a stellar self-own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
an hour ago
- Vogue
The In-Office Treatment That Builds Long-Lasting Collagen
I've always followed the skincare holy trinity: good nutrition, adequate sleep, and lots of SPF. But when I turned 35, I started to think about something that had never crossed my mind before: skin laxity. I found myself examining my face in the mirror more closely. Is that a new wrinkle? Am I getting jowls? Suddenly, my daily collagen drinks didn't seem like enough. Last week, I finally decided to undergo my first in-office treatment. No, I didn't get Botox or fillers. Instead, I went with something non-invasive that promised to address my biggest concern: collagen loss. My treatment of choice? Thermage FLX, which is FDA-approved and marketed as one of the most powerful in-office radiofrequency treatments on the market. According to one recent scientific analysis that looked at 52 surveys among dermatologists, Thermage FLX was considered 57.4% more effective than older Thermage devices. I figured that if it was good enough for Jennifer Aniston and Gwyneth Paltrow, it was good enough for me. What is Thermage FLX? Thermage FLX is a non-invasive monopolar radiofrequency treatment that 'ensures stimulation of endogenous collagen with just one treatment,' says Dr. Óscar Suárez, founder and medical director of Barcelona's MD Cliniques. He says it's so effective that a once-a-year treatment is enough for most people. But what exactly makes Thermage FLX so effective? 'It's specially designed to reverse skin flaccidity and improve wrinkles and expression lines,' explains Dr. Maria Dolores Antón, an aesthetic doctor and the medical director of Antón Clinic in Valencia, Spain. 'It tightens and firms the skin through an extremely precise delivery of energy. The device can be used to treat all areas that show the effects of flaccidity: cheeks, eyelids, jawline, bags, buttocks, arms, abdomen, knees, and thighs.' How does Thermage FLX work? Basically, Thermage FLX emits low-frequency electromagnetic waves to generate heat below the surface of the skin. 'The heat penetrates deep into the skin to stimulate the production of collagen, which is responsible for tissue tightening, rejuvenation, and improved elasticity,' explains board certified dermatologist Dr. Tanya Kormeili, a clinical instructor at UCLA. 'Because collagen and elastin are essential for skin firmness and youthfulness, the more you build the more youthful your skin can be in theory,' she says. Thermage FLX heats the deepest layer of the skin to around 140°F to stimulate the fibroblast to increase collagen production. 'Thermage FLX acts directly on the deep dermis in a very specific way: It causes shrinkage of old collagen and gives a message to the fibroblast to generate new, high-quality collagen,' Anton says.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How synthetic lichens can launch Martian construction
This story was originally published on Construction Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Construction Dive newsletter. As NASA continues its preparations to land a human on the moon via its Artemis program, new research points to the possibility of building on the surface of not just the moon, but also Mars. A research team has developed a synthetic lichen system that can form building materials with no outside intervention, according to a news release from College Station, Texas-based Texas A&M University. The team was led by Congrui Grace Jin, an assistant professor in the school's Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution. Jin's team developed a synthetic community, or group of lichen species, that makes use of the advantages of those multiple species, according to the release. This system, which could enable autonomous construction on the planet, eliminates the need for external nutrient supplies and could eventually convert biomaterials into ink for 3D printing. For years, NASA has leaned on the private sector to help field solutions that can lead to permanent structures in space. Building in space presents challenges that range from the prohibitive cost of transporting building materials along with the harsh lunar and Martian climates. In this case, the surface of Mars is covered in regolith, which can consist of dust, sand and rocks. But Jin's team believes they've found a way around that. Their system grows with only Martian regolith simulant, air, light and an inorganic liquid medium, according to the release. In other words, no manpower needed. 'We can build a synthetic community by mimicking natural lichens,' Jin said in the news release. 'We've developed a way to build synthetic lichens to create biomaterials that glue Martian regolith particles into structures. Then, through 3D printing, a wide range of structures can be fabricated, such as buildings, houses and furniture.' That next step — using this regolith ink to print bio-structures using the 3D printing technique of direct ink writing — is already underway, according to the release. 'The potential of this self-growing technology in enabling long-term extraterrestrial exploration and colonization is significant,' Jin said. The study was funded by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts program and recently published in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Recommended Reading GSA program to test 20 emerging technologies Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Earth is as far away from the sun as it ever gets. So why is it so hot?
The peak of summer is approaching for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, but as we prepare for more sunshine and sweltering temperatures, our planet is spinning at its farthest point from the sun. On Thursday at 3:55 p.m. ET, our planet reached what's called the aphelion — the most distant point in its orbit around the sun, roughly 3 million miles farther away than when it's closest. This happens every year in early July, which might sound backward. If we're farthest from the sun, shouldn't it be cooler? People tend to associate proximity with warmth, so it seems natural to assume the seasons are caused by changes in how far Earth is from the sun. But the planet's distance has little to do with it. The real reason for seasonal temperature changes lies in the fact that Earth is tilted. Our planet spins at an angle — about 23.5 degrees — which means different parts of the globe receive more (or less) sunlight depending on the time of year. In July, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, bringing longer days and higher sun angles that lead to more direct sunlight — all of which produce summer-like heat. In contrast, the shape of Earth's orbit plays only a minor role. Although it's slightly oval-shaped rather than perfectly circular, the difference between our closest and farthest points from the sun is relatively small. Right now, Earth is about 3.1 million miles farther from the sun than it is in early January when it reaches perihelion, its closest point. Compared to its average distance of 93 million miles, that's only about a 3.3% difference. Because sunlight spreads out as it travels, even a relatively small change in distance results in about a 7% drop in the amount of solar energy reaching the planet. That's tiny compared to the effect of Earth's tilt. Just how big is the difference? Let's look at a few examples. In cities like Houston, New Orleans and Phoenix — near 30 degrees north in latitude — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth's atmosphere in summer is more than double what those cities receive in winter. Farther north, around 40 degrees, the seasonal swing is even more dramatic. Cities like New York, Denver and Columbus see solar energy climb from about 145 watts per square meter in winter to 430 in summer — nearly a 300% difference. So, while it's true that Earth is receiving less energy from the sun right now, that detail barely registers compared to the power of the planet's tilt. A slight angle in Earth's spin does far more to shape our seasonal patterns than a few million miles of extra distance ever could. In the end, it's not how close we are to the sun that makes summer feel like summer — it's how we're angled toward it.
