logo
A party resolution accusing Israel of genocide divides Democrats in a key swing state

A party resolution accusing Israel of genocide divides Democrats in a key swing state

CNN —
When the executive committee of North Carolina's Democratic Party passed a resolution in June calling for an immediate arms embargo on Israel, it set off another episode in the party's ongoing struggles with how it addresses the Israel-Hamas war.
Some Jewish Democrats in North Carolina said the resolution was consistent with their support of Palestinian human rights while others characterized it as divisive. The resolution's backers are talking to Democrats in other states who want to take the same stand. And top state leaders – notably the party chair and North Carolina's Democratic governor – have declined to comment.
The Israel-Hamas war still divides the party as it did before the November election, when Democratic nominee Kamala Harris faced protests and boycott threats from parts of the base before eventually losing to President Donald Trump.
In North Carolina, where Sen. Thom Tillis' retirement opened an opportunity for Democrats to flip a Republican-held seat, some in the party are worried the disunity will make it harder to compete in a race they almost certainly have to win next year to regain Senate control.
Sen. Thom Tillis listens during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on June 18 in Washington, DC.'This is an issue that's going to divide Democrats at a time when Democrats need to be working together on the issues that voters actually care about, the kitchen table issues,' said Kathy Manning, who chairs the Board of Directors for the advocacy group Democratic Majority for Israel.
Alan Smith, a lead sponsor of the resolution and a member of the state party's progressive caucus, sees it differently. Passing the resolution, he argues, shows the party is responsive to the will of Democratic voters.
'I think it's only going to help the Democratic Party. It's going to get people to come back,' Smith said.
According to a May survey from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Democrats younger than 45 are far less likely than their older partisan peers to favor the US supporting Israel militarily, with only 38% saying they favor military support until the hostages are returned, compared with 48% support among older Democrats.
Disputes over the war have shaped other Democratic races, notably the New York mayoral primary, where Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist and strident critic of Israel, scored an upset victory despite criticism from some Jewish groups that he hadn't sufficiently denounced antisemitism.
And in Michigan, where Democrats hope to retain control of an open Senate seat next year, the main candidates in the primary have taken sharply different positions on the war. Trump flipped Michigan in 2024 in part by capitalizing on anger in both Jewish and Arab American communities.
How the resolution passed
Though other Democratic state parties, in Wisconsin and Washington, have recently passed resolutions critical of Israel since the country launched its war against Hamas following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, the language passed by North Carolina Democrats is the only example that explicitly calls for an embargo on military aid and weapons transfers and accuses the state of committing genocide and apartheid.
'The military resources that have been made available to Israel through annual and emergency military aid have been used to commit the crime of genocide and other war crimes in Gaza,' it reads.
'The North Carolina Democratic Party supports an immediate embargo on all military aid, weapons shipments and military logistical support to Israel,' it continues.
The resolution also won the support of NCDP's African American Caucus, the Arab Caucus, the LGBTQ+ Caucus, the Association of Teen Democrats, the Jewish Democrats and various other groups within the state party.
Israel rejects claims that its war against Hamas, which killed 1,200 people in the Oct. 7 attack and still holds Israeli hostages, constitutes a genocide. It also rejects allegations that its treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank is akin to apartheid. Earlier this month the Gaza Health Ministry reported the Palestinian death toll had passed 58,000, with the most recent rounds of casualties taking place near food distribution sites.
Lightning strikes over Gaza City following an Israeli bombardment on October 9, 2023.
Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images
Manning says Democratic Majority for Israel is in conversations with Democratic voters across the state and helping them to make their displeasure with the resolution known to state party leadership.
The resolution's advocates worked over a multiyear process to get the statement passed, starting at the local precinct level, on to the county convention, then through the congressional district convention, the platform resolutions committee and ultimately the party's state executive committee.
'We see it as an issue of unity and an issue that is local, because we want taxpayer dollars to be invested here, and we believe that speaking up for human lives, including Palestinian lives, is actually a local issue and is a reminder that when grassroots groups come together, that they can accomplish the things that they wish to see within their party,' said Reem Subei, chair of the party's Arab Caucus.
Since the resolution's passage, Subei says those engaged with their state-level executive committees have reached out to her asking how they could mirror this effort, including organizers in Texas, Oklahoma and Minnesota.
Lisa Jewel, president of the state Democratic party's Jewish Caucus, condemned the resolution as divisive and leaned on leadership to block the effort.
'Our leadership needs to call these extremists out. They need to take a strong stand against antisemitism. By placating these extremists, it helps raise the drum beat that leads to violence,' said Jewel, arguing that state Democrats should be focused on cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, women's reproductive health, the cost of housing, gerrymandering, and other consensus-driven issues. She also voiced fear in the wake of threats against her own synagogue.
The Jewish Caucus was created last year in response to what Jewel described as growing antisemitism in the Democratic party and across North Carolina. This is not to be confused with the state party's Jewish Democrats, a separate group that supported the resolution.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrives for a meeting at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on July 9.
Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images
For a long time, party leadership resisted religious groups creating their own caucuses and wanted the groups to all fall within the Interfaith Caucus out of fear of these very types of disputes, but Jewel says some Jews did not feel welcome in the interfaith group and insisted they would go out on their own.
'It is not feasible for us to disconnect our Judaism from Israel, regardless of the politics that are happening there. It's just part of who we are,' said Jewel.
Mark Bochkis, who leads communications for the Jewish Democrats, said he moved to Greensboro as a child from the former Soviet Union and that his extended family lives in Israel.
'We have to take a look at what wins statewide, and we cannot ignore the will of Democratic voters or their values. And their values right now are saying we care about Palestinian human rights,' Bochkis said.
'This is the new North Carolina Democratic Party. This is the way forward. I think the Jewish Caucus represents kind of a view that we're moving past,' he added.
The next flashpoint will be if or when the resolution is ultimately adopted into the party platform. Its supporters believe they have cleared all the necessary procedural hurdles and that it will eventually be a part of the party's mission statement, but its opponents argue party leadership can still block that from happening. The timeline for when the platform will be voted on is unclear.
Many state party leaders have stayed silent
There is no readily available record of who supported the measure and no video or even mention of the proceeding on the state Democratic Party's website, though proponents of the resolution say it passed 161-151.
According to people who attended the vote, party chair Anderson Clayton and other party officers abstained. Clayton has not commented publicly in local press in the weeks since the resolution passed and declined to speak to CNN.
Gov. Josh Stein, the state's first Jewish governor, and his predecessor, Roy Cooper, who many state and national Democrats are pushing to run for Tillis' open Senate seat, also declined requests for comment. An adviser to Cooper told CNN that he generally does not opine on party resolutions.
Former US Rep. Wiley Nickel speaks to a crowd after winning the Democratic primary for the 13th congressional district of North Carolina on May 17, 2022, in Raleigh, North Carolina.Former US Rep. Wiley Nickel, who is already running for Tillis' seat, dismissed the resolution as one-sided but also criticized the Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
'In an issue as complex as this, nuance is essential, and that's something politics often overlooks. You can look at my record and see I'm a staunch supporter of Israel as a key U.S. ally, but I also care deeply about the suffering of innocent civilians in Gaza. The current approach by Trump and Netanyahu is not leading us toward peace or a two-state solution. Instead, their policies are fueling division and perpetuating violence, making a two-state solution seem more out of reach than ever,' said Nickel in a statement to CNN.
And Rep. Don Davis, a Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee who could also mount a Senate run, reaffirmed his commitment to Israel as an ally of the United States.
'I believe that providing support to our allies, including Israel, is essential in our commitment to countering the threats posed by the Iranian regime and its associated terrorist proxies,' said Davis in a statement to CNN.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel destroys Gaza aid shipments as famine deepens, global pressure mounts to end war
Israel destroys Gaza aid shipments as famine deepens, global pressure mounts to end war

Daily News Egypt

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily News Egypt

Israel destroys Gaza aid shipments as famine deepens, global pressure mounts to end war

Amid a worsening famine in the Gaza Strip and an escalating humanitarian crisis caused by Israel's siege and bombardment, Israeli media have revealed that military officers admitted to destroying food, water, and medical supplies from more than 1,000 humanitarian aid trucks abandoned at the Karam Abu Salem crossing. According to Israel's public broadcaster Kan, the convoys carried tens of thousands of relief parcels that were left for weeks under the sun and never distributed, despite repeated warnings from Gaza's Health Ministry of imminent mass deaths due to starvation. UN Secretary-General António Guterres condemned what he described as a 'lack of humanity and compassion' toward Palestinians, warning that Gaza is facing not only a humanitarian disaster but also 'a moral crisis that challenges the global conscience.' In a joint statement on Friday, France, Britain, and Germany demanded an immediate end to the catastrophe in Gaza. 'We urge the Israeli government to lift restrictions on aid deliveries immediately and allow the UN and NGOs to urgently carry out their humanitarian work,' the statement said. The UN World Food Programme also warned that the crisis has reached 'unprecedented levels of desperation,' with one in three people in Gaza going without food for days. On the political front, Hamas rejected claims by US President Donald Trump and his envoy Steve Witkoff that the group had blocked ceasefire negotiations. Hamas official Izzat al-Rishq said such claims contradict assessments from mediators, particularly Qatar and Egypt, who had noted Hamas's 'serious and constructive' engagement. He added that US statements ignore 'the real obstacle to any agreement – Netanyahu's government, which evades commitments and continues its war.' Al-Rishq urged Washington to stop 'whitewashing Israel's actions and providing political and military cover for its ongoing genocide and starvation campaign against over two million people in Gaza.' Trump had accused Hamas of rejecting a ceasefire, even though the group confirmed it submitted a response to mediators reaffirming its commitment to continue negotiations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his government is working with the US on 'alternatives' to secure hostage releases and end Hamas rule in Gaza. Meanwhile, Egypt and Qatar issued a joint statement confirming 'some progress' in the latest round of talks, while noting a temporary pause to allow for consultations. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi on Saturday reiterated Cairo's commitment to securing a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, welcoming French President Emmanuel Macron's announcement that France will formally recognise the State of Palestine during the upcoming UN General Assembly in September. The Egyptian presidency said Macron's call and his conversation with Al-Sisi reflect the strength of bilateral ties. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer also held talks on Saturday with his French and German counterparts, outlining Britain's plans to deliver aid and evacuate injured and sick children from Gaza. A Downing Street statement said Starmer discussed cooperation with partners such as Jordan to air-drop food and evacuate children needing urgent care. The three leaders described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'horrific' and called for immediate steps toward lasting peace. However, UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini dismissed air-drops as inadequate, describing them in a post on X as 'inefficient, expensive, and potentially dangerous to starving civilians.' He stressed that thousands of aid trucks remain stuck in Jordan and Egypt, awaiting clearance to enter Gaza. 'Human-made famine can only be solved through political will,' he added, calling for Israel to lift its blockade and open land crossings so aid can reach people safely and with dignity. Gaza's Health Ministry reported that famine and malnutrition-related deaths have risen to 127, including 85 children, with five more deaths recorded in the past 24 hours. Meanwhile, UNICEF managed to get six trucks carrying vital medical supplies into Gaza hospitals, though no food was included. The ministry emphasized the urgent need for these supplies to keep essential health services operational. In Iran, Sunni scholars in Kurdistan province issued a fatwa declaring 'jihad' to defend Gaza's civilians from what they described as a campaign of genocide and starvation. The ruling was delivered during a mass gathering at the Quba Mosque in Sanandaj, attended by clerics and activists. At the diplomatic level, UN member states are set to renew efforts toward a two-state solution, spurred by France's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Israel, however, is not expected to attend the upcoming UN meetings. The African Union welcomed Macron's announcement and urged wider international recognition of Palestine. Adding to European pressure on Israel, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof called on Netanyahu to 'take a different path' and allow aid into Gaza. Schoof noted Israel's legal obligation under international law to facilitate humanitarian access and said the Dutch government is discussing with EU partners how best to increase pressure to address what he called 'a catastrophic situation.'

Hamas rejects Trump remarks on Gaza talks breakdown - War on Gaza
Hamas rejects Trump remarks on Gaza talks breakdown - War on Gaza

Al-Ahram Weekly

time3 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Hamas rejects Trump remarks on Gaza talks breakdown - War on Gaza

Hamas officials expressed surprise on Saturday at US President Donald Trump's claim that the group "didn't really want" a ceasefire and captive release deal for Gaza, citing what they said was progress in negotiations. Trump made the allegation on Friday, a day after Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with Hamas in Qatar that had lasted nearly three weeks. "Trump's remarks are particularly surprising, especially as they come at a time when progress had been made on some of the negotiation files," Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP. "So far, we have not been informed of any issues regarding the files under discussion in the indirect ceasefire negotiations", he added. Nunu, who is close to Hamas's most senior political officials, said he was "surprised" that Israel and the United States had left the talks. Announcing the recall of US mediators on Thursday, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of not "acting in good faith". Though not part of the Hamas negotiating team, Hamas politburo member Izzat al-Rishq insisted the group had shown "flexibility" in the talks. "The American statements deliberately ignore the real obstructionist to all agreements, Netanyahu's government, which continues to put obstacles, deceive and evade commitments," he said. Both Hamas officials called on the United States to be more even-handed in its role as mediator in the quest for a ceasefire after more than 21 months of Israel's war on Gaza. "We call for an end to the US bias in favour of Netanyahu, who is obstructing any agreement", Nunu said. The Israeli war -- described as genocide by numerous aid and human rights groups -- has killed or injured nearly 200,000 Palestinians and driven Gaza's 2.3 million people into famine. *This story was edited by Ahram Online. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse
Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

Egypt Independent

time5 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse

Interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell is the Trump administration's first big move to allay concerns about its hugely unpopular handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate. But there were already all kinds of reasons to be skeptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved. And President Donald Trump epitomized all of them in a major way on Friday. While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes. 'Well, I don't want to talk about that,' Trump said initially. When pressed, he said, 'It's something I haven't thought about,' while conspicuously adding, 'I'm allowed to do it.' This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.) A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice. Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as 'evidence' that Trump's actions 'had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government.' Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation. That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels. But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be skeptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them. The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case. It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did 'wish her well' after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction. The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York Mayor Eric Adams. The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration. Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a 'quid pro quo' in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathize. 'Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,' the judge said. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration. Last week he called Trump the 'ultimate dealmaker' while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell. This week, he praised the Trump administration's 'commitment to uncovering the truth in this case' and said he and Maxwell were 'grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth.' Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon. 'The president this morning said he had the power to do so,' Markus said, 'and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way.' Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved. Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, right, leaves his hotel for the federal courthouse on Friday in Tallahassee, Florida. Colin Hackley/AP 'The conflict of interest is glaring,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday on X. 'It stinks of high corruption.' What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labeled him a 'friend.' 'You are by far the best out there,' Blanche said. But one of the biggest reasons to be skeptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department – the first one, at least – labeled a brazen liar. Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury – on top of the more serious charges she faced – while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave. In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's 'scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages,' despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial. Maxwell's lawyers at the time said 'the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed.' She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims. But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question. In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies 'should give the Court serious pause' about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's 'willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes.' All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him – whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants. That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence. But right now, Trump and Co. aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store