City of Cheyenne begins discussions of new $74.4M annual budget
The projected general fund revenues for fiscal year 2026, which begins July 1, 2025, are $74,417,876, up $2,770,229 from FY 2025, or 3.8%.
'Projecting revenues this year was difficult,' Collins told City Council members during a work session Friday. 'We took a very conservative approach in our projections due to the uncertainty stemming from federal tariffs, inflation and the looming recession.'
City Treasurer Robin Lockman said Cheyenne's economy shows promising momentum, but it is important to remain cautious about the potential for an economic downturn. She said the bond market's 10-year yield curve, an historically accurate recession indicator, was inverted from July 2022 to September 2024, the longest period on record.
She said a recession typically begins around six months after the yield curve returns to normal.
According to Lockman, the unemployment rate in Laramie County has risen from 3.7% to 4.4% over the past year, adding that stagnating unemployment growth underscored the need for caution.
In addition, the property tax reductions passed by the Wyoming Legislature, largely in Senate File 69, earlier this year reduced potential city revenues by an estimated $1,775,000, something Collins called an 'opportunity loss.'
SF 69 imposed a blanket property tax cut to residential properties for the first $1 million of a home value. This legislation alone reduced projected revenues by $1.5 million.
A separate long-term homeowner exemption will also decrease assessed valuation for property tax purposes by 50% for qualified individuals. The city projects this will result in an additional $275,000 loss in property tax revenues.
Collins said he would have liked to see those funds go toward hiring more staff for the city's police and fire departments as the city continues to expand.
In the past four years, Cheyenne's land area has grown by 4,637 acres, or 18.24%, in new business parks and neighborhoods, equivalent to 7.25-square-miles.
'Our plans to add more police and fire personnel to keep up with growth must now be postponed. We've made steady progress over the past four budget years in increasing our public safety efforts. And this pause will make our future efforts more difficult,' he said.
However, despite the loss in potential property tax revenue, the projected amount for FY 26 is still slightly higher than FY 25 by $32,433.
This is largely due to rising property values, with a projected 3% increase, and the city's annexation of North Range Business Park in December, which added approximately $1 million in new business property taxes, since SF 69 only applied to residential properties.
Collins said further projected revenue growth is catalyzed by data center development, which is now the city's second-largest revenue source.
According to the proposed budget, franchise fees on natural gas and electricity have grown by $2,652,000, or 48%, in the past year.
'Data centers use an enormous amount of electricity, and that use is reflected in the increases,' Collins said. 'And the great news is we have more campuses and data centers planned for the future.'
Congruent to this is expected growth in revenue from building permits. City officials are projecting an increase of $710,000, or 31%, in building permit revenue in the next fiscal year. The mayor said this is driven by more data center construction and several multi-family housing projects planned.
Lockman highlighted one additional revenue source, the city's investment income. She said the higher interest rates, paired with a strategic portfolio, have nearly quadrupled investment returns from $683,000 in FY 23 to a projected $2.2 million in the current fiscal year on general fund investments. She estimated it at $1,380,000 in the coming year, an increase of $530,841 over FY 25.
However, some other revenue sources are weaker than the previous year. Collins said sales tax collections have been under pressure since January 2024, largely due to less oil and gas activity. The proposed budget suggests sales tax could by down by $904,800, or 3.65%, in the coming fiscal year.
Another anticipated decrease is in lottery proceeds, which have decreased by $208,895 since 2023. It is projected to decrease $100,000 this year to $300,000, down from over $600,000 in 2023.
The city's top three projected revenue sources for FY 26 are sales taxes at 34%, franchise fees at 11.8% and property taxes at 11.6%.
The top 10 projected revenue sources are about 85.7% of the general fund budget, or $65.59 million, and the rest amounts to around $9.8 million.
Employee wages and benefits are once again the city's top expense, at 71.8%, followed by capital projects at 3.7%, and fleet, fuel and labor at 3.4%.
City staff have been working on assembling this proposed budget since December. In the coming weeks, members of the City Council will meet with department heads to hear the details of the requests in their budget proposals and ask any questions.
On Friday, department heads from the mayor's office, Youth Alternatives and human resources presented their budgets. Council members also discussed miscellaneous budget items.
The budget will come before the governing body for first reading on May 12 and will undergo workshopping over the next month to address any issues. It is scheduled to come before the council for third and final reading on June 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Jeb Bush is wrong about charters. They are gutting Florida's public schools
Former Gov. Jeb Bush recently praised, in a Miami Herald opinion article, Florida's expanding charter school and 'Schools of Hope' programs as bold education reform. But what he describes as courageous and innovative is, in truth, part of a coordinated, well-funded campaign to defund and depopulate traditional public schools — not to improve them, but to replace them with privately managed institutions operating with public dollars. As a Miami-Dade school teacher, I believe that behind the narrative of 'choice,' 'accountability' and 'innovation' lies a troubling reality: a strategy to dismantle public education and convert it into a profit-driven marketplace. These outcomes in Florida are not accidental — they result from deliberate policy choices designed to shift control away from democratically governed schools and into the hands of private operators. While traditional public schools follow strict transparency laws and financial reporting standards, charter schools are exempt from many of these requirements — even though they receive public funds. This double standard allows charter operators to profit from taxpayer dollars while shielding their operations from scrutiny. Bush points to 'persistently low performing' schools in Florida as justification for charter takeovers. But he ignores the fact that many traditional schools in low-income communities — despite chronic underfunding — have earned consecutive 'A' grades under Florida's punitive grading system. Rather than celebrate these successes, the Florida Legislature has withheld resources, expanded vouchers and rewritten rules to tip the scales against public schools. This is not reform — it's a campaign of forced failure, designed to create a false narrative that public schools are broken and must be handed over to private actors. It is nothing but a hostile takeover of a vital public good for private gain. Bush also cites declining public school enrollment as a reason to grant charters access to taxpayer-funded buildings. But this trend is no accident. It's the result of deliberate policies: Florida's universal voucher scheme, for-profit virtual schools and aggressive charter expansion have siphoned students and dollars out of public schools. When enrollment drops by design, schools are labeled 'underutilized' or 'surplus,' paving the way for their buildings to be handed over to private entities. It's a manufactured crisis with real consequences. Public schools also serve critical community functions that charters do not. They act as hurricane shelters, polling sites and hubs for vital services. These are not just schools — they are the backbone of community life. What's too often ignored is that many charter schools in Florida are run by for-profit Education Management Organizations (EMOs). These companies receive public tax dollars but operate with little accountability. Though labeled as public, they are privately managed, profit-driven institutions. Their goal isn't to serve every child — it's to reduce costs, maximize revenue and grow market share. Public dollars are flowing into private hands while communities lose control. Charter expansion is often marketed as 'parental choice.' But without information, there is no real choice — only manipulation. Many families are selecting schools without knowing whether they meet standards for safety, certified staff, special education or curriculum. Despite charter schools push to divert students, most Florida families still choose traditional public schools, including magnet and choice programs. That speaks volumes: families still believe in public education. It's up to policymakers to stop undermining it. This isn't just a Florida issue — it's part of a global playbook: starve public schools, declare them broken, then privatize under the banner of 'reform.' The winners are corporations, investors and real estate developers. Florida is the model. If we don't push back, the rest of the nation could follow. Here are some suggestions: Florida needs to tie public funds to public oversight, ban for-profit school operators, preserve public ownership of school buildings and protect the civic role of public schools. Crystal Etienne is a Miami-Dade school teacher and president of EDUVOTER, a nonprofit organization committed to protecting and strengthening Florida's traditional public schools.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Did Mike Collins misspell Georgia in his Senate announcement? Here's what we know
On Monday, U.S. Rep. Mike Collins announced his bid to represent Georgia on the U.S. Senate. But in the days leading up to it, his X team, called the "Mike Collins War Room," has been hyping followers up. Just before the announcement, there was a bit of a hiccup. Mike Collins misspells Georgia On Sunday, the team, which calls itself the "Official team account for @MikeCollinsGA campaign" posted a video captioned "Mike Collins is ready to put the hammer down and get it done." It's pretty typical of campaign ads meant to project strength: Taking shots at Sens. Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, Collins is seen with a gun, and messages like "Unrelenting, unafraid to fight." But then it ends with this message "Georiga, Let's Ride." Reactions to Mike Collins misspelling Georgia It's unclear if the video will be revised or taken down, but as of Tuesday morning, it's still up with more than 460,000 views. Here are some comments from the more critical viewers: "Spell Georgia right, and maybe we'll take it seriously." "Knowing how to spell the name of your own state should at least be a baseline requirement for running for the Senate." "Cant even spell check, nor spell your state correctly in a political the thing thats broken is your stupid little MAGA brain." But this fumble didn't deter Collins's supporters, who have been hoping he'd run long before he announced his intentions: "Georgia needs you!" "Let's ride, I call shotgun!" "I'm ready to be put to work! Let's go!" Who is Mike Collins? Mike Collins is a Republican who has represented Georgia's 10th congressional district since 2023. The Jackson native is the founder of Collins Trucking, and is one of the biggest figures behind the Laken Riley Act. When is the U.S. Senate election in Georgia? Election Day for Georgians to pick a new U.S. Senator is on November 3, 2026. Miguel Legoas is a Deep South Connect Team Reporter for Gannett/USA Today. Find him on Instagram @miguelegoas and email at mlegoas@ This article originally appeared on Athens Banner-Herald: Mike Collins campaign video on X for U.S. Senate misspells Georgia Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
10 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Newsom faces a tight timeline to redistrict California. Here are the roadblocks
SACRAMENTO — To counter Texas redistricting, Gov. Gavin Newsom faces a tight timeline to convince lawmakers to act. But many won't even say where they stand on the issue. Newsom first raised the prospect of redrawing California's congressional maps in favor of Democrats three weeks ago as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott moved to do the same in his state in favor of Republicans. But while Abbott has been able to move forward with his redistricting efforts unfettered, Newsom faces more roadblocks. In most states, including in Texas, state lawmakers approve congressional maps, giving politicians power to shape districts in favor of their own political parties. But California voters took that power away from the state Legislature in 2010 and handed it to an independent redistricting commission. The secretary of state's office would need about three month's heads up to facilitate a special election, said spokesperson Jim Patrick. That means California lawmakers would need to act immediately when they return from their summer recess in mid-August to bring the issue before voters at the same time as municipal elections in November. Sen. Dave Cortese, D-San Jose, said he thinks that's an unlikely prospect. 'I never use the word impossible, but that's about as close as you can get to impossible,' said Cortese, who serves as the Senate majority whip. 'I think rushing like that would be imprudent. If we're going to do it at all, it needs to be well thought out, well planned, defensible in every way, and then we put it before the voters. That's what it would take to get my vote.' To go to voters, as Newsom has suggested, and ask them to at least partially undo the law they passed in 2010, the governor will need to convince at least 80 of the 120 state lawmakers. Democrats control 91 seats in the state Senate and Assembly combined. In theory, that gives Newsom a wide margin of support if he can get his party on board. But even lawmakers who represent the liberal Bay Area are mostly staying silent. The Chronicle reached out to the 27 lawmakers — all Democrats — who represent the area asking what they think of Newsom's plan. Just two said explicitly that they support putting a measure on the ballot to reclaim the power to draw congressional districts. Some others expressed general support for the idea of pushing back against Texas, but did not explicitly endorse a ballot measure. Sen. Chris Cabaldon, a Democrat representing parts of the Sacramento region and Bay Area wine country, said he supports Newsom's proposal. 'I think he's got it exactly right,' Cabaldon told the Chronicle. 'We have to recognize what's really at stake here and fight back.' He doesn't want to change the independent commission's power to draw state legislative districts, but said he supports the idea of a ballot measure that temporarily allows California lawmakers to draw new congressional maps. Assembly Member Catherine Stefani of San Francisco also endorsed the idea of a ballot measure. 'Trump and his allies have shown they'll do whatever it takes to undermine democracy — and if they're going to rig the game, we owe it to our voters to fight back,' she wrote in a statement. 'The fairest way to do that is to let the people of California decide at the ballot box.' Sen. Josh Becker of Menlo Park and Assembly Members Patrick Ahrens of Sunnyvale and Ash Kalra of San Jose agreed with Newsom that California should fight back. They also agreed that a ballot measure should be on the table, but stopped short of explicitly endorsing one. Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire and Assembly Member Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, who represent parts of the North Bay, did not respond directly to questions about whether they support Newsom's specific proposals, but broadly endorsed the idea of fighting back against Republicans. Assembly Member Alex Lee of San Jose pushed back on Newsom's plan. 'Respectfully… why?' he wrote on social media in response to Newsom's proposal. He described California's independent redistricting commission as a 'model for the nation.' Cortese said he's willing to consider a ballot measure, given the stakes, but said he wouldn't support something that permanently revoked the independent commission's power to draw districts, something he considers one of the biggest improvements to the Legislature in the last 20 years. There's no way for California state lawmakers, who often run for Congress themselves and are close with many candidates who do, to draw district lines objectively, he said. 'When it comes to taking back the House, I don't think anyone in our caucus will say that's not an important goal,' Cortese said. 'The question is can we come up with a way to get there that doesn't throw our own Legislature into chaos?' Cortese said he would not consider another plan Newsom has floated — to simply have the Legislature draw new maps using the argument that while the California Constitution gives that power to the independent commission after each census, it doesn't explicitly prohibit lawmakers from drawing different maps mid-decade. The governor has acknowledged that's a strategy that might not hold up in court. The state budget deficit is also a concern. The last statewide special election in 2021 cost $200 million in public funds to administer. If the Legislature can't consolidate this special election with local elections already scheduled in November, that means it could be looking at a similar cost in the face of a massive budget deficit. And the timeline will still be tight. If the Legislature draws new maps, it must do so with enough time for candidates to file to run in the new districts. California's 2026 primary election is scheduled for June 2, and the deadline for people to declare their candidacy is March 6. Pro-redistricting pollsters are already interviewing voters about how they feel about the prospect of politicians redrawing the state's political boundaries less than 20 years after Californians overwhelmingly voted that a non-partisan commission should. It is not clear who is funding or performing the polling. Former Brea (Orange County) Mayor Glenn Parker was called by a pollster last week asking if he would support a proposition to eliminate California's redistricting commission and put the process back in the hands of the Legislature. As a longtime local elected official and registered Democrat who has never voted for Donald Trump, he said he was torn. The redistricting commission 'isn't necessarily perfect, but it's probably the closest thing we could get to an objective drawing of the districts,' said Parker, who applied to be on the commission but was not accepted. 'But you do have to fight fire with fire.' Stanford University political science professor Bruce Cain worked on California's 1980 redistricting plans when he was a Democratic staffer in the Assembly. He said he doubts voters would support a measure to undo the commission. Democrats are split between those who want to counter the Republican move in Texas and good government types who don't want to roll back a nationally lauded political reform, he said. Republicans would be uniformly against it, Cain said, because it would strip them of power. Independent voters are 'more likely to say, 'Hey, wait a minute. Under this (current) system, we have a voice. If we're going back to the Legislature (drawing the maps), we don't count for anything.' So I don't see the winning coalition there,' Cain said. The unknown factor is whether Newsom could convince Democrats and left-leaning independents that the move is necessary to counter Trump, of whom two-thirds of California voters disapprove. 'That is to be determined,' Cain said. 'This will be an uphill battle to convince voters. There'll be some backlash to this.' Newsom has insisted he's serious about his plans to counter redistricting in Texas, though he hasn't committed to spending a specific amount of money on a campaign, which would likely cost tens of millions of dollars. Some opposition might already be amassing. On Tuesday, Charles Munger Jr., the longtime Republican donor who funded the 2010 ballot measure that created a citizens panel to draw boundaries for congressional seats, posted on X that 'any attempt to undermine the nonpartisan California Redistricting Commission will be strongly opposed in the courts and at the ballot box.' Munger would have the funds to mount a credible opposition campaign. Munger's father, who died in 2023, was vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Corp. and a longtime colleague of Warren Buffett.
