logo
Opinion - Will Trump's sovereign wealth fund really ‘Make America Great Again?'

Opinion - Will Trump's sovereign wealth fund really ‘Make America Great Again?'

Yahoo06-02-2025
All the talk about tariffs has overshadowed one of the president's most enlightened proposals — the creation of a U.S. sovereign wealth fund.
On Feb. 3, President Trump signed an executive order to 'establish a sovereign wealth fund to promote fiscal sustainability, lessen the burden of taxes on American families and small businesses, establish economic security for future generations, and promote United States economic and strategic leadership internationally.'
It is an idea whose time has come.
Today, there are over 90 sovereign wealth funds worldwide, collectively managing and investing assets exceeding $12 trillion as of June 2024. This amount has grown significantly over the past two decades, reflecting the increasing importance of sovereign wealth funds in the global economy.
And yet the U.S., the world's most dominant economic power, is not among them.
While there may be many reasons for this situation, the rationale for creating a U.S. sovereign wealth fund now could not be clearer. Harnessing the inherent wealth of America's assets into an acquisitive global investment vehicle seems prudent, and the economic and geopolitical conditions appear ripe.
But it took Trump, the consummate businessman — perhaps with the counsel of Jared Kushner and a few private equity players — to translate theory into reality.
Of course, Kushner himself appreciates the significance of sovereign wealth investments, due in large part to a generous $2 billion deal he brokered with Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund. In fact, we all marvel at the financial prowess of the Saudi fund: With investments in every sector imaginable, it provides an illustrative model for how to cast a nation's economic wealth into global power and influence. This came into full view when the fund, among other major investments, made a play to acquire the Professional Golfers' Association wholesale.
Interestingly, we hear much less about other sovereign wealth funds that are even larger than the Saudi one.
For example, Norway's, Government Pension Fund Global is the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, with $1.7 trillion under management. It is followed by the China Investment Corporation, with $1.3 trillion; the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, with $1 trillion; the Kuwait Investment Authority, with $1 trillion; and the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia, with over $980 billion under management, according to the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute.
Sovereign wealth funds are state-owned investment funds that manage national assets that have traditionally been funded via excess reserves from trade surpluses, natural resource exports (such as oil and gas), or foreign currency reserves accumulated by central banks. Their role in global finance has grown in stature and effect to become some of the most powerful and influential financial entities in the world.
With investments spanning every asset class, from stocks, bonds, real estate, infrastructure, energy, oil and gas, media, tech and emerging industries (including artificial intelligence), these funds own and control significant resources in industrialized nations.
Despite the strength of the U.S. economy, we have traditionally relied on private investment funds, pension funds and venture capital rather than a centralized sovereign wealth fund for national and global investment.
But the U.S. is at an historic crossroad where its international alliances and economic relations are realigning. And that may be the factual predicate to create and sustain the nation's first sovereign wealth fund.
Among the merits of a U.S. sovereign wealth fund would be the opportunity to leverage existing governmental assets, including federal land, infrastructure holdings and intellectual property, into revenue-generating investments. Transitioning from a debtor to a creditor nation is a lofty but likely goal.
Through it all, governance and transparency should be paramount, and the fund should be subject to congressional authorization, review and oversight.
While the concept of a U.S. sovereign wealth fund has been discussed before, previous administrations, including that of Joe Biden, have stopped short due to concerns about government interference in private markets. But several U.S. states have funds that are used to finance specific functions such as education or to provide general revenue.
Today, however, our lack of a sovereign wealth fund may be seen as a strategic vulnerability, especially when state-controlled investment funds around the world are exercising tremendous economic power. Structured properly, a U.S. sovereign wealth fund could provide a counterbalance to foreign sovereign wealth funds, allowing the U.S. to leverage its vast resources more effectively in the global economy.
Beyond financial gains, a strong U.S. fund could be an effective geopolitical tool to strengthen American economic diplomacy, funding infrastructure projects in strategic regions and reducing dependence on foreign capital markets.
With the right leadership, bipartisan support and a clear investment mandate, America's sovereign wealth fund could serve as a game-changing financial instrument — one that advances the national interest and long-term prosperity.
As the media buzz surrounds the Trump economy, a U.S. sovereign wealth fund could advance America's interests in new and untold ways. Far from being punitive or controversial, it is a consequential idea whose time has come.
Adonis Hoffman writes on business, law and policy. He served in senior roles at the FCC and the U.S. House of Representatives and is a senior partner at American Law Group, PLLC
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Trump statistics chief slams Friday firing of Erika McEntarfer
Former Trump statistics chief slams Friday firing of Erika McEntarfer

Politico

time23 minutes ago

  • Politico

Former Trump statistics chief slams Friday firing of Erika McEntarfer

Trump fired McEntarfer after BLS' monthly jobs report for July showed that the economy had added just 73,000 jobs, coming in under expectations. He also took issue with the agency's major revisions to job numbers from May and June. Employment only increased by 33,000 jobs in those two months, the government said Friday, down by 258,000 from previous estimates. Revisions to preceding job reports are routinely issued when a new one comes out. The president also suggested McEntarfer had led an effort to inflate job statistics to aid former Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 election. McEntarfer, Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social, would 'be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' But Beach told Hunt on Sunday that the bureau's estimates are far better now than in previous decades. And the president's firing of McEntarfer 'undermines credibility' in the statistical system, he said. 'Suppose that they get a new commissioner and this person, male or female are just the best people possible. And they do a bad number. Well, everybody's going to think, well, it's not as bad as it probably really is because they're going to suspect political influence.' Larry Summers, who led the Treasury Department under former President Bill Clinton, told ABC's George Stephanopoulos on Sunday that the firing 'is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism.' 'I mean, this is way beyond anything that Richard Nixon ever did, Summers said on 'This Week.' 'I'm surprised that other officials have not responded by resigning themselves as took place when Richard Nixon fired people lawlessly.'

Senate heads into recess as Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'
Senate heads into recess as Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'

UPI

time23 minutes ago

  • UPI

Senate heads into recess as Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, speaks at a press conference calling on the administration to release the Epstein files in the U.S. Capitol building last week. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate began its month‑long recess Saturday night amid negotiations to advance the nomination of dozens of Donald Trump's pending nominees, as the president told Sen. Chuck Schumer to "go to hell" when the talks collapsed. Trump, in a post to his Truth Social platform on Saturday, had wanted the Senate to stay in session but accused Schumer of "political extortion" for allegedly demanding a billion dollars in funding in order to approve dozens of his remaining "highly qualified nominees" for appointment to the administration. A source familiar with Schumer's alleged demands told Axios that Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of the nominees. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" Trump said in his post. "Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our country." Schumer later shared Trump's post and quipped, "The Art of the Deal." He later added that Trump had "attempted to steamroll" the Senate into approving his "historically unqualified nominees." But the standoff has led Senate Republicans to express support for the possibility that Trump use recess appointments, a controversial constitutional mechanism that allows the president to "temporarily" fill vacant positions when the Senate is in recess. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall posted on Saturday. Senate Republicans also indicated they might pursue a change to Senate rules after they return from recess to make it easier to pass through confirmations. Sen. Markwayne Mullin told Fox News that lawmakers would be moving forward with a rule change in September.

Consider Minority Students' Medical School Performance
Consider Minority Students' Medical School Performance

Wall Street Journal

time23 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Consider Minority Students' Medical School Performance

I have a question for David Skorton, president of the Association of American Medical Colleges. In his letter 'Medical Schools' Standards Aren't Slipping,' he gives the six-year graduation rate for non-dual-degree M.D. students (Letters, July 31). But medical school is typically a four-year endeavor. Can Dr. Skorton give the four-year non-dual-degree graduation rate for minority students and how it compares to non-minority students? During my experience in medical school in the 1980s, there were various initiatives to support minorities, including tutoring services specifically for minority students. The pass rate of these students was much lower than that of the non-minority students.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store