Save the River picks up nearly 400 pounds of trash along St. Lawrence
Save the River announced that 375 pounds of trash were picked up at locations in Cape Vincent, Ogdensburg and Grass Point on Tuesday, April 22 as part of Earth Day.
The group does its shoreline cleanup every Earth Day. This was done in partnership with the Ogdensburg Kiwanis Club and Ogdensburg Free Academy Key Club.
Save the River said they will be hosting more cleanup days throughout the year. Those dates will be announced later on.
Trump economic approval rating falls to 37 percent: Survey
Popular social media chef says he's cancer-free after given 30% chance to live
FDA says it will phase out food dyes
Wildfire in New Jersey triples in size overnight, threatens more than 1,300 structures
DeSantis faces growing storm over Hope Florida controversy
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
Child-Free Woman Convinced She'd Use Cloth Diapers—Then Comes Viral Response
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 32-year-old woman "undecided" about children asked moms for their opinions on cloth diapers—and the response is going viral. Miam-based Chanel Goodson wrote in her post on Threads: "As … someone who cares about the planet, I know I'd want to use cloth diapers." She asked parents on Threads why cloth diapers, despite being reusable and potentially more eco-friendly, aren't more widely adopted—especially given the rising concerns about chemicals in disposables and the mounting cost of single-use products. Stock image: A baby lays on a bed wearing a cloth diaper. Stock image: A baby lays on a bed wearing a cloth diaper. Aurora Uribe As a vegan of 12 years, Goodson told Newsweek that her values around sustainability shapes all aspects of consumption—including food, fashion and household products. "I'm very mindful about recycling and limiting single-use items, and disposable diapers have always struck me as incredibly wasteful," Goodson said. "When I saw a box of diapers in-store priced at $50, that honestly shocked me." That is when she started learning about cloth diapers—the cost savings, sustainability, and reusability made her want to understand them better. But many parents on Threads, moms in particular, had answers. The post itself was viewed over 135,000 times and received more than 2,000 comments. "The amount of labor involved with cleaning human s*** out of fabric is more intense than you will understand until you have a kid and it's a regular occurrence," one mom wrote. Another added: "I wanted to do cloth diapers but quickly realized I had to choose convenience for my sanity." Many others highlighted logistic hurdles such as day-care restrictions, lack of laundry access, and sheer exhaustion. "A washing machine makes it significantly easier and not everyone has one. High up front cost is off-putting. Add in exhaustion from having a newborn and most people give up," another mom posted. Some parents, however, shared positive experiences. "We use cloth diapers and have a service," one user commented. "Every Tuesday they drop off 60 clean diapers and pick up the soiled ones. It costs $80 a month. Everyone assumes it's ultra-luxury, but it's actually affordable." Sarah Topalian Davies, director of communications and media at Earth Day ( told Newsweek that cloth diapers are a hard sell, even as a committed environmentalist. "I … was given a bag of them for free by my midwife, but I quickly realized you have to be 100 percent committed as they get filthy fast," Davies said. "You need to be able to scrape the poop off the diaper, flush it and then hot-wash a ton of cotton diapers, easily five to 10 times a day to keep your supplies ready." Davies added that all the washing and drying is time-consuming, not to mention driers being the most energy-demanding appliances in the home. "The thing that makes the disposables so convenient is you can change your baby in the back of the car and just put the diaper in a trash bin after," Davies said. "A cotton diaper is much more demanding, and then you have to carry a soiled cotton diaper around with you till you get home, too." Davies said we need safer, plastic-free disposables, but finding affordable options is challenging. Goodson's aim, she said, wasn't to make a statement online, and understood that choosing cloth diapers involves a demanding washing schedule and extra time. "It didn't deter me from considering cloth diapers, but it definitely helped me understand that it's not just a sustainable choice; it's a lifestyle one that takes real commitment," Goodson said.
Associated Press
5 days ago
- Associated Press
Fifth Year of Camden Cleanup Underway
Originally published on TAPinto On Tuesday, which was Earth Day, Camden resident and avid gardener Ernesto Ventura Sr. received a free tree to add to his yard. 'This will fit in nicely with my tomatoes, grapes and other trees,' he said in an interview as he examined the roughly 2-foot piece of greenery. The tree Ventura received was one of 75 that the Subaru Corporation, through the Arbor Day Foundation, gave away for free during the Camden Cleanup kickoff that took place at Dudley Grange Park, Adam Leiter, a corporate communications specialist for Subaru, told TAPinto Camden. Continue reading here. Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from Subaru of America
Vox
6 days ago
- Vox
Your favorite national park is struggling to survive
is a freelance journalist who covers science, the environment, wildlife, and the outdoors. She is based in Laramie, Wyoming. Researchers study black swifts in Glacier National Park, Montana, in 2018. Cuts to the Park Service means the parks are missing out on species monitoring data. National Park Service This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk Collaboration. Stories of struggle flow unceasingly from our public lands — here, a senior botanist pulled from invasive species removal to check campgrounds for unattended fires; there, a trail crew fired, leaving backcountry areas inaccessible after timber blowdowns. Elsewhere, fire crews are bracing for destructive wildland blazes without the necessary backup from extra personnel certified to help. The Trump administration has already cut thousands of employees from the US Forest Service, Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management, and thousands more workers now fear for their jobs after the Supreme Court gave the administration the green light. And yet, on the surface, many national parks and even Forest Service campgrounds appear to be managing business as usual. 'Some districts still have recreation crews in place, though others hardly have any, and fire folks are running around trying to clean toilets,' said Mary Erickson, the recently retired Custer Gallatin National Forest supervisor. Senior staff have retired or taken the DOGE 'fork in the road' email, leading to, among other things, drastic shortfalls in trail maintenance. 'On top of that, there's a hiring freeze. But I know the mantra at the local level is, they're trying to do the best they can do with what they have.' The national parks are no different, said Jeff Mow, former Glacier National Park superintendent. The toilets might still be cleaned and pumped, but behind the scenes our national treasures are being 'hollowed out.' 'They're not understanding the impacts the cuts have, not just on staffing but also resources and local economies,' Mow said. Mow spent 32 years with the Park Service, many of them as superintendent of various parks, including Montana's Glacier National Park and Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument in central Colorado. He retired in 2022 and now serves on the executive council of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks and is a board member of National Park Friends Alliance. Mow sat down with High Country News to explain what we're seeing this summer and what the recent cuts mean for our public lands' future. How have the Park Service cuts hit park units differently? Many people, when they think of the National Park System, think of large parks like Yellowstone, Yosemite, Glacier, or Grand Teton. These are all parks that have pretty significant staffs. It's often like running a small city with multiple sewer systems, water systems, and all the law enforcement. What most people don't realize is that the majority of National Park Service units are small and medium-sized parks, like Gettysburg or Florissant Fossil Beds. A lot of those small units are minimally staffed, and when these guys lose three or four positions, in some cases, they've lost half their staffing. Jeff Mow, then Glacier National Park superintendent, at the park in 2016. Tami A. Heilemann/DOI We keep hearing from visitors to some of the major national parks that not much has changed — that toilets are clean and front desks are operating. Why would that be? They are putting the focus on visitor services so that the visitors coming aren't going to see a whole lot of changes from what they might have seen the year before. But there are two halves to the National Park Service mission. One half is preserving the resources for future generations, and they are taking away the emphasis on preserving the resources. When I was superintendent, I relied on my local inventory and monitoring network to tell me: Is the park in good shape? Are these invasives coming from this farmer's field, or this rancher's field? Do I need to be concerned about this housing development and what it may do, or oil and gas development on my boundary? I didn't have the expertise in a small park to deal with that. I relied on that expertise from a regional office, or from a program office like our Natural Resource Program Center. We're losing that. We're losing a lot of expertise. What does that mean over the long term? You can look at this as a homeowner. If you don't get the house painted this year, you will probably be fine. But if you don't get the house painted or fix the broken piece on the house, over five years you may have real problems. We are losing monitoring, like what are black swifts doing in Glacier? This is the largest population of black swifts in Montana. Or the monitoring of our endangered species, whether grizzly bears or wolverines or bull trout. All those things are getting cut short. And in the long term, we won't have a lot of that information about our understanding of what is going on under climate change. So we won't know how species are doing until it's potentially too late? Correct. And when we lose the resource, it's gone. We may be losing the very purpose for which each unit was established. As a federal agency, each park has a mission, but then each unit is established for a particular reason. Fossil Buttes has very specific enabling legislation for why it was established, and it's for understanding and connecting us to the ancient world, which is very different than what the Martin Luther King home does. Unlike Disneyland, where everything's replicated, these are almost always (unique): the original fabric in the bedroom where Abraham Lincoln died and its significance in our nation's history.
