Rapid Spread of Whooping Cough: Alert Should Be Raised to Prevent Infection among Infants
The number of patients with whooping cough, which is characterized by severe coughing that can last for a prolonged period of time, has surged. Caution must be strengthened, particularly for babies, as they are more prone to developing severe symptoms if they become infected.
Whooping cough is transmitted through cough droplets or contact with hands that are contaminated with a certain type of bacteria. It is significantly more contagious than seasonal influenza and other diseases.
This year, the number of patients has exceeded 28,000 nationwide. The figure has already significantly surpassed the 2019 figure of 16,845, which was the record high in recent years. Moreover, the weekly number of patients in early June topped 3,000, indicating the rapid spread of infection.
The infection is spreading across all age groups, but it is particularly prevalent among children aged 10 or younger.
Caution is especially needed for infants. If babies are infected within the first six months after they are born, they are at high risk of losing their lives from developing respiratory distress and pneumonia. At least two infants died this year due to whooping cough.
Those related to such entities as childcare facilities and schools must be vigilant for infection clusters. It is important for people who have symptoms, including adults, to quickly see a doctor to prevent the spread of infection.
Whooping cough caused many deaths until the 1940s, but shortly after World War II, vaccinations began to be administered, allowing those who became infected to only have mild symptoms. However, as the symptoms are mild, people could spread the disease without knowing it.
It is hoped that people who are coughing wear a mask and follow certain etiquette to prevent the spread of infection. It is also crucial to check whether basic measures against infection are taken, such as hand washing.
Infants are eligible to receive vaccinations against whooping cough at public expense. Currently, they are supposed to receive a total of four doses at various intervals after they are 2 months old. Parents and guardians are urged to have infants vaccinated as soon as they reach 2 months of age.
It is also effective for family members to voluntarily receive additional vaccinations in order to protect infants. However, there has been a surge in demand for such additional vaccinations, raising concerns in the medical field about a shortage of the vaccines for voluntary shots.
It is hoped that medical institutions will prioritize people who are more in need of the vaccines, such as family members who have close contact with babies.
Treatment usually involves the use of antimicrobial drugs but recently there has been an increase in drug-resistant bacteria that do not respond to antimicrobial drugs. The current outbreak is believed to be linked to the spread of such bacteria. The drug-resistant bacteria have been spreading in countries and regions such as China. There also have been a series of reports of the bacteria in Japan since late last year.
Patients infected with such drug-resistant bacteria require different antimicrobial drugs for treatment. It is hoped that medical associations and other relevant groups will make efforts to make appropriate treatment methods widely known.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 21, 2025)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
7 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
The bombers that look like giant bats
Anyone who has observed those B-2 Stealth bombers used by the US in Iran last week will be aware of the unique futuristic design that some say makes them resemble giant bats. Opinion is divided on whether these planes are an inspired example of beautiful modern engineering and technology or just plain ugly. They certainly look a bit sinister, but then so do most planes designed for dropping bombs. Over the years the bombers have tended not to be as aesthetically pleasing as the fighter jets which are a lot more sleek, versatile and easier on the eye. Even back in World War II the British Spitfire fighter plane looked so graceful as it swooped around the skies it was sometimes likened to a swallow and much-loved by the pilots who appreciated its manoeuvrability. The B-52 bombers that preceded the B-2s are still in operation and were certainly not known for their beauty. These planes were very busy during the Vietnam War and many were based in U-Tapao. The Thai populace referred to them as "Bee Hasip-sawng" (B-52) but the Americans had a more colourful nickname, (BUFF) which stood for "Big Ugly Fat Fellow" although the last word was usually replaced by an expletive. In the early 1970s I recall standing on the Rayong roadside watching the B-52s taking off from U-Tapao on their daily missions to North Vietnam. It was both an awesome and scary experience. The noise was deafening and they were an intimidating sight. They carried such heavy payloads of bombs it made you wonder how they even managed to get off the ground. Down the hatch The B-52 also became the name for a particularly lethal cocktail. It had numerous variations but the basic ingredients involved three layers consisting of Kahlua (coffee liqueur), Baileys Irish Cream and Grande Marnier (French liqueur). The more adventurous could try "B-52 With Bomb Bay Doors" which added a fourth layer of Bombay Gin. For those who really wanted to punish themselves there was "B-52 with a Full Payload" which includes a fifth layer featuring Bacardi rum. I might just stick to beer. Beehive Rock There was also a successful American rock group named the B-52s. In fact they were originally known for many years as the B-52's featuring a stray apostrophe which was eventually dropped in 2011. The group which was formed in 1976 acquired their name from the popular B-52 beehive hairdo at that time which resembled the distinctive nose cone of the bomber. The two terrific female singers in the group, Kate Pierson and Cindy Wilson both wore beehives during their energetic concert performances. The group had a string of hits with the most successful being "Love Shack" and "Rock Lobster". But it is one of their lesser-known songs that more recently caught my attention. It has a most intriguing title which will surface in the next item. From Ipanema to Greenland When Greenland gets back in the news, as it surely will, I reckon the B-52s song "Girl From Ipanema Goes to Greenland" released in 1986 could become a hit again. For a start, it's a great title for a song. Donald Trump might even like it. It would at least make a welcome change from him dancing to "YMCA". The B-52s song is a bouncy feel-good number although admittedly the lyrics don't make much sense. The song is a nod of the hat to the soothing 1963 Brazilian bossa nova hit "Girl From Ipanema" written by Antonio Carlos Jobim and performed by Astrud Gilberto, backed by saxophonist Stan Getz. The B-52s song released 21 years later is very different and definitely not bossa nova. It's a song to lift your spirits and can be heard on YouTube. So why on earth would the girl from sunny Ipanema suddenly decide to go to freezing Greenland? As far as I can make out from the lyrics the girl is fed up with Ipanema beach and opts to head off to somewhere completely different… and Greenland is certainly different. Her bikini wouldn't be much use though. On the beach Back to that relaxing 1963 song. It was Astrud Gilberto's first professional performance which was part of its charm. Her plaintive voice managed to sound innocent yet seductive. Like most teenage lads at the time I loved it. The song conjured up an irresistible image: "Tall and tan and young and lovely/The girl from Ipanema goes walking/And when she passes, each one she passes/Goes ah ..." I certainly went "ah" listening to it all those years ago and it still sounds pretty cool 60 years later. Coffee break The very mention of Brazil brings to mind the old Frank Sinatra song that begins: "Way down among Brazilians/Coffee beans grow by the billions …" It was called rather unimaginatively "The Coffee Song" and a big hit when I was a kid back in the Stone Age. In fact, that song just about summed up my knowledge of Brazil in those days. It includes the splendid lines: "You date a girl, and find out later/She smells just like a percolator …" All very romantic. It was hardly a surprise that as a kid I pictured Brazil as a country full of cheerful people who spent every day dancing the samba at never-ending carnivals and guzzling gallons of coffee.
NZ Herald
12 hours ago
- NZ Herald
5 Best winter walks in New Zealand
Waiwhakāta, Lake Hayes Loop Track | Arrowtown, 8km loop One of the easier segments of Te Araroa, the Lake Hayes Loop Track is just 5km from picturesque Arrowtown on SH6. Stride out from Lake Hayes Pavilion or North Lake Hayes Picnic area, and on a still day you'll be rewarded with sublime views of snow-capped Coronet Peak reflected in the lake's mirrored surface. Bird watchers will want binoculars, as the 280ha lake is home to a variety of species, including the pūteteke, or Australian crested grebe made famous by John Oliver in the 2023 Bird of the Year – and with rebooted rabbit control, the flora and fauna are flourishing. Mostly on flat terrain, this is a comfortable winter walk, with some boardwalk sections. Cycling is also permitted but because the path narrows in places, please share with care. Lake Hayes is home to the pūteteke, a rare grebe made famous by a comedy show. Photo / QueenstownNZ Karangahake Gorge Walkways | Waikato Region The gorgeous Karangahake Gorge cuts through the Coromandel and Kaimai Ranges, with a choice of short strolls and longer hikes. It is an area of outstanding natural beauty book-ended by the mining towns of Paeroa and Waihī – pull over at the carpark beside Ohinemuri River and cross the impressive swing bridge. Information panels provide details of the walks, including the 2.5km Rail Tunnel Loop. Ninety minutes of easy walking through lush native bush, on this loop you'll see the crown battery stamper, built in 1892 for crushing quartz. You'll also find a 1100m tunnel, so hooray for phones with torches! Karangahake Gorge Historic Walkway is another beauty and at 7km takes about four hours and follows the Ohinemuri River, with gold mining relics dotted along the way. It features three bridges and a cascading waterfall – there's a swimming hole if you fancy a midwinter dip. The 2km return Windows Walk is also divine, with secret tunnels and windows cut through rock that offer perfectly framed views of the awa. It is part of the Hauraki Rail Trail Cycleway, so keep your eyes peeled for bikes. North Shore Coastal Walk, Long Bay to Devonport | Auckland, 23.5km Also part of Te Araroa, this 23.5km gem can be walked in its entirety from Long Bay to Devonportif you're feeling especially frisky. Alternatively, break it down into bite-sized sectors. Start at Devonport's ferry building and follow Te Araroa's markers by the foreshore heading towards North Head, before coming to Cheltenham Beach and Narrow Neck. Relish views to Rangitoto from the coastal path, then meander through Milford and Castor Bays. Interpretation panels bring history to life, as do relics from World War II, including tunnels and gun emplacements. Each beach has its own flavour, with Rothesay, Castor or Brown's ideal for lunch, then before you know it, you'll arrive at Long Bay Regional Park. Some sections are tide-dependent, with alternative road routes, but it's well signposted, and if you do the whole thing end to end, it takes about seven hours. Tokatoka Scenic Reserve Track | Northland, 0.5km An impressive landmark 17km south of Dargaville, Tokatoka looms beside the curving Wairoa River. A short walk that offers sweeping 360-degree views from the 180m summit, it's a steep ascent, so take time to catch your breath at the top and gaze out to the river, the distant Kaipara Harbour and the far-off ranges. It was once a volcanic plug, and it's awe-inspiring to stand on the remnants of an ancient eruption, on top of the world, looking down on creation, to quote Karen Carpenter. It has well-formed tracks and steps cut into rock – be cautious after rain, and if you're on a roadie, do check out Trounson's Kauri Park 55km to the north, as it's an unsung wonder for lovers of ancient trees.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
With Supreme Court ruling, another check on Trump's power fades
WASHINGTON : The Supreme Court ruling barring judges from swiftly blocking government actions, even when they may be illegal, is yet another way that checks on executive authority have eroded as President Donald Trump pushes to amass more power. The decision on Friday, by a vote of 6-3, could allow Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship to take effect in some parts of the country -- even though every court that has looked at the directive has ruled it unconstitutional. That means some infants born to immigrants without legal status or foreign visitors without green cards could be denied citizenship-affirming documentation like Social Security numbers. But the diminishing of judicial authority as a potential counterweight to exercises of presidential power carries implications far beyond the issue of citizenship. The Supreme Court is effectively tying the hands of lower-court judges at a time when they are trying to respond to a steady geyser of aggressive executive branch orders and policies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Jesus' Tomb Is Opened And Scientists Find Something Unbelievable Novelodge Undo The ability of district courts to swiftly block Trump administration actions from being enforced in the first place has acted as a rare effective check on his second-term presidency. But generally, the pace of the judicial process is slow and has struggled to keep up. Actions that took place by the time a court rules them illegal, like shutting down an agency or sending migrants to a foreign prison without due process, can be difficult to unwind. Presidential power historically goes through ebbs and flows, with fundamental implications for the functioning of the system of checks and balances that defines American-style democracy. Live Events But it has generally been on an upward path since the middle of the 20th century. The growth of the administrative state inside the executive branch, and the large standing armies left in place as World War II segued into the Cold War, inaugurated what historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. coined the "imperial presidency." Presidential power waned in the 1970s, in the period encompassing the Watergate scandal and the end of the Vietnam War. Courts proved willing to rule against the presidency, as when the Supreme Court forced President Richard Nixon to turn over his Oval Office tapes. Members of both parties worked together to enact laws imposing new or restored limits on the exercise of executive power. But the present era is very different. Presidential power began to grow again in the Reagan era and after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. And now Trump, rejecting norms of self-restraint, has pushed to eliminate checks on his authority and stamp out pockets of independence within the government while only rarely encountering resistance from a Supreme Court he reshaped and a Congress controlled by a party in his thrall. The decision by the Supreme Court's conservative majority comes as other constraints on Trump's power have also eroded. The administration has steamrolled internal executive branch checks, including firing inspectors general and sidelining the Justice Department 's Office of Legal Counsel, which traditionally set guardrails for proposed policies and executive orders. And Congress, under the control of Trump's fellow Republicans, has done little to defend its constitutional role against his encroachments. This includes unilaterally dismantling agencies Congress had said shall exist as a matter of law, firing civil servants in defiance of statutory limits, and refusing to spend funds that lawmakers had authorized and appropriated. Last week, when Trump unilaterally bombed Iranian nuclear sites without getting prior authorization from Congress or making any claim of an imminent threat, one Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, stepped forward to call the move unconstitutional since Congress has the power to declare war. Trump reacted ferociously, declaring that he would back a primary challenger to end Massie's political career, a clear warning shot to any other Republican considering objecting to his actions. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, recently told her constituents that "we are all afraid" of Trump. While the immediate beneficiary of the Supreme Court's ruling is Trump, the decision also promises to free his successors from what has been a growing trend of district court intervention into presidential policymaking. In the citizenship case, the justices stripped district court judges of the authority to issue so-called universal injunctions, a tool that lower courts have used to block government actions they deem most likely illegal from taking effect nationwide as legal challenges to them play out. The frequency of such orders has sharply increased in recent years, bedeviling presidents of both parties. Going forward, the justices said, lower courts may only grant injunctive relief to the specific plaintiffs who have filed lawsuits. That means the Trump administration may start enforcing the president's birthright citizenship order in the 28 states that have not challenged it, unless individual parents have the wherewithal and gumption to bring their own lawsuits. The full scope of the ruling remains to be seen given that it will not take effect for 30 days. It is possible that plaintiffs and lower-court judges will expand the use of class-action lawsuits as a different path to orders with a nationwide effect. Such an option, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in the majority opinion, would be proper so long as they obey procedural limits for class-action cases. Still, in concurring opinions, two other key members of the conservative bloc, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, warned lower-court judges not to lower standards for using alternative means to issue sweeping orders in an effort to circumvent the ruling. Alito wrote that "district courts should not view today's decision as an invitation to certify nationwide classes without scrupulous adherence to the rigors" of legal rules. Thomas added that if judges do not "carefully heed this court's guidance" and act within limits, "this court will continue to be 'duty bound' to intervene." In a rare move that signaled unusually intense opposition, Justice Sonia Sotomayor read aloud a summary of her dissenting opinion from the bench Friday. Calling the ruling a grave attack on the American system of law, she said it endangered constitutional rights for everyone who is not a party to lawsuits defending them. "Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship," she wrote. "Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from law-abiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship. The majority holds that, absent cumbersome class-action litigation, courts cannot completely enjoin even such plainly unlawful policies unless doing so is necessary to afford the formal parties complete relief." Sotomayor also said the administration did not ask to entirely halt the multiple injunctions against its order because it knew the directive was patently illegal, and accused the majority of playing along with that open gamesmanship. She, like the other two justices who joined her dissent, is a Democratic appointee. All six of the justices who voted to end universal injunctions were Republican appointees, including three Trump installed on the bench in his first term. The same supermajority has ruled in ways that have enhanced his power in other avenues. Last year, the bloc granted Trump presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for his official acts as president. The ruling, by Chief Justice John Roberts, asserted that presidents have absolute immunity for anything they do with the Justice Department and their supervision of federal law enforcement power. Emboldened, Trump this year has built on his approach from his first term, when he informally pressured prosecutors to investigate his political foes. He has issued formal orders to scrutinize specific people he does not like, shattering the post-Watergate norm of a Justice Department case independent from White House political control. The supermajority also has blessed Trump's gambit in firing Democratic members of independent agency commissions before their terms were up. The conservative justices have made clear that they are prepared to overturn a long-standing precedent allowing Congress to establish specialized agencies to be run by panels whose members cannot be arbitrarily fired by presidents. In a separate concurrence, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson offered a realpolitik take. The majority's exegesis of what powers Congress understood itself to be granting lower courts when it created them in 1789 was a smokescreen of mind-numbing "legalese," she wrote, obscuring the question of whether a court can order the executive branch to follow the law. "In a constitutional republic such as ours, a federal court has the power to order the executive to follow the law -- and it must," she wrote before striking a cautionary note. "Everyone, from the president on down, is bound by law," she added. "By duty and nature, federal courts say what the law is (if there is a genuine dispute), and require those who are subject to the law to conform their behavior to what the law requires. This is the essence of the rule of law." But Barrett accused her of forgetting that courts, too, must obey legal limits. "Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary," Barrett wrote. "No one disputes that the executive has a duty to follow the law. But the judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation -- in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the judiciary from doing so." This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
