logo
California Assembly Passes Film Tax Bill to Expand Production Incentives

California Assembly Passes Film Tax Bill to Expand Production Incentives

Yahoo05-06-2025

The California State Assembly has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would overhaul the state's production tax incentive program, a key step in legislators' efforts to provide support to struggling Hollywood workers.
The vote on Assembly Bill 1138 was 73 in favor and one against, and comes a day after a similar bill, SB 630, passed 34-1 out of the state senate. The bills now head to the opposite houses as its co-authors say they are looking to expedite the committee vote process so that they can be passed by the legislature, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, and implemented by the California Film Commission all ideally before the legislative session ends for the year in September.
'We are in an emergency, given the unemployment levels and the loss of business in California due to the film industry, so we are working with the legislative leadership to find ways to have the bill go into effect this summer,' said Hollywood Asm. Rick Chavez Zbur, who is one of the co-authors on the bills.
The two bills had language removed that calls for the program's cap to be increased from $330 million to $750 million, though that increase is still included in Gov. Gavin Newsom's revised proposed budget for the coming fiscal year. Zbur says that there is high confidence among supporters of the program expansion that the cap raise will be approved in the final budget.
'The structural support that we are receiving from all of the entertainment unions, all of the studios, independent producers, the sound stage managers and owners is uniform, and I've never seen anything like it,' he said.
The two bills, known together as the California Film & TV Jobs Act, would expand the types of productions eligible for the tax credit, including animated productions and TV shows with a half-hour runtime.
The bill also allows productions that shoot in Los Angeles County and other select nearby shooting locations in Southern California to be eligible for an increased tax writeoff of 35% of all eligible spending.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of film and TV production jobs in California in 2024 fell by approximately 40,000 from the all-time high recorded in 2022, when ongoing demand for streaming shows and a need to catch up on projects delayed by the 2020 pandemic helped fuel a surge in productions.
But a variety of factors led to production jobs dropping not just in California but in other major American production hubs like Georgia and New York in 2024. Among them was an industry-wide cutback in production spending as media companies looked to make their streaming services profitable, as well as increased competition from other countries with their own production tax incentives.
The combination of that drop in jobs and the loss of work caused by the 2023 strikes that shut down productions for 191 days has led to thousands of entertainment workers in California facing serious financial struggle and has called the future of a cornerstone of the state's economy into question.
The post California Assembly Passes Film Tax Bill to Expand Production Incentives appeared first on TheWrap.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Majority of Americans back sanctions on Russia, allies that purchase oil: Survey
Majority of Americans back sanctions on Russia, allies that purchase oil: Survey

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Majority of Americans back sanctions on Russia, allies that purchase oil: Survey

A majority of Americans say they support sanctions on Russia and its allies over the ongoing war with Ukraine, according to a poll released Friday by YouGov. The survey found that 44 percent of U.S. citizens said the country should increase sanctions on Moscow, compared to 19 percent who say the set sanctions should remain. Twenty three percent of respondents were unsure about how to move forward while 6 percent said sanctions should be decrease. Nine percent said the U.S. should end all sanctions. The survey was taken after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and other GOP lawmakers urged President Trump to punish his counterpart, Russian President Vladimir Putin, with economic restrictions following repeated strikes on Kyiv. The over three years-long war has been backed by U.S. dollars sent to Ukraine to bolster their defense against their neighbor. Graham said he believes his bill, which has more than 60 cosponsors, to impose new sanctions on Russia and tariffs on countries that purchase Russian oil, gas and uranium would help put an end to the conflict overseas. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has spoken out against the effort while Trump his still mulling his support. 'The Graham bill would derail President Trump's efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Self-defeating economic warfare is no way to achieve peace,' Paul said on the social media platform X. 'This bill won't force China or India to change behavior, but it will impose an effective embargo on ourselves that will hurt American families,' he said. YouGov's Friday poll shows that most Democrats — 59 percent — and more than a third of Republicans, 37 percent, support sanctions on Russia. Forty-two percent of independents said they feel the same. YouGov's poll was conducted online between June 12 and June 16 with 1,133 U.S. adult citizens from an opt-in panel. The margin of error for the overall sample is approximately 4 percentage points.

With Iran, President Trump faces his neocon moment
With Iran, President Trump faces his neocon moment

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

With Iran, President Trump faces his neocon moment

Donald Trump rose to the presidency on a promise to end America's 'forever wars' and avoid new military entanglements, particularly in the Middle East. He often blames global instability on former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, but he reserves his harshest criticism for President George W. Bush and the neoconservative movement, which he accuses of dragging the U.S. into costly and endless Middle Eastern conflicts. Yet with his recent decision to order strikes against Iran, Trump tied himself to the very neoconservative vision he once derided. Rhetoric aside, Trump has now become the ultimate neocon. And if he hopes to succeed, he must see that vision through. The neoconservative doctrine — crystallized during the Bush administration — aimed to reshape the Middle East by removing authoritarian regimes, eliminating weapons of mass destruction, and ultimately securing regional peace through U.S. military power. The invasion of Iraq was the signature act of this strategy. Trump has repeatedly ridiculed that war as a mistake, yet by launching strikes against Iran, he has adopted the same logic: The use of force to achieve long-term strategic transformation in the region. To avoid the very 'forever war' he once promised to end, Trump must now follow through on the neocon playbook. That means embracing a strategic objective beyond limited airstrikes. Trump must work on forever eliminating Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon, dismantling its theocratic regime and laying the groundwork for regional realignment — between Israel, Iran and the Arab Gulf states. It's a mistake to assume that Iran's current leadership is permanent. The shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, ruled for nearly four decades, and many believed his regime would last indefinitely — until it collapsed in 1979. The current Iranian Islamic Republic has now ruled for roughly the same length of time. Its longevity is no more guaranteed than the shah's. Recent Israeli — and now American — strikes on Iran have exposed serious vulnerabilities in the regime. By degrading its nuclear program and Israel demonstrating complete control over Iranian airspace, these attacks have shaken the foundations of Iran's power. Without the deterrent of a nuclear arsenal and with weakened internal confidence, the regime may be more fragile than at any point since 1979. If the Iranian regime were to fall — perhaps through an internal military coup, catalyzed by Trump's actions — the entire regional dynamic could shift. For decades, Iran has sought to dominate the region as the preeminent Shiite and Persian power, in opposition to the Sunni and Arab Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia. Israel, meanwhile, has viewed a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat. A post-theocratic Shiite Iran that prioritizes stability over ideological expansion could pursue peaceful coexistence with its Sunni Arab neighbors — and possibly reach a détente with Israel. Such a transformation could usher in an era of relative peace and stability in a region long defined by conflict. But this outcome is only possible if Trump commits to completing the strategy he has now initiated. Without that commitment, his strike on Iran merely risks escalating tensions without achieving meaningful change. A half-measure could backfire — provoking Iran into accelerating its nuclear ambitions and intensifying regional conflicts involving Israel and the Gulf states. This is the precise 'forever war' Trump vowed to avoid. Trump states he first ran against 'warmonger' Hillary Clinton, in part, for her support of the Iraq War, and he repeatedly lambasted Bush for what he called a 'stupid' decision to invade Iraq. But with his own decision to strike Iran, Trump now finds himself embracing the very framework he once mocked. The choice before him is stark: either follow through on the neocon vision he has inadvertently adopted or risk becoming the failed foreign policy leader he so often condemns. Charles K. Djou served in Congress from 2010-2011 and was a member of the House Armed Services Committee. He is an Afghanistan War Veteran.

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors
‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

Former Vice President Kamala Harris' prospective gubernatorial bid is not striking up much excitement among Democratic fundraisers in California, Politico reported Friday. The outlet spoke to multiple Democratic Party donors in California to see how they felt about Harris possibly running for governor. So far, her interest in exploring a gubernatorial run in the state following her 2024 presidential election loss hasn't enthused many. "She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped," one Southern California fundraiser told Politico. Republicans Use Mamdani Bombshell Victory Over Cuomo As Ammunition To Blast Democrats As Extremists Harris, who lost November's election to President Donald Trump, is seriously considering a 2026 bid to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif. A source close to Harris told Fox News Digital in March that she has told allies she will decide by the end of summer on whether to launch a gubernatorial campaign. The two potential options for Harris are launching a gubernatorial run next year in her home state or seeking the presidency again in 2028. Extremely early polls in the next Democratic Party presidential nomination race — which are heavily reliant on name recognition at this point — indicate that the former vice president holds a significant lead over other potential White House contenders. Read On The Fox News App "In interviews, several major donors in the state told POLITICO they fear her reemergence as a candidate would re-open still-fresh wounds from her defeat in 2024," the outlet reported. "Some harbor lingering frustration about how her billion-dollar campaign juggernaut ended in debt and want assurances she would have a clear plan to win the governor's mansion." Top Trump Ally Teases Bid For California Governor If Harris Runs Mather Martin, a party fundraiser from San Francisco who worked for multiple Harris campaigns, told Politico, "There was more enthusiasm at first" for Harris' run. However, he added, "I think it waned a bit." Another donor who gave a six-figure donation to Harris' presidential campaign last year told the outlet they had found the implosion of her White House bid "traumatizing" and seemed reluctant to support her in the state. "Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s--- storm. With Biden, we got bamboozled… I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too. I've written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but we're living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. I'm furious at them, truly." The donor who declared that "no one is incredibly pumped" about Harris' run also shared that donors "realize it's just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then it's the whole 'Did you know Joe Biden?' thing." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Scott Drexel, a donor-adviser based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted, "It's very fair to say there's not an overwhelming clamor" for Harris' gubernatorial run. He also pointed out, "It's very hard for there to be one if it's not 100 percent clear if she really wants to do it." "She's going to have to work for the nomination. Every day that passes, there's less of a sense of inevitability about her candidacy," Drexel said. Democratic donor and San Francisco trial lawyer Joe Cotchett told Politico, "She is talking to people around the state about whether she is going to run. If she does, she's going to have very difficult problems." Harris' team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this article source: 'No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store